Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 177 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 119 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 432 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

$R_{D^{(*)}}$ motivated $\mathcal{S}_1$ leptoquark scenarios: Impact of interference on the exclusion limits from LHC data (1811.03561v3)

Published 8 Nov 2018 in hep-ph and hep-ex

Abstract: Motivated by the persistent anomalies in the semileptonic $B$-meson decays, we investigate the competency of LHC data to constrain the $R_{D{(*)}}$-favoured parameter space in a charge $-1/3$ scalar leptoquark ($\mathcal S_1$) model. We consider some scenarios with one large free coupling to accommodate the $R_{D{(*)}}$ anomalies. As a result, some of them dominantly yield nonresonant $\tau\tau$ and $\tau\nu$ events at the LHC through the $t$-channel $\mathcal S_1$ exchange. So far, no experiment has searched for leptoquarks using these signatures and the relevant resonant leptoquark searches are yet to put any strong exclusion limit on the parameter space. We recast the latest $\tau\tau$ and $\tau\nu$ resonance search data to obtain new exclusion limits. The nonresonant processes strongly interfere (destructively in our case) with the Standard Model background and play the determining role in setting the exclusion limits. To obtain precise limits, we include non-negligible effects coming from the subdominant (resonant) pair and inclusive single leptoquark productions systematically in our analysis. To deal with large destructive interference, we make use of the transverse mass distributions from the experiments in our statistical analysis. In addition, we also recast the relevant direct search results to obtain the most stringent collider bounds on these scenarios to date. These are independent bounds and are competitive to other known bounds. Finally, we indicate how one can adopt these bounds to a wide class of models with $\mathcal S_1$ that are proposed to accommodate the $R_{D{(*)}}$ anomalies.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.