Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Predicting optical coherence tomography-derived diabetic macular edema grades from fundus photographs using deep learning (1810.10342v4)

Published 18 Oct 2018 in cs.CV, cs.LG, and stat.ML

Abstract: Diabetic eye disease is one of the fastest growing causes of preventable blindness. With the advent of anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapies, it has become increasingly important to detect center-involved diabetic macular edema (ci-DME). However, center-involved diabetic macular edema is diagnosed using optical coherence tomography (OCT), which is not generally available at screening sites because of cost and workflow constraints. Instead, screening programs rely on the detection of hard exudates in color fundus photographs as a proxy for DME, often resulting in high false positive or false negative calls. To improve the accuracy of DME screening, we trained a deep learning model to use color fundus photographs to predict ci-DME. Our model had an ROC-AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.91), which corresponds to a sensitivity of 85% at a specificity of 80%. In comparison, three retinal specialists had similar sensitivities (82-85%), but only half the specificity (45-50%, p<0.001 for each comparison with model). The positive predictive value (PPV) of the model was 61% (95% CI: 56-66%), approximately double the 36-38% by the retinal specialists. In addition to predicting ci-DME, our model was able to detect the presence of intraretinal fluid with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86) and subretinal fluid with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91). The ability of deep learning algorithms to make clinically relevant predictions that generally require sophisticated 3D-imaging equipment from simple 2D images has broad relevance to many other applications in medical imaging.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (18)
  1. Avinash Varadarajan (3 papers)
  2. Pinal Bavishi (4 papers)
  3. Paisan Raumviboonsuk (2 papers)
  4. Peranut Chotcomwongse (4 papers)
  5. Subhashini Venugopalan (35 papers)
  6. Arunachalam Narayanaswamy (5 papers)
  7. Jorge Cuadros (6 papers)
  8. Kuniyoshi Kanai (1 paper)
  9. George Bresnick (1 paper)
  10. Mongkol Tadarati (2 papers)
  11. Sukhum Silpa-archa (1 paper)
  12. Jirawut Limwattanayingyong (2 papers)
  13. Variya Nganthavee (1 paper)
  14. Joe Ledsam (3 papers)
  15. Greg S Corrado (41 papers)
  16. Lily Peng (17 papers)
  17. Dale R Webster (23 papers)
  18. Pearse A Keane (3 papers)
Citations (101)