Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Constraining Bianchi Type I Universe With Type Ia Supernova and H(z) Data (1802.04251v5)

Published 10 Feb 2018 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: We use recent 36 observational Hubble data (OHD) in the redshift range $0.07\leq z\leq 2.36$, latest \textgravedbl joint light curves\textacutedbl (JLA) sample, comprised of 740 type Ia supernovae (SNIa) in the redshift range $0.01\leq z \leq 1.30$, and their joint combination datasets to constrain anisotropic Bianchi type I (BI) dark energy (DE) model. To estimate model parameters, we apply Hamiltonian Monte Carlo technique. We also compute the covariance matrix for BI dark energy model by considering different datasets to compare the correlation between model parameters. To check the acceptability of our fittings, all results are compared with those obtained from 9 year WMAP as well as Planck (2015) collaboration. Our estimations show that at 68\% confidence level the dark energy equation of state (EOS) parameter for OHD or JLA datasets alone varies between quintessence and phantom regions whereas for OHD+JLA dataset this parameter only varies in phantom region. It is also found that the current cosmic anisotropy is of order $\sim10{-3}$ which imply that the OHD and JLA datasets do not put tight constraint on this parameter. Therefore, to constraint anisotropy parameter, it is necessary to use high redshif dataset namely cosmic microwave background (CMB). Moreover, from the calculation of $p$-value associated with $\chi{2}$ statistic we observed that non of the $\omega \mbox{BI}$ and flat $\omega\mbox{CDM}$ models rule out by OHD or JLA datasets. The deceleration parameter is obtained as $q=-0.46{+0.89 +0.36}{-0.41 -0.37}$, $q=-0.619{+0.12 +0.20}{-0.095 -0.24}$, and $q=-0.52{+0.080 +0.014}_{-0.046 -0.15}$ for OHD, SNIa, and OHD+SNIa data respectively.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube