Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 85 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 419 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Painting galaxies into dark matter halos using machine learning (1712.03255v2)

Published 8 Dec 2017 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We develop a ML framework to populate large dark matter-only simulations with baryonic galaxies. Our ML framework takes input halo properties including halo mass, environment, spin, and recent growth history, and outputs central galaxy and halo baryonic properties including stellar mass ($M_$), star formation rate (SFR), metallicity ($Z$), neutral ($\rm HI$) and molecular ($\rm H_2$) hydrogen mass. We apply this to the MUFASA cosmological hydrodynamic simulation, and show that it recovers the mean trends of output quantities with halo mass highly accurately, including following the sharp drop in SFR and gas in quenched massive galaxies. However, the scatter around the mean relations is under-predicted. Examining galaxies individually, at $z=0$ the stellar mass and metallicity are accurately recovered ($\sigma\lesssim 0.2$~dex), but SFR and $\rm HI$ show larger scatter ($\sigma\gtrsim 0.3$~dex); these values improve somewhat at $z=1,2$. Remarkably, ML quantitatively recovers second parameter trends in galaxy properties, e.g. that galaxies with higher gas content and lower metallicity have higher SFR at a given $M_$. Testing various ML algorithms, we find that none perform significantly better than the others, nor does ensembling improve performance, likely because none of the algorithms reproduce the large observed scatter around the mean properties. For the random forest algorithm, we find that halo mass and nearby ($\sim 200$~kpc) environment are the most important predictive variables followed by growth history, while halo spin and $\sim$Mpc scale environment are not important. Finally we study the impact of additionally inputting key baryonic properties $M_*$, SFR and $Z$, as would be available e.g. from an equilibrium model, and show that particularly providing the SFR enables $\rm HI$ to be recovered substantially more accurately.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube