Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 206 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 457 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Accuracy and validity of posterior distributions using the Cressie-Read empirical likelihoods (1708.00711v2)

Published 2 Aug 2017 in math.ST and stat.TH

Abstract: The class of Cressie-Read empirical likelihoods are constructed with weights derived at a minimum distance from the empirical distribution in the Cressie-Read family of divergences indexed by $\gamma$ under the constraint of an unbiased set of $M$-estimating equations. At first order, they provide valid posterior probability statements for any given prior, but the bias in coverage of the resulting empirical quantile is inversely proportional to the asymptotic efficiency of the corresponding $M$-estimator. The Cressie-Read empirical likelihoods based on the maximum likelihood estimating equations bring about quantiles covering with $O(n{-1})$ accuracy at the underlying posterior distribution. The choice of $\gamma$ has an impact on the variance in small samples of the posterior quantile function. Examples are given for the $M$-type estimating equations of location and for the quasi-likelihood functions in the generalized linear models.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)