The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sense (1706.04261v2)

Abstract: Neural networks trained on datasets such as ImageNet have led to major advances in visual object classification. One obstacle that prevents networks from reasoning more deeply about complex scenes and situations, and from integrating visual knowledge with natural language, like humans do, is their lack of common sense knowledge about the physical world. Videos, unlike still images, contain a wealth of detailed information about the physical world. However, most labelled video datasets represent high-level concepts rather than detailed physical aspects about actions and scenes. In this work, we describe our ongoing collection of the "something-something" database of video prediction tasks whose solutions require a common sense understanding of the depicted situation. The database currently contains more than 100,000 videos across 174 classes, which are defined as caption-templates. We also describe the challenges in crowd-sourcing this data at scale.

Overview of "LaTeX Author Guidelines for ICCV Proceedings"

The paper "LaTeX Author Guidelines for ICCV Proceedings," serves as a comprehensive guide for authors who intend to submit their manuscripts to the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Fundamental to its design is ensuring that submissions adhere to the ICCV's stringent formatting rules. This document provides explicit instructions on various aspects of manuscript preparation, through detailed sections focusing on language, paper length, dual submissions, as well as formatting specifics.

Key Sections and Content

Introduction

The introduction succinctly outlines the steps for submitting a manuscript and highlights significant modifications applied to this version of the style guide. Notably, it emphasizes the importance of adhering to updated guidelines to avoid common pitfalls.

Manuscript Language

All submissions must be written in English. This requirement is standard for most high-impact conferences to maintain readability and accessibility within the global research community.

Dual Submission Policy

The guide refers authors to the ICCV web page for detailed discussions on dual submissions. This is a critical consideration for authors to avoid breaches in ethical standards, ensuring transparency in manuscript content that may be under consideration by multiple venues.

Paper Length and Formatting Restrictions

One of the most critical sections addresses the allowed length of the paper. Specifically, the paper, excluding references, must not exceed eight pages. An additional page is permitted exclusively for cited references, making the total maximal length nine pages. Overlength papers are outright rejected without review, emphasizing the need for concise and focused manuscript preparation.

Ruler Implementation and Mathematics

The guide provides intricate details on the usage of printed rulers in the LaTeX style for review purposes and emphasizes correct handling of displayed equations. All sections and equations must be numbered to aid in reference and future discussions.

Anonymization for Blind Review

The concept of anonymization for blind review is clarified. Authors must avoid self-referential language such as "my" or "our" when citing previous work. This ensures that the reviewer's ability to assess the manuscript is unbiased.

Miscellaneous Guidelines

Additional guidelines cover topics such as footnote usage, citation styles, illustration formatting, and the inclusion of figures and tables. The emphasis is placed on ensuring that all graphical content is legible when printed, an important aspect often neglected with the prevalence of digital submissions.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

The rigorous guidelines set forth in this document have both practical and theoretical implications:

1. Consistency and Quality: By adhering to standardized formatting, the guidelines ensure that all submissions maintain a high level of presentation quality. This consistency aids reviewers in focusing on content quality without being distracted by formatting inconsistencies.
2. Efficient Reviewing Process: The explicit rules around paper length and formatting facilitate a more efficient reviewing process. Reviewers can allocate time more effectively, knowing that papers comply with predefined structural standards.
3. Ethical Compliance: The dual submission and blind review policies underscore the importance of ethical compliance in research dissemination. Adhering to these guidelines ensures transparency and fairness in the evaluation process.

Future Directions

Looking forward, these guidelines reflect ongoing efforts to simplify and streamline the submission process for authors while maintaining the high standards expected at premier conferences like ICCV. Future advancements may incorporate automated tools for pre-submission checks, ensuring compliance with formatting guidelines before review. Additionally, evolving best practices in manuscript preparation could see enhanced support for reproducibility and open science initiatives within submission guidelines.

In summary, the "LaTeX Author Guidelines for ICCV Proceedings" paper is a crucial resource for prospective authors, providing the necessary foundation to prepare manuscripts that meet ICCV's rigorous standards, thereby contributing to the overall quality and integrity of the conference's scholarly output.