Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research? An Ongoing Study (1705.06013v3)

Published 17 May 2017 in cs.SE

Abstract: The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is a prerequisite for problem-driven research in the area and key for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. To better understand how industry practitioners perceive the practical relevance of RE research, we have initiated the RE-Pract project, an international collaboration conducting an empirical study. This project opts for a replication of previous work done in two different domains and relies on survey research. To this end, we have designed a survey to be sent to several hundred industry practitioners at various companies around the world and ask them to rate their perceived practical relevance of the research described in a sample of 418 RE papers published between 2010 and 2015 at the RE, ICSE, FSE, ESEC/FSE, ESEM and REFSQ conferences. In this paper, we summarise our research protocol and present the current status of our study and the planned future steps.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. X. Franch (1 paper)
  2. D. Méndez Fernández (18 papers)
  3. M. Oriol (1 paper)
  4. A. Vogelsang (4 papers)
  5. R. Heldal (2 papers)
  6. E. Knauss (1 paper)
  7. G. Horta Travassos (1 paper)
  8. J. C. Carver (1 paper)
  9. O. Dieste (1 paper)
  10. T. Zimmermann (7 papers)
Citations (27)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.