Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 30 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 184 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A comparison of the most massive quiescent galaxies from $z \sim 3$ to the present: slow evolution in size, and spheroid-dominated (1704.01969v1)

Published 6 Apr 2017 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We use Hubble Space Telescope imaging to study the structural properties of ten of the most massive ($M \geq 10{11.25}$ Msun) quiescent galaxies (QGs) in the UKIDSS UDS at $2.5<z<3.0$. The low spatial density of these galaxies required targeted WFC3 $H_{160}$ imaging, as such systems are rare in existing surveys like CANDELS. We fit Sersic models to the 2D light profiles and find that the median half-light radius is $R_e \sim 3$ kpc, a factor of $\sim 3$ smaller than QGs with similar masses at $z \sim 0$. Complementing our sample with similarly massive QGs at lower redshifts, we find that the median size evolves as $R_e \propto H(z){-0.85 \pm 0.12}$ (or alternatively, $R_e \propto (1+z){-0.90 \pm 0.12}$). This rate of evolution is slower than that for lower mass QGs. When compared to low redshift QGs, the axis ratio distribution for our high redshift massive QG sample is most consistent with those in which spheroids are dominant. These observations point to earlier size growth among massive QGs that also resulted in spheroidal systems. Finally, we measured residual-corrected surface brightness profiles for our sample. These show that the Sersic parameterization is generally representative out to several effective radii and does not miss excess low surface brightness light. The sizes inferred from the light profiles therefore confirm the compactness of these most massive high redshift QGs.

Citations (12)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.