Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 84 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 425 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 157 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The origin of scatter in the stellar mass - halo mass relation of central galaxies in the EAGLE simulation (1608.08218v2)

Published 29 Aug 2016 in astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.CO

Abstract: We use the hydrodynamical EAGLE simulation to study the magnitude and origin of the scatter in the stellar mass - halo mass relation for central galaxies. We separate cause and effect by correlating stellar masses in the baryonic simulation with halo properties in a matched dark matter only (DMO) simulation. The scatter in stellar mass increases with redshift and decreases with halo mass. At $z = 0.1$ it declines from 0.25 dex at $M_{200, \rm DMO} \approx 10{11}$ M${\odot}$ to 0.12 dex at $M{200, \rm DMO} \approx 10{13}$ M${\odot}$, but the trend is weak above $10{12}$ M${\odot}$. For $M_{200, \rm DMO} < 10{12.5}$ M${\odot}$ up to 0.04 dex of the scatter is due to scatter in the halo concentration. At fixed halo mass, a larger stellar mass corresponds to a more concentrated halo. This is likely because higher concentrations imply earlier formation times and hence more time for accretion and star formation, and/or because feedback is less efficient in haloes with higher binding energies. The maximum circular velocity, $V{\rm max, DMO}$, and binding energy are therefore more fundamental properties than halo mass, meaning that they are more accurate predictors of stellar mass, and we provide fitting formulae for their relations with stellar mass. However, concentration alone cannot explain the total scatter in the $M_{\rm star} - M_{200, \rm DMO}$ relation, and it does not explain the scatter in $M_{\rm star} -V_{\rm max, DMO}$. Halo spin, sphericity, triaxiality, substructure and environment are also not responsible for the remaining scatter, which thus could be due to more complex halo properties or non-linear/stochastic baryonic effects.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.