Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT-4o
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
o3 Pro
GPT-4.1 Pro
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
2000 character limit reached

Pentaquarks from intrinsic charms in $Λ_b$ decays (1508.03910v2)

Published 17 Aug 2015 in hep-ph, hep-ex, and nucl-th

Abstract: We study the three-body $\Lambda_b$ decays of $\Lambda_b\to J/\psi pM$ with $M=K-$ and $\pi-$. The two new states ${\cal P}{c1}\equiv {\cal P}_c(4380)+$ and ${\cal P}{c2}\equiv {\cal P}c(4450)+$ observed recently as the resonances in the $J/\psi p$ invariant mass spectrum of $\Lambda_b\to J/\psi p K-$ can be identified to consist of five quarks, $uudc\bar c$, being consistent with the existence of the pentaquark states. We argue that, in the doubly charmful $\Lambda_b$ decays of $\Lambda_b\to J/\psi pK-$ through $b\to c\bar c s$, apart from those through the non-resonant $\Lambda_b\to pK-$ and resonant $\Lambda_b\to \Lambda*\to pK-$ transitions, the third contribution with the non-factorizable effects is not the dominant part for the resonant $\Lambda_b\to K-{\cal P}{c1,c2}, {\cal P}{c1,c2}\to J/\psi p$ processes, such that we propose that the ${\cal P}{c1,c2}$ productions are mainly from the charmless $\Lambda_b$ decays through $b\to \bar u u s$, in which the $c\bar c$ content in ${\cal P}{c1,c2}$ arises from the intrinsic charms within the $\Lambda_b$ baryon. We hence predict the observables related to the branching ratios and the direct CP violating asymmetries to be ${\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to \pi-({\cal P}{c1,c2}\to) J/\psi p)/{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to K-({\cal P}{c1,c2}\to) J/\psi p)=0.8\pm 0.1$, ${\cal A}{CP}(\Lambda_b\to \pi-({\cal P}{c1,c2}\to)J/\psi p)=(-3.9\pm 0.2)\%$, and ${\cal A}{CP}(\Lambda_b\to K-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to)J/\psi p)=(5.8\pm 0.2)\%$, which can alleviate the inconsistency between the theoretical expectations from the three contributions in the doubly charmful $\Lambda_b$ decays and the observed data.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)