Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The "bounded gaps between primes" Polymath project - a retrospective

Published 30 Sep 2014 in math.HO | (1409.8361v1)

Abstract: For any $m \geq 1$, let $H_m$ denote the quantity $H_m := \liminf_{n \to \infty} (p_{n+m}-p_n)$, where $p_n$ denotes the $n{\operatorname{th}}$ prime; thus for instance the twin prime conjecture is equivalent to the assertion that $H_1$ is equal to two. In a recent breakthrough paper of Zhang, a finite upper bound was obtained for the first time on $H_1$; more specifically, Zhang showed that $H_1 \leq 70000000$. Almost immediately after the appearance of Zhang's paper, improvements to the upper bound on $H_1$ were made. In order to pool together these various efforts, a \emph{Polymath project} was formed to collectively examine all aspects of Zhang's arguments, and to optimize the resulting bound on $H_1$ as much as possible. After several months of intensive activity, conducted online in blogs and wiki pages, the upper bound was improved to $H_1 \leq 4680$. As these results were being written up, a further breakthrough was introduced by Maynard, who found a simpler sieve-theoretic argument that gave the improved bound $H_1 \leq 600$, and also showed for the first time that $H_m$ was finite for all $m$. The polymath project, now with Maynard's assistance, then began work on improving these bounds, eventually obtaining the bound $H_1 \leq 246$, as well as a number of additional results, both conditional and unconditional, on $H_m$. In this article, we collect the perspectives of several of the participants to these Polymath projects, in order to form a case study of online collaborative mathematical activity, and to speculate on the suitability of such an online model for other mathematical research projects.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.