Limitations of Skeptical Default Reasoning

Published 6 Feb 2013 in cs.AI | (1302.1536v1)

Abstract: Poole has shown that nonmonotonic logics do not handle the lottery paradox correctly. In this paper we will show that Pollock's theory of defeasible reasoning fails for the same reason: defeasible reasoning is incompatible with the skeptical notion of derivability.

Abstract PDF Upgrade to Chat

Citations (2)

View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Create Your Own

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Top Community Prompts

Explain it Like I'm 14

Practical Applications

Conceptual Simplification

Sign Up to Activate View All Prompts

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Jens Doerpmund

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.