Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 79 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 85 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 431 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 186 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Clump Mass Function of the Dense Clouds in the Carina Nebula Complex (1212.4499v1)

Published 18 Dec 2012 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We want to characterize the properties of the cold dust clumps in the Carina Nebula Complex (CNC), which shows a very high level of massive star feedback. We derive the Clump Mass Function (ClMF), explore the reliability of different clump extraction algorithms, and investigate the influence of the temperatures within the clouds on the resulting shape of the ClMF. We analyze a 1.25x1.25 deg2 wide-field sub-mm map obtained with LABOCA (APEX), which provides the first spatially complete survey of the clouds in the CNC. We use the three clump-finding algorithms CLUMPFIND (CF), GAUSSCLUMPS (GC) and SExtractor (SE) to identify individual clumps and determine their total fluxes. In addition to assuming a common `typical' temperature for all clouds, we also employ an empirical relation between cloud column densities and temperature to determine an estimate of the individual clump temperatures, and use this to determine individual clump masses. While the ClMF based on the CF extraction is very well described by a power-law, the ClMFs based on GC and SE are better represented by a log-normal distribution. We also find that the use of individual clump temperatures leads to a shallower ClMF slope than the assumption of a common temperature (e.g. 20 K) of all clumps. The power-law of dN/dM \propto M-1.95 we find for the CF sample is in good agreement with ClMF slopes found in previous studies of other regions. The dependence of the ClMF shape (power-law vs. log-normal distribution) on the employed extraction method suggests that observational determinations of the ClMF shape yields only very limited information about the true structure of the cloud. Interpretations of log-normal ClMF shape as a signature of turbulent pre-stellar clouds vs. power-law ClMFs as a signature of star-forming clouds may be taken with caution for a single extraction algorithm without additional information.

Citations (12)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.