Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 95 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 449 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Lattice QCD Calculation of Nuclear Parity Violation (1108.1151v2)

Published 4 Aug 2011 in hep-lat and nucl-th

Abstract: We present the first lattice QCD calculation of the leading-order momentum-independent parity violating coupling between pions and nucleons, $h_{\pi{NN}}1$. The calculation performs measurements on dynamical anisotropic clover gauge configurations, with a spatial extent of $L\sim2.5$ fm, a spatial lattice spacing of $a_s\sim0.123$ fm, and a pion mass of $m_{\pi}\sim389$ MeV. While this first calculation does not include non-perturbative renormalization of the bare parity-violating operators, a chiral extrapolation to the physical pion mass, or contributions from disconnected (quark-loop) diagrams, these are expected to result in systematic errors within the quoted statistical error. We find a contribution from the `connected' diagrams of $h_{\pi{NN}}{1,con}=(1.099\pm0.505{+0.058}_{-0.064})\times10{-7}$, consistent with current experimental bounds and previous model-dependent theoretical predictions.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)