Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 114 tok/s
Gemini 3.0 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash 132 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 176 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Winter's Nonlinear Model

Updated 18 November 2025
  • Winter's Nonlinear Model is a one-dimensional quantum system that extends the classical Winter’s model to include nonlinear Schrödinger dynamics with Dirichlet and delta potential conditions.
  • It establishes dispersive and Strichartz estimates that underpin the analysis of resonances, survival amplitudes, and well-posedness, linking nonlinear effects to decay rates.
  • The model features bifurcation analysis and stability criteria (e.g., Vakhitov–Kolokolov) while highlighting open challenges in applying traditional spectral theory to nonlinear settings.

Winter’s nonlinear model is a one-dimensional quantum system formulated to extend the classical Winter’s model—originally prescribed for linear Schrödinger operators—into the setting of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLS). This model has become a canonical framework for analyzing quantum resonances, survival amplitudes, and local and global well-posedness in the nonlinear context. In particular, it incorporates a Dirichlet wall at the origin and a delta potential at a fixed positive distance, providing a controlled environment for studying boundary-driven and singular-interaction quantum phenomena under nonlinear evolution (Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025, Sacchetti, 2023).

1. Mathematical Formulation

The nonlinear Winter’s model is posed for wave functions ψ(x,t)\psi(x,t) supported on the half-line x0x \geq 0 with a Dirichlet boundary at x=0x=0 and a point interaction at x=a>0x=a>0 of strength αR\alpha\in\mathbb R. The self-adjoint operator on L2(R)L^2(\mathbb R) is:

Hα=d2dx2+βδ(x)+αδ(xa),β=+,H_\alpha = -\frac{d^2}{dx^2} + \beta\,\delta(x) + \alpha\,\delta(x-a), \qquad \beta=+\infty,

imposing the boundary and jump conditions:

ψ(0)=0,ψ(a+)=ψ(a),ψ(a+)ψ(a)=αψ(a).\psi(0) = 0, \quad \psi(a^+)=\psi(a^-), \quad \psi'(a^+)-\psi'(a^-) = \alpha\,\psi(a).

The time-dependent nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLS) is then:

{itψ(t,x)=Hαψ(t,x)+ηψ(t,x)2σψ(t,x), ψ(0,x)=ψ0(x)L2([0,)),ψ0(0)=0,\begin{cases} i\partial_t\psi(t,x) = H_\alpha\,\psi(t,x) + \eta\,|\psi(t,x)|^{2\sigma}\psi(t,x), \ \psi(0,x) = \psi_0(x) \in L^2([0,\infty)),\quad \psi_0(0)=0, \end{cases}

with ηR\eta \in \mathbb R controlling the nonlinearity (focusing for η<0\eta<0, defocusing for η>0\eta>0), and σ>0\sigma>0 the nonlinearity exponent. Conservation laws include mass ψ(t)L2\|\psi(t)\|_{L^2} and energy

E(ψ)=ψ,Hαψ+ησ+1ψL2(σ+1)2(σ+1).\mathcal{E}(\psi) = \langle\psi,H_\alpha\psi\rangle + \frac{\eta}{\sigma+1}\|\psi\|_{L^{2(\sigma+1)}}^{2(\sigma+1)}.

(Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025, Sacchetti, 2023)

2. Dispersive and Strichartz Estimates

For the linearized evolution (η=0\eta=0), considering the continuous spectrum subspace (projection PcP_c), the evolution operator satisfies the dispersive decay estimate:

eitHαPcφLxCt1/2φLx1,t>0,\|e^{-itH_\alpha}P_c\varphi\|_{L_x^\infty} \leq C t^{-1/2}\|\varphi\|_{L^1_x}, \quad t>0,

with kernel analysis via the free Green’s function and perturbative corrections. This decay matches the free 1D Schrödinger case and underpins the derivation of Strichartz estimates:

eitHαPcψLtpLxqCψLx2,2p+1q=12, 2p,q.\|e^{-itH_\alpha}P_c\psi\|_{L^p_tL^q_x} \leq C\|\psi\|_{L^2_x}, \quad \frac{2}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{2},\ 2\leq p,q\leq\infty.

These estimates are critical in establishing well-posedness and nonlinear analysis (Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025).

3. Well-Posedness, Conservation, and Blow-Up

With initial data ψ0H1([0,))\psi_0 \in H^1([0,\infty)), ψ0(0)=0\psi_0(0)=0, and normalized mass, for any σ>0\sigma>0 and ηR\eta\in\mathbb R, there exists maximal existence time 0<Tmax+0<T_{\max}\leq+\infty and a unique solution:

ψC([0,Tmax);H1)\psi \in C([0,T_\text{max});H^1)

preserving both L2L^2-norm and energy. The blow-up alternative holds: either Tmax=+T_\text{max} = +\infty (global existence), or ψ(t)H1\|\psi(t)\|_{H^1}\to\infty as tTmaxt\to T_\text{max}^- (Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025). Global existence is ensured under any of:

  • η0\eta \geq 0 (defocusing),
  • η<0\eta<0 and 0<σ<20<\sigma<2,
  • η<0\eta<0, σ=2\sigma=2, and η\eta above a negative threshold,
  • η<0\eta<0, σ>2\sigma>2, and η\eta above a problem-dependent threshold.

The virial identity, formulated for the variance Iq(t)=0(xq)2ψ(t,x)2dxI_q(t) = \int_0^\infty (x-q)^2 |\psi(t,x)|^2 dx, provides functional inequalities for analyzing blow-up mechanisms. Finite-time blow-up is proven for

  • negative initial energy (E(ψ0)<0)(\mathcal{E}(\psi_0)<0),
  • power nonlinearity σ>2\sigma>2,
  • and η<ηc\eta<\eta_c for some threshold ηc<0\eta_c<0, by convexity arguments on Ia(t)I_a(t) (Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025).

4. Resonances, Survival Amplitudes, and Nonlinear Spectral Analysis

In the linear case (η=0\eta=0), resonances are identified as poles in the meromorphic continuation of Green’s functions, corresponding to solutions of 2ikλ+λe2ika=02ik-\lambda + \lambda e^{2ika} = 0 for the outgoing-wave problem. Nonlinear extension (e.g., with cubic nonlinearity gψ2ψg|\,\psi|^2\psi) renders standard spectral theory inapplicable due to nonanalyticity and breakdown of resolvent methods. Instead, "nonlinear resonances" are defined via the real-energy scattering coefficient S(Ω)S(\Omega), determined by matching amplitudes of stationary solutions across the δ\delta–shell at x=ax=a (Sacchetti, 2023).

Sharp peaks in S(Ω)S(\Omega) track resonance-like features; their positions and widths deform continuously as gg varies. For moderate gg, the survival amplitude—A(t)=ψ0,ψ(t)A(t)=\langle \psi_0, \psi(t) \rangle—displays

A(t)=CreseiΩrest+Dt3/2+,A(t) = C_\text{res} e^{-i\Omega_\text{res} t} + D t^{-3/2} + \cdots,

where Ωres=EresiΓres/2\Omega_\text{res} = E_\text{res} - i\Gamma_\text{res}/2. Repulsive nonlinearity (g>0g>0) increases the decay rate (ImΩres\operatorname{Im}\Omega_\text{res}), focusing nonlinearity (g<0g<0) reduces it, and beyond a negative threshold g=g^g=\hat g, an isolated bound state forms and exponential decay ceases (Sacchetti, 2023).

Table: Effects of Nonlinearity on Resonance and Survival Amplitude

Nonlinearity (gg) Resonance Peak Shift Survival Amplitude Decay
g>0g>0 (defocusing) Broader, shifted right Faster exponential decay
g<0g<0, g<g^|g|<|\hat g| Sharper, shifted left Slower decay
g<0g<0, g>g^|g|>|\hat g| Collapse to bound state No exponential decay, stationary

(Sacchetti, 2023)

5. Structure and Bifurcation of Stationary Solutions

Stationary solutions (ψ(t,x)=eiωtψ(x)\psi(t,x) = e^{-i\omega t} \psi(x)) reduce to a nonlinear eigenvalue problem:

Hαψ+ηψ2σψ=ωψ,ψ(0)=0.H_\alpha\,\psi + \eta|\psi|^{2\sigma}\psi = \omega\psi, \qquad \psi(0)=0.

For real ω\omega, η\eta, and integer σ\sigma, solutions are real up to global phase. Cubic nonlinearity (σ=1\sigma=1) admits explicit solutions in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions on (0,a)(0,a) and (a,)(a,\infty), subject to matching the Dirichlet and δ\delta–jump conditions. The normalization ψL2=1\|\psi\|_{L^2}=1 uniquely selects the nonlinearity parameter η\eta for each branch (Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025).

Numerical analysis reveals a sequence of saddle-node bifurcations: for instance, with a=1a=1 and α=4\alpha=-4, a primary ground-state branch ω0(η)\omega_0(\eta) continues from the linear ground state at η=0\eta=0, and for each negative ηn\eta_n, two new branches ωn±(η)\omega_n^\pm(\eta) appear for η<ηn\eta<\eta_n (Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025, Sacchetti, 2023).

In the cubic case and for the Dirichlet problem at x=ax=a (λ=+\lambda=+\infty), L2^2 solutions are given on (0,a)(0,a) by Jacobi sn (defocusing) or cn (focusing) families, with energies tending to the linear spectrum as g0g\to 0. For finite λ\lambda and sufficiently large g|g|, pairs of localized bound states bifurcate at g=g^(λ)g = \hat g(\lambda) (Sacchetti, 2023).

6. Stability and Spectral Criteria

Stability of standing waves is conjectured following the Vakhitov–Kolokolov (VK) criterion: for a family φω\varphi_\omega with μ(ω)=φωL2\mu(\omega) = \|\varphi_\omega\|_{L^2}, the sign of dμ2/dωd\mu^2/d\omega distinguishes stability:

  • dμ2/dω>0d\mu^2/d\omega > 0: orbitally stable,
  • dμ2/dω<0d\mu^2/d\omega < 0: unstable.

For a=1a=1, α=4\alpha=-4, numerical data confirm that the primary branch ω0(η)\omega_0(\eta) is expected to be orbitally stable (dμ2/dω>0d\mu^2/d\omega>0). Bifurcating branches alternate in stability following the sign changes of the VK index (Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025).

7. Open Problems and Mathematical Challenges

The nonlinear Winter’s model demonstrates several mathematical obstacles in extending standard resonance theory: loss of linear resolvent theory, breakdown of analytic continuation, and the nonanalytic character of the nonlinearity—particularly in attempts to rigorously define or track resonance poles for complex energies. No general spectral-theoretic extension is known for NLS with point interactions. The existing strategy involves tracking resonance analogs via real-energy scattering data and analyzing bifurcations in the stationary regime. Numerical evidence indicates that the link between resonance poles and exponential decay of the survival amplitude, as well as their deformation under nonlinearity, persists in the nonlinear regime (Sacchetti, 2023).

References

  • A. Sacchetti, "Mathematical results for the nonlinear Winter's model," (Sacchetti, 16 Nov 2025)
  • A. Sacchetti, "Quantum resonances and analysis of the survival amplitude in the nonlinear Winter's model," (Sacchetti, 2023)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Winter's Nonlinear Model.