Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 109 tok/s
Gemini 3.0 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash 159 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 203 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Wigner Phase-Space Formulation of 2-RDM

Updated 17 November 2025
  • The paper demonstrates a rigorous Wigner phase-space technique for representing and evolving two-body reduced density matrices, enhancing computational tractability.
  • It applies spectral discretization and Chebyshev methods to efficiently handle high-dimensional phase-space integrals and capture dynamic correlations beyond mean-field approximations.
  • The study reveals significant implications such as quantifiable entropy growth in two-body scattering, preservation of entanglement, and potential extensions to time-dependent density functional theory.

The Wigner phase-space formulation of the two-body reduced density matrix (2-RDM) provides a rigorous and computationally tractable framework for representing and evolving two-particle quantum correlations in continuous and discrete many-body systems. By encoding the 2-RDM as a quasiprobability function in phase space, both analytic and numerically efficient routes are opened for the paper of two-body phenomena that go beyond one-body mean-field descriptions, including entanglement, dynamic correlation, collision integral effects, and irreversibility.

1. Foundations: The Wigner Transform and the 2-RDM

Let ρ\rho be a density operator on the NN-particle Hilbert space H=(L2(Rd))N\mathcal H=(L^2(\mathbb R^d))^{\otimes N}, with canonical coordinates x=(x1,...,xN)\mathbf x=(x_1,...,x_N) and momenta p=(p1,...,pN)\mathbf p=(p_1,...,p_N). The NN-body Wigner function Wtot(x;p)W_{\rm tot}(\mathbf x;\mathbf p) is defined by the Weyl–Wigner integral,

Wtot(x1,...,xN;p1,...,pN)=1(2π)dNRdNeipyx+y2ρxy2dNy,W_{\rm tot}(x_1,...,x_N; p_1,...,p_N) = \frac{1}{(2\pi\hbar)^{dN}}\int_{\mathbb R^{dN}} e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\mathbf p \cdot \mathbf y}\left\langle \mathbf x + \frac{\mathbf y}{2} \Big| \rho \Big| \mathbf x - \frac{\mathbf y}{2}\right\rangle\, d^N y,

which recasts the quantum state as a function on R2dN\mathbb R^{2dN}.

The two-body reduced density matrix (2-RDM) is obtained by tracing out all but two particles, labeled i,ji,j: ρ(2)=Trrest(ρ),ρ(2)(xi,xj;xi,xj)=ρ(xi,xj,xrest;xi,xj,xrest)dd(N2)xrest.\rho^{(2)} = \operatorname{Tr}_{\rm rest}(\rho), \qquad \rho^{(2)}(x_i, x_j; x'_i, x'_j) = \int \rho(x_i, x_j, \mathbf{x}_{\rm rest}; x'_i, x'_j, \mathbf{x}_{\rm rest})\, d^{d(N-2)}x_{\rm rest}. Its Wigner function, W2(zi,zj)W_2(z_i,z_j) with zk=(qk,pk)z_k = (q_k,p_k), becomes

W2(qi,pi;qj,pj)=ki,jdqkdpkWtot(q1,...,qN;p1,...,pN),W_2(q_i,p_i; q_j,p_j) = \int \prod_{k\neq i,j} dq_k\,dp_k\, W_{\rm tot}(q_1,...,q_N; p_1,...,p_N),

i.e., the marginalization of WtotW_{\rm tot} over all degrees of freedom except the specified pair (Gosson et al., 2021).

2. Rigorous Phase-Space Marginalization and Weyl–Wigner–Moyal Structure

The operator-level partial trace is, under suitable regularity conditions, rigorously equivalent to phase-space marginalization of the Wigner function. This equivalence follows from the Weyl correspondence:

  • For any bounded operator QQ on the two-particle subspace,

Tr(ρQIrest)=Tr(ρ(2)Q),\operatorname{Tr}(\rho\, Q \otimes I_{\rm rest}) = \operatorname{Tr}(\rho^{(2)} Q),

  • With Weyl symbol qij(zi,zj)q_{ij}(z_i,z_j) independent of traced-out variables, the trace relation is

Tr(ρOpW(q))=(2π)dNWtot(z)q(z)d2dNz.\operatorname{Tr}(\rho\,\operatorname{Op}_W(q)) = (2\pi\hbar)^{dN} \int W_{\rm tot}(\mathbf z)\, q(\mathbf z)\, d^{2dN} \mathbf z.

Comparing with the analogous formula for ρ(2)\rho^{(2)} yields the marginalization result.

Wigner functions are central to the Weyl–Wigner–Moyal formalism:

  • They obey star-product composition,

ab=a(z)exp[i2(xppx)]b(z).a \star b = a(z)\exp\left[\frac{i\hbar}{2} \left(\overleftarrow{\partial_x}\cdot\overrightarrow{\partial_p} - \overleftarrow{\partial_p}\cdot\overrightarrow{\partial_x}\right)\right] b(z).

  • Quantum commutators become Moyal brackets,

1i[A,B]{a,b}M=1i(abba),\frac{1}{i\hbar}[A,B] \longleftrightarrow \{a,b\}_{\rm M} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}(a\star b - b\star a),

so that quantum evolution in this representation closely parallels classical phase-space dynamics (Gosson et al., 2021).

3. Gaussian States and Explicit 2-Body Wigner Functions

For Gaussian states, the Wigner function is itself Gaussian: Wtot(z)=1(2π)dNdetΣexp[12zTΣ1z],W_{\rm tot}(\mathbf z) =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{dN}\sqrt{\det\Sigma}}\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\mathbf z^T\Sigma^{-1}\mathbf z\right], where Σ\Sigma is the 2dN×2dN2dN\times 2dN covariance matrix. Marginalization yields another Gaussian: W2(zi,zj)=1(2π)2ddetΣ[ij]exp[12(zi,zj)TΣ[ij]1(zi,zj)],W_2(z_i,z_j) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2d}\sqrt{\det\Sigma_{[ij]}}} \exp\left[-\frac12 (z_i,z_j)^T\Sigma_{[ij]}^{-1} (z_i,z_j)\right], with Σ[ij]\Sigma_{[ij]} the 4d×4d4d\times4d block corresponding to the distinguished pair. For such states, phase-space marginalization gives an explicit, closed-form description of all two-body correlations.

This highlights a particular strength of the Wigner formalism: for all Gaussian states (including thermal and squeezed states), the 2-RDM Wigner function is efficiently computed and completely characterized by appropriate covariance blocks (Gosson et al., 2021).

4. Discrete Phase-Space Formulation for Finite Systems

For finite-dimensional (e.g., spin or qubit) systems, the Wigner 2-RDM formalism is constructed using discrete phase-space points and Schwinger operator bases. The mapping kernel A(μ,ν)A(\mu,\nu) for an NN-level system,

A(μ,ν)=1Nη,ξ=0N1ωΦ(η,ξ;N)μηνξU^ηV^ξ,A(\mu,\nu) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{\eta,\xi=0}^{N-1} \omega^{\Phi(\eta,\xi;N) - \mu \eta - \nu \xi}\,\hat U^\eta \hat V^\xi,

generates an orthonormal operator basis. For two qubits, either an SU(2)SU(2)\mathrm{SU(2)}\otimes\mathrm{SU(2)} “product” phase space or a single SU(4)\mathrm{SU(4)} “ququart” phase space may be employed (Marchiolli et al., 2019).

The discrete Wigner function is given by

W(μ,ν)=Tr[ρA(μ,ν)]=1N+12i=1N21gigi(μ,ν),W(\mu,\nu) = \operatorname{Tr}[\rho A(\mu,\nu)] = \frac{1}{N} + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^{N^2-1} g_i\,g_i(\mu,\nu),

where gig_i are Bloch vector components and gi(μ,ν)g_i(\mu,\nu) are fixed functions of the phase-space coordinates.

Marginals over a subset of phase-space coordinates yield the Wigner function of the reduced density matrix, enabling reconstruction of partial states and diagnostics of nonseparability or entanglement (Marchiolli et al., 2019).

5. Wigner Phase-Space Dynamics of the 2-RDM

Phase-space evolution of the 2-RDM is governed by equations obtained via Wigner transformation of the BBGKY hierarchy, with the highest-body correlations truncated. The time-dependent Wigner 2-RDM f12(r1,r2,p1,p2,t)f_{12}(r_1,r_2,p_1,p_2,t) satisfies

f12t+p1mr1f12+p2mr2f12=ΘVHXC[n1][f12]+ΘVHXC[n2][f12]+ΘV12[f12]+ΘW12[f12],\frac{\partial f_{12}}{\partial t} + \frac{p_1}{m} \cdot \nabla_{r_1}f_{12} + \frac{p_2}{m} \cdot \nabla_{r_2}f_{12} = \Theta_{V_{HXC}[n_1]}[f_{12}] + \Theta_{V_{HXC}[n_2]}[f_{12}] + \Theta_{V_{12}}[f_{12}] + \Theta_{W_{12}}[f_{12}],

where:

  • ΘVHXC[nj][f12]\Theta_{V_{HXC}[n_j]}[f_{12}] encodes Hartree–exchange–correlation on particle jj, as a convolution in momentum,
  • ΘV12\Theta_{V_{12}} is the two-body collision integral,
  • ΘW12\Theta_{W_{12}} is the effect of external potentials (Liang et al., 14 Nov 2025).

The explicit kernels incorporate Fourier transforms of the relevant potentials and action of shifted arguments in the momenta, mimicking both collision and mean-field effects in phase space.

6. Numerical Methods for High-Dimensional 2-RDM Wigner Equations

To address the high-dimensionality inherent in the 2-RDM Wigner equation (in $4d$ phase-space dimensions for dd spatial degrees), efficient spectral discretization and parallelism are essential.

Two complementary families of spectral approximations are employed:

  • Periodic case: Pseudo-difference operators, with momentum discretization and FFT acceleration, yield difference formulas such as

ΘVHXC[n1][f12]=1imZdV^m[n1]e2πiLxmr1[f12(p1mΔp,...)f12(p1+mΔp,...)],\Theta_{V_{HXC}[n_1]}[f_{12}] = \frac{1}{i\hbar} \sum_{m \in \mathbb Z^d} \widehat V_m[n_1] e^{-\frac{2\pi i}{L_x}m \cdot r_1} [f_{12}(p_1-m\Delta p,...) - f_{12}(p_1+m\Delta p,...)],

and similar representations for the two-body collision term. Truncation to mNp|m|\le N_p and selection Nx=2NpN_x=2N_p enables O(Nx2dNp2dlogNp)\mathcal O(N_x^{2d}N_p^{2d}\log N_p) scaling (Liang et al., 14 Nov 2025).

  • Non-periodic case: Chebyshev spectral-element methods are adopted, expanding f12f_{12} in tensorized Chebyshev polynomials within subdomains of momentum space, reducing the action of the complex nonlocal kernels to manageable sparse tensor contractions.

A fully distributed characteristic–spectral integration scheme (termed CHASM in this context) is used for time-stepping, combining semi-Lagrangian advection with localized spline interpolation, domain decomposition, and minimal cross-domain communication via perfectly-matched boundary conditions.

7. Applications, Numerical Experiments, and Physical Implications

Direct simulation in 1D-2RDM Wigner phase space elucidates two-body corrections beyond mean-field theory:

  • In nonlinear Landau damping, local exchange–correlation has negligible effect on the linear damping rate, whereas the inclusion of the two-body collision operator modifies the rate and suppresses fine-scale filamentation in phase space.
  • In the quantum two-stream instability, two-body repulsion regularizes saturation patterns and suppresses field energy growth.
  • For strongly correlated initial conditions, mean-field or Hartree dynamics cause rapid dispersal and do not affect the natural occupation spectrum {nk}\{n_k\}. Inclusion of the two-body operator impedes wavepacket coalescence, preserves two-particle correlations, and leads to quantitatively irreversible entropy growth.

Correlation entropy, defined as s(t)=knk(t)lnnk(t)s(t)=-\sum_k n_k(t)\ln n_k(t) where {nk}\{n_k\} are the eigenvalues of the one-body density matrix, remains constant under mean-field, but increases monotonically under two-body scattering. This provides deterministic evidence that 2-RDM Wigner dynamics can generate entropy and correct kinetic rates beyond mean-field approximations (Liang et al., 14 Nov 2025).

A plausible implication is that these Wigner phase-space approaches may be used to extend time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) to include fully dynamical two-body observables in both quantum and semiclassical systems, potentially enabling accurate simulation of processes involving dynamic correlation, double excitations, and quantum thermalization.


Table: Key Wigner 2-RDM Procedures

Procedure Formula Type Physical/Computational Effect
Continuous marginalization Wtot()d2d(N2)zrest\int W_{\rm tot}(\cdot)d^{2d(N-2)}z_{\rm rest} Extracts 2-RDM Wigner function from NN-body state
Discrete marginal (qubits) restW()\sum_{\rm rest} W(\cdot) Extracts reduced discrete Wigner function, finite NN
2-RDM Wigner dynamics PDEs involving ΘV12\Theta_{V_{12}} Simulates time evolution including explicit collisions
FFT pseudo-difference Discrete convolutions (periodic) Efficient high-dimensional computation
Chebyshev spectral method Polynomial element expansion Non-periodic domains, sparse contraction computation

The Wigner phase-space formulation of the 2-RDM unifies operator-theoretic manipulations, rigorous phase-space representations, and efficient high-dimensional computation, providing a powerful framework for the investigation of many-body quantum dynamics, irreversibility, and multipartite entanglement.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Wigner Phase-Space Formulation of 2-RDM.