Weighted Threshold Potential Functions

• Weighted threshold potential functions are mathematical constructs that determine system outputs by comparing a weighted sum of inputs against an adaptive, state-dependent threshold.
• They extend classical threshold models by incorporating dynamic mechanisms such as energy-temporal and input-based adaptations to ensure robust performance.
• These functions are pivotal in neural computation, complex network contagion, harmonic analysis, circuit design, and various computational applications.

Weighted threshold potential functions are mathematical constructs describing the firing behavior or decision-making in systems—most notably neural networks, harmonic analysis, combinatorics, circuit design, and network dynamics—by comparing a weighted sum of inputs against a threshold that is itself static or adaptive and potentially also a function of system state. These functions underpin a broad array of theoretical, computational, and applied research areas, including neural computation, learning theory, complex network contagion, function approximation, and more. Weighted threshold potentials generalize simple threshold functions by extending the notion of state-dependence, input weighting, and threshold dynamics.

1. Mathematical Formulation and Core Principles

Weighted threshold potential functions generalize classical threshold logic units, expressing an output that depends on whether a weighted sum of inputs (or input features) exceeds a threshold, often itself a function of system dynamics or additional weights. The most canonical form for a threshold function is: $f(x) = H\left(\sum_{i=1}^n w_i x_i - \theta\right)$ where $H(\cdot)$ is the Heaviside function, $w_i$ are input weights, and $\theta$ is the threshold parameter. For polynomial threshold functions and high-order models, this generalizes to: $f(x) = \operatorname{sign}(p(x))$ with $p(x)$ a weighted sum of monomials.

The concept further expands to adaptive, dynamic, or state-dependent thresholds, such as: $$\Theta_i^l(t+1) = \frac{1}{2} \big[ E_i^l(t) + T_i^l(t+1) \big]$$ where each component is a weighted function of neural state variables (membrane potential, depolarization rate, etc.) (Ding et al., 2022).

Weighted threshold functions also arise in network contagion models, with threshold-crossing determined by weighted neighbor sums (Unicomb et al., 2017), and in harmonic analysis, via the weighting of Fourier coefficients for function regularity (Limani, 21 May 2025).

2. Biological and Artificial Implementations: Dynamic Thresholds in Neural Systems

Weighted threshold potentials are central to neural computation. Biological neurons modulate their spike threshold dynamically in response to membrane potential statistics and prior depolarization rates, maintaining homeostasis and robust firing behavior (Ding et al., 2022). The Bioinspired Dynamic Energy-Temporal Threshold (BDETT) scheme in spiking neural networks models this as: $$\Theta_i^l(t+1) = \frac{1}{2} \left( \eta (v_i^l(t) - V_m^l(t)) + V_\theta^l(t) + \ln\big(1 + e^{\frac{v_i^l(t) - V_m^l(t)}{\psi}}\big) + a + e^{-\frac{[v_i^l(t+1) - v_i^l(t)]}{C}} \right)$$ where the threshold evolves according to weighted state statistics and temporal changes, resulting in adaptive homeostatic firing even in adverse conditions. The weighted averaging of the energy (DET) and temporal (DTT) components embodies the dynamic potential principle.

Other mechanisms, such as Input-Weighted Threshold Adaptation (IWTA) (Stroobants et al., 2023), exploit per-synapse weights to modulate the firing threshold based on incoming spike history, enabling robust temporal integration: $$\theta^\text{thr}(t+1) = \theta^\text{thr}(t) + \theta_{\text{add}}(s_{-}(t) - s_{+}(t))$$ where $\theta_{\text{add}}$ is an adaptation weight per input channel.

These approaches yield SNNs capable of sophisticated temporal computation, integral control, and resilience to model and environmental noise.

3. Weighted Thresholds in Complex Networks and Functional Analysis

Threshold potential functions generalize to contexts such as contagion dynamics on weighted networks (Unicomb et al., 2017). Here, node state transitions are determined by the sum of weighted neighbor influences: $$q_m(i) = \sum_{j \in \text{infected neighbors}} w_{ij}$$ with transition occurring if $q_m(i) \geq \phi q_k(i)$, where $q_k(i)$ is the total node strength and $\phi$ is the threshold fraction. This approach models binary-state dynamics—including neural activation and social contagion—with explicit edge heterogeneity, yielding non-trivial, non-monotonic cascade behaviors.

In harmonic analysis, weighted threshold phenomena determine the regularity or singularity of function representations. The core threshold is governed by the summability condition on the weight sequence (Limani, 21 May 2025):

• If $\sum_n 1/w_n = \infty$, one constructs functions with finely disconnected support (maximal "badness") in $\ell^2(w)$.
• If $\sum_n 1/w_n < \infty$, all functions are continuous; the threshold effect is sharp and generic.

This dichotomy bridges weighted threshold potentials and classical results (Körner, Ivashev-Musatov), now extended via Baire category arguments to weighted settings.

Table: Threshold Dynamics Across Domains

Domain (Paper)	Weighted Threshold Formulation	Key Phenomenon/Result
SNNs (Ding et al., 2022)	Weighted dynamic thresholds (energy/temporal)	Homeostatic, robust, adaptive spike firing
SNNs, Control (Stroobants et al., 2023)	Input-weighted time-varying threshold	Accurate temporal integration, PID-control mimicry
Networks (Unicomb et al., 2017)	Weighted sum over edges for node transition	Non-monotonic cascades, edge heterogeneity effects
Harmonic Analysis (Limani, 21 May 2025)	Summability/divergence of sequence weights	Generic singularity or regularity, sharp threshold
Polynomial/LTF (0909.4727, 0910.3719)	Weighted integer approximators	Low-weight/high-weight bounds, regularity lemma

4. Approximation Theory, Complexity, and Weight Bounds

Weighted threshold functions underpin the expressive power and resource requirements for Boolean circuits, learning systems, and approximation theory. Critical results establish both upper and lower bounds for the weights required to represent or approximate functions (0909.4727, Podolskii, 2012, 0910.3719):

• For degree-$d$ polynomial threshold functions, any can be $\epsilon$-approximated by an integer-weighted PTF with total magnitude $O(n^d \cdot (d/\epsilon)^{O(d)})$ (0909.4727), which is tight up to constants.
• Lower bounds demonstrate that for large degree, some functions require double-exponential weights for any threshold representation (Podolskii, 2012): $W \geq 2^{\Omega(2^{2n/5})}$
• Structural results relate approximation ability to regularity (variable influence) and anti-concentration inequalities.

For linear threshold functions, the minimal approximator weight is also tightly bounded in terms of function influence and approximation error (0910.3719).

In combinatorial enumeration, deep flag-based formulas provide weight-independent lower bounds on the number of threshold functions over the Boolean cube, revealing combinatorial invariance across weightings (Irmatov, 2018).

5. Circuit Realization and Hardware Implementation

Weighted threshold potential functions are directly mapped to physical hardware via programmable devices. Flash Threshold Logic (FTL) cells implement threshold logic functions using floating-gate transistors whose threshold voltages correspond to function weights (Wagle et al., 2019). Key features of FTL include:

• Physical weights ($w_i$) realized by programmable threshold voltages ($V_{t,i}$); lower voltage = higher weight.
• Threshold ($T$) mapped to an electrical parameter.
• PLA-driven adaptive weight programming ensures robust behavior against process variations.
• FTL design achieves substantial area, power, and speed improvements over conventional CMOS logic for threshold functions.

6. Weighted Thresholds in Game Theory, Combinatorics, and Spectral Graph Theory

Weighted threshold potential functions formalize the representability of simple games (monotonic Boolean functions) as weighted games; a coalition is winning if the sum of member weights exceeds a quota (Freixas et al., 2016). Robustness properties—specifically trade robustness and its variants—characterize the conditions under which such a representation exists. For complete games, parameters such as types of equivalent players ($t$) and types of shift-minimal winning coalitions ($r$) determine the computational tractability of weightedness testing.

In spectral graph theory, Laplacian matrices of weighted threshold graphs form a commutative algebra, with their spectra determined by linear maps of link weight assignments (Ke et al., 20 Jun 2025): $\mu_i = i w_i + \sum_{j=i+1}^N w_j$ This correspondence enables prescribed potential functions and control over network dynamics via eigenvalue design.

7. Potential Theory and Function Approximation

Weighted threshold principles are central to numerical approximation in weighted Hardy spaces, with the design of almost-optimal interpolation formulas formulated as a Green potential minimization under an external field determined by the weight function $w$ (Tanaka et al., 2015). The threshold phenomenon determines node distribution and error decay rates, and the technique achieves near-optimal rates in the double-exponential case where classic Sinc formulas are suboptimal.

---

Weighted threshold potential functions unify key methodological advances across fields, from bioplausible neural adaptation to combinatorial, harmonic, computational, and hardware realizations. Their mathematical formulation and behavior underpins modern theory and application in robust computation, complexity, function regularity, and design of physical and logical systems.