Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Weak Comp Algebra in Secondary Hochschild Cohomology

Updated 7 July 2026
  • Weak comp algebra is a graded structure on secondary Hochschild complexes that organizes differentials, cup products, and higher operations via partial compositions and a distinguished 2-cochain.
  • It arises from entwining structures over a commutative base, where an algebra, a coalgebra, and a twisting map interact to control cohomological operations and deformation theory.
  • The introduction of an equivariant subcomplex refines the weak comp structure to a full comp algebra, yielding a Gerstenhaber algebra on cohomology with merged cup product operations.

Weak comp algebra, in the sense developed for secondary Hochschild cohomology of entwining structures, is a graded algebraic structure carried by the secondary Hochschild complex C(A,B,C,φ)C^*(A,B,C,\varphi) associated with an entwining structure (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi) over a commutative kk-algebra BB. Its defining data are partial composition operations i\circ_i and a distinguished element αV2\alpha\in V^2, and its role is to organize the differential, cup products, and higher algebraic operations on cochains. In this setting, the secondary Hochschild complex becomes a right weak comp algebra, admits two cup products on cohomology, and contains a subcomplex on which the weak structure strengthens to a comp algebra; the cohomology of that subcomplex forms a Gerstenhaber algebra (Balodi et al., 2019).

1. Entwining structures over a commutative base

An entwining structure over kk is a triple (A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi) consisting of an associative unital kk-algebra AA, a coassociative counital (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)0-coalgebra (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)1, and a (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)2-linear map

(A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)3

subject to four compatibility conditions. Writing (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)4, these are: (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)5

(A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)6

(A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)7

(A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)8

Over a commutative (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)9-algebra kk0, the relevant datum is a tuple

kk1

where kk2 is a kk3-algebra map with central image kk4, kk5 is an entwining structure over kk6, and

kk7

The coefficient objects are kk8-bimodules kk9 satisfying the BB0-centrality condition

BB1

This framework combines an algebra BB2, a coalgebra BB3, and a twisting map BB4 with a distinguished commutative base algebra BB5. The condition involving BB6 forces the BB7-part of the structure to commute with the entwining in the strongest possible way (Balodi et al., 2019).

2. Secondary Hochschild complex

For BB8, the secondary cochain group attached to BB9 and coefficients i\circ_i0 is

i\circ_i1

The tensor factors are written as upper triangular tensor matrices. For i\circ_i2, one writes

i\circ_i3

with diagonal entries in i\circ_i4 and upper triangular entries in i\circ_i5.

The differential is defined by transporting Staic’s secondary Hochschild differential through the canonical isomorphism

i\circ_i6

Here i\circ_i7 is endowed with the i\circ_i8-bimodule structure

i\circ_i9

With this bimodule structure, αV2\alpha\in V^20 is a αV2\alpha\in V^21-central αV2\alpha\in V^22-bimodule, and the resulting operator αV2\alpha\in V^23 satisfies αV2\alpha\in V^24. The cohomology groups are denoted

αV2\alpha\in V^25

In this form, the secondary Hochschild complex generalizes ordinary Hochschild cohomology, Staic’s secondary Hochschild cohomology, and the Hochschild-type cohomology attached to entwining structures (Balodi et al., 2019).

3. Weak comp algebra structure

A right weak comp algebra is a graded αV2\alpha\in V^26-vector space αV2\alpha\in V^27, together with an element αV2\alpha\in V^28 and operations

αV2\alpha\in V^29

such that kk0 for kk1, the relation

kk2

holds, the relation

kk3

holds when either kk4 or kk5, and

kk6

On the secondary Hochschild complex, the paper defines operations

kk7

by explicit block-matrix formulas, and introduces the distinguished kk8-cochain

kk9

The resulting system satisfies the weak comp algebra axioms. Precisely,

(A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)0

is a right weak comp algebra.

The differential is recovered from (A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)1 and the insertion operations by the identity

(A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)2

This is the secondary analogue of the classical expression of the Hochschild differential in terms of the multiplication cochain (Balodi et al., 2019).

A comp algebra is the stronger structure in which the insertion operations satisfy the full Gerstenhaber–Schack associativity pattern for all relative positions of iterated insertions. Every comp algebra is a weak comp algebra, but not conversely.

4. Cup products and cohomology

The weak comp structure yields two cochain-level cup products,

(A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)3

on (A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)4. Their explicit formulas are given in terms of block tensor matrices, products of the (A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)5-entries through (A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)6, and the two coproduct components (A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)7 of the coalgebra element (A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)8. The difference between them is in how the comultiplication of (A,C,ψ)(A,C,\psi)9 is assigned to the two cochains and where the entwining kk0 acts.

These products admit compact descriptions in terms of kk1 and the insertion operations: kk2

kk3

for kk4, kk5.

Both products are graded associative at the cochain level, and the differential is a graded derivation for each: kk6

kk7

Hence both descend to cohomology,

kk8

On cohomology they satisfy

kk9

Thus the secondary Hochschild cohomology of the entwining structure carries two distinct cup product structures. Their coexistence is a characteristic feature of the weak comp algebra formalism in this setting (Balodi et al., 2019).

5. Equivariant subcomplex and the passage to comp algebras

The paper isolates an equivariant subcomplex

AA0

defined by compatibility of cochains with the AA1-bicomodule structure determined by the entwining maps AA2 and AA3. Concretely, a cochain belongs to AA4 when a diagram involving AA5, AA6, AA7, and the cochain itself commutes.

This subcomplex has several decisive properties. The distinguished element AA8 belongs to AA9, and (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)00 is closed under all operations (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)01. Consequently,

(A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)02

is a weak comp subalgebra of

(A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)03

and (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)04 is a subcomplex.

The key simplification occurs at the level of cup products: for (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)05 and (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)06,

(A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)07

The paper then considers this subcomplex as the locus on which the two cup products coincide and on which the stronger comp algebra axioms hold. The abstract states that this subcomplex satisfies the axioms for being a comp algebra, and that the cohomology of this subcomplex forms a Gerstenhaber algebra (Balodi et al., 2019).

This passage from the full weak comp algebra to the equivariant comp algebra is structurally important. On the full complex, the two cup products remain distinct; on the equivariant subcomplex, they merge into a single product compatible with the standard Gerstenhaber package.

6. Deformations and mathematical position

The weak comp algebra formalism is not introduced only to organize cochain operations. It is also tied to deformation theory. The paper constructs a bicomplex that controls the deformations of the entwining structure over (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)08. In this sense, the secondary Hochschild complex of (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)09 plays the same role for entwining structures over a commutative base that ordinary Hochschild complexes play for associative algebras and that secondary Hochschild complexes play for (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)10-parametrized algebra structures.

Within this framework, weak comp algebra occupies an intermediate position. It is weaker than a comp algebra, because the insertion identities are only imposed in full when one of the entries is the distinguished element (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)11, yet it is strong enough to recover the differential from (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)12, define two graded associative cup products, and make the differential a graded derivation for both. The equivariant subcomplex then restores the stronger comp algebra regime and yields a Gerstenhaber algebra on cohomology.

Accordingly, “weak comp algebra” denotes not merely a weakened operadic gadget, but the specific algebraic mechanism by which secondary Hochschild cochains of entwining structures over (A,B,C,ψ,φ)(A,B,C,\psi,\varphi)13 support insertion operations, multiple cup products, and deformation-theoretic control in a single formalism (Balodi et al., 2019).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Weak Comp Algebra.