Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Upbend Resonance (UBR) in Atomic Nuclei

Updated 10 November 2025
  • Upbend Resonance (UBR) is a low-energy enhancement of the gamma-ray strength function in nuclei, emerging from thermally induced p–p and h–h excitations.
  • Experimental observations in samarium isotopes reveal an exponential increase in dipole strength, exceeding the GDR tail by up to 10³ at Eγ ≲ 2–3 MeV.
  • UBR challenges the Brink–Axel hypothesis and significantly impacts (n,γ) reaction rates in r-process nucleosynthesis, altering astrophysical models.

The upbend resonance (UBR) constitutes a pronounced low-energy enhancement of the radiative strength function (RSF) for γ\gamma-decay in atomic nuclei. Specifically, it manifests as an exponential increase in dipole strength for γ\gamma-ray energies Eγ2E_\gamma \lesssim 2–$3$ MeV, exceeding the extrapolated tail of the giant dipole resonance (GDR) by factors of up to 10310^3 in neutron-rich nuclei. The physical origin of the UBR has recently been elucidated as arising from non-collective particle–particle (p–p) and hole–hole (h–h) excitations, becoming significant only at finite nuclear temperatures. The UBR impacts statistical model calculations, with direct consequences for (n,γ)(n,\gamma) reaction rates in r-process nucleosynthesis (Simon et al., 2016, Naqvi et al., 2019, Phuc et al., 3 Nov 2025).

1. Radiative Strength Function and Definition of UBR

The radiative γ\gamma-strength function f(Eγ)f(E_\gamma) quantifies the average reduced probability of γ\gamma emission (or absorption) per MeV and serves as a fundamental input to statistical Hauser–Feshbach reaction models. For a multipole order LL and character XX (electric or magnetic), the strength function is given by:

fXL(Eγ)=ΓXL(Eγ)DEγ2L+1f_{XL}(E_\gamma) = \frac{\langle\Gamma_{XL}(E_\gamma)\rangle}{D\, E_\gamma^{2L+1}}

where ΓXL(Eγ)\langle\Gamma_{XL}(E_\gamma)\rangle is the average partial radiative width, DD is the average level spacing, and Eγ2L+1E_\gamma^{2L+1} reflects the Weisskopf estimate. For L=1L=1 (dipole), and in Oslo-method extractions:

f(Eγ)=12πT(Eγ)Eγ3f(E_\gamma) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \frac{{\cal T}(E_\gamma)}{E_\gamma^3}

The upbend resonance refers to a marked enhancement of f(Eγ)f(E_\gamma) for Eγ2E_\gamma \lesssim 2–$3$ MeV, parameterized empirically by an exponential form:

fupbend(Eγ)=CeηEγf_{\rm upbend}(E_\gamma) = C\, e^{-\eta E_\gamma}

where CC and η\eta are fitted parameters, with C2×106MeV3C \sim 2 \times 10^{-6}\, \mathrm{MeV}^{-3} and η5MeV1\eta \sim 5\, \mathrm{MeV}^{-1} for mid-shell rare-earth nuclei such as 151,153Sm{}^{151,153}\mathrm{Sm} (Simon et al., 2016, Naqvi et al., 2019).

2. Experimental Observations and Methodologies

The UBR has been systematically observed in samarium isotopes through (p,d)(p,d) reactions on enriched targets (152,154Sm{}^{152,154}\mathrm{Sm} and 148,150Sm{}^{148,150}\mathrm{Sm}), employing segmented ΔE\Delta EEE silicon telescopes for particle identification and HPGe clover detectors with BGO Compton shields for γ\gamma-spectroscopy. Notable features of the setups include:

  • Extension of reliable γ\gamma-strength measurements down to Eγ500E_\gamma \approx 500 keV.
  • Photopeak efficiencies of 4.8%\sim4.8\% at 100 keV and energy resolutions $2.6$ keV at $122$ keV, $3.5$ keV at $963$ keV.

Data processing involves:

  • Sorting particle–γ\gamma coincidences into excitation versus γ\gamma energy matrices.
  • Unfolding detector response via GEANT4 simulations.
  • Oslo-method iterative subtraction to extract primary γ\gamma-ray spectra P(Ex,Eγ)P(E_x, E_\gamma).

The resultant f(Eγ)f(E_\gamma) exhibits a low-energy enhancement by roughly an order of magnitude compared to the GDR extrapolation for Eγ2E_\gamma \lesssim 2 MeV. Representative f(Eγ)f(E_\gamma) values extracted for 153Sm{}^{153}\mathrm{Sm} are:

EγE_\gamma [MeV] f(Eγ)f(E_\gamma) [MeV3\mathrm{MeV}^{-3}]
0.6 1.2×1061.2 \times 10^{-6}
1.0 6.5×1076.5 \times 10^{-7}
1.5 3.8×1073.8 \times 10^{-7}
2.0 2.8×1072.8 \times 10^{-7}
3.0 1.5×1071.5 \times 10^{-7} (SR onset)

3. Microscopic Interpretation and Thermodynamic Origin

The EP+PDM (exact thermal pairing plus phonon damping model) provides a microscopic foundation for the UBR as a thermally induced dipole excitation (Phuc et al., 3 Nov 2025). Under EP+PDM, the RSF for each resonance (GDR, UBR) assumes:

fR(Eγ,T)=σRγqR(Eγ,T)SR(Eγ,T)3π22c2Eγf^{R}(E_\gamma,T) = \frac{\sigma_R\, \gamma_q^R(E_\gamma,T)\, S^R(E_\gamma,T)}{3\pi^2 \hbar^2 c^2 E_\gamma}

with the strength function SRS^R given by:

SR(Eγ,T)=1πγqR(Eγ,T)(EγER)2+[γqR(Eγ,T)]2S^R(E_\gamma,T) = \frac{1}{\pi} \frac{\gamma_q^R(E_\gamma,T)}{(E_\gamma-E_R)^2 + [\gamma_q^R(E_\gamma,T)]^2}

The total (temperature-dependent) width γqR\gamma_q^R for the UBR splits into quantal (particle–hole) and thermal (particle–particle, hole–hole) contributions. Critically, thermal p–p and h–h excitations only emerge at finite temperature, with coupling matrix elements to the UBR phonon approximately three times stronger than for the GDR:

FphUBR3FphGDR,FssUBR3FssGDRF_{ph}^{\rm UBR} \simeq 3\, F_{ph}^{\rm GDR}, \quad F_{ss'}^{\rm UBR} \simeq 3\, F_{ss'}^{\rm GDR}

This threefold enhancement accounts for the prominence of the UBR at low EγE_\gamma across a broad mass range (44A15344 \leq A \leq 153).

4. Systematics, Isotopic Dependence, and Coexistence with Scissors Resonance

Analysis across the samarium chain reveals systematic behavior:

  • In near-spherical 147,149Sm{}^{147,149}\mathrm{Sm}: Upbend visible below 2\sim2 MeV; no distinct scissors resonance (SR) at Eγ3E_\gamma \sim3 MeV.
  • In well-deformed mid-shell 151,153Sm{}^{151,153}\mathrm{Sm}: Coexistence of upbend and pronounced SR (Eγ3E_\gamma \sim3 MeV, BSR7.8μN2B_{\rm SR} \sim 7.8\,\mu_N^2).
  • The total low-energy M1M1 strength (0–5 MeV) remains nearly constant (8.3μN2\sim8.3\,\mu_N^2) from A=147A=147 to $153$, matching shell-model estimates (Naqvi et al., 2019).

The extracted upbend parameters for lighter Sm isotopes are:

Nucleus CC (×107MeV3\times 10^{-7}\,\mathrm{MeV}^{-3}) η\eta (MeV1\mathrm{MeV}^{-1})
147{}^{147}Sm 10±510 \pm 5 3.2±1.03.2 \pm 1.0
149{}^{149}Sm 20±1020 \pm 10 5.0±1.05.0 \pm 1.0

The UBR fraction of the total low-energy RSF, R(A)R(A), declines steeply with mass, described globally by:

R(A)243.18eA/11.45+1.17lnA5.05R(A) \approx 243.18\,e^{-A/11.45} + 1.17\,\ln A - 5.05

This empirical relation holds over 40A16040 \leq A \leq 160 (R2=0.95\mathcal{R}^2=0.95) (Phuc et al., 3 Nov 2025).

5. Theoretical Implications and Validity of the Brink–Axel Hypothesis

UBR's thermodynamic nature has profound consequences. In EP+PDM:

  • UBR is absent at T=0T=0 (ground-state absorption) and emerges only at finite temperature, invalidating the conventional Brink–Axel hypothesis in the low-energy region.
  • The total RSF at low EγE_\gamma is a strongly temperature-dependent function, ftot(Eγ,T)=fGDR(Eγ,T)+fUBR(Eγ,T)f_{\rm tot}(E_\gamma, T) = f^{\rm GDR}(E_\gamma, T) + f^{\rm UBR}(E_\gamma, T).

This temperature dependence manifests in decay (hot compound nucleus) but not in ground-state photoabsorption, implying that absorption and decay RSFs diverge at low energies—directly falsifying Brink–Axel at Eγ2E_\gamma \lesssim 2 MeV.

6. Astrophysical Consequences and Reaction Rate Sensitivity

The (n,γ) cross sections for r-process nucleosynthesis are highly sensitive to the low-energy γ\gamma-ray strength. Hauser–Feshbach calculations using TALYS or equivalent reaction codes, including measured fupbend(Eγ)f_{\rm upbend}(E_\gamma) and SR, result in:

  • Enhancement of Maxwellian-averaged (n,γ) rates for neutron-rich Sm isotopes beyond N=126N=126 by factors of 10210^{2}10310^{3} at T0.15T \approx 0.15 GK (“cold” r-process), and by factors of several at T=1.0T=1.0 GK (Simon et al., 2016).
  • Substantial alteration of r-process abundance peaks and waiting-point lifetimes (Phuc et al., 3 Nov 2025).

A plausible implication is that inclusion of UBR in statistical model calculations is essential for reliable nucleosynthesis modeling, reducing rate uncertainties via a microscopic thermodynamically consistent description.

7. Nuclear Structure Perspectives and Future Directions

Multiple microscopic mechanisms have been proposed for UBR:

  • Thermal coupling in the continuum enhancing low-energy E1E1 transitions.
  • Strong M1M1 transitions among high-\ell orbitals with shears-like character.
  • Coherent recoupling of quasi-particles in the same shell.

Current angular-distribution and shell-model data favor a dominant M1M1 (magnetic dipole) origin, though admixture with other multipoles cannot be excluded. The systematic observation of UBR in near-spherical and well-deformed systems supports its universality as a non-collective, thermally induced mode.

A plausible implication is that the UBR challenges existing nuclear structure paradigms of the quasi-continuum and residual interactions. Future experimental studies—such as those involving polarized photon beams, high-resolution γ\gamma-spectroscopy, and fully microscopic modeling—are expected to further clarify the origin, evolution, and application of the UBR in nuclear physics and astrophysics.

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Upbend Resonance (UBR).

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube