Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Universal Scaling in Direct-Photon Production

Updated 14 July 2026
  • Universal scaling of direct-photon production is the empirical observation that low-pT yields follow a power-law relation with charged-particle density.
  • Experiments use internal and external conversion techniques to reveal a super-linear scaling with an exponent of about 1.2–1.25 across various collision systems and energies.
  • The scaling results constrain theoretical models by linking thermal radiation and pre-equilibrium dynamics to a common underlying photon emission mechanism.

Universal scaling of direct-photon production denotes the empirical observation that low-pTp_T direct-photon yields from heavy-ion collisions, when organized by the charged-particle pseudorapidity density at midrapidity, follow a common power law,

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,

with α\alpha near $1.2$–$1.25$, across Au+Au, Cu+Cu, and Pb+Pb systems and across beam energies from $39$ GeV to $2.76$ TeV. In PHENIX measurements this scaling is accompanied by a large low-pTp_T yield, a large azimuthal anisotropy relative to the reaction plane, and similar scaled spectral shapes up to about pT2p_T\sim 2 GeV/cc; prompt high-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,0 photons, by contrast, follow the expected binary-collision scaling (Esha, 2022).

1. Experimental observable and discovery context

Direct photons are photons not coming from hadronic decays such as dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,1 and dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,2. Because they escape the medium essentially unmodified, they provide an integral probe of the space-time evolution of the fireball. PHENIX measured low-momentum direct photons in dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,3, dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,4Au, dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,5Au, Cu+Cu, and Au+Au collisions at RHIC, using internal conversions in some cases and external conversions in detector material such as the HBD/VTX in others (Khachatryan, 2018).

The central experimental observations are twofold. First, large A+A systems show a significant excess over scaled dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,6 baselines at low dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,7. Second, the integrated low-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,8 direct-photon yield from large systems follows a universal scaling as a function of charged-particle multiplicity, dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,9, with α\alpha0. PHENIX summarized this as a discovery that the photon production yield increases faster than the charged-particle multiplicity (Khachatryan, 2018).

This empirical organization of the data was not limited to a single collision energy. PHENIX reported consistency across Au+Au at α\alpha1, α\alpha2, and α\alpha3 GeV, Cu+Cu at α\alpha4 GeV, and broader comparisons including Pb+Pb at the LHC. The multiplicity variable α\alpha5 was used because direct comparison by α\alpha6 or α\alpha7 is useful only at a fixed beam energy, whereas multiplicity allows comparisons across different α\alpha8 (Khachatryan, 2018).

2. Multiplicity scaling in large systems

The phenomenological core of universal scaling is the power-law relation

α\alpha9

In the PHENIX compilation of low-$1.2$0 direct photons from large systems, the fitted exponent is $1.2$1. The abstract statement that this means “the photon production yield increases faster than the charged-particle multiplicity” is a direct consequence of $1.2$2 (Khachatryan, 2018).

A later PHENIX study of Au+Au collisions at $1.2$3 and $1.2$4 GeV sharpened the scaling statement. It found that a universal scaling is observed when the direct-photon $1.2$5 spectra for different center-of-mass energies and for different centrality selections at $1.2$6 GeV are scaled with $1.2$7 for $1.2$8. This scaling also holds for earlier PHENIX Au+Au data at $1.2$9 GeV and for ALICE Pb+Pb spectra at $1.25$0 TeV. The scaling power $1.25$1 seems to be independent of $1.25$2, center-of-mass energy, and collision centrality (Abdulameer et al., 2022).

PHENIX subsequently summarized the same pattern in terms of system size thresholds and global systematics. For systems with $1.25$3–30, a large direct-photon yield and a large azimuthal anisotropy are observed, and the yield follows

$1.25$4

According to that study, the scaling holds across A+A systems spanning almost two orders of magnitude in system size, and it is also consistent with the scaled $1.25$5 trend, though the heavy-ion yields are much larger, by about an order of magnitude. Importantly, the observed scaling is reported to be independent of collision system size, beam energy, and, within uncertainties, $1.25$6 over the measured range from about $1.25$7 to $1.25$8 GeV/$1.25$9 (Esha, 2022).

A related centrality formulation predates the multiplicity-collapse plots. In Au+Au at $39$0 GeV, PHENIX parameterized the integrated excess yield as

$39$1

with exponents around $39$2–$39$3, and a simultaneous fit giving $39$4. The paper also quoted $39$5 as a very similar value for the centrality scaling of the excess yield. This established that the yield grows faster than linear in $39$6 but slower than $39$7 (Adare et al., 2014).

3. Spectral shapes, inverse slopes, and anisotropy

Universal scaling does not imply that the direct-photon spectrum is characterized by a single temperature-like parameter over the full measured $39$8 range. PHENIX emphasized that, after subtracting the prompt component, the inverse slope for the $39$9 range from $2.76$0–$2.76$1 GeV/$2.76$2 is $2.76$3 MeV/$2.76$4, but increases to about $2.76$5 MeV/$2.76$6 for the range from $2.76$7 to $2.76$8 GeV/$2.76$9. Within the experimental uncertainty, there is no indication of a system size dependence of the inverse slope (Esha, 2022).

The lower-energy Au+Au measurements at pTp_T0 and pTp_T1 GeV show the same curvature in another form. The spectra have a local inverse slope pTp_T2 increasing with pTp_T3, from pTp_T4 GeV/pTp_T5 in the range pTp_T6 GeV/pTp_T7 to pTp_T8 GeV/pTp_T9 for pT2p_T\sim 20 GeV/pT2p_T\sim 21. The spectra from different collision energies have a similar shape up to pT2p_T\sim 22 of pT2p_T\sim 23 GeV/pT2p_T\sim 24 (Abdulameer et al., 2022).

Earlier PHENIX work at pT2p_T\sim 25 GeV, reaching down to pT2p_T\sim 26 GeV/pT2p_T\sim 27, found that the excess yield above the pT2p_T\sim 28-scaled pT2p_T\sim 29 baseline is well described by an exponential distribution with an inverse slope of about cc0 MeV/cc1 in the cc2 range from cc3–cc4 GeV/cc5. A major result was that, once the prompt component is removed, the shape of the excess spectrum is consistent across centrality bins within the experimental uncertainties; the centrality dependence appears mainly in the normalization, not in the cc6-shape (Adare et al., 2014).

The anisotropy measurement is central to the scaling discussion because PHENIX observes a large azimuthal anisotropy with respect to the reaction plane together with the large low-cc7 yield. Thermal radiation from the quark-gluon plasma is qualitatively the natural explanation for the large low-cc8 yield and the strong anisotropy, since photons escape without strong final-state interactions and therefore carry information about the medium’s evolution. However, the combination of large yield and large anisotropy remains difficult to reconcile with naive expectations for early thermal photons (Esha, 2022).

Independent STAR data reinforce the same low-cc9 excess pattern. In Au+Au at dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,00 GeV, STAR found that for dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,01 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,02 the direct-photon yield lies clearly above the dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,03-scaled dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,04 reference, while for dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,05 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,06 it becomes consistent with the scaled dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,07 expectation. STAR compared the spectrum with a model by Ralf Rapp and collaborators including QGP thermal radiation, hadronic gas radiation, in-medium dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,08 contributions, and primordial hard-scattering photons, and found consistency within uncertainties (Yang, 2014).

4. Baselines, small systems, and prompt–nonprompt separation

The universality claim for low-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,09 photons is inseparable from the prompt baseline. At high dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,10, direct photons are dominated by prompt hard processes, and scaling with dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,11 is expected because dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,12. In the PHENIX scaling compilations, the slopes in the high-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,13 integrated-yield plot are similar to those at low dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,14, but the physical interpretation there is straightforward: prompt production follows binary-collision scaling (Khachatryan, 2018).

The cold-nuclear-matter benchmark is supplied by dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,15Au collisions. PHENIX measured direct photons at dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,16 GeV over dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,17 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,18 using nearly-real virtual photons and real photons, and found that the invariant yield over the scaled dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,19 cross section is consistent with unity. Theoretical calculations assuming standard cold nuclear matter effects describe the data well for the entire dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,20 range. The paper concluded that the large enhancement of direct photons observed in Au+Au collisions for dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,21 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,22 is due to a source other than the initial-state nuclear effects (Adare et al., 2012).

Small systems occupy an intermediate position. PHENIX reported a non-zero excess over the scaled dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,23 yield in central dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,24Au collisions, observed within systematic uncertainties and at roughly the dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,25 level, while dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,26Au serves as a binary-scaled baseline. The low-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,27 region in the integrated-yield plots shows a trend that may connect smoothly toward the large-system trend. The PHENIX interpretation was suggestive of a possible “thermal transition region or point” between small and large systems (Khachatryan, 2018).

A more differential decomposition was introduced by PHENIX under the term nonprompt direct photons. In Au+Au at dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,28 GeV, the prompt component was estimated as the dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,29-scaled dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,30 direct-photon yield, with

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,31

An excess of direct photons above prompt-photon production from hard-scattering processes is observed for dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,32 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,33. For the nonprompt component, the spectrum has an increasing inverse slope from approximately dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,34 to dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,35 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,36 with increasing dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,37, and the dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,38-integrated nonprompt direct-photon yields follow a power-law scaling behavior as a function of collision-system size with dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,39 consistent with dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,40 and no apparent dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,41 dependence (Acharya et al., 2022).

The dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,42 baseline at the LHC does not show a corresponding low-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,43 enhancement. ALICE measured inclusive and direct photon production at mid-rapidity in dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,44 collisions at dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,45 and dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,46 TeV and found no statistically significant direct-photon signal below dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,47 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,48 at either energy; the combined dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,49 results are consistent with unity throughout the measured low- and intermediate-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,50 range, and above dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,51 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,52 dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,53 is at least one standard deviation above unity and consistent with next-to-leading order pQCD expectations (Collaboration, 2018).

5. Geometrical scaling, saturation variables, and other notions of universality

The multiplicity scaling observed by PHENIX motivated attempts to connect direct-photon data to saturation-based geometrical scaling. One line of analysis showed that low-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,54 direct-photon spectra from Au+Au, Cu+Cu, and Pb+Pb systems, for transverse momenta up to about dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,55–dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,56 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,57, are approximately universal once divided by dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,58 with experimental dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,59. The same spectra also exhibit geometrical scaling when expressed as a universal function of

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,60

or, in the heavy-ion form,

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,61

with dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,62, dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,63, and dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,64. Under power-law assumptions for the scaling functions, the derived estimates dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,65 and dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,66 overshoot the experimental value by about dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,67 on average (Khachatryan et al., 2019).

A related phenomenology tested geometrical scaling directly by participant number and centrality. Using

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,68

the authors showed that direct-photon data from PHENIX Au+Au at dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,69 GeV and ALICE Pb+Pb at dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,70 TeV are broadly consistent with geometrical scaling, with the ratios of scaled spectra closest to unity for dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,71. The paper emphasized that the evidence for a precise universal energy-scaling exponent dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,72 is not strong enough yet because the available data come from different experiments with different rapidity intervals and centrality binning (Praszalowicz, 2018).

An earlier saturation-based analysis made the same point in a simpler form. It argued that the inclusive spectrum of photons in the transverse momentum range dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,73 satisfies geometric scaling when written as

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,74

with

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,75

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,76 GeV and dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,77–dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,78. The same scaling form was reported to work across dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,79, dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,80, AuAu, and PbPb data from RHIC to the LHC, while scaling at SPS energy is only approximate at low dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,81 and clearly breaks above about dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,82 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,83 (Klein-Bösing et al., 2014).

A distinct use of universality appears in QCD kinetic theory for pre-equilibrium photons. In a boost-invariant, transversely homogeneous setup, photon emission during chemical equilibration can be written in terms of universal scaling functions controlled by dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,84, dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,85, and dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,86, with

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,87

and

dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,88

These scaling functions were proposed as practical tools for realistic predictions and were implemented into KoMPoST (Garcia-Montero et al., 2024).

6. Physical interpretation, misconceptions, and unresolved tensions

The dominant interpretation of the low-dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,89 excess is that it reflects radiation from the hot and dense medium created in heavy-ion collisions. In PHENIX summaries, the excess likely reflects substantial thermal radiation from a hot, dense medium in large A+A systems, while the hint of excess in central dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,90Au raises the possibility that even small systems may occasionally reach conditions sufficient for some thermal-like photon emission. The fact that the yield scales faster than multiplicity hints that photon production is sensitive not just to the number of produced particles, but also to the space-time volume, temperature history, and lifetime of the emitting medium (Khachatryan, 2018).

At the same time, the scaling results do not imply that a single microscopic source or a single exponential describes the full spectrum. PHENIX stressed that the nonprompt spectrum is not a single constant-slope exponential over all dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,91; instead, the inverse slope increases from roughly dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,92 MeV to about dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,93 MeV as dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,94 moves from around dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,95 to dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,96 GeV/dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,97. This behavior is consistent with a time-integrated emission history in which the earliest, hottest phases contribute more strongly at higher dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,98. A plausible implication is that universal multiplicity scaling can coexist with a changing relative weight of QGP, hadron-gas, and pre-equilibrium emission (Esha, 2022).

A common misconception is that universal scaling means simple binary-collision scaling everywhere. The data show the opposite. Hard photons at high dNγdy(dNchdη)α,\frac{dN_\gamma}{dy} \propto \left(\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\right)^\alpha,99 follow α\alpha00 scaling, but low-α\alpha01 photons do not: they lie above the α\alpha02-scaled α\alpha03 baseline in A+A collisions, and in large systems the integrated yield follows a super-linear multiplicity law instead (Yang, 2014).

Another misconception is that the universality of the scaling already amounts to a quantitative theoretical solution. PHENIX repeatedly emphasized that the measured yield is often larger than predicted, particularly below α\alpha04 GeV/α\alpha05, where one comparison to a hybrid model with thermal plus pre-equilibrium emission falls short by a factor of about α\alpha06–α\alpha07. The calculations do capture the general spectral shape reasonably well and indicate that pre-equilibrium radiation may become dominant above α\alpha08 GeV/α\alpha09, but they do not yet quantitatively reproduce the full observed yield and anisotropy. The observed scaling, inverse slopes, and large α\alpha10-like anisotropy therefore remain among the most constraining observables for models of thermal radiation, pre-equilibrium dynamics, and the space-time evolution of the quark-gluon plasma (Esha, 2022).

The broader significance of universal scaling is that it suggests a remarkably simple systematics underlying photon production in a very complex dynamical environment. The observed similarity of low-α\alpha11 direct-photon production from α\alpha12 to α\alpha13 GeV suggests a common source of direct photons for the different collision energies and event centrality selections, and suggests a comparable space-time evolution of direct-photon emission. This suggests a stable organizing principle for direct-photon phenomenology, even though a quantitative first-principles description remains incomplete (Abdulameer et al., 2022).

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Universal Scaling of Direct-Photon Production.