Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 114 tok/s
Gemini 3.0 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash 132 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 176 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Two-Particle Coherent States

Updated 23 September 2025
  • Two-particle coherent states are quantum states that extend the concept of single-particle coherence to coupled systems with rich correlations and wave-packet structures.
  • They are constructed via product states of Glauber coherent states, with necessary symmetrization or antisymmetrization, and generalized to include nonlinear interactions.
  • Applications in models such as the Bose-Hubbard and Hartree frameworks reveal their impact on entanglement, phase-space dynamics, and quantum interference phenomena.

Two-particle coherent states are quantum states that exhibit coherence characterizing systems of two particles—whether elementary, composite, non-interacting, or interacting—such that their quantum correlations, wave-packet structure, and occupation properties extend the notion of single-particle coherence to richer many-body or coupled scenarios. These states underpin fundamental aspects of quantum optics, condensed matter physics, and field theory, impacting phenomena ranging from Bose-Einstein condensation and superfluidity to quantum information and scattering in both linear and nonlinear settings.

1. Constructing Two-Particle Coherent States

The construction of two-particle coherent states depends on both the physical setting (e.g., coupled oscillators, Bose-Hubbard models, composite bosons, nonlinear quantum fields) and the symmetries or interactions present. The canonical approach considers product states of single-particle coherent states:

ψ=α1β2|\psi\rangle = |\alpha\rangle_1 \otimes |\beta\rangle_2

where each α|\alpha\rangle (or β|\beta\rangle) is a Glauber coherent state. For identical particles, symmetrization (bosons) or antisymmetrization (fermions) is necessary:

ψ±=N(α1β2±β1α2)|\psi_\pm\rangle = \mathcal{N} \left( |\alpha\rangle_1 |\beta\rangle_2 \pm |\beta\rangle_1 |\alpha\rangle_2 \right)

However, interactions or composite structures necessitate generalized forms. For example, composite bosons formed from two distinguishable particles AA and BB admit a Schmidt decomposition and an effective coboson ladder operator construction (Lee et al., 2013):

c^=pλpa^pb^p\hat{c}^\dagger = \sum_p \sqrt{\lambda_p}\, \hat{a}_p^\dagger \hat{b}_p^\dagger

with associated coherent state eigenstates c^ψ=γψ\hat{c} |\psi\rangle = \gamma |\psi\rangle and coefficients determined by the normalization constants χn\chi_n arising from non-bosonic commutation relations.

Nonlinear or field-theoretic generalizations, such as in Hartree equations (Carles, 2011), present coherent states as semiclassical wave packets with modulated envelopes and phases. In the two-packet case, the relevant ansatz is:

ψε(t,x)j=12εd/4uj(t,xqj(t)ε)ei(Sj(t)+pj(t)(xqj(t)))/ε\psi^\varepsilon(t, x) \approx \sum_{j=1}^2 \varepsilon^{-d/4} u_j\left(t, \frac{x-q_j(t)}{\sqrt{\varepsilon}}\right) e^{i(S_j(t) + p_j(t)\cdot(x-q_j(t)))/\varepsilon}

where uju_j is an envelope function and (qj,pj)(q_j, p_j) are classical phase-space centers.

2. Coherence in Interacting Systems

In nonlinear frameworks—such as the Hartree equation for wave packets—the interaction between two-particle coherent states yields regime-dependent phenomena:

  • Critical Regime (α=1\alpha=1): Nonlinearity alters the envelope phase but leaves center trajectories classical.
  • Intermediate Regime (α=1/2\alpha=1/2): The envelopes are coupled; classical actions acquire ε\varepsilon-dependent corrections.
  • Supercritical Regime (α=0\alpha=0): Both envelope and trajectory are modified by nonlinear interactions, with centers obeying coupled equations:

q˙1=p1,p˙1=V(t,q1)a12K(0)a22K(q1q2)\dot{q}_1 = p_1,\quad \dot{p}_1 = -\nabla V(t, q_1) - |a_1|^2\nabla K(0) - |a_2|^2 \nabla K(q_1 - q_2)

(and similarly for q2,p2q_2, p_2)

Microlocal analysis reveals that interference (off-diagonal or "rectangle" terms) decays rapidly and is negligible for well-separated wave packets, preserving coherent-state structure with modulations only in the envelope and center parameters.

3. Two-Particle Coherent States in Extended Algebraic and Deformed Spaces

Extensions to non-orthogonal or deformed Fock spaces (Tavassoly et al., 2012) allow for more general coherent and squeezed two-particle states. In a two-parameter deformed basis nλ1,λ2|n\rangle_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2}, the coherent states satisfy aα,λ1,λ2)=αα,λ1,λ2)a |\alpha, \lambda_1, \lambda_2) = \alpha |\alpha, \lambda_1, \lambda_2) and are expanded as:

α,λ1,λ2)=C0n=0αnn!Ennλ1,λ2|\alpha, \lambda_1, \lambda_2) = C_0 \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\alpha^n}{\sqrt{n! E_n}} |n\rangle_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2}

The quantum statistical properties (Mandel Q-parameter, quadrature squeezing) depend on the deformation; coherent states typically retain standard uncertainty properties, whereas squeezed states may exhibit enhanced non-classicality in certain regimes.

4. Coherence, Entanglement, and Experimental Signatures

Two-particle coherent states serve as testbeds for examining entanglement (spatial and inter-species, as in Bose-Hubbard models (Li et al., 2022)), quantum statistics effects (bunching/anti-bunching, as in damped oscillators (Mousavi, 2022)), and coherence quantification (relative entropy of coherence):

Cr(ρ)=S(ρd)S(ρ)C_r(\rho) = S(\rho_d) - S(\rho)

where S(ρ)S(\rho) is the von Neumann entropy and ρd\rho_d is the diagonal part in a chosen basis. Superpositions (cat states) and the degree of separation in phase space strongly alter coherence measures and interference properties. Symmetry (bosonic versus fermionic) impacts reduced single-particle coherences and joint detection probabilities, yielding matter-wave analogues of familiar optical phenomena.

5. Two-Particle Coherent States in Specific Models

Coupled Bose-Hubbard Model: Eigenstates are combinations of Choy-Haldane states, with energies dependent on coupling strengths and interactions. The spectrum features scattering continua and doublon dispersions. Doublon states exhibit strong localization and maximal entanglement, while continuum states show lower participation ratios.

Composite Bosons: The effective coboson annihilation operator introduces a ladder with nonstandard normalization constants, and the coherent state eigenvalue provides bounds on maximum occupancy, relevant for condensation thresholds.

Nonlinear Field Models (Hartree): Coherent states remain robust even with nonlinear interferences, with detailed modifications encapsulated by shifts in envelope and center variables. Interactions of two packets are classified by the scaling of nonlinearity with the semiclassical parameter, affecting phase and trajectory structure.

Fermionic Coherent States: Proper construction proceeds via exponentiation of creation operators in the fermionic Fock space and yields reproducing kernel Hilbert space representations. The expansion into two-particle sectors aligns naturally with pair correlation functions and transformation under unitary dynamics (Oeckl, 2014).

6. Extensions and Outlook

Extensions to relativistic systems, many-body states, time-dependent or dissipative settings, and quantum field protocols utilize two-particle coherent state concepts to describe classical wave-packet dynamics, minimal uncertainty propagation, and quantum statistical features in a unified language. The methodology encompasses harmonic oscillator generalizations, semiclassical analysis (stationary phase, microlocal techniques), and group-theoretic constructions (Perelomov states, covariance under symmetries).

Coherence properties, entanglement signatures, and interference effects computed via the number operator variance, quadrature uncertainties, and entropy measures provide quantitative handles for assessing the quantum/classical boundary and the robustness of coherent phenomena in multiparticle systems.

7. Summary Table: Key Features of Two-Particle Coherent States in Representative Models

Model/Class Coherent State Features Interaction/Statistics Effects
Hartree equation (Carles, 2011) Sum of modulated wave packets Nonlinear coupling of envelopes and centers
Deformed Fock space (Tavassoly et al., 2012) Non-orthogonal basis, squeezing Quadrature squeezing, sub-Poissonian statistics
Bose-Hubbard (two species) (Li et al., 2022) Doublon superpositions, entanglement Spectrum splitting, localization, entropy
Composite bosons (Lee et al., 2013) Coboson ladder eigenstates Bounded occupation, modified uncertainties
Damped oscillators (Mousavi, 2022) Cat-state superpositions Symmetry-dependent coherence, anti-bunching

These frameworks collectively illustrate how two-particle coherence merges wave-packet localization, quantum statistics, interaction-driven modulation, and correlation effects, providing detailed insight into multiparticle quantum dynamics across diverse physical platforms.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Two-Particle Coherent States.