Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Turyn Polynomials and the Quarter-Shift

Updated 14 July 2026
  • Turyn polynomials are shifted quadratic-character polynomials derived from the Legendre symbol and form a special case of mixed character-sum families.
  • Recent results prove that their normalized even L2k-norm profile is minimized at the quarter-shift (α = 1/4), confirming longtime conjectures in analytic number theory.
  • These polynomials connect to Littlewood constructions and Mahler’s problem, offering practical insights into flatness phenomena and autocorrelation sequence applications.

Searching arXiv for the cited Turyn-polynomial papers and closely related terminology. Turyn polynomials are most explicitly realized as shifted quadratic-character polynomials obtained from the Legendre symbol, and in contemporary analytic number theory they are treated both as special cases of incomplete mixed character sums and as near-Littlewood polynomials whose extremal behavior is governed by the choice of shift. For an odd prime pp, a standard form is

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),

where (⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right) is the Legendre symbol and a/p→αa/p\to\alpha is the normalized shift. In the broader framework of shifted character-sum polynomials, Turyn polynomials correspond to the case β=1\beta=1 in

S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),

so they sit naturally beside Fekete polynomials and other quadratic-character Littlewood-type constructions. Recent work establishes that, for every integer k≥2k\ge 2, the asymptotic normalized L2kL_{2k}-norm profile of Turyn polynomials is minimized at the quarter-shift α=14\alpha=\tfrac14, proving a conjecture of G\"unther and Schmidt (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025). Closely related work on Mahler’s problem shows that the same quarter-shift regime yields normalized Mahler measure exceeding $0.95$ after the standard one-coefficient correction that produces genuine Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),0-coefficient Littlewood polynomials (Mossinghoff, 2024).

1. Definition and placement within character-sum polynomial families

In the notation used for incomplete mixed character sums, the central object is

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),1

for a primitive Dirichlet character Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),2, where Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),3. This can be viewed as the polynomial

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),4

evaluated on the unit circle, and it “naturally generaliz[es] the well-known variants of Fekete (Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),5 and Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),6) and Turyn (Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),7) polynomials.” In this sense, Turyn polynomials are the Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),8 subfamily of shifted mixed character-sum polynomials (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

For quadratic characters, the relevant specialization is

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),9

where (⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)0 is the quadratic character modulo the prime (⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)1. The paper devoted to Mahler’s problem uses an equivalent cyclic-shift formulation based on the Fekete polynomial

(⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)2

and defines the Turyn polynomial by

(⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)3

with asymptotic shift parameter (⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)4 (Mossinghoff, 2024).

This family is therefore best understood as a shifted Legendre-symbol family. In the formulation

(⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)5

the parameter (⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)6 shifts the quadratic-character coefficients, and the normalized asymptotic location is (⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)7. The coefficients are essentially (⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)8, with the usual single zero arising from the Legendre symbol at the residue class (⋅p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)9; after excluding or correcting that coefficient in the standard way, these become Littlewood polynomials in the usual sense (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

A particularly important special case is the quarter-shift a/p→αa/p\to\alpha0. The modern literature repeatedly singles this out, both in norm-minimization results and in Mahler-measure computations, as the distinguished Turyn regime (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

2. Classical form, coefficient structure, and Littlewood-polynomial status

The explicit classical shifted Turyn polynomial appearing in recent analytic work is

a/p→αa/p\to\alpha1

Here the Legendre symbol furnishes a quadratic-character coefficient sequence. Since a/p→αa/p\to\alpha2, the unshifted Fekete polynomial has one zero coefficient and all other coefficients are a/p→αa/p\to\alpha3; the same phenomenon persists under cyclic shift for a/p→αa/p\to\alpha4, where exactly one coefficient is a/p→αa/p\to\alpha5, namely at the index where a/p→αa/p\to\alpha6 (Mossinghoff, 2024).

To obtain genuine Littlewood polynomials, one introduces the companion polynomials

a/p→αa/p\to\alpha7

These have all coefficients equal to a/p→αa/p\to\alpha8, and the asymptotic normalized a/p→αa/p\to\alpha9-norms and Mahler measure are unchanged by this one-term modification in the sense made precise by the asymptotic results (Mossinghoff, 2024).

The terminology “Turyn polynomial” is therefore exact in one well-defined sense: it denotes a cyclically shifted Fekete polynomial, equivalently a shifted quadratic-character polynomial with β=1\beta=10. At the same time, the broader Turyn literature contains adjacent but distinct objects. Turyn-type sequences are quadruples β=1\beta=11 whose associated sequence polynomials satisfy

β=1\beta=12

which is a different construction, although closely related in autocorrelation theory and Hadamard-matrix applications (Best et al., 2012).

A separate source of terminological ambiguity arises from Turán expressions, defined for a polynomial sequence β=1\beta=13 by

β=1\beta=14

These belong to the theory of Turán inequalities and weak Hurwitz stability and are unrelated to Turyn polynomials except for the similarity of names (Chasse et al., 2014).

3. Asymptotic β=1\beta=15-norm theory and the quarter-shift theorem

The central asymptotic extremal theorem for Turyn polynomials concerns their normalized even norms. The β=1\beta=16-norm convention is

β=1\beta=17

For Turyn polynomials, G\"unther and Schmidt established the existence of a limiting profile β=1\beta=18 via

β=1\beta=19

They verified for S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),0 that S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),1 is minimized at S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),2, and conjectured this for all S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),3. The recent resolution is the theorem

S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),4

which proves the conjecture in full (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

The statement is asymptotic rather than finite-S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),5. It identifies the minimizing shift of the limiting profile

S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),6

but does not assert that for every sufficiently large prime S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),7 the minimizing discrete shift must be exactly S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),8 or any related finite statement. The contribution is the exact asymptotic minimizer, not an explicit closed-form value of S(χ,α,β,θ)=∑αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),9 (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

The proof replaces the recursive combinatorics of G\"unther–Schmidt with a probabilistic representation derived from a quadratic random-process limit. For fixed k≥2k\ge 20 and k≥2k\ge 21, the random process k≥2k\ge 22 converges in distribution to

k≥2k\ge 23

where the k≥2k\ge 24 are independent k≥2k\ge 25-valued random variables. In the Turyn case k≥2k\ge 26, this yields a probabilistic model for the shifted quadratic polynomial (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

The limiting norm profile k≥2k\ge 27 is then rewritten as an expectation over a random Fourier-type series, and a moment expansion shows that only pairings survive because the independence of the k≥2k\ge 28 annihilates mixed terms unless indices occur in pairs. This reduces the minimization to the building block

k≥2k\ge 29

Using an integral representation derived from the Lerch transcendent, the analysis shows that this is minimized at L2kL_{2k}0, hence at L2kL_{2k}1, which propagates back to the full theorem (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

The quarter-shift theorem is therefore not merely a computational observation. It is an asymptotic extremal result valid for every even norm L2kL_{2k}2 with L2kL_{2k}3, and it supplies a conceptual explanation for the recurrent appearance of the quarter-shift in Turyn-polynomial flatness phenomena.

4. Flatness, Mahler measure, and record behavior near L2kL_{2k}4

The Mahler-measure viewpoint places Turyn polynomials inside Mahler’s problem for Littlewood polynomials. For a polynomial

L2kL_{2k}5

the Mahler measure is defined by

L2kL_{2k}6

equivalently

L2kL_{2k}7

For unimodular polynomials of degree L2kL_{2k}8, Parseval gives L2kL_{2k}9, so the natural normalized quantity is α=14\alpha=\tfrac140 (Mossinghoff, 2024).

Recent work analyzes Turyn polynomials through the random process

α=14\alpha=\tfrac141

where α=14\alpha=\tfrac142 are i.i.d. Rademacher random variables. For every α=14\alpha=\tfrac143 and every α=14\alpha=\tfrac144,

α=14\alpha=\tfrac145

where

α=14\alpha=\tfrac146

and for Mahler measure,

α=14\alpha=\tfrac147

where

α=14\alpha=\tfrac148

(Mossinghoff, 2024).

The numerical study reports that the data suggest α=14\alpha=\tfrac149 is increasing on $0.95$0, and for the quarter-shift it gives

$0.95$1

This is presented as a numerical estimate rather than a proved closed-form constant. The companion Littlewood polynomials $0.95$2 have the same asymptotic normalized Mahler measure, so the one-coefficient correction does not disturb the asymptotic value and yields a genuine $0.95$3-coefficient family with normalized Mahler measure exceeding $0.95$4 (Mossinghoff, 2024).

The asymptotic $0.95$5-norm minimization theorem provides an explanatory mechanism for this phenomenon. The quarter-shift Turyn polynomials are described as tending to be “somewhat flat,” and this flatness is presented as a natural reason to expect large Mahler measure. A plausible implication is that the Mahler-measure extremality and the even-norm extremality are manifestations of the same underlying distributional structure, though the Mahler result requires separate logarithmic analysis not used in the $0.95$6-proof (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

5. Autocorrelation, Barker sequences, and Turyn-type sequence constructions

Turyn’s name also appears prominently in low-autocorrelation sequence theory, which supplies an adjacent but distinct polynomial context. A binary sequence $0.95$7 has aperiodic autocorrelation

$0.95$8

and a Barker sequence is one for which

$0.95$9

Encoding the sequence by the polynomial

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),00

the autocorrelations appear in

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),01

This makes Barker-sequence theory directly relevant to Turyn-style polynomial questions, even though the resulting objects are not the shifted quadratic-character Turyn polynomials of the analytic number-theory literature (Schmidt et al., 2015).

The odd-length case of Turyn’s conjecture is completely settled: if there exists a Barker sequence of odd length Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),02, then Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),03. The proof in the modern treatment proceeds via run structure, parity, two Turyn–Storer identities, and an autocorrelation-difference contradiction, rather than the original more intricate induction (Schmidt et al., 2015).

A broader flatness-based argument for normalized Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),04-coefficient Littlewood polynomials asserts that there are no square Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),05-flat sequences

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),06

and derives as a consequence that there are only finitely many Barker sequences. In that framework, square Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),07-flatness is equivalent to Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),08, so long Barker-type perfection would force impossible asymptotic flatness (Abdalaoui, 2016).

Another adjacent construction is the theory of Turyn-type sequences Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),09, quadruples Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),10 of Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),11-sequences whose associated polynomials satisfy the norm identity

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),12

This polynomial formulation is explicit, and the paper develops an equivalence relation, a canonical form, enumeration up to Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),13, and the first example of Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),14. These objects are not the same as shifted Legendre-symbol Turyn polynomials, but they belong to the same autocorrelation-centered combinatorial ecosystem and share the Littlewood-polynomial perspective (Best et al., 2012).

6. Terminological distinctions and conceptual synthesis

The modern literature supports a precise but layered usage of the term “Turyn polynomials.” In analytic number theory, the term refers to shifted Fekete polynomials or, equivalently, shifted quadratic-character polynomials

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),15

with normalized shift Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),16, or to the equivalent form

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),17

This is the sense in which the quarter-shift theorem and the Mahler-measure record are formulated (Mossinghoff, 2024).

In combinatorial design theory and autocorrelation theory, however, Turyn’s name also labels other constructions: Turyn-type sequences, Turyn–Golay conjectures, and Turyn–Storer identities. These are polynomially encoded through autocorrelation or Laurent-norm identities, but they are structurally distinct from the shifted Legendre-symbol family (Best et al., 2012). A plausible implication is that the shared nomenclature reflects a common focus on Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),18-coefficients, flatness, autocorrelation, and extremal behavior rather than a single unified polynomial class.

A further distinction is necessary between Turyn and Turán. Turán expressions, such as

Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),19

belong to a different literature on weak Hurwitz stability, Bell polynomials, Chebyshev polynomials, and related zero-location problems. They are not Turyn polynomials, and the similarity of names is merely orthographic (Chasse et al., 2014).

Taken together, these strands show that Turyn polynomials occupy a central place at the interface of quadratic character sums, Littlewood polynomials, flatness theory, and autocorrelation extremals. Their most definitive modern property is now asymptotic: for every integer Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),20, the quarter-shift Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),21 uniquely minimizes the limiting normalized Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),22-norm profile Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),23 (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025). Their most prominent current application is to Mahler’s problem, where the same quarter-shift regime produces a genuine Littlewood family with asymptotic normalized Mahler measure about Fp,a(t)=∑n≤p(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),24 after the standard one-coefficient correction (Mossinghoff, 2024). This identifies the quarter-shifted Turyn family as a distinguished extremal locus within the broader theory of quadratic-character Littlewood polynomials.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Turyn Polynomials.