Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Turyn Polynomials and the Quarter-Shift

Updated 14 July 2026
  • Turyn polynomials are shifted quadratic-character polynomials derived from the Legendre symbol and form a special case of mixed character-sum families.
  • Recent results prove that their normalized even L2k-norm profile is minimized at the quarter-shift (α = 1/4), confirming longtime conjectures in analytic number theory.
  • These polynomials connect to Littlewood constructions and Mahler’s problem, offering practical insights into flatness phenomena and autocorrelation sequence applications.

Searching arXiv for the cited Turyn-polynomial papers and closely related terminology. Turyn polynomials are most explicitly realized as shifted quadratic-character polynomials obtained from the Legendre symbol, and in contemporary analytic number theory they are treated both as special cases of incomplete mixed character sums and as near-Littlewood polynomials whose extremal behavior is governed by the choice of shift. For an odd prime pp, a standard form is

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),

where (p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right) is the Legendre symbol and a/pαa/p\to\alpha is the normalized shift. In the broader framework of shifted character-sum polynomials, Turyn polynomials correspond to the case β=1\beta=1 in

S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),

so they sit naturally beside Fekete polynomials and other quadratic-character Littlewood-type constructions. Recent work establishes that, for every integer k2k\ge 2, the asymptotic normalized L2kL_{2k}-norm profile of Turyn polynomials is minimized at the quarter-shift α=14\alpha=\tfrac14, proving a conjecture of G\"unther and Schmidt (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025). Closely related work on Mahler’s problem shows that the same quarter-shift regime yields normalized Mahler measure exceeding $0.95$ after the standard one-coefficient correction that produces genuine Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),0-coefficient Littlewood polynomials (Mossinghoff, 2024).

1. Definition and placement within character-sum polynomial families

In the notation used for incomplete mixed character sums, the central object is

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),1

for a primitive Dirichlet character Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),2, where Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),3. This can be viewed as the polynomial

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),4

evaluated on the unit circle, and it “naturally generaliz[es] the well-known variants of Fekete (Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),5 and Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),6) and Turyn (Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),7) polynomials.” In this sense, Turyn polynomials are the Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),8 subfamily of shifted mixed character-sum polynomials (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

For quadratic characters, the relevant specialization is

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),9

where (p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)0 is the quadratic character modulo the prime (p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)1. The paper devoted to Mahler’s problem uses an equivalent cyclic-shift formulation based on the Fekete polynomial

(p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)2

and defines the Turyn polynomial by

(p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)3

with asymptotic shift parameter (p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)4 (Mossinghoff, 2024).

This family is therefore best understood as a shifted Legendre-symbol family. In the formulation

(p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)5

the parameter (p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)6 shifts the quadratic-character coefficients, and the normalized asymptotic location is (p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)7. The coefficients are essentially (p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)8, with the usual single zero arising from the Legendre symbol at the residue class (p)\left(\frac{\cdot}{p}\right)9; after excluding or correcting that coefficient in the standard way, these become Littlewood polynomials in the usual sense (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

A particularly important special case is the quarter-shift a/pαa/p\to\alpha0. The modern literature repeatedly singles this out, both in norm-minimization results and in Mahler-measure computations, as the distinguished Turyn regime (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

2. Classical form, coefficient structure, and Littlewood-polynomial status

The explicit classical shifted Turyn polynomial appearing in recent analytic work is

a/pαa/p\to\alpha1

Here the Legendre symbol furnishes a quadratic-character coefficient sequence. Since a/pαa/p\to\alpha2, the unshifted Fekete polynomial has one zero coefficient and all other coefficients are a/pαa/p\to\alpha3; the same phenomenon persists under cyclic shift for a/pαa/p\to\alpha4, where exactly one coefficient is a/pαa/p\to\alpha5, namely at the index where a/pαa/p\to\alpha6 (Mossinghoff, 2024).

To obtain genuine Littlewood polynomials, one introduces the companion polynomials

a/pαa/p\to\alpha7

These have all coefficients equal to a/pαa/p\to\alpha8, and the asymptotic normalized a/pαa/p\to\alpha9-norms and Mahler measure are unchanged by this one-term modification in the sense made precise by the asymptotic results (Mossinghoff, 2024).

The terminology “Turyn polynomial” is therefore exact in one well-defined sense: it denotes a cyclically shifted Fekete polynomial, equivalently a shifted quadratic-character polynomial with β=1\beta=10. At the same time, the broader Turyn literature contains adjacent but distinct objects. Turyn-type sequences are quadruples β=1\beta=11 whose associated sequence polynomials satisfy

β=1\beta=12

which is a different construction, although closely related in autocorrelation theory and Hadamard-matrix applications (Best et al., 2012).

A separate source of terminological ambiguity arises from Turán expressions, defined for a polynomial sequence β=1\beta=13 by

β=1\beta=14

These belong to the theory of Turán inequalities and weak Hurwitz stability and are unrelated to Turyn polynomials except for the similarity of names (Chasse et al., 2014).

3. Asymptotic β=1\beta=15-norm theory and the quarter-shift theorem

The central asymptotic extremal theorem for Turyn polynomials concerns their normalized even norms. The β=1\beta=16-norm convention is

β=1\beta=17

For Turyn polynomials, G\"unther and Schmidt established the existence of a limiting profile β=1\beta=18 via

β=1\beta=19

They verified for S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),0 that S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),1 is minimized at S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),2, and conjectured this for all S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),3. The recent resolution is the theorem

S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),4

which proves the conjecture in full (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

The statement is asymptotic rather than finite-S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),5. It identifies the minimizing shift of the limiting profile

S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),6

but does not assert that for every sufficiently large prime S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),7 the minimizing discrete shift must be exactly S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),8 or any related finite statement. The contribution is the exact asymptotic minimizer, not an explicit closed-form value of S(χ,α,β,θ)=αq<n<(α+β)qχ(n)e(nθ),S(\chi,\alpha,\beta,\theta)=\sum_{\alpha q<n<(\alpha+\beta)q}\chi(n)e(n\theta),9 (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

The proof replaces the recursive combinatorics of G\"unther–Schmidt with a probabilistic representation derived from a quadratic random-process limit. For fixed k2k\ge 20 and k2k\ge 21, the random process k2k\ge 22 converges in distribution to

k2k\ge 23

where the k2k\ge 24 are independent k2k\ge 25-valued random variables. In the Turyn case k2k\ge 26, this yields a probabilistic model for the shifted quadratic polynomial (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

The limiting norm profile k2k\ge 27 is then rewritten as an expectation over a random Fourier-type series, and a moment expansion shows that only pairings survive because the independence of the k2k\ge 28 annihilates mixed terms unless indices occur in pairs. This reduces the minimization to the building block

k2k\ge 29

Using an integral representation derived from the Lerch transcendent, the analysis shows that this is minimized at L2kL_{2k}0, hence at L2kL_{2k}1, which propagates back to the full theorem (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

The quarter-shift theorem is therefore not merely a computational observation. It is an asymptotic extremal result valid for every even norm L2kL_{2k}2 with L2kL_{2k}3, and it supplies a conceptual explanation for the recurrent appearance of the quarter-shift in Turyn-polynomial flatness phenomena.

4. Flatness, Mahler measure, and record behavior near L2kL_{2k}4

The Mahler-measure viewpoint places Turyn polynomials inside Mahler’s problem for Littlewood polynomials. For a polynomial

L2kL_{2k}5

the Mahler measure is defined by

L2kL_{2k}6

equivalently

L2kL_{2k}7

For unimodular polynomials of degree L2kL_{2k}8, Parseval gives L2kL_{2k}9, so the natural normalized quantity is α=14\alpha=\tfrac140 (Mossinghoff, 2024).

Recent work analyzes Turyn polynomials through the random process

α=14\alpha=\tfrac141

where α=14\alpha=\tfrac142 are i.i.d. Rademacher random variables. For every α=14\alpha=\tfrac143 and every α=14\alpha=\tfrac144,

α=14\alpha=\tfrac145

where

α=14\alpha=\tfrac146

and for Mahler measure,

α=14\alpha=\tfrac147

where

α=14\alpha=\tfrac148

(Mossinghoff, 2024).

The numerical study reports that the data suggest α=14\alpha=\tfrac149 is increasing on $0.95$0, and for the quarter-shift it gives

$0.95$1

This is presented as a numerical estimate rather than a proved closed-form constant. The companion Littlewood polynomials $0.95$2 have the same asymptotic normalized Mahler measure, so the one-coefficient correction does not disturb the asymptotic value and yields a genuine $0.95$3-coefficient family with normalized Mahler measure exceeding $0.95$4 (Mossinghoff, 2024).

The asymptotic $0.95$5-norm minimization theorem provides an explanatory mechanism for this phenomenon. The quarter-shift Turyn polynomials are described as tending to be “somewhat flat,” and this flatness is presented as a natural reason to expect large Mahler measure. A plausible implication is that the Mahler-measure extremality and the even-norm extremality are manifestations of the same underlying distributional structure, though the Mahler result requires separate logarithmic analysis not used in the $0.95$6-proof (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025).

5. Autocorrelation, Barker sequences, and Turyn-type sequence constructions

Turyn’s name also appears prominently in low-autocorrelation sequence theory, which supplies an adjacent but distinct polynomial context. A binary sequence $0.95$7 has aperiodic autocorrelation

$0.95$8

and a Barker sequence is one for which

$0.95$9

Encoding the sequence by the polynomial

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),00

the autocorrelations appear in

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),01

This makes Barker-sequence theory directly relevant to Turyn-style polynomial questions, even though the resulting objects are not the shifted quadratic-character Turyn polynomials of the analytic number-theory literature (Schmidt et al., 2015).

The odd-length case of Turyn’s conjecture is completely settled: if there exists a Barker sequence of odd length Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),02, then Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),03. The proof in the modern treatment proceeds via run structure, parity, two Turyn–Storer identities, and an autocorrelation-difference contradiction, rather than the original more intricate induction (Schmidt et al., 2015).

A broader flatness-based argument for normalized Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),04-coefficient Littlewood polynomials asserts that there are no square Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),05-flat sequences

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),06

and derives as a consequence that there are only finitely many Barker sequences. In that framework, square Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),07-flatness is equivalent to Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),08, so long Barker-type perfection would force impossible asymptotic flatness (Abdalaoui, 2016).

Another adjacent construction is the theory of Turyn-type sequences Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),09, quadruples Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),10 of Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),11-sequences whose associated polynomials satisfy the norm identity

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),12

This polynomial formulation is explicit, and the paper develops an equivalence relation, a canonical form, enumeration up to Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),13, and the first example of Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),14. These objects are not the same as shifted Legendre-symbol Turyn polynomials, but they belong to the same autocorrelation-centered combinatorial ecosystem and share the Littlewood-polynomial perspective (Best et al., 2012).

6. Terminological distinctions and conceptual synthesis

The modern literature supports a precise but layered usage of the term “Turyn polynomials.” In analytic number theory, the term refers to shifted Fekete polynomials or, equivalently, shifted quadratic-character polynomials

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),15

with normalized shift Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),16, or to the equivalent form

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),17

This is the sense in which the quarter-shift theorem and the Mahler-measure record are formulated (Mossinghoff, 2024).

In combinatorial design theory and autocorrelation theory, however, Turyn’s name also labels other constructions: Turyn-type sequences, Turyn–Golay conjectures, and Turyn–Storer identities. These are polynomially encoded through autocorrelation or Laurent-norm identities, but they are structurally distinct from the shifted Legendre-symbol family (Best et al., 2012). A plausible implication is that the shared nomenclature reflects a common focus on Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),18-coefficients, flatness, autocorrelation, and extremal behavior rather than a single unified polynomial class.

A further distinction is necessary between Turyn and Turán. Turán expressions, such as

Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),19

belong to a different literature on weak Hurwitz stability, Bell polynomials, Chebyshev polynomials, and related zero-location problems. They are not Turyn polynomials, and the similarity of names is merely orthographic (Chasse et al., 2014).

Taken together, these strands show that Turyn polynomials occupy a central place at the interface of quadratic character sums, Littlewood polynomials, flatness theory, and autocorrelation extremals. Their most definitive modern property is now asymptotic: for every integer Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),20, the quarter-shift Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),21 uniquely minimizes the limiting normalized Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),22-norm profile Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),23 (Bober et al., 7 Oct 2025). Their most prominent current application is to Mahler’s problem, where the same quarter-shift regime produces a genuine Littlewood family with asymptotic normalized Mahler measure about Fp,a(t)=np(n+ap)e(nt),F_{p,a}(t)=\sum_{n\le p}\left(\frac{n+a}{p}\right)e(nt),24 after the standard one-coefficient correction (Mossinghoff, 2024). This identifies the quarter-shifted Turyn family as a distinguished extremal locus within the broader theory of quadratic-character Littlewood polynomials.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Turyn Polynomials.