Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 150 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Tree-Like Shortcuttings: Sparse 1-Spanners

Updated 18 October 2025
  • The paper introduces tree-like shortcuttings that construct sparse 1-spanners by balancing constant hop-diameter with optimal treewidth, overcoming previous Ω(log n) limitations.
  • The methodology employs recursive decomposition and hierarchical clustering to achieve tight tradeoffs, with even k yielding O(k · log^(2/k) n) treewidth and odd k yielding O(k · (log n/log log n)^(2/(k-1))).
  • The findings offer practical insights for efficient routing, low-treewidth embeddings, and scalable network designs by ensuring uniform local sparsity via bounded arboricity and treewidth.

Tree-like shortcuttings of trees represent a systematic approach to constructing sparse 1-spanners for tree metrics that not only maintain short-hop paths but also ensure that the resultant shortcut graph remains structurally close to a tree, as measured by graph parameters such as arboricity and treewidth. Unlike traditional shortcutting approaches which may introduce locally dense regions, the tree-like paradigm emphasizes uniform local sparsity, providing substantial benefits for algorithmic applications that exploit tree-like structural properties.

1. Definitions and Concepts

Tree-like shortcuttings are distinguished from classical sparse shortcuttings by their emphasis on local structure and uniform sparsity. In standard shortcutting constructions, additional edges ("shortcuts") are added to a tree to ensure that the hop-diameter—the maximum number of edges traversed in any shortest-path between two vertices—is minimized, often to a constant, while preserving distances (stretch-1, i.e., each pair's shortest-path in the shortcut graph matches the tree metric). Classical results [Yao82, Cha87, AS87, BTS94] achieve near-optimal sparsity (e.g., O(nαk(n))O(n\alpha_k(n)) edges) but inevitably induce subgraphs where average degree is Ω(logn)Ω(\log n) for constant hop-diameter, which is a significant limitation for certain applications.

In contrast, tree-like shortcuttings impose additional constraints:

  • Arboricity: The maximum over all nontrivial subgraphs HH of the ratio E(H)/(V(H)1)|E(H)|/(|V(H)|-1); equivalently, the minimum number of edge-disjoint forests covering all edges.
  • Treewidth: The minimum width among all tree decompositions; bounded treewidth implies that many dynamic programming and decomposition-based algorithms are efficient.

Tree-like shortcuttings are 1-spanners for tree metrics (distance preservation) with constant hop-diameter, and their edges can be partitioned into a small number of forests (low arboricity) or have small treewidth, i.e., the shortcut graph remains tree-like not just globally but in every subgraph.

2. Key Results and Contributions

The principal technical contribution is the establishment of tight bounds for the tradeoff between hop-diameter (kk) and treewidth (or arboricity) in tree-like shortcuttings. For any nn-vertex tree and hop-diameter parameter k=O(loglogn)k = O(\log\log n), the following bounds hold:

  • Upper Bound: For even kk, the treewidth is O(klog2/kn)O(k \cdot \log^{2/k} n). For odd k3k \geq 3, O(k(lognloglogn)2/(k1))O\big(k \cdot (\frac{\log n}{\log\log n})^{2/(k-1)}\big).
  • Lower Bound: Any 1-spanner (even on line metrics) must have treewidth at least Ω(klog2/kn)Ω(k \cdot \log^{2/k} n).

This yields an optimal relationship, summarized as:

hop-diameter×treewidth=Ω((loglogn)2)\text{hop-diameter} \times \text{treewidth} = Ω((\log\log n)^2)

for all values of kk. This resolves an open question outlined in prior works ([FL22, Le23]), showing it is impossible to simultaneously have constant-hop and substantially sub-logarithmic treewidth in such shortcut graphs.

The constructions provided surpass previous Ω(logn)Ω(\log n) treewidth barriers for hop-diameter 2 spanners; e.g., hop-diameter 3 shortcuttings achieve treewidth O(logn/loglogn)O(\log n/\log\log n).

3. Applications and Implications

These results have direct and far-reaching implications:

  • Low-Treewidth Embeddings: Embedding planar and minor-free graphs using spanners with low treewidth and constant hop-diameter enables efficient algorithms for routing, distance labeling, and approximation schemes.
  • Compact Routing Schemes: With tree-like shortcuttings, a stretch-1 routing scheme on tree metrics in the fixed-port model can use O(log2n/loglogn)O(\log^2 n/\log\log n) bits per vertex and 3 hops, with extensions to doubling and Euclidean metrics.
  • Spanner Construction in Doubling and Minor-Free Metrics: By leveraging tree cover decompositions, tree-like shortcuttings yield uniformly sparse spanners for these broader metric classes, improving over previous constructions (e.g., Arya et al).
  • Distributed Network Design: The uniform sparsity prevents local congestion and enables scalable, resource-efficient protocols where per-node degree and memory (related to arboricity) are critical.

Algorithms that efficiently solve problems on graphs of bounded treewidth, such as dynamic programming or fixed-parameter tractable algorithms, are now applicable to these spanner constructions.

4. Methodological Advances

Tree-like shortcutting constructions involve intricate decompositions. The paper's constructions partition trees recursively, adding shortcuts so that the shortcut graph's edge set can be covered either by a bounded number of forests or ensure that a decomposition tree exists with bounded bag size. The underlying ideas often involve augmenting the tree with shortcut edges according to hierarchical clustering, recursive heavy path decompositions, and edge partitioning, thereby guaranteeing the required hop and sparsity properties.

Formally, for nn-vertex trees and various kk, the tradeoffs are provided by explicit formulas:

  • For even kk:

Wk(n)=O(klog2/kn)W_k(n) = O(k \cdot \log^{2/k} n)

  • For odd k3k \geq 3:

Wk(n)=O(k(lognloglogn)2/(k1))W_k(n) = O\left(k \cdot \left(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\right)^{2/(k-1)}\right)

Matching lower bounds guarantee these are tight.

5. Limitations and Contrast with Prior Work

Traditional shortcuttings achieve exceptional overall sparsity and constant hop-diameter but suffer from dense pockets—local regions where degrees are high (Ω(logn)Ω(\log n)), which is not conducive for algorithms sensitive to local structure. Tree-like shortcuttings overcome this by maintaining uniform sparsity, quantified by bounded arboricity and treewidth. The impossibility results established in this work show that one cannot improve upon the optimal (loglogn)2(\log\log n)^2 product for hop-diameter and treewidth, even when considering line metrics.

6. Future Directions

A number of promising avenues arise from these results:

  • Extension to Broader Graph Classes: Investigating whether tree-like shortcuttings with comparable bounds can be realized for non-tree networks, beyond those amenable to tree embeddings (e.g., general minor-free or high-genus graphs).
  • Dynamic Maintenance: Developing algorithms to maintain tree-like shortcuttings efficiently in dynamic or online networks as topology evolves.
  • Constant Factor Improvements: While bounds are asymptotic, improving constants and practical performance in distributed implementations remains of interest.
  • Algorithmic Applications: Leveraging these constructions for more efficient algorithms in routing, clustering, and distance approximation, particularly in models that benefit from treewidth limitations.

Summary

Tree-like shortcuttings of trees offer an optimal method to construct hop-efficient, uniformly sparse 1-spanners by balancing hop-diameter, arboricity, and treewidth. The key contribution is tight bounds resolving a longstanding open question: for all nn-vertex trees and all hop-diameter k=O(loglogn)k = O(\log\log n), one achieves the optimal tradeoff hop-diameter×treewidth=Ω((loglogn)2)\text{hop-diameter}\times\text{treewidth} = Ω((\log\log n)^2). These constructions impact a broad spectrum of areas, including graph embedding, routing, and dynamic programming, and provide a foundation for future exploration into sparsity and efficiency in graph algorithms and network design (Le et al., 16 Oct 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Tree-Like Shortcuttings of Trees.