Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 178 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 56 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 445 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Time-Non-Local Stationary-Action Framework

Updated 14 November 2025
  • The framework is a variational formalism for coarse-grained models that captures memory effects through time-non-local action functionals.
  • It systematically derives Generalized Langevin Equations with data-driven memory kernels, ensuring both equilibrium structure and dynamic fidelity.
  • Validated on coarse-grained water, the approach outperforms traditional models by accurately reproducing time-dependent correlations.

The time-non-local stationary-action framework is a variational formalism for coarse-grained (CG) models that accounts for memory effects arising from integrating out microscopic degrees of freedom. By expressing the effective dynamics of CG variables through a stationarity principle applied to a non-local action functional, this approach facilitates the systematic derivation and parametrization of Generalized Langevin Equations (GLEs) with data-driven memory kernels. The framework addresses fundamental dynamical shortcomings of traditional CG methodologies that rely on local-in-time action principles, providing a route to models that maintain both equilibrium structure and realistic time-dependent correlations.

1. Motivation for Time-Non-Local Action Functionals

Standard classical mechanics postulates a time-local action,

S[q]=0TdtL(q(t),q˙(t)),S[q] = \int_0^T dt\, L(q(t), \dot{q}(t)),

whose stationarity under variations of q(t)q(t) yields ordinary Euler–Lagrange equations:

ddt(Lq˙)Lq=0.\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\right) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} = 0.

However, when constructing CG models of soft matter by partitioning the system into “slow” CG variables R(t)R(t) and “fast” microscopic variables q(t)q(t), the projection formalism of Mori–Zwanzig leads to effective equations of motion with memory:

MR¨(t)=U(R(t))0t ⁣dsK(ts)R˙(s)+ξ(t),M \ddot{R}(t) = -\nabla U(R(t)) - \int_0^t \! ds\, K(t-s)\, \dot{R}(s) + \xi(t),

where K(τ)K(\tau) is a friction (memory) kernel, and ξ(t)\xi(t) is temporally correlated noise consistent with fluctuation–dissipation constraints, ξ(t+τ)ξ(t)=kBTK(τ)\langle \xi(t+\tau)\, \xi(t) \rangle = k_B T\, K(\tau). Since no time-local action functional S[R]S[R] can generate the memory (non-Markovian) term via its Euler–Lagrange equations, a variational formulation must explicitly incorporate the full past history of RR. This necessitates the development of time-non-local (“history-dependent”) action functionals to recover GLEs from stationary-action principles.

2. Construction of the Time-Non-Local Action Functional

The effective time-non-local action functional employed in the stationary-action framework is formulated as:

Σ[R,R˙;ζ]=0Tdt[KR(R˙(t))U(R(t))]+I=1NB0Tdt  R˙I(t)0tdsQ(ts;ζ)R˙I(s)+I=1NB0TdtξI(t;ζ)RI(t).\Sigma[ R, \dot{R}; \zeta ] = \int_0^T dt\, [ K_R(\dot{R}(t)) - U(R(t)) ] + \sum_{I=1}^{N_B} \int_0^T dt \;\dot{R}_I(t) \cdot \int_0^t ds\, Q(t-s; \zeta)\, \dot{R}_I(s) + \sum_{I=1}^{N_B} \int_0^T dt\, \xi_I(t; \zeta) \cdot R_I(t).

where:

  • KR(R˙)=IM2R˙I2K_R(\dot{R}) = \sum_I \frac{M}{2}|\dot{R}_I|^2 is the CG kinetic energy,
  • U(R)=I<JU2(RIRJ)U(R) = \sum_{I<J} U_2(|R_I - R_J|) is a two-body CG potential typically constructed via iterative Boltzmann inversion (IBI) from all-atom statistics,
  • Q(τ;ζ)Q(\tau; \zeta) is a memory-potential, with dQ/dτ=K(τ;ζ)dQ/d\tau = K(\tau; \zeta),
  • ξI(t;ζ)\xi_I(t;\zeta) is a realization of colored noise.

In condensed notation,

Σ[R]=0Tdt(KR(R˙)U(R))+120Tdt0TdsR˙(t)Q(ts;ζ)R˙(s)+0Tdtξ(t;ζ)R(t),\Sigma[R] = \int_0^T dt\, (K_R(\dot{R}) - U(R)) + \frac{1}{2} \int_0^T dt \int_0^T ds\, \dot{R}(t) \cdot Q(t-s; \zeta) \cdot \dot{R}(s) + \int_0^T dt\, \xi(t; \zeta) \cdot R(t),

highlighting the locality of the kinetic and potential terms and the non-locality of the dissipative and noise contributions.

3. Derivation of the Generalized Langevin Equation

Stationarity of the time-non-local action is formulated via a generalized Euler–Lagrange equation (cf. Ferialdi–Bassi, 2012):

δΣδRI(σ)ddσ[δΣδR˙I(σ)]=0,\frac{\delta \Sigma}{\delta R_I(\sigma)} - \frac{d}{d\sigma}\left[ \frac{\delta \Sigma}{\delta \dot{R}_I(\sigma)} \right] = 0,

for every σ[0,T]\sigma \in [0, T]. Key steps in the derivation are:

  1. Variation of RI(σ)RI(σ)+ϵη(σ)R_I(\sigma) \to R_I(\sigma) + \epsilon\, \eta(\sigma) and expansion of Σ\Sigma to first order in ϵ\epsilon;
  2. Extraction of a local term yielding MR¨I+IUM\ddot{R}_I + \partial_I U;
  3. Reorganization of the non-local double integral, contributing 0σdsK(σs)R˙I(s)\int_0^\sigma ds\, K(\sigma - s)\, \dot{R}_I(s);
  4. Contribution of the colored noise term as +ξI(σ)+\xi_I(\sigma).

Assembling these, the resulting equation of motion for each II becomes:

MR¨I(σ)=RIU(R(σ))0σdsK(σs)R˙I(s)+ξI(σ),M \ddot{R}_I(\sigma) = -\partial_{R_I} U(R(\sigma)) - \int_0^\sigma ds\, K(\sigma-s)\, \dot{R}_I(s) + \xi_I(\sigma),

which is the GLE associated with the Mori–Zwanzig projection.

4. Mori–Zwanzig Projection Formalism and Action Equivalence

Mori–Zwanzig theory employs projection operators PP and Q=1PQ=1-P to distinguish CG variables in phase space. The procedure recasts the microscopic dynamics (Liouville equation) into equations for the projected variables, yielding a dynamical equation with explicit memory and a Q-projected orthogonal force:

R˙I=PI/M,P˙I=IU(R)0tdsK(ts)PI(s)/M+ξI(t).\dot{R}_I = P_I/M,\quad \dot{P}_I = -\partial_I U(R) - \int_0^t ds\, K(t-s)\, P_I(s)/M + \xi_I(t).

Within the stationary-action construction, the “memory functional” 0tdsQ(ts)R˙(s)\int_0^t ds\, Q(t-s)\dot{R}(s) and the colored noise ξR\xi \cdot R correspond to the back-reaction of the fast variables as projected by QQ. Thus, enforcing stationarity of the time-non-local action is equivalent to enforcing the projected Mori–Zwanzig GLE, establishing a formal equivalence between the variational and projection-operator approaches.

5. Data-Driven Optimization of the Memory Kernel

The memory kernel K(t;ζ)K(t; \zeta) is parameterized as

K(t;ζ)=g(t;a)b(t;{b0,...,bM1}),g(t;a)=eat2,b(tk)=bk,tk=kΔt,K(t; \zeta) = g(t; a)\, b(t; \{b_0, ..., b_{M-1}\}),\quad g(t; a) = e^{-a t^2},\quad b(t_k) = b_k,\, t_k = k\Delta t,

with parameter set ζ={a,b0,...,bM1}\zeta = \{a, b_0, ..., b_{M-1}\}. The action Σ\Sigma is discretized along mapped CG trajectories {RI(nΔt)}n=0N\{R_I(n\Delta t)\}_{n=0}^N produced from atomistic molecular dynamics in the NVE ensemble. The optimization objective is to enforce

Σζiζ=ζ=0\left. \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial \zeta_i} \right|_{\zeta = \zeta^*} = 0

subject to:

  • non-negativity, K(tk;ζ)0K(t_k;\zeta) \geq 0;
  • preservation of the Green–Kubo integral for the diffusion coefficient, 0dtK(t;ζ)= const\int_0^\infty dt\, K(t;\zeta) = \text{ const};
  • optional smoothness/Tikhonov regularization for {bk}\{b_k\}.

Practically, a derivative-free optimizer, such as Nelder–Mead, is employed to solve for ζ\zeta^*. The optimized kernel K(t)K^*(t) and noise ξ(t)\xi^*(t) are then used in the CG GLE integrator, ensuring the dynamical consistency of the CG model.

6. Application to Coarse-Grained Water

The framework is applied to a system of 1,001 SPC/E water molecules at 298 K in a periodic cubic box. CG mapping is performed by assigning each molecule to a single bead at its center of mass. The two-body CG potential U2(R)U_2(R) is calibrated by Iterative Boltzmann Inversion (IBI) utilizing the all-atom center-of-mass radial distribution function g(R)g(R). The parameters (K(t;ζ),ξ(t;ζ))(K(t;\zeta),\, \xi(t;\zeta)) are determined by minimizing the non-local action over the atomistic trajectory mapped to CG variables.

Key outcomes include:

  • The CG GLE accurately reproduces the atomistic velocity autocorrelation function (VACF) C(t)C(t), including its negative lobe, whereas a traditional Langevin CG model with constant friction does not;
  • Both GLE and standard Langevin CG schemes preserve the diffusion constant and static pair distribution g(R)g(R);
  • Only the GLE captures correct time-dependent dynamical correlations, establishing its superiority for dynamical fidelity.

Elevating the projected Mori–Zwanzig GLE to a time-non-local stationary-action framework and optimizing the parameters on mapped atomistic trajectories yields a CG model that is both structurally and dynamically consistent with its microscopic reference.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Time-Non-Local Stationary-Action Framework.