Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Time Cholesteric Dynamics

Updated 6 July 2026
  • Time cholesteric is a class of liquid crystals characterized by dynamic control of helical order, defect evolution, and pitch switching via external stimuli.
  • Experimental studies using electric-field and UV-induced photochemistry reveal non-equilibrium responses, including metastable defect states and branch selection.
  • Continuum models based on Landau–de Gennes theory capture the interplay of elastic, anchoring, and field effects, elucidating temporal switching kinetics and defect transport.

Searching arXiv for recent and relevant papers on cholesteric systems with temporal switching, time-dependent fields, and pitch transitions. “Time cholesteric” is an Editor’s term for cholesteric liquid-crystalline systems in which the helical state, defect population, or effective pitch is explicitly driven as a function of time by external control fields. In the literature considered here, the temporal degree of freedom is introduced through electric-field switching and rotation in cholesteric droplets and colloid-doped hosts, and through UV-induced photochemical conversion that changes the equilibrium pitch in planar cells. Across these cases, the central problem is not the static cholesteric texture alone, but the kinetics of branch selection, defect transport, metastable trapping, and relaxation under time-dependent forcing (Fadda et al., 2017).

1. Temporal control of cholesteric order

Cholesterics are characterized by a preferred twist q0=2π/p0q_0=2\pi/p_0 or q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_0, depending on notation, and by a competition between bulk elastic preference, surface anchoring, and external fields. In the droplet formulation, the concentration field ϕ\phi distinguishes a cholesteric droplet from the surrounding isotropic fluid, while the tensor order parameter QαβQ_{\alpha\beta} resolves orientational order and defects. In the photosensitive planar-cell formulation, the key variable is the evolving pitch P(t)P(t), inferred from polarimetry and compared with the equilibrium pitch P0(t)P_0(t) set by photochemistry. In colloidal dispersions, time-dependent fields reorganize both defect topology and particle positions (Orlova et al., 2013).

The common physical pattern is a driven mismatch between the instantaneous preferred twist and the twist or defect arrangement actually realized by the system. In a droplet under a uniform or rotating electric field, the mismatch appears through elastic deformation, defect dragging, and ON–OFF hysteresis. In a photosensitive cell, the mismatch is between the free twisting number ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_0 and the realized half-turn number ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P, with jump-like transitions controlled by anchoring energy. In colloidal cholesterics, the mismatch is generated by time-dependent electric forcing that repeatedly unwinds and rewinds the host, producing a sequence of metastable equilibria rather than a unique steady state (D'Adamo et al., 2015).

A plausible implication is that “time cholesteric” behavior is best understood as a non-equilibrium cholesteric response problem in which temporal forcing selects among many elastic and topological states rather than merely perturbing a single equilibrium texture.

2. Continuum descriptions and governing equations

The droplet and colloidal studies both employ Landau–de Gennes QQ-tensor theory with dielectric coupling to the electric field. For a cholesteric droplet of volume VV immersed in an isotropic fluid, the free energy is written as (Fadda et al., 2017)

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_00

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_01

Here q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_02 denotes planar anchoring and q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_03 homeotropic anchoring. The same dielectric coupling term,

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_04

also appears in the colloidal study, where the total free energy is decomposed into bulk, elastic, and field contributions (D'Adamo et al., 2015).

The droplet dynamics are governed by the Beris–Edwards equation

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_05

with molecular field

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_06

and co-rotational term

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_07

where q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_08. The fluid is incompressible and obeys Navier–Stokes with q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_09 (Fadda et al., 2017).

By contrast, the colloidal field-driven study uses purely relaxational dynamics for ϕ\phi0,

ϕ\phi1

while colloid centers obey overdamped Langevin dynamics with Stokes drag ϕ\phi2 (D'Adamo et al., 2015). This distinction separates hydrodynamically coupled switching in droplets from defect-mediated assembly in a model where particle motion is overdamped.

Several dimensionless groups recur. In the droplet problem, the Ericksen number is

ϕ\phi3

and the dimensionless field strength is

ϕ\phi4

The chirality parameter satisfies ϕ\phi5 for ϕ\phi6–0.01 and ϕ\phi7 or ϕ\phi8 (Fadda et al., 2017). In the colloidal study,

ϕ\phi9

and a bulk cholesteric–nematic reorientation occurs when QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}0 exceeds a threshold QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}1 (D'Adamo et al., 2015).

3. Switching kinetics in cholesteric droplets

The droplet study resolves an ON–OFF protocol: the system starts from equilibrium at QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}2, the field is switched ON at QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}3, the system is allowed to reach a new steady ON state after QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}4, the field is then switched OFF at QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}5, and relaxation is monitored over QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}6. For typical cases with QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}7, QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}8, and QαβQ_{\alpha\beta}9, field orientation relative to the cholesteric axis is decisive (Fadda et al., 2017).

When the field is parallel to the cholesteric axis, P(t)P(t)0–5 gives P(t)P(t)1, and OFF relaxation is P(t)P(t)2. Under these conditions, metastable defect structures form and the OFF-state elastic free energy satisfies P(t)P(t)3. When the field is perpendicular to the cholesteric axis, defect motion is negligible, the director is nearly nematic uniform, and both P(t)P(t)4 and P(t)P(t)5 are P(t)P(t)6 (Fadda et al., 2017).

The basic hydrodynamic and diffusive scales contextualize these switching times. With P(t)P(t)7, P(t)P(t)8, and P(t)P(t)9, the characteristic hydrodynamic time is P0(t)P_0(t)0, while the diffusive time for P0(t)P_0(t)1 is P0(t)P_0(t)2. Rotational viscosity P0(t)P_0(t)3 Poise corresponds to P0(t)P_0(t)4 in simulation units (Fadda et al., 2017). The fact that switching and recovery occur over P0(t)P_0(t)5-scale intervals rather than P0(t)P_0(t)6-scale intervals suggests that elastic restructuring and defect kinetics, rather than only viscous momentum relaxation, dominate the temporal response.

A compact summary of representative switching outcomes is given below.

Anchoring Field direction Outcome
homeotropic P0(t)P_0(t)7 new metastable
homeotropic P0(t)P_0(t)8 near-surface defects return partially
tangential P0(t)P_0(t)9 partial twist reversal
free ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_00 cholesteric axis rotated by ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_01

These outcomes indicate that field direction and anchoring do not merely alter switching speed; they determine whether the droplet returns toward equilibrium, rotates its cholesteric axis, or becomes trapped in a defect-rich metastable state (Fadda et al., 2017).

4. Rotating fields, periodic response, and defect transport

Under a rotating electric field of varying frequency, the droplet and its defects rotate as well, typically at lower speed than the field because of the inertia of the liquid crystal. If the surface anchoring is homeotropic, a periodic motion is found (Fadda et al., 2017). The principal control parameter is the field frequency ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_02, which enters through the Ericksen number ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_03.

For ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_04, the measured droplet angular velocity ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_05 depends strongly on anchoring. At ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_06, ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_07 for tangential anchoring and ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_08 for homeotropic anchoring; at ν0=2D/P0\nu_0=2D/P_09, the corresponding values are ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P0 and ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P1; at ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P2, ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P3 and ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P4; and at ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P5, ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P6 and ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P7. The associated Ericksen numbers are ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P8, ν=2D/P\nu=2D/P9, QQ0, and QQ1 (Fadda et al., 2017).

For QQ2, the response is linear, QQ3, with QQ4 for tangential anchoring and QQ5 for homeotropic anchoring. Above QQ6, inertial and frictional effects saturate QQ7 (Fadda et al., 2017). This separates a low-QQ8 regime in which the droplet approximately tracks the forcing from a high-QQ9 regime in which elastic and dissipative limitations cap the rotational response.

A similar temporal logic appears in the colloidal study, but there the field waveform itself becomes a design parameter. The electric field is prescribed as VV0, with square-wave or sine-wave modulation. Because VV1, the even-harmonic content of the waveform affects cholesteric–nematic switching and the defect free-energy landscape. For a pulsed field of duration VV2 along VV3, a near-threshold field partially unwinds the host and nucleates disconnected twist-lines, whereas a strong field yields a nearly perfect nematic host with a Saturn-ring VV4 disclination around the particle. After field removal, the system does not fully rewind to the initial cholesteric configuration but becomes trapped in metastable states, including stacked loops or a glassy amorphous network of disclinations (D'Adamo et al., 2015).

In steady cyclic driving, a square wave produces a two-state oscillation between a Saturn-ring state and a stacked-loop state, with negligible colloid motion, whereas a sine wave generates transient three-hoop configurations and a more intricate three-dimensional defect network growing and dissolving each cycle (D'Adamo et al., 2015). This establishes a broader temporal-control principle: the waveform, not only the amplitude, is a selector of accessible topological pathways.

5. Anchoring as a selector of temporal branches

Surface anchoring is the principal selector of defect topology and reversibility. In droplets, homeotropic anchoring yields many surface-pinned VV5 and twist disclinations; under a field parallel to the cholesteric axis, these are dragged into the bulk and can form hyperbolic hedgehogs. The OFF states are strongly metastable and not easily restored. Tangential anchoring produces fewer defects, such as VV6 or VV7 pairs; under a parallel field, bulk bend stripes appear in the ON state, but relaxation returns almost fully to equilibrium. Free surfaces are defect-free, and ON–OFF cycles simply rotate the cholesteric axis by VV8 (Fadda et al., 2017).

In planar cells, the same anchoring issue appears in a different mathematical form. The Rapini–Papoular surface anchoring potential is

VV9

and the actual twist q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_000 minimizes

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_001

For strong symmetric anchoring, the half-turn number is locked to an integer,

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_002

For semistrong anchoring, the equilibrium condition becomes

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_003

with stability condition

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_004

These relations predict continuous branches of q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_005 versus q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_006 that terminate in fold-type instabilities, forcing jump-like pitch transitions (Orlova et al., 2013).

For the asymmetric semistrong cell, one substrate is strong and the other has q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_007, giving q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_008 and q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_009. The fitted stable branches satisfy

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_010

Successive jumps occur only between adjacent integer branches, q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_011 (Orlova et al., 2013). In the symmetric strong–strong cell, by contrast, the system follows the integer-step model q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_012, with jumps when q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_013 crosses a half-integer average of neighboring branches (Orlova et al., 2013).

Taken together, these results show that anchoring does not simply alter boundary conditions; it sets the admissible temporal branches along which the cholesteric can evolve. In droplets, this branch selection appears as defect-rich metastable recovery versus near-complete restoration. In planar cells, it appears as integer locking versus fold-limited continuous evolution.

6. Photochemical pitch dynamics and measurement of q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_014

The photosensitive cholesteric system of Orlova et al. introduces time dependence through UV-driven isomerization of the chiral dopant. The two relevant species are 7-DHC, with concentration q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_015 and right-handed chirality, and tachysterol, with concentration q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_016 and left-handed chirality. Under UV irradiation at q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_017, the dominant process is essentially irreversible photo-isomerization,

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_018

so that

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_019

The instantaneous equilibrium pitch follows the helical-twisting-power relation

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_020

with q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_021 for 7-DHC and q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_022 for tachysterol (Orlova et al., 2013).

The actual pitch q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_023 is then extracted polarimetrically. For normally incident linearly polarized He–Ne light at q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_024, the transmitted field becomes elliptically polarized. In the circular basis,

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_025

where q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_026, q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_027 is the misalignment between rubbing and incident polarization, and q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_028 is the rotating-wave transmission matrix. The ellipticity is

q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_029

Experimentally, one measures q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_030 after each UV dose and inverts the numerically computed function q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_031 through a lookup table generated by exact transfer-matrix calculations, thereby obtaining q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_032 (Orlova et al., 2013).

The physical interpretation given in the source is explicit: as the UV-driven reaction shifts the equilibrium twist q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_033 from large positive to large negative, the cell passes from right-handed helices through the unwound nematic state to left-handed helices. Strong anchoring enforces integer half-turn numbers and therefore discrete jumps, while finite anchoring allows continuous distortion on each branch until a fold instability triggers a first-order transition (Orlova et al., 2013). This is a canonical realization of time-dependent cholesteric behavior in which the temporal driver is chemical rather than electrical.

7. Metastability, assembly, and device-relevant implications

Across droplets, planar cells, and colloid-doped cholesterics, the recurring motif is a free-energy landscape containing many competing metastable equilibria. In droplets with homeotropic anchoring and a field parallel to the cholesteric axis, the system becomes stuck in metastable states rich in topological defects; when the field is perpendicular to the cholesteric axis, the effect on defect dynamics is usually negligible (Fadda et al., 2017). In colloidal hosts, time-dependent electric fields drive the system reproducibly out of equilibrium through different kinetic pathways, generating states that range from Saturn rings to amorphous defect networks and stacks of disclination loops (D'Adamo et al., 2015).

The colloidal work further shows that these non-equilibrium pathways can reposition particles. In a colloidal dimer, each field switch produces an impulsive defect-mediated force of order q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_034–q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_035 pN, and after a few cycles the particles line up along the field direction in a columnar stack even though this has higher free energy than the starting state. In a dilute suspension of many colloids, square-wave cycles along q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_036 assemble straight columns, and subsequent cycles along q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_037 and q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_038 reorganize those columns into planar sheets (D'Adamo et al., 2015). The proposed mechanism is a competition between the field-on impulse, which creates Saturn-ring or figure-eight structures and pulls particles in the plane orthogonal to the field, and the field-off impulse, which releases stored elastic energy, produces multiple loops and network segments, and preferentially displaces particles along the field axis.

Several design rules stated in the source define the operational regime. The threshold coupling for cholesteric-to-nematic switching is q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_039, and robust Saturn-ring formation requires q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_040. The pulse-on time should exceed the cholesteric relaxation time q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_041, while the pulse-off time should be long enough, q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_042, to allow loop nucleation. Square-wave driving yields the most reproducible two-state hopping, whereas sine waves populate more intermediate metastables and can impart stronger impulses. Hydrodynamic simulations confirm the same two competing impulses and show that viscous backflow can enhance net displacement (D'Adamo et al., 2015).

A common misconception is that time-dependent forcing simply accelerates equilibration to the nearest cholesteric state. The cited studies show the opposite in several regimes: forcing can stabilize defect-rich OFF states, rotate the cholesteric axis by q0=2π/P0q_0=2\pi/P_043, induce branch-jump hysteresis in the half-turn number, or assemble colloids into structures of higher free energy than the initial configuration (Fadda et al., 2017). This suggests that temporal control in cholesterics is fundamentally a problem of path dependence and state selection. In that sense, “time cholesteric” behavior denotes a class of driven cholesteric phenomena in which the chronology of the stimulus—its direction, amplitude, frequency, waveform, and anchoring context—is part of the state definition itself.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Time Cholesteric.