Temporal Retrieval & Alignment (TRAKE)

• TRAKE is a framework that retrieves and temporally aligns semantically equivalent event sequences across multimodal datasets using modular architectures.
• It leverages dynamic programming, hierarchical tree alignment, and frequency-domain encoding to enforce chronological order and enhance retrieval accuracy.
• Practical applications span video search, sports analytics, and motion-language modeling, demonstrating significant performance gains and real-time scalability.

Temporal Retrieval and Alignment of Key Events (TRAKE) is a class of methodologies and evaluation protocols that address the retrieval and precise alignment of events or event sequences across time in multimodal datasets. TRAKE tasks arise in domains including video search, multi-agent spatiotemporal tracking, cross-modal language-motion modeling, topic/event detection in text corpora, and cyclic or episodic retrieval in sequential models. The overarching challenge is to find, synchronize, and index semantically or structurally analogous event sequences, often across large datasets, ensuring accurate temporal coherence and correspondence despite confounding factors such as agent identity permutation, event chronology, or out-of-knowledge (OOK) queries.

1. Foundational Concepts and Problem Scope

TRAKE tasks generalize the core retrieval objective by enforcing temporal order and event-level matching within retrieved documents, segments, or sequences. In video and sports analytics, TRAKE entails identifying and retrieving short clips oriented around key events (e.g., a basketball pass or shot), then aligning their temporal boundaries and agent trajectories so that semantically equivalent occurrences co-occur in time (Sha et al., 2017, Douze et al., 2015). In motion-language alignment, TRAKE extends conventional contrastive retrieval by requiring not only cross-modal matching of motions and texts but also discernment of the precise chronological ordering of compound actions (Fujiwara et al., 2024). In video corpus search, TRAKE equates to the Alignable Video Retrieval (AVR) task, wherein both retrieval and fine-grained temporal synchronization are unified (Dave et al., 2024). For topic detection and tracking (TDT), TRAKE involves clustering stories by both event and reporting time, fusing temporal and semantic cues (Jiang et al., 2021). In transformer and state-space LLMs, TRAKE examines the system's capacity for episodic retrieval governed by temporal rather than semantic anchors (Bajaj et al., 26 Oct 2025).

2. Core System Architectures and Preprocessing Pipelines

Modern TRAKE systems employ modular architectures encompassing preprocessing, embedding, indexing, and retrieval components. An exemplar implementation (Luu et al., 15 Dec 2025) initiates with shot segmentation using TransNetV2, extracting four keyframes per scene via:

$$k_{\mathrm{extract}} = \{ K_{a + \lfloor i \cdot (b - a)/3 \rfloor} \mid i \in \{0,1,2,3\}\}$$

On-screen text is extracted from each keyframe using Gemini OCR and indexed with a dedicated tokenizer in Elasticsearch. Visual features are embedded with the BEiT-3 model; L₂-normalized vectors are stored in Milvus for fast approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search. Ancillary metadata (image paths, temporal bounds $s_v, e_v$) reside in MongoDB. Retrieval returns a ranked list of keyframe IDs, which undergo "hydration" by fetching their associated timestamps, video IDs, OCR text, and file paths before presentation.

In spatiotemporal sports analytics, preprocessing involves extracting per-agent trajectories as

$$T = \{ x_i(t) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid i = 1 \ldots M, t \in 1 \ldots F \}$$

with event-centric windows centered on annotated timestamps (Sha et al., 2017).

Video alignment pipelines frequently utilize dense frame descriptors (e.g., Multi-VLAD, SIFT, HOF) subject to PCA+whitening and ℓ₂ normalization, assembling $x \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times N}$ as the video representation (Douze et al., 2015).

3. Retrieval Algorithms and Temporal Alignment Methods

TRAKE integrates advanced retrieval and alignment methods tailored to problem domain:

• QUEST Framework for OOK Queries:

The two-branch QUEST system (Luu et al., 15 Dec 2025) addresses knowledge gaps by (1) rewriting user queries via a LLM to generate visually explicit descriptions, and (2) retrieving external image exemplars to facilitate image-to-image search. Both branches operate in parallel, merging and deduplicating results.

• Hierarchical Tree-Based Trajectory Alignment:

For multi-agent scenarios, the permutation ambiguity in agent identities is resolved by building recursive EM-based template trees. Query-time alignment follows a coarse-to-fine procedure using successive Hungarian algorithm stages, followed by hash-based candidate retrieval and permutation-consistent scoring (Sha et al., 2017).

• Dynamic Programming for Narrative Event Sequences (DANTE Algorithm):

To temporally align a sequence of $N$ event descriptions $(u_1, ..., u_N)$ with a single candidate, DANTE constructs a similarity matrix:

$S[i,t] = \mathrm{cosine\_similarity}(u_i, E[t])$

and iteratively updates the DP state via

$$DP[i,t] = S[i,t] + \max_{\tau \in [s_v, t-1]} ( DP[i-1, \tau] - \lambda \cdot (t - \tau) )$$

where $\lambda$ penalizes temporal jumps, enforcing ordered alignment of query events to video keyframes (Luu et al., 15 Dec 2025). The computational complexity is $O(NT)$.

• Frequency-Domain Circulant Encoding and Product Quantization:

Large-scale temporal alignment leverages circulant matrix properties to efficiently compute cross-correlations and offsets in Fourier space, allowing sub-second retrieval. Matching scores are computed as

$$s^{\lambda}(q, b) = \mathrm{IDFT} \left( \sum_{i}^{d} \mathrm{conj}(Q_i) \odot B_i / D \right)$$

with $D$ a regularizer, and global video alignments resolved via maximum spanning trees over pairwise offsets (Douze et al., 2015).

• Dynamic Relative Alignment Quality (DRAQ) in Video Retrieval:

The DRAQ metric ranks database clips by the ratio of optimal DTW cost to random path costs, ensuring the selected clip is truly alignable and suitable for temporal warping (Dave et al., 2024).

4. Temporal Coherence, Event Chronology, and Biases

TRAKE frameworks emphasize maintenance of temporal integrity. In motion-language alignment, the Chronologically Accurate Retrieval (CAR) protocol tests models' ability to prefer ground-truth event ordering over shuffled alternatives:

$$CAR = \frac{1}{K} \sum_{i=1}^K \mathbf{1} \left[ f(z^{T}_i, z^{M}_i) > f(z^{C}_i, z^{M}_i) \right ]$$

Contrastive losses penalize mismatched orderings by augmenting batches with shuffled-event hard negatives (Fujiwara et al., 2024). Enforcing this constraint during training elevates CAR accuracy from near-random ($\sim$60–67%) to near-perfect ($\sim$99%).

In sequential models, experiments reveal inherent temporal biases—primacy and recency peaks, troughs for "lost in the middle"—that must be mitigated by architectural induction-head tuning, state-space gating, and careful positional embedding management (Bajaj et al., 26 Oct 2025).

In multi-agent trajectory contexts, the penalty term $-\lambda \cdot (t-\tau)$ in DP recursions and DTW-like measures in tree-based alignments likewise favor temporally adjacent matches (Luu et al., 15 Dec 2025, Sha et al., 2017).

5. Applications and Evaluation Protocols

TRAKE enables high-fidelity retrieval in diverse domains:

• Interactive Video Search:

Combining semantic, metadata, and visual information, systems achieve "Outstanding" Top-1 accuracy on challenging temporal-event sequence tasks (e.g. Ho Chi Minh City AI Challenge 2025), outperforming conventional semantic search that fails to maintain event order (Luu et al., 15 Dec 2025).

• Sports Analytics:

Multi-agent trajectory alignment boosts Mean Average Precision (mAP) and Expected Reciprocal Rank (ERR) for targeted event queries, with sub-second retrieval over thousands of candidate plays. User studies validate superiority over fixed-role or ball-only baselines (Sha et al., 2017).

• Motion-Language Retrieval and Generation:

Chronologically grounded models show improved Recall@k and Frechet Inception Distance (FID), successfully synthesizing events in correct order (Fujiwara et al., 2024).

• Video Corpus Alignment:

Contextualized frame features plus DRAQ reranking on Kinetics700 reduce Frame Position Error (FPE) and Cycle Phase Error (CPE) by over an order of magnitude compared to uncontextualized baselines (Dave et al., 2024).

• Topic Detection and Tracking:

Time-aware BERT embeddings, fused via multi-head attention, raise F1 scores above earlier document clustering methods, and differentiate recurring events better by monotonically decaying cross-time similarity (Jiang et al., 2021).

6. Limitations, Open Problems, and Future Directions

TRAKE faces domain-dependent limitations:

• Extraction of key event timestamps remains reliant on external logs, manual annotation, or imperfect detectors. Automated, robust event-detection (e.g., learned visual, audio, or textual detectors) would generalize applicability (Sha et al., 2017).
• Many frameworks assume one-to-one, monotonic alignment; real-world data may contain partial matches, non-monotonic event order, or spurious sub-clips. Outlier-robust DTW, learned boundary detectors, and segment-level alignment are needed (Dave et al., 2024).
• Static and offline growth in hierarchical alignment trees restrict adaptation to evolving styles and contexts; online update mechanisms could address this (Sha et al., 2017).
• Embedding representation choices influence model periodicity, granularity, and handling of recurring events. Ablation studies indicate sinusoidal positional encodings outperform alternatives for temporal separation (Jiang et al., 2021).
• Architectural innovations in transformer-based models—specialized induction heads, bias channels, state-space gating—are necessary to counteract temporal retrieval biases and improve episodic memory (Bajaj et al., 26 Oct 2025).

7. Quantitative Benchmarks and Operational Performance

The following table summarizes key performance metrics across representative TRAKE domains:

Domain	Primary Metric	Reported Value
Video Retrieval (HCMC 2025)	Top-1 Accuracy (TRAKE)	"Outstanding" and significant boost
Motion-Language CAR	CAR Accuracy (post-aug training)	~99% (from ~60–67%)
Sports Play Retrieval	mAP gain (specificity)	+20–30 points (select agents)
Topic Detection (News2013)	F1 (SinPE-E-BERT + CM + HDBSCAN)	90.04 (+14 over baselines)
Video Alignment (Kinetics700)	FPE / CPE (context+DRQ)	0.5% / 0.09 (vs 22.7% / 0.86)
Video Pairwise Alignment (Juggler)	Correct offset (SIFT-only CTE)	93% @ 0.2 s tolerance

These systems demonstrate scalable, real-time operation on multimillion-item corpora, maintain event chronology across modalities, and generalize retrieval to OOK and hard negative settings (Luu et al., 15 Dec 2025, Fujiwara et al., 2024, Dave et al., 2024, Sha et al., 2017, Jiang et al., 2021, Douze et al., 2015). Empirical evaluations and user studies validate robust improvement over baseline models.

---

Taken collectively, Temporal Retrieval and Alignment of Key Events (TRAKE) unifies event-centric indexing, temporal sequence alignment, and cross-domain retrieval into a rigorous methodological framework. Advances in modular pipelines, dynamic programming, coarse-to-fine permutation alignment, frequency-domain encoding, contrastive learning with hard negatives, and evaluation protocols have established TRAKE as a cornerstone for high-precision chronologically sensitive search across video, motion data, text, and sequential model contexts.