Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Taylor-Interpolated Cache in AATS

Updated 12 July 2026
  • Taylor-interpolated cache is a method that stores per-coordinate degree-K Taylor segments in fixed-size circular buffers for continuous history representation.
  • It uses compile-time automatic differentiation to generate Taylor coefficients, ensuring C⁰ continuity while eliminating runtime heap allocations.
  • The design supports exact, interpolation-free dense output and asynchronous, out-of-order evaluations with O(N) scaling in multi-rate delay differential equation solvers.

Searching arXiv for the cited paper and closely related work to ground the article. arXiv search: (Malik, 19 Jun 2026) The Taylor-interpolated cache is the history-storage and dense-output mechanism used inside the Asynchronous Adaptive Taylor Solver (AATS) for high-dimensional, multi-rate Delay Differential Equations (DDEs). In AATS, each coordinate is assigned an independent local clock, and its recent history is represented not by dynamically allocated samples but by fixed-size circular buffers of degree-KK Taylor segments. The resulting design combines statically allocated storage, compile-time Automatic Differentiation (AD), interpolation-free continuous dense-output evaluation, and asynchronous event scheduling. Within the formulation given for AATS, the cache provides exact continuous dense output, zero-allocation history storage, and O(N)O(N) time scaling for large, sparse delay systems (Malik, 19 Jun 2026).

1. Concept and functional role

Within AATS, the Taylor-interpolated cache is the per-coordinate repository of local Taylor expansions that represent the continuous trajectory required by delayed evaluations. For each coordinate v=1…Nv=1\ldots N, AATS allocates at startup a fixed-size circular buffer of capacity MM segments. No further heap allocations occur at runtime, and the buffer never grows beyond size MM. This design is introduced specifically to avoid the dynamic memory allocation otherwise required for continuous history tracking in DDE solvers (Malik, 19 Jun 2026).

Each stored segment represents the degree-KK Taylor expansion of xv(t)x_v(t) about a local update time t0t_0,

xv(t)≈∑k=0Kck(t−t0)k.x_v(t) \approx \sum_{k=0}^{K} c_k (t-t_0)^k.

The cache is therefore not a store of raw state snapshots alone; it is a store of local polynomial models that can be queried continuously in time. Because delayed-argument evaluations xj(t−τ)x_j(t-\tau) can read directly from earlier segments of a neighbor’s ring buffer, no global synchronization is needed during asynchronous multi-rate integration.

This organization implies that the cache is not an auxiliary optimization layered on top of a synchronous solver. It is part of the solver’s core representation of history and is coupled directly to local clocks, event scheduling, and adaptive stepping.

2. Storage layout and segment representation

The data structure is a statically allocated ring buffer indexed by coordinate and segment slot. The description given for AATS is:

xv(t)x_v(t)4

For each coordinate O(N)O(N)0, an integer O(N)O(N)1 points to the most recently written slot. Once the buffer has filled, the oldest valid segment is O(N)O(N)2. When a new segment is pushed,

O(N)O(N)3

then ringbuf[v] [i_new] = new_segment, and head[v] = i_new.

Component Stored data Role
ringbuf[v] [m] t0, c[0..K] One Taylor segment for coordinate O(N)O(N)4
Segment.t0 Start time of the segment Reference point for local evaluation
Segment.c[0..K] O(N)O(N)5 Taylor coefficients Polynomial representation of history
head[v] Integer in O(N)O(N)6 Most recently written slot

The coefficients are stored in scaled form. On a subinterval O(N)O(N)7, AATS states the local Taylor expansion

O(N)O(N)8

and stores

O(N)O(N)9

so that evaluation becomes

v=1…Nv=1\ldots N0

The representation is significant because it converts history storage from a potentially open-ended sequence of time-stamped values into a bounded sequence of polynomial segments with fixed memory cost per coordinate.

3. Coefficient generation and continuity properties

AATS generates the v=1…Nv=1\ldots N1 coefficients of each segment using a forward-mode AD graph that was built once at compile time for the right-hand side v=1…Nv=1\ldots N2. Because v=1…Nv=1\ldots N3 is fixed at compile time, the AD engine unrolls all loops and generates a sequence of fused multiply–add (FMA) instructions to compute the v=1…Nv=1\ldots N4 derivatives in v=1…Nv=1\ldots N5 time, entirely in registers (Malik, 19 Jun 2026).

The segment-generation procedure is specified as:

xv(t)x_v(t)5

AATS further states that at each update the true coordinate value v=1…Nv=1\ldots N6 is sampled exactly from its previous segment, or from initial data, and then the v=1…Nv=1\ldots N7 coefficients are recomputed to match v=1…Nv=1\ldots N8 and its derivatives at v=1…Nv=1\ldots N9. As a consequence, the piecewise-polynomial trajectory is MM0 continuous at each boundary.

That continuity result is central to the cache’s role in delayed systems. The cache is not merely a piecewise approximation assembled from independent local fits; each segment begins from an exactly sampled boundary value, so adjacent segments meet without a jump.

4. Querying history and asynchronous evaluation

The evaluation procedure, named EvaluateHistory, locates the segment whose time interval contains the query time and then evaluates the stored polynomial in Horner form:

xv(t)x_v(t)6

This procedure is used both for present-time local updates and for delayed evaluations. In the asynchronous multi-rate design, each coordinate MM1 maintains its own local clock, and events MM2 are scheduled into a global RadixHeap in MM3 amortized time. When an event MM4 is popped, AATS performs the following steps: it calls EvaluateHistory(v,t) to obtain MM5; it generates a new segment about MM6 using GenerateSegment(v,t,x_v(t)); it computes the next step size MM7 via the adaptive controller, using the highest-order AD coefficient as an error estimate; and it re-inserts MM8 into the heap (Malik, 19 Jun 2026).

A notable property of the cache is that out-of-order evaluations are explicitly supported. When MM9 lies in the past relative to ringbuf[j] head, EvaluateHistory searches the correct historical segment and evaluates that polynomial. This is essential in asynchronous DDE integration because delayed dependencies are not aligned to a single global clock.

5. Eviction policy, memory cost, and complexity

The eviction rule is implicit in the circular-buffer design: when head[v] wraps, the oldest segment is simply overwritten. AATS chooses MM0 so that no needed segment, for delays up to MM1, is ever overwritten prematurely. Since MM2 and MM3 are chosen once at startup based on MM4 and minimal step size, no runtime heap allocations ever occur; the formulation describes this as zero allocation.

Memory per coordinate is

MM5

which yields total static memory

MM6

The time per event for coordinate MM7 with local in-degree MM8 is given as:

  • MM9 to pop/push RadixHeap.
  • KK0 to compute ForwardAD (linear in KK1 for linear terms, KK2 for nonlinearity).
  • KK3 to binomial-shift (time-alignment of neighbor polynomials, if this is done).
  • KK4 for each delay lookup.

The stated overall per-event cost is therefore

KK5

independent of KK6. Over a time interval KK7, the global work is

KK8

under sparse coupling, with KK9 constant, and adaptive step control. The paper then concludes xv(t)x_v(t)0 scaling in xv(t)x_v(t)1, with no dynamic memory overhead. Benchmarks against state-of-the-art synchronous solvers are reported as empirically consistent with xv(t)x_v(t)2 execution scaling, including large-scale benchmarks up to xv(t)x_v(t)3 coordinates (Malik, 19 Jun 2026).

This suggests that the Taylor-interpolated cache is not only a storage optimization. Its bounded-memory design and locality properties are part of the mechanism by which AATS reduces redundant evaluations and preserves linear scaling under sparse coupling.

6. Distinction from other Taylor-based caches and extrapolators

The term “cache” appears in multiple computational settings, but the Taylor-interpolated cache in AATS is specific to continuous history representation in DDE solvers. A useful contrast appears in diffusion acceleration, where feature-caching methods reuse or extrapolate intermediate activations across timesteps rather than store delayed state histories. In that separate setting, polynomial-based extrapolators such as TaylorSeer are described as suffering from error accumulation and trajectory drift in low-step regimes, motivating the use of rational Padé approximants in TC-Padé (Cui et al., 3 Mar 2026).

That contrast helps delimit the concept. In AATS, the cache stores piecewise Taylor segments of coordinate trajectories, supports out-of-order historical queries, and is designed around zero-allocation history storage. In diffusion acceleration, cached objects are raw features or residuals, and the central issue is predictive extrapolation across denoising steps rather than exact continuous dense output. A plausible implication is that the shared language of “Taylor” and “cache” can obscure fundamentally different numerical roles: in AATS the cache is an integral component of asynchronous DDE integration, whereas in diffusion sampling it is part of an inference-acceleration strategy.

A related misconception is that a Taylor-based cache must entail interpolation overhead or unbounded memory growth. The AATS formulation explicitly rejects both assumptions: the design uses statically allocated circular buffers, and evaluation is interpolation-free because each history query is answered directly by evaluating the appropriate stored Taylor polynomial.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Taylor-Interpolated Cache.