Symmetry-Aware Steering Framework

• The symmetry-aware steering framework is a mathematical approach that leverages fiber-linear Lie group actions and Lie derivatives to characterize and regulate symmetry in dynamical systems.
• It employs linear constraints, nullspace analysis, and convex regularization to either strictly enforce equivariance or bias models toward approximate invariants.
• Applied in neural networks, operator learning, and physics-informed systems, the framework enhances model robustness and efficiency through symmetry-aware optimization.

A symmetry-aware steering framework is a mathematical and algorithmic approach for harnessing symmetries in dynamical systems, machine learning, and optimization. It enables the enforcement, discovery, or promotion of invariances by incorporating group-theoretic structures—typically Lie group actions—directly into model design, parameterization, or training. The central object is the fiber-linear Lie group action on vector bundles, with the Lie derivative providing a unified means of expressing equivariance, detecting symmetries, and quantifying or regularizing deviations from symmetry. This framework encompasses strict symmetry constraints, symmetry discovery (via nullspaces), and convex relaxations to bias learning toward (approximate) invariants, with immediate applications to neural networks, operator learning, dynamical system identification, and classical physics-informed models (Otto et al., 2023).

1. Mathematical Foundations: Fiber-Linear Lie Group Actions and the Lie Derivative

Consider a rank-$k$ real vector bundle $\pi : E \to M$ and a real Lie group $G$ acting smoothly and fiber-linearly: for $g \in G$, $\Theta_g : E_p \to E_{p \cdot g}$ is linear. The transformation operator for a section $F \in \Gamma(E)$ is

$K_g F = \Theta_{g^{-1}} \circ F \circ \theta_g\,,$

where $\theta$ is the induced action on the base $M$. The infinitesimal generator for symmetry transformations is the Lie derivative,

$$\mathcal{L}_\xi F = \left . \frac{d}{dt} \right|_{t=0} K_{\exp(t\xi)} F = \lim_{t \to 0} \frac{1}{t}\big( \Theta_{\exp(-t\xi)} \circ F \circ \theta_{\exp(t\xi)} - F \big)\,,$$

with $\xi \in \mathfrak{g} = \operatorname{Lie}(G)$. In local trivialization for $F: V \to W$ (vector spaces), this specializes to

$$(\mathcal{L}_\xi F)(x) = \phi_W(\xi) F(x) - \frac{\partial F(x)}{\partial x} (\phi_V(\xi) x)\,,$$

where $\phi_V, \phi_W$ are the induced representations on $V$ and $W$.

These constructs obey standard commutation and linearity relations: $$\frac{d}{dt} K_{\exp(t\xi)} F = \mathcal{L}_\xi( K_{\exp(t\xi)} F ) = K_{\exp(t\xi)}(\mathcal{L}_\xi F)\,,\qquad \mathcal{L}_{[\xi, \eta]} = \mathcal{L}_\xi \mathcal{L}_\eta - \mathcal{L}_\eta \mathcal{L}_\xi\,.$$

2. Enforcing Symmetry: Linear Constraints for Equivariance

For enforcing equivariance of a model $F$ with respect to a known group $G$:

• Infinitesimal constraints: For each $\xi_i$ in a basis of $\mathfrak{g}$,

$$\mathcal{L}_{\xi_i} F = 0\,,\qquad i = 1, \dots, \dim G\,.$$

• Discrete coset constraints: For each $g_j$ in discrete representatives not in the identity component $G_0$,

$K_{g_j} F - F = 0\,.$

For a parametric family $F_w = \sum_{i=1}^N c_i F_i$:

1. Build matrices $A_i$ such that $A_i c$ gives the coefficients of $\mathcal{L}_{\xi_i} F_w$.
2. Build $B_j$ for discrete constraints.
3. Stack all constraints, $A c = 0$, $B c=0$, and impose these on the parameters.

During training, projection onto the constraint nullspace, e.g., via $$c \leftarrow c - \eta (I - C^+C)\nabla_c \text{Loss}$$, ensures that parameter updates remain in the symmetric subspace (Otto et al., 2023).

3. Symmetry Discovery: Nullspace Analysis via the Lie Derivative

To discover symmetries (i.e., to find the symmetry algebra of a given model $F$), compute

$$\mathfrak{sym}_G(F) = \{\xi \in \mathfrak{g} : \mathcal{L}_\xi F = 0\} = \operatorname{Null}(L_F)\,,$$

where $L_F: \mathfrak{g} \to \Gamma(E)$ is the mapping $\xi \mapsto \mathcal{L}_\xi F$. Discretizing $L_F$ to a matrix $M$, singular vectors of zero singular value characterize the symmetry directions. This nullspace property enables data-driven identification of latent or emergent invariances in functions or dynamical systems (Otto et al., 2023).

Alternatively, for submanifolds $M \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ and candidate actions $\Phi: G \to \text{GL}(d)$, a symmetric, positive-semidefinite tangency operator $S_M$ allows symmetry determination via spectral analysis.

4. Promoting Symmetry: Convex Regularization via the Lie Derivative

Promotion of symmetry—biasing models toward invariance when strict constraints are undesirable—uses convex penalties:

• Discrete group regularizer: $R_{G,1}(F) = \sum_{g \in G} \| K_g F - F \|\,.$
• Continuous group regularizer (nuclear norm relaxation to rank): $$R_{G,*}(F) = \| L_F \|_* = \sum_{i=1}^{\dim G} \sigma_i(L_F)\,,$$ where $\| \cdot \|_*$ is the nuclear norm, encouraging large nullspaces (i.e., maximal symmetry) in the learned model.

This bias can be incorporated directly into loss functions during training (e.g., $$L_{\text{tot}} = L_{\text{data}} + \gamma R_{\text{sym}}(\theta)$$), allowing for automatic selection of the maximal symmetric hypothesis consistent with the data (Otto et al., 2023).

5. Duality Between Enforcement and Discovery

The map $(\xi, F) \mapsto \mathcal{L}_\xi F$ is bilinear, yielding a duality: enforcing symmetry involves fixing $\xi$ and solving for $F$, while discovering symmetry fixes $F$ and solves for $\xi$. The nullspace characterization is symmetric in this sense. This duality allows for unified algorithmic treatments of symmetry learning problems (Otto et al., 2023).

Task	Variable Fixed	Solution Seeks
Enforce symmetry	$\xi$	$F \in \operatorname{Null}(L_\xi)$
Discover symmetry	$F$	$\xi \in \operatorname{Null}(L_F)$

6. Applications to Model Classes

Symmetry-aware steering is instantiated across numerous model types:

• Multilayer perceptrons: Layer weights/biases are constrained by tensor equations involving representations of $\mathfrak{g}$ (Otto et al., 2023).
• Equivariant convolutional kernels: Constraints on kernel functions enforce transformation properties, solved via nullspace conditions or SVD (Otto et al., 2023).
• Neural operators (integral kernel networks): Direct imposition of Lie derivative constraints on the kernel (Otto et al., 2023).
• Dynamical systems discovery (e.g., SINDy): The parameter matrix $W$ in $F(x) = W D(x)$ is constrained/regularized by the infinitesimal symmetry conditions (Otto et al., 2023).
• Physics-informed learning of conserved quantities and Hamiltonian structure: Enforce or discover conservation, symplecticity, and other structures via Lie derivative constraints and associated regularizers (Otto et al., 2023).

7. General Algorithmic Pipeline

The full symmetry-aware steering workflow proceeds as follows (Otto et al., 2023):

1. Model selection: Choose model family $F_\theta$ and candidate group $G$.
2. Operator construction: Compute matrices or operators realizing the action of $\mathcal{L}_{\xi_i}$ and $K_{g_j} - I$ on model parameters.
3. Constraint imposition or regularization: During each training epoch, include projection operators or penalty terms to enforce or bias toward symmetry.
4. Symmetry discovery (if needed): Upon convergence, analyze the nullspace of constraint operators (e.g., via SVD) to extract discovered symmetries.
5. Model output: Trained parameters $\theta^*$ that enforce, reveal, or are maximally consistent with group-invariance, according to design.

This symmetry-aware framework thus reduces to repeated applications of linear algebra: matrix-vector products, SVD or eigendecomposition, and gradiant projections or nuclear-norm proximal steps. It is immediately compatible with stochastic optimization schemes and scales naturally with large models and datasets.

---

The symmetry-aware steering framework, as formalized via the Lie derivative approach, brings rigor and algorithmic efficiency to the integration of symmetries in learning and control, offering a single mathematical machinery capable of exact constraint enforcement, principled symmetry search, and flexible, convex regularization for real-world tasks where perfect invariance may not strictly hold (Otto et al., 2023).