Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Surface Models of Brauer Graph Algebras

Updated 18 January 2026
  • Surface models of Brauer graph algebras are algebraic frameworks that encode ring structures via decorated surfaces with marked points and mixed-angulations.
  • The construction employs differential graded algebras and Calabi–Yau properties, linking geometric data and algebraic invariants through derived equivalences.
  • Geometric methods using perverse schobers and partially wrapped Fukaya categories reveal stability conditions and deformations, aiding practical insights in algebraic topology.

A surface model of a Brauer graph algebra encodes the algebraic structure of the algebra via the combinatorics and geometry of a suitably decorated surface—such as a compact oriented surface with marked points and, potentially, boundary. The theory realizes Brauer graph algebras (and their graded, relative analogues) as arising from the topology of surfaces with certain data (ribbon graphs, mixed-angulations, or arc systems) and establishes deep links with Calabi–Yau structures, perverse schobers, Fukaya categories, and stability conditions. This realization provides a dictionary between algebraic constructs and geometric/topological objects.

1. Weighted Marked Surfaces and Mixed-Angulations

Classical Brauer graph algebras are defined via a ribbon graph with multiplicities, where the cyclic order at each vertex specifies the local orientation and the multiplicity prescribes the length of certain cycles in the corresponding quiver. In the modern surface model, one begins with a weighted marked surface (S,M,Δ,w,ν)({\bf S}, M, \Delta, w, \nu), where:

  • S{\bf S} is a compact, oriented surface (possibly with boundary).
  • MSM \subset {\bf S} is a finite nonempty set of marked points meeting every boundary component.
  • ΔS\Delta \subset {\bf S} is a finite set of singular points, each with integer degree d(x)=w(x)+2{1,2,,}d(x)=w(x)+2 \in \{1,2, \ldots, \infty\}.
  • ν\nu is a grading (line field) on S(MΔ){\bf S} \setminus (M \cup \Delta) compatible with combinatorial data.

A mixed-angulation AA is a collection of non-compact, properly embedded arcs (with endpoints in MM) cutting S{\bf S} into polygons, each ascribed a unique interior singularity xΔx \in \Delta of degree matching the polygon's number of edges. The gradings are compatible such that consecutive polygon edges meet in degree zero.

The S-graph dual to the mixed-angulation has vertices indexed by Δ\Delta and edges by the arcs; at an internal vertex vv of degree mm, the cyclically ordered half-edges record the combinatorics of the local configuration, with integer labels d(i,i+1)d(i,i+1) defined by the number of boundary edges between consecutive arcs.

2. Construction of Relative Graded Brauer Graph Algebras

The relative graded Brauer graph algebra A(S,n)A(S, n) is a (curved) differential graded algebra whose quiver and relations are determined by the surface data:

  • Vertices: edges ee of the S-graph.
  • Arrows: for each corner (i,i+1)(i,i+1), an arrow ai:ii+1a_i: i \to i+1 of degree d(i,i+1)d(i,i+1); for boundary half-edges ii, a loop τi\tau_i of degree n1n-1.
  • Relations:
  1. ajai=0a_j a_i = 0 if i+1ji+1 \neq j but i,ji, j share the same edge.
  2. Around each internal edge {i,j}\{i, j\}, the cycles cic_i and cjc_j satisfy ci=(1)n1cjc_i = (-1)^{n-1} c_j.
  3. τi2=0\tau_i^2 = 0 on boundary edges.
  4. aiτi=(1)aiτi+1aia_i \tau_i = (-1)^{|a_i|} \tau_{i+1} a_i at boundary corners.
  5. On all-boundary edges, τi=(1)nτj\tau_i = (-1)^n \tau_j.

The only nonzero differential occurs for τj\tau_j at edges with one end internal, given by d(τj)=(1)ncid(\tau_j) = (-1)^n c_i (where ii is the internal half–edge). In the absence of boundary, the algebra reduces to the classical graded Brauer graph algebra with vanishing differential.

3. Calabi–Yau and Relative Calabi–Yau Structures

For orientable surfaces or odd nn, A(S,n)A(S, n) admits an nn–Calabi–Yau structure: a homogeneous trace

tr:A(S,n)nk,tr(ci)=1\mathrm{tr} : A(S, n)^n \to k,\quad \mathrm{tr}(c_i)=1

such that tr(ab)=(1)abtr(ba)\mathrm{tr}(ab)=(-1)^{|a||b|} \mathrm{tr}(ba) and the pairing is nondegenerate. In dg settings with boundaries (infinite degree polygons), a relative Calabi–Yau structure emerges in the sense of Brav–Dyckerhoff, realized as a nondegenerate, cyclic class in relative Hochschild homology HH(A(S,n),)\mathrm{HH}_\bullet(A(S, n), \partial). The surface construction enables gluing of local Calabi–Yau structures associated to Ginzburg algebras of polygons into a global relative structure on the full algebra (Christ et al., 2024).

4. Surface Realization via Perverse Schobers and Fukaya Categories

There are two parallel geometric constructions:

4.1 Perverse Schober Approach

A perverse schober is a constructible sheaf of stable kk-linear \infty-categories on a ribbon graph (here, the S-graph or its augmentation), assigning to each vertex a local dg-category (e.g., the category of modules over a relative Ginzburg algebra GnG_n for polygons, Z/(n/m)\mathbb Z/(n/m)-quotients Gn,mG_{n,m} for divisors mnm|n, or one-dimensional spherical functor models for boundary points). The global sections of the resulting schober yield a dg-category Morita equivalent to the Koszul dual A(S,n)!A(S, n)^! of the relative graded Brauer graph algebra, producing equivalences

Perf(A(S,n))Nil(G(S,n))D(G(S,n))\mathrm{Perf}(A(S, n)) \simeq \mathrm{Nil}(G(S, n)) \subset \mathcal D(G(S, n))

where G(S,n)G(S, n) is constructed as a colimit over the exit-path category of the S-graph (Christ et al., 2024).

4.2 Partially Wrapped Fukaya Category Approach

Starting from the partially wrapped Fukaya category F(S,M,ν)\mathcal F(S, M, \nu) for the surface, one chooses an arc system cutting SS into polygons and builds a strictly unital AA_\infty-category FX\mathcal F_{\mathbb X} with morphisms determined by intersection combinatorics (paths along the boundary, AA_\infty-operations counting immersed polygons). Deforming these categories with curvature to account for marked points MM' and winding data, one defines a category of torsion modules C(S,n)\mathcal C(S, n). The subcategory generated by S-graph edges is quasi-equivalent to PerfA(S,n)\mathrm{Perf} \, A(S, n), realizing A(S,n)A(S, n) as an explicit endomorphism algebra in the surface model (Christ et al., 2024, Opper et al., 2021).

5. Derived Equivalence and Surface Moves

Brauer graph algebras realized from different surface decompositions (triangulations, mixed-angulations, or partial triangulations) of the same topological surface are derived equivalent. The fundamental mechanism is the Kauer move (pivoting an edge of the underlying ribbon graph), which corresponds to a flip of an arc in the surface triangulation, or, dually, a Whitehead move on the dual tree. Each such move translates to a tilt at a specific simple module, giving a derived equivalence between the associated Brauer graph algebras [(Marsh et al., 2013); (Schroll, 2016); (Demonet, 2017)].

Invariants classifying derived equivalence classes of Brauer graph algebras are encoded as surface data: the genus and number of boundary components of the underlying surface, the winding numbers of boundary components, and the multiplicities of the cyclic orderings at punctures or singular points. Antipov’s invariants (number of vertices, edges, faces; face-perimeter multiset; vertex multiplicities; bipartiteness) are exactly captured by mapping class group orbits of the surface model with chosen line field (Opper et al., 2021).

6. Embedding in Weighted Surface and Hybrid Algebras

Brauer graph algebras appear as idempotent subalgebras (blocks) of weighted surface algebras and, more generally, as hybrid algebras. The procedure is constructive: any Brauer graph GG can be embedded as a ribbon graph in a surface SS with a compatible triangulation Δ\Delta, assigning weights and parameters accordingly, such that the idempotent block eA(S,Δ,m,c)ee A(S, \Delta, m, c) e is isomorphic to B(G)B(G). Socle-deformations may be necessary to enforce symmetry in low-dimensional cases and are reflected by local monodromy data in the triangulation (Erdmann et al., 2021, Erdmann et al., 2017).

7. Stability Conditions, Quadratic Differentials, and Deformations

Bridgeland stability conditions on the derived category PerfA(S,n)\mathrm{Perf}\,A(S,n) correspond to moduli of framed quadratic differentials on the surface (S,M,ν)(S, M, \nu). The central charge is given by integrating the square root of a holomorphic quadratic differential along cycles in the surface, providing a geometric realization of stability and wall-crossing phenomena (Christ et al., 2024). Infinitesimal deformations of the algebra—classified by Hochschild cohomology—admit geometric interpretations as surgeries on the surface: filling boundaries, twisting line fields, or introducing orbifold points, each corresponding to a distinct deformation class (Liu et al., 11 Jan 2026).


Relevant references:

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Surface Models of Brauer Graph Algebras.