Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
118 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
12 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
24 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
33 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Supersymmetry-Preserving Mass Deformation

Updated 25 July 2025
  • Supersymmetry-preserving mass deformation is a modification of quantum field theories that introduces mass terms while maintaining some or all original supersymmetry.
  • It systematically classifies allowed gauge-invariant operators by mass dimension to ensure the deformed action remains invariant under modified supersymmetry transformations.
  • Canonical models like the polarized IKKT and D=4 matrix models demonstrate rich vacuum landscapes that facilitate nonperturbative studies and connections to emergent geometry and holography.

A supersymmetry-preserving mass deformation is a modification of a supersymmetric quantum field theory or matrix model by mass terms or more general relevant operators, chosen such that some or all of the original supersymmetry is preserved. These deformations play a fundamental role in understanding nonperturbative dynamics, moduli stabilization, holographic dualities, emergent geometry, and the structure of quantum field theoretic vacua. The precise form and classification of such deformations depends on the spacetime dimension, the nature of the supersymmetric algebra, the field content, and the global symmetries of the underlying theory.

1. Classification and Structural Principles

Supersymmetry-preserving mass deformations are systematically classified via analysis of allowed gauge-invariant operators organized by mass dimension and their compatibility with the supersymmetry algebra. In supersymmetric Yang–Mills (SYM) matrix models of dimensionally reduced theories, the undeformed action consists of Hermitian matrices XIX_I (bosons) and their supersymmetric partners ψα\psi_\alpha (fermions):

S0=1gYM2Tr(14[XI,XJ]2i2ψˉα(ΓI)αβ[XI,ψβ])S_0 = \frac{1}{g_{YM}^2} \operatorname{Tr} \left( -\frac{1}{4} [X_I, X_J]^2 - \frac{i}{2} \bar\psi_\alpha (\Gamma^I)_{\alpha\beta} [X_I, \psi_\beta] \right)

The deformation is constructed as a series in a mass parameter μ\mu:

S=S0+1gYM2[μS1+μ2S2+]S = S_0 + \frac{1}{g_{YM}^2}\left[ \mu S_1 + \mu^2 S_2 + \cdots \right]

where S1S_1 includes allowed bosonic mass terms, Myers cubic terms, and fermion mass terms, and S2S_2 includes quadratic bosonic mass terms. The selection of operators is constrained by gauge invariance, mass dimension, and representation under global symmetries.

Supersymmetry is preserved by introducing μ\mu-dependent modifications of the transformation rules. The classification is then achieved by solving the algebraic conditions ensuring closure of the deformed supersymmetry variations and invariance of the action for all spinor parameters. This procedure has been systematically carried out for models in D=3,4,6,10D=3,4,6,10 dimensions (Martina, 23 Jul 2025).

2. Canonical Models and Representative Examples

a) Polarized IKKT Model (D=10)

The unique maximally supersymmetric mass deformation in ten dimensions is the polarized IKKT model:

SpIKKT=1gYM2Tr[14[XI,XJ]2i2ψˉΓI[XI,ψ]+3μ226XiXi+μ226XpXp +iμ3ϵijkXiXjXkμ8ψˉΓ123ψ]\begin{align*} S_{\text{pIKKT}} = \frac{1}{g_{YM}^2} \mathrm{Tr} \Bigg[ & -\frac{1}{4} [X_I, X_J]^2 - \frac{i}{2} \bar\psi \Gamma^I [X_I, \psi] + \frac{3\mu^2}{2^6} X_i X_i + \frac{\mu^2}{2^6} X_p X_p \ & + i\frac{\mu}{3} \epsilon^{ijk} X_i X_j X_k - \frac{\mu}{8} \bar\psi \Gamma^{123} \psi \Bigg] \end{align*}

with the corresponding deformed supersymmetry variations involving Γ123\Gamma^{123} insertions and a residual SO(3)×SO(7)SO(3) \times SO(7) symmetry.

The action admits a landscape of saddle points corresponding to fuzzy sphere configurations, labeled by partitions of NN. The rich vacuum structure is tied to the Myers term and is a candidate for emergent holographic geometries. The uniqueness of this deformation is a consequence of the algebraic constraints derived from supersymmetry invariance (Martina, 23 Jul 2025).

b) D=4 Matrix Models

Two inequivalent supersymmetry-preserving massive deformations are found:

  • Type I (SO(4)-invariant): Contains quadratic boson and fermion masses, no Myers term; positive semi-definite fermionic Pfaffian; free of the sign problem.
  • Type II (SO(4)→SO(3)-breaking): Includes Myers term and non-uniform bosonic and fermionic mass terms; landscape of fuzzy sphere vacua.

These models are especially suitable for non-perturbative numerical studies, with absence of sign problems enabling lattice Monte Carlo and bootstrap computations.

c) Lower-dimensional Cases and Other Frameworks

In D=6D=6, two distinct deformations exist differing in symmetry breaking patterns; in D=3D=3, a unique two-parameter deformation is found, extending the "BMN-type" construction. In quantum mechanics (d=1d=1), mass deformations are linked to curved superalgebras (e.g., SU(21)SU(2|1), SU(22)SU(2|2)) (Ivanov et al., 2013), yielding oscillator-type spectra and atypical representations.

3. Supersymmetry Algebras, R-symmetry, and Non-central Extensions

Mass deformations may require or induce modifications of the underlying supersymmetry algebra. Notably, in the maximally supersymmetric mass deformation of the BLG theory (N=8\mathcal{N}=8 in d=3d=3), the super-Poincaré algebra acquires non-central extensions via R-symmetry generators, enabled by three-dimensional peculiarity. The anticommutator takes the form:

{Q,Q}P+(M–dependent R-symmetry terms)\{ Q, Q \} \sim P + (M\text{–dependent R-symmetry terms})

where MM is the mass deformation parameter and the extra terms correspond to specific SO(8)SO(8) generators, not true central charges. This extension allows all 16 supercharges to be preserved while breaking SO(8)SO(4)×SO(4)SO(8) \to SO(4)\times SO(4), realized by the selection of a quaternionic direction among scalar fields (1006.1646).

4. Hamiltonian and Vacuum Structure

Mass-deformed supersymmetric theories commonly feature Hamiltonians expressible as quadratic forms of dynamical supersymmetry generators. For the mass-deformed BLG theory, the light-cone Hamiltonian HH is given by:

H=i162dˉφ(Qm+iWm)(QmiWm)φH = \frac{i}{16\sqrt{2}} \bar{d}\,\varphi (Q_m + iW_m) (Q^{m\dagger} - iW^m) \varphi

where WmW_m encodes mass-dependent corrections. Such representations provide powerful constraints on perturbative computations and enforce maximal symmetry in the quantum theory (1006.1646).

In matrix models, the vacuum structure is often enriched by the mass deformation. The polarized IKKT model and D=4 Type II deformation display a multitude of fuzzy sphere vacua, connecting to the moduli spaces of higher-dimensional gauge theories and potentially to the microstate structure of dual gravitational backgrounds.

5. Applications, Phenomenology, and Localization

Supersymmetry-preserving mass deformations underpin theoretical and computational advances across diverse domains:

  • Emergent Geometry & Holography: The presence of multiple, supersymmetric saddle points (notably in the polarized IKKT model) supports the paper of emergent gravitational backgrounds and the microstate geometry program (Martina, 23 Jul 2025).
  • Non-perturbative Dynamics: Sign-problem-free deformations in D=4 models enable non-perturbative investigations via Monte Carlo methods, making these models suitable laboratories for numerical explorations (Martina, 23 Jul 2025).
  • Supersymmetric Localization: The tractability of certain deformed models under localization yields exact results for observables (partition functions, correlation functions), aiding the connection to dual supergravity computations and the analysis of RG flows (Gutperle et al., 2018, Anderson et al., 2018).
  • Moduli Stabilization: In supergravities, mass deformations (or mass parameters induced via radiative corrections) can lift moduli and stabilize vacua, select between SUSY-preserving and SUSY-breaking branches, and generate candidate axion-like states (Kobayashi et al., 2017).
  • Curved Superspaces and Worldline Mechanics: Deforming worldline or d=1d=1 supersymmetric models by mass terms interpolates between flat and curved superalgebras, expands the range of allowed quantum degeneracies, and leads to new structures in spectral theory (Ivanov et al., 2013).

6. Future Directions and Open Questions

Recent research has outlined several avenues for further investigation:

  • Localization for Deformed Matrix Models: There is scope to develop a full localization program analogous to Pestun's for calculating exact observables in mass-deformed settings at finite NN (Martina, 23 Jul 2025).
  • Numerical Studies of Saddle Landscapes: Systematic investigation of the vacuum landscapes via Monte Carlo approaches, especially for D=4 sign-problem-free models, may reveal new insights into emergent geometries and phase transitions.
  • Generalization to Partial Supersymmetry Breaking: Allowing for deformations that preserve fewer than the maximal set of supercharges, or that involve complex parameters, could uncover further classes of physically interesting matrix models.
  • Holographic Duals and Emergent Gravity: Relating the rich spectrum of saddle points to Euclidean spacetimes in type IIB supergravity, particularly in the context of holography and nonperturbative string theory, remains an active research area.
  • Extensions to Non-commutative and Exceptional Geometry: Applying the techniques and classification to models with non-commutative deformations, exceptional field theory backgrounds, or higher-spin structures is a target for further exploration (Kulyabin et al., 2022).

7. Mathematical Formulation and Representation Theory

The construction and analysis of supersymmetry-preserving mass deformations centrally involve the explicit expansion of allowable terms in the action and supersymmetry variations in terms of gamma matrices. For instance, deformation terms are classified as:

  • Bosonic Myers terms: SIJKTr(XIXJXK)S_{IJK} \operatorname{Tr}(X^I X^J X^K)
  • Fermion masses: Tr(ψˉMψ)\operatorname{Tr}(\bar\psi M\psi), with MM in the Clifford algebra
  • Quadratic bosonic masses: SIJTr(XIXJ)S_{IJ}\operatorname{Tr}(X^I X^J)

Algebraic constraints for invariance are solved by decomposing the matrices and tensors into irreducible pieces under the relevant global symmetries and requiring all variation terms to cancel identically for arbitrary supersymmetry parameters.

This algebraic structure naturally connects to underlying superalgebras, for instance, F(4)F(4) in D=10D=10, or D(2,1;12)D(2,1;\frac{1}{2}) and OSp(12)OSp(1|2) in lower dimensions, and the representation theory of these algebras determines the field content and transformation rules of allowed mass deformations.


Supersymmetry-preserving mass deformations thus constitute a rich and highly structured subject, interfacing algebraic, geometric, analytic, and computational aspects of supersymmetric theories, and continuing to serve as a touchstone for future research in quantum field theory, nonperturbative string theory, and mathematical physics.