Supergravity Scenarios: Unifying Gravity & SUSY
- Supergravity scenarios are theoretical frameworks where local supersymmetry is gauged to unify gravity with matter and gauge interactions, introducing the gravitino as the superpartner of the graviton.
- They employ key structures such as the Kähler potential, superpotential, and gauge kinetic functions to meticulously control SUSY breaking via F-term and D-term mechanisms.
- These frameworks offer practical solutions for cosmological challenges, including inflation, dark matter generation, and the stabilization of moduli in extra-dimensional models.
Supergravity Scenario refers broadly to the class of theoretical frameworks in which supersymmetry (SUSY) is promoted to a local symmetry, leading to the incorporation of gravity alongside gauge and matter interactions within a unified supersymmetric field theory. The term "supergravity scenario" encompasses a wide spectrum of models engineered for particle physics, cosmology, and mathematical consistency, including those addressing dark matter, inflation, the hierarchy problem, and mechanisms of supersymmetry breaking.
1. Foundations and General Structure
Supergravity arises by gauging global supersymmetry, resulting in a gravitational theory where the graviton (spin-2) acquires a superpartner, the gravitino (spin-3/2), and local supersymmetry becomes an additional gauge symmetry of spacetime (Dall'Agata et al., 2022). The minimal realization in four dimensions is supergravity, where all matter and gauge couplings are encoded in three geometric structures:
- The Kähler potential determining the kinetic terms and scalar geometry,
- The holomorphic superpotential controlling Yukawa couplings and the F-term potential,
- The gauge kinetic function for vector multiplets.
The scalar potential takes the form
with . This structure is universal for matter-coupled supergravity.
2. Supersymmetry Breaking and Cosmological Constant
Supersymmetry breaking in supergravity scenarios can proceed via F-terms (due to nonzero vevs of auxiliary fields in chiral multiplets), D-terms (from vector multiplets), or more elaborate geometric/dynamical mechanisms. A critical aspect is the relationship between the SUSY-breaking scale (setting the gravitino mass, ) and the vacuum energy (cosmological constant), which is more intricate than in global supersymmetry due to the structure of the scalar potential (Guendelman et al., 2015, Dall'Agata et al., 2022).
Notably, modifying the spacetime volume measure, as in non-Riemannian volume-form supergravity, can make the cosmological constant and SUSY-breaking scale dynamically determined integration constants, decoupling their values and allowing tuning for cosmological purposes (Guendelman et al., 2015).
3. Model Building: From the MSSM to Extra Dimensions
3.1. SUGRA-MSSM and Soft Terms
Supergravity scenarios often provide the UV completion for softly-broken supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model, such as the MSSM. They generate "soft terms" (gaugino masses, scalar masses, A- and B-terms) in the visible sector, typically via gravitational mediation from a hidden sector where SUSY is broken (Domingo et al., 2022). The soft term structure is essential for phenomenological viability and is influenced by the choice of Kähler potential and mediation mechanism.
3.2. No-scale Supergravity
No-scale supergravity models feature a flat tree-level scalar potential in the hidden sector, with physical SUSY-breaking parameters dynamically determined by quantum corrections. These scenarios naturally accommodate a vanishing classical vacuum energy and dynamically linked supersymmetry breaking and moduli stabilization (Benhenni et al., 2011). The presence of a scale-dependent vacuum energy term is crucial for renormalization group invariance and the existence of stable minima.
3.3. Extra Dimensions and Brane Worlds
Higher-dimensional supergravity scenarios exploit compactified extra dimensions—either flat, warped (Randall-Sundrum), or with nontrivial profiles (clockwork/dilaton). These models address mass hierarchies and generate predictive flavor structures through the localization of matter wavefunctions and moduli dynamics (Kehagias et al., 2017, Salem, 2023, Otsuka, 2015). Moduli multiplets may double as inflaton candidates or sources for dark matter genesis via their cosmological evolution.
4. Applications to Cosmology
4.1. Inflation
Supergravity scenarios provide fertile ground for inflationary model-building. Mechanisms include:
- Chiral superfield inflation with scalar inflatons,
- Vector multiplet inflaton realization, as in Starobinsky-Polonyi models (Aldabergenov et al., 2017, Addazi et al., 2017),
- Gravitino condensation-induced inflation, where a condensate dynamically breaks local SUSY and triggers Starobinsky-like or hilltop inflation (Alexandre et al., 2014).
The interplay of the Kähler potential and superpotential is critical for constructing viable inflationary potentials, especially for controlling the notorious -problem via symmetries or higher-order corrections (Kawasaki et al., 2016).
4.2. Dark Matter
Supergravity scenarios offer multiple avenues for dark matter candidates:
- Gravitino dark matter, with production via inflationary and preheating dynamics or decays of Polonyi and moduli fields (Addazi et al., 2017, Otsuka, 2015).
- Primordial black holes (PBHs) as dark matter, enabled by double inflation models with tailored inflaton potentials featuring flat inflection points, thereby producing local enhancements in curvature perturbations (Kawasaki et al., 2016).
- WIMP/Axion admixtures arise naturally when a supergravity model is coupled with a Peccei-Quinn sector, addressing the strong CP and -problems simultaneously (Baer et al., 2015).
5. Advanced Theoretical Developments
5.1. Higher-derivative and Geometric SUGRA
Equivalence between higher-derivative SUGRA (actions defined as arbitrary holomorphic functions of the chiral scalar curvature superfield) and dual matter-coupled SUGRA with chiral superfields allows geometric unification of inflation and quintessence, embedding both early and late-time cosmic acceleration into a superstring-inspired effective action (0901.2467).
5.2. Supergravity in Various Dimensions
Twelve-dimensional supergravity (Choi, 2015) provides a geometric parent framework for 11D SUGRA and 10D IIA/IIB supergravities, enabling interpretation of dualities (e.g., T-duality as an interchange of compactified dimensions), elucidating the modular symmetry of F-theory, and ensuring the correct maximal number of real supercharges is never exceeded by appropriate compactification.
5.3. Virial Supergravity and Exotic Compensators
"Virial supergravity" arises from gauging the virial supercurrent multiplet present in globally scale invariant supersymmetric theories (Nakayama, 2014). It is characterized by the use of a covariantly linear unitary compensator, absence of Einstein-Hilbert-type kinetic terms in the absence of matter, a dynamical non-geometric connection, and a unimodular metric in the Wess-Zumino gauge. Only scale-invariant matter can be coupled, completing the classification of irreducible supergravities in four dimensions.
6. Bottom-up and Swampland Approaches
6.1. S-matrix Consistency and Uniqueness
On-shell, S-matrix-based approaches demonstrate that consistent, unitary effective field theories with massive spin-3/2 particles coupled to scalars, vectors, and gravity—as required by supergravity—necessarily reproduce the coupling structure of or SUGRA, with unitarity restored up to the Planck scale only when gravity is included (Gherghetta et al., 16 Jul 2025). - and -term breaking mechanisms, and their multiplet structure, are uniquely recovered from scattering amplitudes and Ward identities.
6.2. Swampland Criteria
Within SUGRA frameworks, Swampland conjectures—such as the de Sitter and refined de Sitter conjectures—are formulated in terms of Kähler-invariant functions, leading to algebraic constraints on the potential and its derivatives in chiral field space (Ferrara et al., 2019). Failure to meet these conjectures characterizes models unable to be consistently embedded in string theory (i.e., ending up in the "Swampland"), whereas specific modifications (e.g., coupling to chiral fields with geometry) can "uplift" models into Swampland-safe territory.
7. Phenomenological Outlook and Experimental Signatures
Supergravity scenarios underpin many models that remain viable after LHC data and cosmological observations, provided appropriate choices of mediation mechanisms, non-universalities, and parameter alignments to preserve naturalness and match experimental constraints (Baer et al., 2015, Otsuka, 2015). Collider searches, direct and indirect dark matter detection, CMB, and gravitational wave measurements (e.g., for PBHs or cosmic strings (Kamada et al., 2012)) are anticipated as crucial tests for the low-energy realizations of supergravity scenarios.
Summary Table: Canonical Elements Across Supergravity Scenarios
| Feature | Mechanism/Model Example | Reference/arXiv |
|---|---|---|
| SUSY breaking & CC tuning | Non-Riemannian measure SUGRA | (Guendelman et al., 2015) |
| Moduli stabilization/inflation | 5D SUGRA on | (Otsuka, 2015) |
| Dark matter via PBHs | New inflation with flat inflection | (Kawasaki et al., 2016) |
| Gravitino condensation inflation | SUGRA NJL-type dynamics | (Alexandre et al., 2014) |
| Clockwork/RS/no-scale hierarchies | D=5 clockwork SUGRA | (Kehagias et al., 2017) |
| Unified higher-deriv. inflation/quintessence | SUGRA | (0901.2467) |
| SUGRA UV uniqueness | On-shell S-matrix | (Gherghetta et al., 16 Jul 2025) |
| Swampland constraints | dS conjecture in SUGRA | (Ferrara et al., 2019) |
The supergravity scenario thus serves as a richly structured, dynamically adaptable, and phenomenologically flexible framework, integrating gravitational and supersymmetric principles for theoretical and experimental high-energy physics and cosmology.