Structure-Guided Neighborhood Enhancement

• SGNE is a suite of methods that integrate explicit structural cues into neighborhood selection for enhanced feature aggregation across various domains.
• It utilizes extended filtering, adaptive graph construction, and structure-aware pooling to overcome the limitations of traditional local aggregation techniques.
• Empirical validations show that SGNE improves metrics in image enhancement, node classification, and link prediction while offering theoretical performance guarantees.

Structure-Guided Neighborhood Enhancement (SGNE) encompasses a broad set of methodologies that systematically leverage underlying structural information to augment or adapt the neighborhood context used in feature aggregation, learning, or enhancement operations. SGNE appears in diverse domains including magnetic resonance imaging, graph neural networks, contrastive learning, knowledge graph completion, and low-light image enhancement. The foundational principle is to go beyond naïve local or adjacency-based neighborhood definitions by infusing explicit, latent, or synthesized structural cues to improve model robustness, expressivity, or accuracy, often in settings corrupted by noise, sparsity, or heterophily.

1. Foundational Principles and Conceptual Framework

SGNE is based on the recognition that classical neighborhood aggregation—whether in image filtering or graph message-passing—can be suboptimal when the raw connectivity is sparse, noisy, or fails to capture critical geometric or relational patterns. Instead, SGNE mechanisms extract, encode, or synthesize additional structural information, thereby “guiding” the definition and selection of neighborhoods. These may include:

• Extended spatial neighborhoods in imaging filters using directionality and lattice geometry (Paul et al., 2013).
• Structurally informed pseudo-neighbors in knowledge graphs, retrieved by embedding similarity and multi-head fusion (Yang et al., 8 Sep 2025).
• K-nearest graphs or structural graphs in GNNs using role-based and global features to foster homophily (Tenorio et al., 10 Jun 2025).
• Prototype vectors derived from global subgraphs (cliques, biconnected components) in graph pooling (Lee et al., 2022).
• Path labeling for contextual encoding of positions and roles in link prediction (Ai et al., 2022).
• Adaptive neighborhood selection using reinforcement learning in multi-relational graphs (Peng et al., 2021).
• Stochastic neighbor masking and randomized dropout for contrastive learning on graphs (Sun et al., 12 Dec 2024).
• Structure-invariant edge priors guiding transformer blocks in low-light image enhancement (Dong et al., 18 Apr 2025).

Each approach extends local aggregation rules by injecting topological, geometric, or semantic priors, often driven by either data-driven or theoretically motivated criteria.

2. Methodological Realizations Across Domains

SGNE manifests as different algorithmic constructs, tailored to the hosting domain:

1. Extended Neighborhood Filtering In voxel-wise MR image enhancement, SGNE appears via binary weighting maps computed along extended radial directions within a lattice, using thresholded intensity comparisons. The resulting composite weight images allow edge-preserving denoising and contrast boosting (Paul et al., 2013).
2. Graph Structure Adaptation Graph domains employ SGNE for:
   • Reinforced neighbor selection with relation-aware similarity and threshold tuning via recursive RL (Peng et al., 2021).
   • Multiple graph view integration, where alternative structural graphs—with edges built from node structural similarities—are adaptively weighted for aggregation (Tenorio et al., 10 Jun 2025).
   • Self-supervised contrastive adaptation, balancing homophilous and structurally equivalent positive samples using persistent homology embeddings and topological losses (Zhu et al., 2022).
   • Structure-aware pooling using prototype vectors corresponding to graph substructures and affinity-based node selection (Lee et al., 2022).
   • Adaptive neighborhood generator modules that learn both neighbor identity and count per node in a differentiable, end-to-end fashion (Saha et al., 2023).
3. Knowledge Graph Completion In SLiNT, SGNE enriches sparse entities by retrieving pseudo-neighbors in embedding space and fusing them via multi-head attention, improving structural context for link prediction under sparsity and ambiguity (Yang et al., 8 Sep 2025).
4. Image Enhancement SG-LLIE leverages illumination-invariant structure priors extracted from low-light images, integrating these priors into transformer blocks to guide multi-scale UNet processing and restoration (Dong et al., 18 Apr 2025).
5. Contrastive Learning SIGNA introduces soft neighborhood awareness, employing stochastic masking and dropout to move away from strict adjacency-based positive pairs, yielding improved sample diversity and inference speed (Sun et al., 12 Dec 2024).

3. Mathematical Formalism and Algorithmic Structures

SGNE implementations are formalized through composite weight constructions, attention mechanisms, relation modules, and adaptive aggregation schemes. Representative formulas include:

Approach	Key Formula(s)	Description
MR Image Enhancement	$O(i,j) = I(i,j) + I(i,j) \times BWI(i,j)$	Multiplicative enhancement via binary weights
SG-GNN	$$H^{(\ell+1)} = \psi^{(\ell)}\left(\mathrm{concat}\{\alpha_r H^{(\ell+1)}_r\}\right)$$	Adaptive fusion of representations from multiple graphs
SLiNT / SGNE	$$\mathcal{N}_p(\mathbf{x}) = \operatorname{Top}\text{-}k_s(\cos(\mathbf{x}, \mathcal{E}))$$	Retrieval of pseudo-neighbors by cosine similarity
SPGP	$$\varphi(v) = \sigma(\varphi_\text{prototype}(v) + \lambda \varphi_\text{aux}(v))$$	Node scoring using structural prototypes and local deviation
SIGNA	$$D_\phi^{(\text{norm})}(u, v) = [\cos(\mathbf{z}_u, \mathbf{z}_v) + 1]/2$$	Normalized JSD contrastive learning discriminator

These formulas articulate the enhanced neighborhood computation, weighted aggregation, and structural signal integration across SGNE variants.

4. Empirical Validation and Performance Characteristics

SGNE frameworks are empirically validated on tasks ranging from image enhancement and node classification to link prediction and knowledge graph completion:

• In MRI, extended neighborhood filtering demonstrates superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for noise $\sigma < 0.03$, outperforming diffusion-based methods, and improves visual delineation of ROIs in clinical images (Paul et al., 2013).
• SG-GNN models yield consistently better node classification on heterophilic datasets by lowering the rate of false positive edges and boosting homophily, as shown through total variation and edge homophily metrics (Tenorio et al., 10 Jun 2025).
• SLiNT’s SGNE yields improved mean reciprocal rank and Hits@K in knowledge graph completion on WN18RR and FB15k-237; ablation shows SGNE is critical for mitigating sparsity-driven performance drops (Yang et al., 8 Sep 2025).
• SIGNA achieves a margin of up to 21.74% over previous contrastive frameworks (PPI dataset), and enables more efficient encoders (MLPs) for fast inference (Sun et al., 12 Dec 2024).
• SPGP graph pooling attains up to 9–10% accuracy gain over competing pooling methods on chemical datasets (Lee et al., 2022).
• Learning adaptive neighborhoods for GNNs improves classification, trajectory prediction, and point cloud accuracy by 1–2%, 7–22%, and >1% respectively compared to structure-learning baselines (Saha et al., 2023).
• SG-LLIE reaches best PSNR and SSIM scores on NTIRE 2025 LLIE, confirming the value of multi-scale structure-guided transformers for challenging low-light restoration (Dong et al., 18 Apr 2025).

5. Theoretical Guarantees and Limitations

SGNE methods often come with theoretical bounds and constraints that justify their performance:

• SG-GNN formalizes an error bound: $$\|Z^* - Z\|_F \leq \rho_1\rho_2(\alpha\sqrt{N} + 2(1+\sqrt{N})\|A - A^*\|_F\|X\|_F)$$, demonstrating that fewer false positives in the adjacency matrix correspond to lower prediction errors (Tenorio et al., 10 Jun 2025).
• Probabilistic guarantees in multi-graph integration ensure that with enough structural views, the likelihood of high-homophily subgraphs increases.
• For SGNE variants relying on k-NN or $\epsilon$-ball constructions, optimal parameter choice (e.g., $k$, $\epsilon$) is context-dependent and incurs computational cost.
• In self-supervised learning formulations, robust joint training is required to balance local and global (homophilous vs. structurally equivalent) signals (Zhu et al., 2022).
• Adaptive modules may require annealing intermediate objectives to avoid overfitting or oversparsification (Saha et al., 2023).

6. Application Contexts, Extensions, and Future Directions

SGNE is broadly applicable where vanilla adjacency or local connectivity fails to reflect true relational or geometric similarity, including:

• Medical imaging with fine structure and high noise (MR/CT, angiography).
• Networked systems exhibiting heterophily, such as social and biological graphs.
• Knowledge graph completion under sparsity and ambiguity.
• Multi-modal representation learning requiring alignment of structural and functional cues.
• Large-scale contrastive learning, benefiting from efficient neighborhood sampling and inference decoupling.

A plausible implication is that future SGNE frameworks may further automate graph view generation and fusion, optimize structural attribute selection dynamically, and extend domain-specific priors (e.g., chemical motifs, topological invariants) for more generalized neighborhood enhancement. The paradigm is also likely to influence methods for robust learning on noisy, incomplete, or dynamic graphs, and facilitate scalable, explainable model architectures in both supervised and self-supervised contexts.

7. Comparative Analysis with Classical Methods

SGNE approaches contrast with classical neighborhood processing as follows:

Classical Approach	SGNE Augmentation
Fixed local adjacency	Structural, adaptive, or global priors guide neighborhood selection
Homophily-centric GNNs	Integration of role-based/global attribute k-NN graphs
Iterative diffusion-based filtering	Non-iterative, directionally weighted enhancement
Pairwise positive sample selection	Introduction of long-range, structurally equivalent pairing

This suggests SGNE lays the foundation for more adaptive, context-sensitive learning pipelines in both imaging and graph domains, systematically improving upon limitations of strictly local aggregation or heuristically defined neighborhoods.

---

Structure-Guided Neighborhood Enhancement constitutes an overview of explicit structural context integration methods that enhance the fidelity, interpretability, and robustness of feature aggregation under diverse, often challenging data regimes. It informs design choices across domains and provides theoretical guarantees that support its empirical superiority.