Stray Light Mitigation Strategies

• Stray Light Mitigation Strategies are systematic methods that reduce unwanted light caused by diffraction, scattering, and reflection in optical instruments.
• They combine precise optical designs—such as baffles, serrated edges, and specialized coatings—with advanced modeling and deconvolution techniques to improve measurement sensitivity.
• Integrating engineered physical structures and real-time sensor arrays, these strategies achieve suppression improvements of up to 40% or exceed 10 dB in critical applications.

Stray light mitigation strategies comprise the systematic design, modeling, measurement, and correction of unwanted light that contaminates optical and photonic measurement systems. Stray light—arising from every component in a system via diffraction, scattering, or reflection—limits achievable sensitivity in instruments ranging from astronomical spectrographs and coronagraphs to interferometric gravitational-wave detectors and advanced imaging arrays. The following sections synthesize foundational and advanced approaches reported across observational astronomy, space instruments, precision optical metrology, and micro/nano-photonics, drawing exclusively from peer-reviewed studies and instrument-specific modeling.

1. Physical Origins and Modeling of Stray Light

Two principal processes generate stray light: (1) diffraction from finite apertures or optical edges and (2) non-specular scattering from surface imperfections (micro-roughness, figure errors) or particles. In coronagraphic spectroscopy (UVCS on SOHO), the diffracted contribution and non-specular scattering are both quantitatively modeled as (Cranmer et al., 2010):

$$\frac{\mathrm{d}I}{I_{0}\,\mathrm{d}\theta_x} = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi^2 D_x \theta_x^{2} \left[ W + \frac{D_x}{\Lambda} \left( \frac{32\pi^3 \sigma^2}{\lambda^2} \right) \right] }$$

where $D_x$ is illuminated mirror width, $\lambda$ is wavelength, $W$ accounts for diffraction wing enhancement due to figure errors, $\sigma$ is the r.m.s. micro-roughness, and $\Lambda$ is the surface coherence length. For off-axis systems, point source normalized irradiance transmittance (PSNIT) is used to trace weak paths from environmental or celestial sources to the focal plane (see (Li, 2019)).

Surface scattering in mirrors destined for coronagraphs is further characterized by bidirectional reflectance distribution functions (BRDF) derived from the power spectral density (PSD) of surface features. The K-correlation (ABC) model is prominent, allowing arbitrary log–log PSD slopes—a necessity for precision modeling of real mirror surfaces spanning nano- to micron-scale features (Xue et al., 2020).

2. Design-Based Mitigation: Optical Surfaces, Baffles, and Structures

Stray light suppression hinges on optical system architecture:

• Baffles and Vanes: Precision-placed vanes within baffles or along critical paths block multiply-scattered light. Detailed ray tracing for the Xinglong 2.16-m telescope demonstrates that five vanes placed at calculated intervals along the secondary baffle reduce PSNIT by ~40% at zenith (Li, 2019). Empirical work confirms that vanes alone are often nearly as effective as baffles plus vanes, especially when stray sources are offset by more than 20–30° from the target (Li, 2021).
• Edge Treatments: Serrations on baffle edges disrupt regular diffraction, introducing asymmetric diffraction patterns that can direct energy away from sensitive detectors. New modeling in the Einstein Telescope explicitly simulates serrated baffle edges, revealing a modified angular redistribution of diffracted light that can lower recombination with primary beams (Andrés-Carcasona et al., 22 Jun 2025).
• Macroscopic Structural Absorbers: “Macroscopic” periodic or quasi-random 3D microstructures fabricated by additive manufacturing (e.g., laser powder bed fusion) multiply internal reflections before escape, reducing peak intensities by factors of ~0.39 and average intensities by ~0.65 without altering surface coatings (Kaster, 7 Jul 2025). Examples include gyroid or Schwarz D minimal surfaces.
• Material and Coating Treatments: Black anodized aluminium, matte polymers, and platinum black coatings create high surface area, low-reflectivity interfaces. Platinum black electrodeposition achieves >100× reflectivity reduction (to R/R_Au ≲ 0.005) in the visible–NIR for delicate probes, and its conformal deposition on microcantilevers preserves electrical conductivity (Venugopalan et al., 21 Nov 2024).

3. Advanced Instrumental and Algorithmic Strategies

• Instrumental Shielding and Optical Modeling: For critical space missions, comprehensive end-to-end simulation is required. The CHEOPS detector’s stray light mitigation combines detailed solid angle calculations, baffle PST measurements, and the use of cumulative sky-visibility maps for adaptive observation scheduling (Kuntzer, 2013). Point source transmittance (PST) quantifies the effectiveness of off-axis rejection, with sensitivity to manufacturing tolerances; a <10% change in PST near 35° off-axis can lead to limiting magnitude degradation by factors of several.
• Sensor Array Architecture: In non-contiguous CMOS arrays for space astronomy, each detector’s bandpass filter must be held exactly perpendicular to the local beam to avoid bandpass variations and ghosting. Multi-level baffling, two-tier vanes, and precise edge finishing at the millimeter and sub-millimeter level are engineered to prevent scattered light from bridging sensor gaps (Kautz et al., 28 Aug 2025). PST-based stray light path analysis is an essential tool, guiding placement and tolerances for both baffles and vanes.
• Internal Absorbers for Imaging Arrays: Large-area MKID or LEKID arrays suffer from “pedestal” response due to internally scattered substrate modes. Patterned on-chip absorbers (e.g., Ta mesh, with critical design to ensure superconductivity at readout frequencies) can reduce the substrate-induced stray response by ≥10 dB without impacting primary beam response (Yates et al., 2018). For lens–antenna designs, a correctly dimensioned hole in the mesh preserves per-pixel throughput.

4. Stray Light Characterization, Measurement, and Correction

• Blind Deconvolution and PSF Measurement: In solar EUV imaging (e.g., STEREO-B/EUVI), blind deconvolution under strong constraints—using known zero-signal regions such as the lunar disk—permits separation of astrophysical signals from stray patterns. The deconvolution treats the PSF as a composite of analytically calculated and empirically determined components (e.g., mirror microroughness modeled as an elliptical power law), and the algorithm recovers both the underlying signal and the PSF itself (Shearer et al., 2011). Stray light correction led to 40–70% intensity reductions in coronal holes.
• Post facto Deconvolution and PSF-Based Correction: For slit-spectrograph data, instrumental PSFs, derived from edge-spill experiments (blocked FOV), enable spatial deconvolution. Fourier or first-order corrections using measured kernels both improve spatial resolution and reveal hidden structure in solar observations, increasing rms contrast and measurable line profile amplitudes by 5–10% (Beck et al., 2011). Comparable strategies are deployed in atmospheric seeing correction of spectropolarimetric data, where synthetic data from MHD simulations and Kolmogorov turbulence models are used to calibrate the PSF, enabling iterative deconvolution that recovers true solar granulation contrast (Saranathan et al., 2021).
• Calibration in Time-of-Flight and LIDAR Systems: In AMCW LiDAR, internal stray light produces static sinusoidal interference, parameterizable by amplitude and phase. Gaussian mixture model segmentation of calibration scenes, combined with PSO-driven global minimization of inter-cluster depth error, enables subtraction of the spurious signal, reducing depth errors from tens of cm to 3.2 mm over multi-meter ranges (Lee et al., 2023).

5. Noise Mitigation via Readout and Signal Processing Schemes

• Balanced Homodyne Readout: In the context of Michelson interferometers for gravitational wave detection, the use of dual balanced homodyne detectors (BHD) at both output ports enables construction of linear combinations that isolate arm-specific signals. For instance, $S_1(t) = ½(Q_\text{AS}(t) + P_\text{S}(t))$ accesses phase changes in a single arm, while subtraction of the appropriate combinations cancels arm-specific scattered light (Lohde et al., 6 Sep 2024). Experimental results demonstrate 13.2 dB suppression of injected scattered light peaks.
• Tunable Coherence Approaches: PRN phase modulation (“tunable coherence”) dramatically shortens the laser’s effective coherence length—e.g., to centimeter or even micrometer scales at 10 GHz phase flip rates—thereby suppressing the ability of path-length-mismatched stray light to interfere with the primary signal in an interferometric setup. This approach achieved up to 35 dB suppression of injected stray light and is especially promising for complex topologies such as power-recycled Michelson interferometers, with the main challenge being extreme path length matching and high-speed modulation requirements (Voigt et al., 1 Aug 2025).
• Real-Time Stray Light Sensors and Baffle Instrumentation: In advanced interferometers such as Virgo, instrumented baffles equipped with dense arrays of photodiode sensors continuously monitor scattered light power at multiple radial locations, providing real-time diagnostics of misalignment and mirror surface defects. Differential power analysis across concentric sensor rings enables detection thresholds below 0.2 µrad tilt and is robust even when high order optical modes are excited (Macquet et al., 2022).

6. Impacts, Limitations, and Forward Directions

• Achievable Suppression and Engineering Limits: For high-precision applications, even perfect surface polishing cannot overcome finite-aperture diffraction limits. For SOHO/UVCS, this sets a floor on achievable stray light, which only geometric redesign (aperture scaling, occulter relocation, slit optimization) can improve beyond (Cranmer et al., 2010). In imaging arrays, substrate-induced backgrounds impose pixel sampling and layout requirements. For structural absorbers, additive manufacturing tolerances and feature size limits (∼100 µm minimum) constrain achievable geometric suppression (Kaster, 7 Jul 2025).
• Practical Tolerances and Performance Metrics: In gravitational wave observatories, explicit simulation shows that mirror misalignments >8 μrad or beam offsets >4–7 cm can bring stray light noise close to design sensitivity limits, implying stringent alignment tolerances and continuous in-situ monitoring (Andrés-Carcasona et al., 22 Jun 2025). Similarly, in mission operations, adaptive observation scheduling based on time-resolved sky visibility and stray light simulation maximizes photometric yield while managing variable environmental and orbital parameters (Kuntzer, 2013).
• Methodological Generalization: Approaches such as lunar-transit-constrained blind deconvolution (Shearer et al., 2011), point source transmission scanning (Kautz et al., 28 Aug 2025), and on-orbit calibration with empty field observations (Kuntzer, 2013) serve as templates for deploying new instrument-specific strategies.
• Potential for Future Integration: The convergence of new materials (e.g., platinum black, engineered polymer absorbers) with advanced computational design (FFT-based propagation, parametric geometry optimization) sets the stage for next-generation stray light suppression, where both system-level and microstructure-level controls are co-optimized. Increasingly, fine-grained metrology and fast digital control will be required to keep pace with the rising sensitivity of astronomical, remote sensing, and quantum measurement systems.

---

This overview, grounded in quantitative modeling, empirical validation, and engineering design, encapsulates the present state and future directions of stray light mitigation strategies across advanced optical instrumentation.