Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Sterile-Active Neutrino Mixing

Updated 9 December 2025
  • Sterile-active neutrino mixing is defined as the quantum-mechanical interplay between SM active flavors and hypothetical sterile states, altering oscillation probabilities.
  • The phenomenon is analyzed via an extended PMNS framework that incorporates new mixing angles and mass-squared differences, explaining short-baseline anomalies.
  • Experimental, cosmological, and astrophysical constraints tightly bound the mixing parameters, guiding theoretical models and future neutrino studies.

Sterile-active neutrino mixing denotes quantum-mechanical mixing between the three Standard Model (SM) “active” neutrino flavors—νe\nu_e, νμ\nu_\mu, ντ\nu_\tau—and one or more hypothetical “sterile” neutrino states, νs\nu_s, which lack SM gauge interactions. The possibility of such mixing arises both in theoretical frameworks extending the SM, such as seesaw models, and in phenomenological scenarios addressing anomalies in short-baseline oscillation data. Sterile-active mixing modifies oscillation probabilities, has critical implications for laboratory and astrophysical neutrino experiments, and is tightly constrained by cosmological and astrophysical observables.

1. Formalism of Sterile-Active Neutrino Mixing

A generalized oscillation framework extends the PMNS matrix to accommodate one or more sterile flavors. For one sterile, the flavor and mass eigenstates are related by a 4×44\times4 unitary matrix: νf=Uνm,νf(νe νμ ντ νs),  νm(ν1 ν2 ν3 ν4)\nu_f = U\,\nu_m,\qquad \nu_f \equiv \begin{pmatrix} \nu_e \ \nu_\mu \ \nu_\tau \ \nu_s \end{pmatrix},\; \nu_m \equiv \begin{pmatrix} \nu_1 \ \nu_2 \ \nu_3 \ \nu_4 \end{pmatrix} where UU can be decomposed into sequential rotations: the standard active-active mixing angles (θ12,θ13,θ23)(\theta_{12}, \theta_{13}, \theta_{23}) and new active-sterile angles, e.g.\ θ14,θ24,θ34\theta_{14},\theta_{24},\theta_{34}, plus additional CP-violating phases (Kisslinger, 2014, Majhi et al., 2019). For small mixing, Uα42sin2θα4|U_{\alpha4}|^2 \simeq \sin^2\theta_{\alpha4} (α=e,μ,τ)(\alpha = e, \mu, \tau).

The corresponding mass-squared differences comprise the established solar (δm122\delta m_{12}^2) and atmospheric (δm132\delta m_{13}^2) scales, plus the new “sterile splitting” δmj42  (0.11  eV2\delta m_{j4}^2\;(\sim 0.1-1\;\text{eV}^2 for light sterile neutrinos) (Kisslinger, 2014).

In models with several sterile states (e.g., 3+N), the mixing matrix expands accordingly, with parameterizations such as those in (Khruschov et al., 2018) for (3+3) schemes. Theoretical models invoking flavor symmetries, e.g.\ A4A_4 or D4D_4, impose relations between active-sterile and active-active angles, and frequently predict correlated values for θ13\theta_{13} and the sterile mixings (Merle et al., 2014, Singh et al., 2022).

2. Oscillation Phenomenology and Key Probabilities

The oscillation probability between active flavors is modified in the presence of sterile mixing. In vacuum and neglecting CP violation for simplicity, the νμνe\nu_\mu \to \nu_e appearance probability reads: P(νμνe)=i=14Uei2Uμi2+2i<jUeiUμiUejUμjcos(ΔijL)P(\nu_\mu\to\nu_e) = \sum_{i=1}^4 U_{ei}^2 U_{\mu i}^2 + 2\sum_{i<j} U_{ei} U_{\mu i} U_{ej} U_{\mu j} \cos (\Delta_{ij} L) where Δij=δmij2/(2E)\Delta_{ij} = \delta m_{ij}^2/(2E) and LL is the baseline (Kisslinger, 2014, Majhi et al., 2019).

For short baselines with Δm4121  eV2\Delta m_{41}^2\sim 1\;\text{eV}^2, the leading appearance and disappearance probabilities reduce to: PSBL(νανβ)4Uα42Uβ42sin2(Δm412L4E)P_{\text{SBL}}(\nu_\alpha\rightarrow\nu_\beta)\simeq 4|U_{\alpha4}|^2|U_{\beta4}|^2 \sin^2 \left(\frac{\Delta m^2_{41} L}{4E}\right) Demonstrably, Ue420.02|U_{e4}|^2 \sim 0.02--$0.04$, Uμ420.01|U_{\mu4}|^2 \sim 0.01--$0.03$ are required to explain MiniBooNE/LSND-type anomalies (Mirizzi et al., 2013, Khruschov et al., 2018). At longer baselines, interference with the standard oscillation phase and matter effects can induce degeneracies and suppress sensitivities to mass hierarchy and CP violation in forthcoming experiments (Majhi et al., 2019).

3. Experimental and Observational Constraints

Laboratory Bounds

Disappearance and appearance channels in short-baseline oscillation experiments, such as reactor (Daya Bay, Double Chooz), accelerator (MINOS, NOν\nuA, T2K), and source experiments, place direct upper bounds on Ue42|U_{e4}|^2, Uμ42|U_{\mu4}|^2, and Uτ42|U_{\tau4}|^2. Representative best-fit regions from global fits are: | Parameter | Best-fit Range | Source | |------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------| | Ue42|U_{e4}|^2 | 0.02 – 0.04 | LSND/MiniBooNE, Reactors | | Uμ42|U_{\mu4}|^2 | 0.01 – 0.03 | LSND/MiniBooNE, MINOS | | δm412\delta m^2_{41} | 0.5 – 2 eV2^2 | Short-baseline anomalies |

NOν\nuA's neutral-current analysis yields Uμ42<0.126|U_{\mu4}|^2 < 0.126, Uτ42<0.268|U_{\tau4}|^2 < 0.268 (90% CL, δm4120.05\delta m^2_{41}\sim 0.05–$0.5$ eV2^2) (Collaboration et al., 2017), while correspondingly weaker limits are obtained for tau mixing.

Cosmological Constraints

Sterile neutrino production in the early universe is stringently constrained by measurements of the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, NeffN_{\rm eff}, and by the neutrino mass contribution to the energy density, Ωνh2\Omega_\nu h^2. Planck data require (Mirizzi et al., 2013): Neff<3.80,mseff<0.42eV (95%) Ue42, Uμ42103 for δm4121eV2N_{\rm eff} < 3.80,\qquad m_s^{\rm eff} < 0.42\,\textrm{eV}\ (95\%) \ |U_{e4}|^2,\ |U_{\mu4}|^2 \lesssim 10^{-3}\ \textrm{for}\ \delta m^2_{41}\sim 1\,\textrm{eV}^2 Thus, most laboratory-favored active-sterile mixing regions at the eV scale are excluded by cosmological constraints unless nonstandard cosmologies (e.g. large lepton asymmetry, secret interactions) suppress sterile production (Mirizzi et al., 2013, Hannestad et al., 2015, Alonso-Álvarez et al., 2022).

Astrophysical Bounds

Active-sterile mixing can be probed via its impact on supernovae, the cosmic microwave background, and high-energy astrophysical neutrino fluxes. Core-collapse supernovae are sensitive to keV–MeV sterile neutrinos via energy-loss arguments—mixing angles as small as sin22θ108\sin^2 2\theta \lesssim 10^{-8} are excluded for ms100m_s\gtrsim 100\,keV (Raffelt et al., 2011, Ray et al., 22 Apr 2024). For ms10m_s \lesssim 10\,keV, matter suppression renders the constraints much weaker, making this mass window available for warm dark matter sterile scenarios.

The flavor composition of astrophysical neutrinos at Earth allows direct tests of non-unitarity in the active sector induced by sterile mixing. Measured flavor-ratio triangles constrain the non-unitarity parameter ϵ\epsilon and are beginning to probe the favored ranges for Uα42|U_{\alpha4}|^2 (Argüelles et al., 2019). At present, constraints are at the level ϵ0.5\epsilon\lesssim 0.5; next-generation telescopes will reach ϵ0.1\epsilon\sim 0.1.

4. Theoretical Origin and Model Realizations

Seesaw Mechanisms

Sterile-active mixing is an inherent feature of seesaw-type extensions of the SM. In Type I seesaw, Yukawa couplings YαIY_{\alpha I} generate a Dirac mass term, and the heavy Majorana mass suppresses active neutrino masses while inducing mixings: θαi(mD)αIMI=v2YαIMI,(α=e,μ,τ)\theta_{\alpha i}\simeq \frac{(m_D)_{\alpha I}}{M_I}=\frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{Y_{\alpha I}}{M_I},\quad (\alpha=e,\mu,\tau) For MIM_I in the (sub-)GeV range, minimal values of the sum Uα12+Uα221011(1GeV/MI)|U_{\alpha1}|^2+|U_{\alpha2}|^2 \gtrsim 10^{-11}(1\,\text{GeV}/M_I) arise for two sterile states (Gorbunov et al., 2013); see Table: | Number below DD-meson | Minimal UeI2+UμI2|U_{eI}|^2+|U_{\mu I}|^2 | Scaling | |------------------------|-------------------------------------|-----------------| | 1 | 0 | — | | 2 | 1011\sim10^{-11} | 1/M\propto 1/M | | 3 | Pairwise, as for 2 | — |

Incorporating CP-violating phases allows destructive interference, potentially suppressing the mixing to 102010^{-20} in parts of parameter space (Krasnov et al., 2018).

Flavor Symmetry Approaches

Flavor models based on A4A_4 or D4D_4 symmetry can account for both reactor and sterile mixings as correlated effects of symmetry breaking and vacuum misalignment (Merle et al., 2014, Singh et al., 2022). In such frameworks, structure in the active–sterile sector, for instance, predicts that θ13\theta_{13} and θ14\theta_{14} are of similar magnitude and can be suppressed or enhanced together.

Alternative mixing schemes factor the full mixing matrix into a dominant “flavor symmetric” part and perturbations responsible for nonzero reactor and active–sterile angles, leading to analytic correlations among oscillation parameters (Dev et al., 2019).

Mirror Sector and Radiative Models

Models incorporating a “mirror” sector or multiple Higgs doublets naturally produce one light sterile state with eV-scale mass from Planck-suppressed dimension-5 operators, with O(10%)O(10\%) active-sterile mixing generated through loop effects or Higgs portal couplings (Zhang et al., 2013).

5. Oscillation Effects in Astrophysical and Cosmological Environments

Supernovae and Core-Collapse

In supernovae, active-sterile mixing induces additional MSW resonances, with matter effects governing adiabatic or nonadiabatic transitions. For ms0.1m_s\gtrsim0.1–$10$ keV and sufficiently large mixing, νˉμνˉs\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_s conversion followed by sterile escape enhances the muonization of the proto-neutron star and modifies the thermodynamics and lepton number transport (Ray et al., 22 Apr 2024, Raffelt et al., 2011). In addition, keV-scale sterile production is self-regulated via feedback on neutrino asymmetries, strongly quenching the emission rate at intermediate masses (Raffelt et al., 2011).

Early Universe: Quantum Kinetics and BBN

Quantum kinetic equations with momentum-dependent collision terms are required to accurately model sterile-state thermalization and its impact on NeffN_{\rm eff}. Nearly complete thermalization (ΔNeff1\Delta N_{\rm eff}\approx 1) occurs for ms1m_s\sim 1 eV and mixing sin22θ103\sin^2 2\theta \gtrsim 10^{-3} unless mechanisms such as lepton asymmetry or secret self-interactions block sterile production (Hannestad et al., 2015, Alonso-Álvarez et al., 2022). BBN sets upper bounds on the effective occupation factor of sterile states (ζ0.65)(\zeta\lesssim0.65) and the active-sterile mixing angles (e.g., ϕ1,210\phi_{1,2} \lesssim 10^\circ for Δm142=1eV2\Delta m_{14}^2 = 1\,\text{eV}^2 (Civitarese et al., 2016)).

Resonant active-sterile conversion around T10T\sim10 GeV can boost sterile production even for very small mixing, excluding angles as low as θs1016\theta_s\sim 10^{-16} for MeV–GeV masses by combined BBN and CMB data (Alonso-Álvarez et al., 2022), thus closing many otherwise unconstrained regions of parameter space.

6. Model-Building and Phenomenological Implications

Sterile-active mixing alters both direct laboratory phenomenology and cosmology:

  • Short-baseline anomalies can be explained with m41m_4 \sim 1 eV and Ue42Uμ420.01|U_{e4}|^2 \sim |U_{\mu4}|^2 \sim 0.01.
  • However, eV-scale sterile neutrinos are disfavored by cosmological datasets unless new physics suppresses their production.
  • In extended seesaw or mirror models, a range of masses (\simeV–GeV–keV) and mixings are natural, constrained by direct searches, BBN, and lepton flavor violating processes.
  • High-precision supernova, reactor, and accelerator experiments—as well as cosmological probes such as future CMB surveys—will further constrain the parameter space, potentially uncovering new physics or conclusively ruling out most light sterile neutrino scenarios (Collaboration et al., 2017, Hannestad et al., 2015, Mirizzi et al., 2013).

Sterile-active mixing thus remains a central topic at the interface of particle physics, cosmology, and astrophysics, providing a unique window into both the origin of neutrino mass and potential portals to hidden sectors.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Sterile-Active Neutrino Mixing.