Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 65 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 113 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 200 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 445 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Spin Reorientation Transition

Updated 2 October 2025
  • Spin reorientation transition is a phenomenon where magnetic moments in crystals realign due to competing anisotropies such as crystalline fields, exchange interactions, and interfacial effects.
  • Experimental probes like neutron diffraction, magnetometry, and heat capacity measurements reveal both abrupt and gradual transitions indicative of changes in magnetic order.
  • Controlling SRTs through temperature, strain, or compositional tuning supports advances in spintronic devices, enabling energy-efficient magnetic switching and tunable topological states.

A spin reorientation transition (SRT) refers to a change in the preferred direction of ordered magnetic moments within a crystalline solid, most often as a function of temperature, external field, pressure, film thickness, or compositional tuning. These transitions emerge from the competition or interplay between distinct sources of magnetic anisotropy—such as single-ion crystalline electric fields, exchange interactions, or interfacial effects—in multi-sublattice or low-dimensional magnets. SRTs provide a direct avenue to manipulate the directionality of magnetic order, underpinning both fundamental studies of magnetic phase transitions and avenues for controlling magnetism in device-relevant platforms.

1. Fundamental Mechanisms Driving Spin Reorientation

Spin reorientation transitions occur when the net magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE) changes sign or favorability due to the competition among several microscopic sources:

  • Single-Ion Anisotropy: Local crystalline electric fields impart preferred orientation axes for magnetic ions. In 3d and 4f systems, the orbital character and Hund’s rules (e.g., S = 5/2, L = 0 for Mn²⁺; S = 3/2, L = 6 for Nd³⁺) yield vastly different anisotropies for transition-metal versus rare-earth magnetic sites.
  • Exchange Coupling: Symmetric (Heisenberg) and antisymmetric (Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya, DM) exchange interactions can stabilize or frustrate particular magnetic configurations and, at times, induce canted spin structures or higher-order reorientations.
  • Inter-sublattice Coupling: In compounds with both rare-earth (4f) and transition-metal (3d) sublattices (e.g., NdMnAsO, NdFeAsO), the anisotropy and ordering of one sublattice (e.g., Nd) can force a reorientation of the other (e.g., Mn, Fe) through exchange interactions and competing ease of moment alignment.
  • Interfacial or Extrinsic Effects: In heterostructures and thin films, interfacial coupling (with heavy metals or organic overlayers) and strain can tune the balance of perpendicular and in-plane anisotropy, leading to SRTs as a function of layer thickness, growth morphology, or external perturbations.

The prototypical scenario involves an “easy-axis” ground state (moments aligned along a principal crystal axis) reorienting to an “easy-plane” (moments within a basal plane) or vice versa, as the effective anisotropy contributions cross over due to temperature, pressure, field, or lattice strain.

2. Experimental Probes and Observable Signatures

SRTs manifest in several magnetic and transport signatures, which are reliably identified through:

  • Neutron and Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction: Used to directly determine magnetic moment orientation, propagation vectors (k\mathbf{k}), and refined sublattice moment values. For instance, in NdMnAsO, a transition from Mn moments along the cc-axis (mMn=2.41(6)μBm_{\text{Mn}} = 2.41(6) \,\mu_\mathrm{B} at 300 K) to the abab-plane (mMn, ab=3.72(1)μBm_{\text{Mn, ab}} = 3.72(1)\,\mu_\mathrm{B} at 1.6 K) at TSR=23T_{\text{SR}} = 23 K is detected (Marcinkova et al., 2010).
  • Magnetization and Susceptibility: SQUID and vibrating sample magnetometry capture anomalies, discontinuities, or peaks in χ(T)\chi(T) (magnetic transitions), with field-dependence distinguishing between antiferromagnetic and weakly ferromagnetic regimes. Second-order SRTs are marked by continuous susceptibility changes; first-order by hysteresis and abrupt jumps (Shaykhutdinov et al., 2023).
  • Heat Capacity Measurements: Cp(T)C_p(T) anomalies corroborate phase transition order, revealing broadened or shifted peaks under external fields—typical of an antiferromagnetic SRT.
  • Electrical Transport: Spin reorientation often modifies scattering, producing resistivity upturns or slope changes at TSRT_{\text{SR}} (e.g., in NdMnAsO, an upturn at 23 K is attributed to enhanced spin scattering).
  • Magnetic Imaging and Dichroism: Techniques such as magnetic force microscopy (MFM), x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD), and transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect (TMOKE) directly visualize domain reorientations and resolve atomic-level changes in moment directionality (Ryan et al., 26 Jul 2024, Lee et al., 2011).

3. Microscopic Theory and Symmetry Analysis

The quantitative modeling of SRTs relies on rigorous magnetic symmetry analysis and detailed Hamiltonian considerations:

  • Power-Law Behavior: Sub-lattice moment evolution near the Néel temperature (TNT_N) follows m(T)=m0(1T/TN)βm(T) = m_0 (1 - T / T_N)^\beta, where deviations from three-dimensional Heisenberg exponents (e.g., β0.27\beta \approx 0.27 vs. ideal 0.367\approx 0.367) diagnose the layered or quasi-2D nature of the material (Marcinkova et al., 2010).
  • Singlet Representation and Basis Vectors: Group-theoretical decomposition of the magnetic representation on each site (e.g., Γmag=Γ3+Γ4+2Γ5\Gamma_{\text{mag}} = \Gamma_3 + \Gamma_4 + 2\Gamma_5 for Mn in NdMnAsO) constrains compatible order parameters and their orientations.
  • Competition of Anisotropies: For two sublattices, the interaction of a weak but cc-axis anisotropic transition metal ion with a strongly in-plane rare-earth ion can trigger SRTs as temperature enables the rare-earth sublattice to order and “drag” the transition metal moment orientation (Marcinkova et al., 2010, Marcinkova et al., 2012).
  • Frustrated Exchange: SRTs serve as a mechanism to resolve frustration between isotropic antiferromagnetic exchanges and single-ion anisotropies, sometimes with antisymmetric interactions (e.g., Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya) further stabilizing the selected orientation (Vibhakar et al., 2020).

4. Prototypical Materials Systems and Realization Examples

A representative (but not exhaustive) sample of systems showing SRTs include:

Material/System SRT Mechanism Probe/Consequence
NdMnAsO (Marcinkova et al., 2010) Nd–Mn competing anisotropies, SRT at 23 K Mn moments: cc-axis ab\rightarrow ab-plane
NdFeAsO (Marcinkova et al., 2012) Nd ordering triggers Fe reorientation Fe: in-plane c\rightarrow c-axis
HoFe1x_{1-x}Mnx_xO3_3 (Shaykhutdinov et al., 2023) Mn doping alters Fe–Fe exchange, SRT to higher TT Order changes, 2nd→1st order SRT
BiFeO3_3 thin films (Goswami et al., 4 Dec 2024) Epitaxial strain induces transition from G-type to C-type 90^\circ domain rotation
Pt/Co/molecule interfaces (Ozdemir et al., 27 May 2025) Competing PMA (Pt/Co) vs. molecular in-plane anisotropy Tunable, low-energy, ultrafast SRT
Ni/Fe/Ni/W(110) (Lee et al., 2011) Nanoparticle-induced 2D–3D crossover reduces dipolar SRT toggled by Fe, Ni deposition
TbMn6_6Sn6_6 (Riberolles et al., 2023, Ryan et al., 26 Jul 2024) Thermal activation of Tb orbital state, changing anisotropy SRT at 310 K; topological phase switching

5. Transition Order, Dynamics, and Time Scales

SRTs can be either second-order (continuous) or first-order (discontinuous, with hysteresis), governed by the free energy landscape:

  • Second-Order SRT: Characterized by gradual rotation over a narrow temperature window, manifesting in smooth χ(T)\chi(T) and CpC_p anomalies (e.g., NdMnAsO, pure HoFeO3_3).
  • First-Order SRT: Marked by abrupt changes, pronounced hysteresis in magnetization, and sharp resistive jumps (e.g., HoFe1x_{1-x}Mnx_xO3_3 for x0.2x\gtrsim 0.2).
  • Ultrafast Dynamics: In systems where SRT is triggered optically or by current-induced heating, characteristic reorientation time scales are ps to sub-100 ps (e.g., 12–24 ps for Mn reorientation in TbMn6_6Sn6_6 with fs-laser excitation (Ryan et al., 26 Jul 2024)), contrasting with demagnetization time scales that can be an order of magnitude faster.

The microscopic dynamics of SRTs under nonequilibrium excitation are captured via Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert-type equations, with the effective field incorporating instantaneous, temperature-dependent anisotropy changes.

6. Applications and Implications

SRTs underlie multiple aspects of magnetic and spintronic device design:

  • Magnetic Memory and Logic: Control over the easy-axis orientation via temperature, field, or interface engineering enables magnetic data storage or logic elements that are switchable with low energy input near the SRT.
  • Heat-Assisted and All-Optical Switching: The proximity to a SRT allows for highly efficient magnetization switching with minimal heat or optical energy, as in Pt/Co/molecule heterostructures or ferrimagnetically coupled systems where 180^\circ reorientations are possible (Ozdemir et al., 27 May 2025, Ryan et al., 26 Jul 2024).
  • Topological Phases: In kagome and layered magnets (e.g., TbMn6_6Sn6_6), SRTs modulate topological gaps (quantum anomalous Hall effects), providing routes for electrically or optically controlled topological state switching (Riberolles et al., 2023).
  • Strain-Driven and Electric-Field Control: In strongly correlated oxides (e.g., NiO), the SRT can be induced by epitaxial strain, suggesting electric field control of spin orientation when integrated with piezoelectric substrates (Gupta et al., 19 Jul 2025).
  • Quantum and Superparamagnetic Regimes: At nanoscale dimensions, SRTs may produce superparamagnetic states where time-averaged magnetization vanishes due to large dynamical fluctuations, a phenomenon with implications for thermal stability in miniaturized devices (Norizuki et al., 2012).

7. Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions

SRTs serve as precision probes into the delicate balance of energy terms in solid-state magnetism. Ongoing and future research directions include:

  • Interfacial Engineering: Expanding the range and tunability of SRTs by selecting new combination of ferromagnetic and molecular/oxide layers, controlling nanoparticle formation, or designing hybrid van der Waals interfaces.
  • Dynamic and Ultrafast Control: Real-time, fs–ns-scale control of SRTs for next-generation information storage.
  • Topological and Quantum Order Parameters: Utilizing SRTs to toggle between distinct quantum phases, such as quantum anomalous Hall or skyrmionic states, via temperature, field, or excitation fluence.
  • Straintronics: Exploiting piezoelectric control for reversible, non-volatile, and energy-efficient magnetization switching by modulating strain-driven SRTs.
  • Theory—Multiplet and Many-Body Effects: Recognizing the essential role of full multipole Coulomb interactions (beyond Hubbard UU and Hund’s JJ models) and excited-state mixing in predicting and controlling SRTs in correlated oxides (Gupta et al., 19 Jul 2025).

The multiplicity of mechanisms and platforms that support SRTs highlights their central importance in condensed matter physics and their promise as a tuning parameter in functional materials and devices.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Spin Reorientation Transition.