Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Spatially Isotropic Constellations in mmWave OAM

Updated 23 November 2025
  • Spatially isotropic constellations are signaling schemes that maintain uniform minimum Euclidean distance across spatial regions by harnessing proportional sub-channel gain matrices.
  • They employ constant-beta contours and map-assisted partitioning to design robust constellations for mmWave WDM with orbital angular momentum in short-range LOS links.
  • Simulation results and fixed-power allocation strategies demonstrate stable error-rate performance, enabling efficient and scalable communication across the defined spatial domain.

Spatially isotropic constellations in the context of mmWave WDM with OAM for short-range LOS links are multi-dimensional signaling schemes whose minimum Euclidean distance (MED), and thus error-rate performance, is uniform across defined regions of space due to the proportionality or near-proportionality of the underlying sub-channel gain matrices. This spatial isotropy is operationalized by partitioning the receiver’s (r,z)(r,z) domain—using constant-β\beta contours—into bands wherein the constellation design remains unchanged or whose MED degradation remains within rigorously bounded thresholds. Collectively, such constellations exploit the rotational symmetry and channel structure inherent in OAM-mmWave links to provide a small library of signaling patterns indexed by β\beta-bands, obviating the need for real-time optimization and ensuring stable communication rates throughout the operational area (Wang et al., 2021).

1. System Model and Notation

The transmitter and receiver are aligned along the zz-axis, with the receiver possibly displaced off-axis by a transverse distance rr in the (x,y)(x,y) plane. The system uses II carrier frequencies {fi=if+f0}\{f_i=i\triangle f+f_0\} and LL orbital angular momentum modes L={l1,,lL}\mathcal L=\{l_1,\dots,l_L\}, forming U=ILU=I\cdot L parallel sub-channels. Denote channel input and output vectors as x,yCU\mathbf x,\mathbf y\in\mathbb C^U, and additive noise as n\mathbf n. The channel transfer matrix is diagonal: y=Hx+n,H=diag(h1l1,,hIlL),\mathbf y = \mathbf H\,\mathbf x + \mathbf n,\quad \mathbf H = \operatorname{diag}(h_{1}^{l_1}, \dots, h_{I}^{l_L}), where

hil(r,ϕ,z)=hil(r,z)ejlϕh_i^l(r,\phi,z) = h_i^l(r,z)e^{-jl\phi}

and

hil(r,z)=ζilλi4πdi,ml(z)(rri,maxl(z))lexp(ri,maxl(z)2r2ωi2(z))exp(j2πdi,ml(z)λi).h_i^l(r,z) = \frac{\sqrt{\zeta_i^l}\,\lambda_i}{4\pi\,d_{i,m}^l(z)}\left(\frac{r}{r_{i,\max}^l(z)}\right)^{|l|} \exp\left(\frac{r_{i,\max}^l(z)^2 - r^2}{\omega_i^2(z)}\right) \exp\left(-j \frac{2\pi d_{i,m}^l(z)}{\lambda_i}\right).

This construction adheres to Eq. (1) and related notation in (Wang et al., 2021).

The power (link) gain is

gil(r,z)=hil(r,z)2=ζilλi2(4πdi,ml(z))2(rri,maxl(z))2lexp(2(ri,maxl(z)2r2)ωi2(z)).g_i^l(r,z) = |h_i^l(r,z)|^2 = \frac{\zeta_i^l \lambda_i^2}{(4\pi d_{i,m}^l(z))^2}\left(\frac{r}{r_{i,\max}^l(z)}\right)^{2|l|}\exp\left(\frac{2(r_{i,\max}^l(z)^2 - r^2)}{\omega_i^2(z)}\right).

Collectively, sub-channel gain matrices are

G(r,z)=diag(g1l1(r,z),,gIlL(r,z)).\mathbf G(r,z) = \operatorname{diag}(g_{1}^{l_1}(r,z),\dots,g_{I}^{l_L}(r,z)).

Power-allocation vectors p=[P1,,PU]T\mathbf p=[P_1,\dots,P_U]^T can be per-subchannel or summed to a total power constraint.

2. OAM Beam Properties and Spatial Gain Proportionality

OAM beams exhibit constant link-gain ratios along “constant-β\beta” curves. Select a reference wavelength λa\lambda_a and OAM mode lml_m; parameterize level sets via

r=βra,maxlm(z),ra,maxlm(z)=ωa(z)lm/2.r = \beta\, r_{a,\max}^{l_m}(z),\quad r_{a,\max}^{l_m}(z) = \omega_a(z)\sqrt{|l_m|/2}.

For two frequencies (i,j)(i,j) with the same ll, the sub-channel gain ratio for positions with equal β\beta is

ai,jl(β,z)=gil(βra,maxlm,z)gjl(βra,maxlm,z)(λjλi)l2exp{β2lm(λiλj1)}.a_{i,j}^l(\beta,z) = \frac{g_i^l(\beta\,r_{a,\max}^{l_m},z)}{g_j^l(\beta\,r_{a,\max}^{l_m},z)} \approx \left( \frac{\lambda_j}{\lambda_i}\right)^{|l|-2} \exp\left\{ \beta^2|l_m| \left( \frac{\lambda_i}{\lambda_j} - 1 \right)\right\}.

For the same carrier ii and two modes l1,l2l_1,l_2: ail1,l2(β,z)(λaλi)l1l2(β2lm)l1l2el1l2.a_i^{l_1, l_2}(\beta,z) \approx \left( \frac{\lambda_a}{\lambda_i} \right)^{|l_1| - |l_2|} (\beta^2 |l_m|)^{|l_1| - |l_2|} e^{|l_1| - |l_2|}. These ratios are functions only of β\beta, signifying that proportional-gain sub-channel matrices arise on constant-β\beta contours and not zz.

Positions (r1,z1)(r_1, z_1) and (r2,z2)(r_2, z_2) with the same β\beta yield for every (i,l)(i,l): gil(r2,z2)=α2gil(r1,z1),G(r2,z2)=α2G(r1,z1),H(r2,z2)=αH(r1,z1),g_i^l(r_2, z_2) = \alpha^2 g_i^l(r_1, z_1), \quad \mathbf G(r_2, z_2) = \alpha^2 \mathbf G(r_1, z_1),\quad \mathbf H(r_2, z_2) = \alpha \mathbf H(r_1, z_1), up to phase, establishing proportional-gain regions central to spatial isotropy (Wang et al., 2021).

3. Conditions for Spatially Isotropic Constellation Design

Spatially isotropic constellations are those for which the minimum Euclidean distance dmind_{\min} under H\mathbf H is either invariant or tightly controlled within a region. For constellation CCU\mathcal C\subset\mathbb C^U: dmin(H,C)=minxxCH(xx)2.d_{\min}(\mathbf H, \mathcal C) = \min_{x\ne x'\in\mathcal C} \|\mathbf H(x-x')\|_2. Suppose H2=αH1\mathbf H_2 = \alpha \mathbf H_1, then

dmin(H2,C)=αdmin(H1,C).d_{\min}(\mathbf H_2, \mathcal C) = \alpha d_{\min}(\mathbf H_1, \mathcal C).

The optimizer for H2\mathbf H_2 and H1\mathbf H_1 are identical, i.e.,

C(H2)=C(H1).\mathcal C^*(\mathbf H_2) = \mathcal C^*(\mathbf H_1).

Thus, a fixed optimal constellation suffices along constant-β\beta contours.

For channels H2=αH1+ΔH\mathbf H_2 = \alpha\mathbf H_1 + \Delta\mathbf H with small perturbation ΔH1\|\Delta\mathbf H\|\ll1, the normalized MED drop is bounded (Theorem 1, Eq. (14)): 1dmin(H2,C(H1))dmin(H2,C(H2))O(ΔHF).1 - \frac{d_{\min}(\mathbf H_2, \mathcal C^*(\mathbf H_1))}{d_{\min}(\mathbf H_2, \mathcal C^*(\mathbf H_2))} \leq O(\|\Delta\mathbf H\|_F). This establishes that near-proportional gain matrices enable shared constellations within a tolerable loss.

4. Fixed Power Vector and Performance Bounds

If the power allocation vector is fixed as p(f)\mathbf p^{(f)} and the optimal is p(o)\mathbf p^{(o)}, let A(f)=diag(p(f))\mathbf A^{(f)} = \sqrt{\operatorname{diag}(\mathbf p^{(f)})}, and similarly for A(o)\mathbf A^{(o)}. For a reduced-alphabet S\mathcal S, design x=Asx = \mathbf A s and optimize: dmin(H,p,S)=minssSHA(ss)2.d_{\min}(\mathbf H, \mathbf p, \mathcal S) = \min_{s\ne s'\in\mathcal S} \|\mathbf H \mathbf A (s - s')\|_2. Theorem 2 (Eq. (20)) bounds the normalized MED loss: Δ=1dmin(H,p(f),S(f))dmin(H,p(o),S(o))O(p(f)p(o)2).\Delta = \left|1 - \frac{d_{\min}(\mathbf H, \mathbf p^{(f)}, \mathcal S^{(f)})}{d_{\min}(\mathbf H, \mathbf p^{(o)}, \mathcal S^{(o)})}\right| \leq O(\| \mathbf p^{(f)} - \mathbf p^{(o)} \|_2). Fixed p(f)\mathbf p^{(f)} near the optimum preserves the error-rate bound, particularly in central regions where gain matrices are nearly proportional.

5. Map-Assisted Spatial Partitioning and Algorithmic Construction

To construct spatially isotropic constellations, discretize the operation area Q\mathcal Q into a fine grid. Partition Q=R1RK\mathcal Q = R_1 \cup \dots \cup R_K such that each region RkR_k has a designated constellation Ck\mathcal C_k. The normalized MED distortion for positions q1,q2q_1, q_2 is

Δmn(q1,q2)=1dmin(Hq2,Cq1)dmin(Hq2,Cq2).\Delta_{mn}(q_1, q_2) = \left| 1 - \frac{d_{\min}(\mathbf H_{q_2}, \mathcal C^*_{q_1})}{d_{\min}(\mathbf H_{q_2}, \mathcal C^*_{q_2})} \right|.

A distortion threshold τd\tau_d (typically $0.10$–$0.15$) controls region assignment: Rk={qQ:Δ(q,qk)τd}R_k = \{q\in\mathcal Q : \Delta(q, q_k) \le \tau_d \}, with qkq_k the region center.

The map-building pseudocode (see (Wang et al., 2021)) iteratively selects region centers, computes optimum constellations, and clusters points based on thresholded MED-distortion, targeting the minimal aggregate distortion and a compact KK-region representation.

As τd0\tau_d\to0, the number of regions KQK\to|\mathcal Q| and distortion per region vanishes; practical implementations select K=10K=10–$15$ for M=32M=32–$64$ in I=2,L=3I=2, L=3 systems under $1$–$5$ GHz spacing.

6. Observed Performance and Guideline Synthesis

Simulation in (Wang et al., 2021) demonstrates that optimal partitions follow curvilinear strips along constant-β\beta lines. Central regions with ββmax\beta\approx\beta_{\max} admit larger RkR_k owing to slow spatial variation of G(r,z)\mathbf G(r, z), while boundaries demand finer partitioning. For the central OAM region, fixed-power constellations (with equal PnP_n) suffice with negligible loss, but near boundaries, particularly with high OAM order, tailored pre-allocations become necessary.

Numerical evaluation indicates that for normalized MED-drop Δ=0.10\Delta=0.10 (SER rise by exp(2Δ/M)\exp(2\Delta/M) for large MM, e.g., 15%15\% SER increase for M=64M=64 and Eb/N015E_b/N_0\approx15 dB). BER remains below 10410^{-4} in central bands and rises to 10310^{-3}10210^{-2} at boundaries unless remapped.

Design recommendations call for partitioning along constant-β\beta curves, distortion thresholds determined by MED→SER tradeoffs, with more constellations for larger MM, carrier spacing, or OAM order. Offline construction with Cd100C_d\sim100 trials yields a compact LUT with KQK\ll|\mathcal Q|, eliminating runtime design requirements.

By leveraging inherent physical symmetries and channel gain proportionality indexed by β\beta, spatially isotropic constellations provide robust, efficient, and universally applicable signaling in mmWave WDM+OAM short-range LOS environments. Fixed-power allocation and map-assisted partitioning enable scalable deployment with controllable error-rate performance across the spatial domain (Wang et al., 2021).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Spatially Isotropic Constellations.