Soft Prompt Enhanced Anomaly Recognition

• Soft Prompt Enhanced Anomaly Recognition (SPEAR) is a prompt-based approach that integrates learnable soft prompts with deep models to detect anomalies efficiently.
• It decouples prompt adaptation from feature extraction by updating task-specific embeddings via gradient-based optimization while keeping the backbone frozen.
• SPEAR achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse modalities by leveraging external semantic guidance, dual-path learning, and knowledge-driven losses.

Soft Prompt Enhanced Anomaly Recognition (SPEAR) refers to a family of anomaly detection methodologies that leverage soft, learnable prompt embeddings to guide deep models—including vision-language and LLMs—for more flexible, robust, and generalizable anomaly recognition across domains such as images, skeleton-based human actions, video, audio, and time series data. SPEAR systems replace or supplement traditional hand-crafted templates and full model fine-tuning with parameter-efficient, data-adaptive prompt vectors, enabling zero-shot or few-shot anomaly detection under real-world constraints.

1. Theoretical Foundations and Key Principles

SPEAR approaches are rooted in the concept of prompt-based adaptation—originally developed for steering large pre-trained models (LLMs or VLMs) toward specific downstream tasks. In SPEAR, soft prompts are trainable embedding vectors prepended to or aligned with input representations. These soft prompts function as task-specific "instructions," enabling otherwise frozen models to attend to anomaly-relevant patterns with minimal parameter updates.

Central to SPEAR’s theoretical foundation is the decoupling of task adaptation (via prompt tuning) from feature extraction (via frozen deep backbones). Soft prompts are updated through gradient-based optimization with objective functions tailored for anomaly tasks—such as cross-entropy, KL divergence, contrastive, and margin-based losses—while all base model parameters remain static. This ensures computational efficiency, prevents catastrophic forgetting, and leads to high flexibility for “zero-shot” settings, where no abnormal samples are available during training.

Another key theoretical advancement is the integration of multiple sources of knowledge into prompt learning, such as leveraging pretrained LLMs, external semantic graphs (e.g., ConceptNet), or specialized knowledge bases via "knowledge-driven" or meta-guided losses, which ensure the prompts remain generalizable and robust to semantic ambiguity.

In time series and speech modalities, quantization is employed to convert continuous input into discrete tokens, preserving compatibility with token-based architectures and maximizing the effectiveness of soft prompt steering.

2. Core Methodologies and Architectures

SPEAR implementations are modality- and task-adaptive but generally share these structural patterns:

1. Input Transformation and Alignment

• For vision-language applications, input images are embedded via vision backbones (e.g., ViT, CLIP), while soft prompts are prepended or fused with patch or global representations.
• Skeleton-based action recognition uses permutation-invariant, point cloud-inspired architectures to ensure robustness to joint set errors and ordering, with soft prompts derived from text instructions for abnormal behaviors.
• In time series, quantized tokens representing discrete bins are embedded and concatenated with soft prompts before being processed by frozen LLMs.

2. Prompt Engineering and Learning Schemes

• Simple soft prompt tuning: A fixed-length, learnable embedding (e.g., [p₁, ..., pₘ]) is prepended and updated using downstream loss.
• Knowledge-driven and meta-guided prompt optimization: Learnable prompts are regularized to approximate external semantic anchors derived from large-LLM outputs, semantic graphs, or meta-prompts, often with divergence-based regularization.
• Dual-path (positive/negative) learning: Trains both positive and negative soft prompts for each domain (or class), using a dual-objective loss to maximize inter-class margins and reduce prompt variability.

3. Anomaly Score Formulation

• Skeleton-based SPEAR: Anomaly score is computed using a Mahalanobis distance for distributional outlierness (OoD), and a separate cosine similarity between feature and prompt embeddings; the joint probability combines both:

$p(O, T|x) = p(O|x) \cdot p(T|x)$

• Time series SPEAR: The LLM output (after the prompt and quantized series embeddings) is projected via a classification head and passed through sigmoid/BCE loss for binary (anomaly/normal) scores.

4. Cross-Modal and Temporal Context Enhancement

• Modules such as Temporal Context Aggregation (TCA) employ global/local attention fusion and dynamic positional encoding to enhance video stream modeling.
• Locality-aware attention for ViTs restricts patch interaction to k-nearest neighbors, improving spatial localization in pixel-level anomaly segmentation.

5. Prompt Variability Mitigation

• Dual-path stable prompt generation (DPSPG) introduces negative learning to clamp generated prompt variability and produce more stable representations, analyzed via margin bounds and gradient norm reduction.

3. Robustness, Generalization, and Error Mitigation

A haLLMark of SPEAR frameworks is enhanced robustness to data imperfections and domain shifts:

• Permutation Invariance: PointNet-inspired skeleton feature extractors allow skeleton-based SPEAR to remain insensitive to joint ordering and tracking errors, substantially reducing the mis-attribution of anomalies due to noisy or missing detection.
• Prompt Regularization: Knowledge- or meta-guided prompt tuning anchors prompt vectors in semantically meaningful subspaces, limiting overfitting to artifacts of synthetic or domain-specific anomalies.
• Dual-Path Learning: Negative learning in prompt generation (as in DPSPG) widens effective margins and clusters prompts more tightly, offering protection from both overfitting and sensitivity to random initialization.
• Adaptivity to Out-of-Distribution Conditions: Soft prompt partitioning in speech-based SPEAR supports rapid adaptation to novel noise conditions without full retraining, directly impacting anomaly recognition in unobserved environments.

These strategies collectively ensure that the model’s decision boundaries adapt fluidly to both known and emergent anomaly classes, even in the absence of explicit labeled anomalies during training.

4. Benchmark Performance and Empirical Results

SPEAR methods have been validated across multiple academic datasets and domains:

Domain	Dataset(s)	Notable Metrics	Performance Highlights
Skeleton/Video	RWF-2000, Kinetics-250, UCF-Crime, XD-Violence, ShanghaiTech	AUC, accuracy, false positive rate	AUC up to 98.14%; FPR as low as 0%
Vision-Language	MVTec, VisA, BrainMRI, LiverCT	mAcc, Pixel AUC	mAcc up to 92.4%, Pixel AUC SOTA
Time Series	MIMIC-IV, NAB AWS, NASA	Accuracy, AUROC, F1, AUPR	Acc 0.93 (SPEAR-BERT), F1/AUROC↑
Speech	LibriSpeech (noisy, clean splits)	WER, noise classifier accuracy	Soft prompts enhance OOD noise adapt.

Empirical findings consistently show that soft prompt enhanced models outperform both zero-shot LLM baselines and traditional fine-tuning or handcrafted template approaches, especially with limited abnormal data or under domain shifts. In time series and speech contexts, soft prompts enable small, efficient LLMs to match or surpass heavyweight models, improving metrics such as anomaly detection accuracy and F1 while reducing computational cost.

5. Interdisciplinary Applications and Real-World Suitability

SPEAR’s modularity and adaptability make it well-suited for:

• Healthcare monitoring: Early detection of anomalous patterns in patient time series (e.g., lab values in MIMIC-IV), enabling preemptive intervention and clinical alerting with minimal model retraining.
• Industrial and Security Monitoring: Robust identification of abnormal human or machine behavior in surveillance footage or IoT sensor streams—thanks to resistance against skeleton or sequence errors.
• Internet Traffic and IoT: Contextual anomaly detection in heterogeneous, variable-length time series streams for cyberattack early warning or system reliability monitoring.
• Speech and Acoustic Surveillance: Zero-shot adaptation to novel environmental noises or unexpected background anomalies for robust security and industrial environments.

Integration with knowledge-driven prompt learning further amplifies interpretability and operator trust, as the system’s flagging of anomaly segments can be rationalized in terms of explicit, human-interpretable concepts.

6. Comparative Analysis and Future Directions

Compared to earlier prompt-based adaptation methods, SPEAR brings several advantages:

• Eliminates reliance on handcrafted, static prompts by supporting fully learnable or meta-guided embeddings, improving generalization across tasks and domains.
• Incorporates advanced architecture design (e.g., locality-aware attention, dual-path prompt generators) to address the unique requirements of pixel-level or instance-level anomaly detection.
• Demonstrates theoretical rigor through explicit analysis of margin enhancement, prompt clustering, and gradient norm attenuation—empirically linked to reduced prompt variability and improved domain generalization.

Future directions for SPEAR research involve unsupervised and multimodal anomaly detection (extending dual-path and meta-guidance strategies), deeper integration of cross-modal semantics (encapsulating both textual and visual/temporal cues), and exploration of prompt security to mitigate vulnerability to adversarial modifications, as highlighted in speech recognition studies.

7. Mathematical Formulations and Algorithmic Constructs

SPEAR’s methodologies are concretely realized through expressive mathematical frameworks, several of which are central to its operation:

• Joint Anomaly Score (Skeleton-based):

$p(O, T | x) = p(O | x) \cdot p(T | x)$

where $p(O|x)$ uses Mahalanobis distance from the normal feature distribution, and $p(T|x)$ evaluates prompt-guided similarity:

$$\text{PromptScore}(x|\mathcal{Y}) = \max\{ \text{Cos}(f(x), y_1), \ldots, \text{Cos}(f(x), y_P) \}$$

• Soft Prompt LLM Ingestion (Time Series):

$S = [p_1, \ldots, p_m, e_1, \ldots, e_T]$

with $e_t = E_{q_t}$, and zero-shot anomaly prediction given by:

$$z_t = W h_{m+t} + b,\qquad \hat{y}_t = \sigma(z_t) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-z_t}}$$

• Dual-Path Margin (DPSPG):

$$g_i(x) = s_i^+(x) - \alpha s_i^-(x),\qquad \Delta_i(x) = [s_y^+(x) - s_i^+(x)] - \alpha [s_y^-(x) - s_i^-(x)]$$

and gradient norm upper-bound:

$$\|J_f(x)\| \leq \frac{L}{\tau} \exp\left(-\frac{\Delta_i^+(x) + \alpha\delta}{\tau}\right)$$

Regularization losses (e.g., KL divergence for meta-guidance, knowledge-driven loss for KnPL, or cross-modal alignment) enforce learned prompts’ proximity to desired semantic neighborhoods and penalize deviation from general anomaly knowledge.

---

Soft Prompt Enhanced Anomaly Recognition frameworks collectively enable robust, generalizable, and efficient anomaly detection by unifying deep representation learning with adaptive, learnable task steering. By decoupling prompt adaptation from the main model backbone and grounding prompt updates in both formal mathematical regularization and rich external knowledge, SPEAR advances the state-of-the-art in anomaly recognition across a range of modalities and real-world scenarios.