Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Semidualizing Bimodule in Homological Algebra

Updated 7 February 2026
  • Semidualizing bimodule is a concept in relative homological algebra that generalizes dualizing complexes by providing a framework for studying projective, injective, and Gorenstein dimensions.
  • It establishes categorical equivalences via adjoint functors between Auslander and Bass classes, thereby refining homological invariants and duality results.
  • Recent generalizations to special semidualizing bimodules extend the theory to higher syzygy categories and (n,d)-injectivity/flatness, enhancing the scope of relative dimension theory.

A semidualizing bimodule is a central concept in relative homological algebra, generalizing both classical dualizing complexes and the identity bimodule by providing a flexible framework for studying projective, injective, and Gorenstein dimensions relative to a particular module. Its axiomatic and categorical characterizations support the construction of Foxby equivalences and a robust relative dimension theory in commutative and noncommutative settings. Recent generalizations to special semidualizing bimodules enable the parametrization of higher syzygy categories and (n,d)(n,d)-injectivity/flattness in both classical and novel contexts.

1. Definition and Axiomatic Properties

Let RR and SS be (not necessarily commutative) rings, and let SCR{}_S C_R be an (S,R)(S,R)-bimodule. The bimodule CC is semidualizing if and only if the following four conditions hold:

  1. Projectivity: Both as a left SS-module and as a right RR-module, CC is degreewise finitely generated and projective (admits a finite projective resolution as a module over each end).
  2. Homothety Isomorphisms:
    • The left homothety map Sγ:SHomRop(C,C){}_S \gamma: S \xrightarrow{\cong} \operatorname{Hom}_{R^{op}}(C,C) is a ring isomorphism, s(csc)s \mapsto (c \mapsto sc).
    • The right homothety map γR:RHomS(C,C)\gamma_R: R \xrightarrow{\cong} \operatorname{Hom}_S(C,C) is a ring isomorphism, r(ccr)r \mapsto (c \mapsto cr).
  3. Vanishing Ext:
    • ExtSi(C,C)=0\operatorname{Ext}^i_S(C,C)=0 and ExtRopi(C,C)=0\operatorname{Ext}^i_{R^{op}}(C,C)=0 for all i1i\geq 1.

In the commutative case, these reduce to White's semidualizing modules; for CRC \cong R (as bimodules), the semidualizing data is trivial (Zhao et al., 2013, Amini et al., 6 Nov 2025, Salimi et al., 2012).

2. Categorical and Reflexivity Characterization

Semidualizing bimodules admit several categorical formulations:

  • The pair of functors (HomR(C,),CR)(\operatorname{Hom}_R(C,-), C \otimes_R -) induces mutually inverse equivalences between the Auslander class AC(R)\mathcal{A}_C(R) (modules that behave "projectively" relative to CC) and the Bass class BC(R)\mathcal{B}_C(R) (modules that behave "injectively" relative to CC).
  • CC is a reflexive generator in the sense that for all finitely generated RR-modules MM, the biduality map

MHomRop(HomR(M,C),C)M \longrightarrow \operatorname{Hom}_{R^{op}}\left( \operatorname{Hom}_R(M,C), C\right)

is an isomorphism in the appropriate subcategory; this is equivalent to the vanishing of the higher Ext groups of CC against itself (Zhao et al., 2013).

  • For bimodules CC that are faithfully semidualizing, the above functors reflect and detect zero modules: HomS(C,N)=0    N=0\operatorname{Hom}_S(C,N)=0 \implies N=0 for all SS-modules and similarly for right-RR-modules (Amini et al., 6 Nov 2025).

This structure underpins the Foxby equivalence, an essential duality for Gorenstein-type homological theory.

3. Construction and Examples of (Special) Semidualizing Bimodules

For any d0d\ge 0, a dd-semidualizing bimodule is obtained by taking the (d1)(d-1)th syzygy module Kd1=ker(Fd1Fd2)K_{d-1} = \ker(F_{d-1} \to F_{d-2}) in any degreewise-superfinite projective resolution

0FdF0C00 \longrightarrow F_d \longrightarrow \dotsb \longrightarrow F_0 \longrightarrow C \longrightarrow 0

of CC (with FiF_i finitely generated projective), and requiring Kd1K_{d-1} to itself be semidualizing. The resulting Kd1K_{d-1} is called a special semidualizing bimodule (Amini et al., 6 Nov 2025).

Canonical Examples:

  • For R=S=CR=S=C, CC is trivially semidualizing and all syzygies are isomorphic to RR.
  • Over a Gorenstein Artin algebra RR, taking CC as a direct sum of indecomposable summands in the minimal injective resolution of RR provides nontrivial semidualizing bimodules with significant homological impact (Zhao et al., 2013).
  • In the context of (2,0)(2,0)-rings (where every finitely $2$-presented module is projective, but not all are projective for n=1n=1), taking C=RC=R yields nontrivial special semidualizing modules and exhibits nontrivial instances of the (n,d)(n,d)-relative theory (Amini et al., 6 Nov 2025).

4. Relative Homological Theory and (n,d)(n,d)-Classes

The presence of a (special) semidualizing bimodule enables the definition and study of homological invariants relative to CC:

  • CC-projective modules: PC={CRPP projective}\mathcal{P}_C = \{ C \otimes_R P \mid P \text{ projective} \}.
  • CC-injective modules: IC={HomR(C,I)I injective}\mathcal{I}_C = \{ \operatorname{Hom}_R(C, I) \mid I \text{ injective} \}.
  • CC-flat modules: For commutative RR, FC={FRCF flat}\mathcal{F}_C = \{ F \otimes_R C \mid F \text{ flat} \} (Salimi et al., 2012).

Specializations to (n,d)(n,d)-injective and (n,d)(n,d)-flat modules utilize higher syzygy special semidualizing bimodules Kd1K_{d-1}:

  • An RR-module is Kd1K_{d-1}-(n,d)(n,d)-injective if it is isomorphic to HomS(Kd1,I)\operatorname{Hom}_S(K_{d-1}, I) for (n,d)(n,d)-injective SS-modules II (i.e., ExtSd+1(U,I)=0\operatorname{Ext}_S^{d+1}(U,I)=0 for all finitely nn-presented UU).
  • Dually, SS-modules of the form Kd1RFK_{d-1} \otimes_R F with FF (n,d)(n,d)-flat (Amini et al., 6 Nov 2025).

This hierarchy generalizes the CC-injective, CC-flat, and CC-FPnFP_n (coherently presented) categories, enabling the refinement of relative dimension-theoretic results.

5. Relative Tor, Global Dimensions, and Foxby Equivalence

Relative homological algebra with respect to CC unlocks the construction of proper CC-projective and CC-flat resolutions, leading to the definition of relative Tor\operatorname{Tor} bifunctors and the identification: ToriPCM(M,N)ToriFCM(M,N)ToriR(HomR(C,M),CRN)\operatorname{Tor}_i^{\mathcal{P}_C M}(M,N) \cong \operatorname{Tor}_i^{\mathcal{F}_C M}(M,N) \cong \operatorname{Tor}_i^R(\operatorname{Hom}_R(C,M), C\otimes_R N) for all i0i\ge 0, which mirrors the classical balance property (Salimi et al., 2012). However, the expected symmetries—e.g., commutativity and compatibility with classical Tor—fail unless CC is trivial: CRC\cong R (Salimi et al., 2012).

Relative Dimensions:

  • The global GCG_C-projective dimension of RR is defined as $\gldim_{G_C-\mathrm{proj}}(R) = \sup \{ G_C\text{-pd}_R(M) \mid M \textrm{ an }R\text{-module}\}$.
  • The global GCG_C-injective dimension $\gldim_{G_C-\mathrm{inj}}(R)$ is defined dually.
  • These dimensions coincide: $\gldim_{G_C-\mathrm{proj}}(R) = \gldim_{G_C-\mathrm{inj}}(R)$, and the common value is called the CC-Gorenstein global dimension, denoted GgldimC(R)\mathrm{Ggldim}_C(R) (Zhao et al., 2013).

Foxby equivalence, mediated by (Kd1)(K_{d-1}), yields a string of mutually inverse equivalences between subcategories of module categories over RR and SS, intertwining (n,d)(n,d)-injective, (n,d)(n,d)-flat, Auslander, and Bass classes: Kd1RHomS(Kd1,) on suitable subcategoriesK_{d-1} \otimes_R - \dashv \operatorname{Hom}_S(K_{d-1},-) \text{ on suitable subcategories} Dimension-shifting identities persist through this equivalence, directly relating relative injective/flat dimensions over RR and SS (Amini et al., 6 Nov 2025).

6. Strongly GCG_C-Projective/Injective Modules and Structural Theorems

An RR-module MM is strongly GCG_C-projective if it is a "stable image" in a HomR(,PC)\operatorname{Hom}_R(-, \mathcal{P}_C)-exact acyclic complex built from direct sums of CRC \oplus R (Zhao et al., 2013). The structure theorem asserts that every GCG_C-projective module is a direct summand of such an object; dually for injectives.

These classes enjoy several closure properties:

  • For an nn-coherent ring SS and faithfully special semidualizing bimodule Kd1K_{d-1}, the categories of Kd1K_{d-1}-(n,d)(n,d)-injective and Kd1K_{d-1}-(n,d)(n,d)-flat modules of bounded relative dimension are closed under extensions, kernels of epimorphisms, and cokernels of monomorphisms (Amini et al., 6 Nov 2025).
  • Duality pair results ensure these categories are covering and preenveloping, consistent with modern approximative module theory.

The relative dimension theory, periodic resolutions, and two-term exact sequences yield concrete criteria, paralleling classical characterizations of projective and injective modules.

7. Implications, Counterexamples, and Limitations

The presence of a semidualizing bimodule CC fundamentally alters the structure of relative homological invariants. While for CRC \cong R all classical properties recover, nontrivial CC-relative theory exposes the lack of classical symmetries—such as commutativity and balance for Tor\operatorname{Tor}—and the possibility of nontrivial enlargement of relative projective/injective classes over rings of infinite classical global dimension (Salimi et al., 2012, Zhao et al., 2013).

The necessity of the homothety isomorphisms and Ext vanishing is evident in the functional properties of the adjoint pairs (Kd1R,HomS(Kd1,))(K_{d-1} \otimes_R -, \operatorname{Hom}_S(K_{d-1},-)) and in the structural theorems underpinning Foxby equivalence and duality results (Amini et al., 6 Nov 2025).

The framework of semidualizing (and special semidualizing) bimodules yields a robust unifying axis along which projective, injective, and Gorenstein relative homological dimensions, as well as categorical equivalences, can be explored in both the commutative and noncommutative settings.

Topic to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Semidualizing Bimodule.