Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Roth-Lempel Codes: Structural & Practical Insights

Updated 6 January 2026
  • Roth-Lempel codes are linear codes over finite fields characterized by unique generator matrices with 'twist' columns that yield MDS, NMDS, AMDS, and self-dual properties.
  • They underpin advanced applications including cryptography, distributed storage, and quantum code design through robust error correction and combinatorial precision.
  • Efficient decoding algorithms based on the Guruswami-Sudan framework enable both list and unique decoding while maintaining the non-GRS structure essential for security and flexibility.

Roth-Lempel codes constitute a fundamental class of linear codes over finite fields, characterized by explicit constructions that yield MDS (maximum distance separable), NMDS (near-MDS), AMDS (almost-MDS), and self-dual codes which are not equivalent to generalized Reed-Solomon (GRS) codes. They have deep connections to algebraic geometry, combinatorics, and practical error correction, with applications ranging from communication and data storage to quantum and locally repairable code constructions. The key technical distinction of Roth-Lempel codes is their generator matrix structure, incorporating "twist" columns that encode specific linear combinations of the highest-degree coefficients of the message polynomial, resulting in codes with high minimum and dual minimum distances outside the class of GRS codes.

1. Definition and Classical Construction

Let Fq\mathbb{F}_q be a finite field of order q=pmq = p^m. A Roth-Lempel code of dimension kk and length n=q+1n = q+1 (or, in general, n+2n+2) is constructed via a generator matrix incorporating evaluation points and "twist" columns. The classical generator for the [q+1,3][q+1,3] Roth-Lempel code is: G=(11100 α1α2αq110 α12α22αq1201)G = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & \cdots & 1 & 0 & 0 \ \alpha_1 & \alpha_2 & \cdots & \alpha_{q-1} & 1 & 0 \ \alpha_1^2 & \alpha_2^2 & \cdots & \alpha_{q-1}^2 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} with {α1,,αq1}Fq\{\alpha_1, \dots, \alpha_{q-1}\} \subset \mathbb{F}_q^*, and the last two columns encoding specific combinations of the message coefficients. The construction generalizes to higher dimensions via the notion of a generalized Roth-Lempel (GRL) code, defined for l1l \geq 1, l+1knql+1 \leq k \leq n \leq q, scaling vector v=(v1,,vn)v = (v_1, \ldots, v_n), and invertible l×ll \times l matrix MM: GRLk(α,v,M)={(v1f(α1),,vnf(αn),β)|f(x)=i=0k1fixi,β=(fkl,,fk1)M}\mathrm{GRL}_k(\alpha, v, M) = \left\{ (v_1 f(\alpha_1), \ldots, v_n f(\alpha_n), \beta) \,\middle|\, f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{k-1} f_i x^i,\, \beta = (f_{k-l}, \ldots, f_{k-1}) M \right\} When l=2l = 2 and v=(1,,1)v = (1, \ldots, 1), the classical Roth-Lempel code is recovered (Liang et al., 24 Jun 2025, Zhu et al., 30 Dec 2025, Liang et al., 4 Jun 2025, Wu et al., 2024).

2. Algebraic Properties: MDS, NMDS, AMDS, and Self-Duality

Roth-Lempel codes, due to their generator matrix structure, exhibit a rich array of distance properties.

  • MDS codes: Attain the Singleton bound d=nk+1d = n - k + 1 if and only if the evaluation set satisfies (n,k1,d)(n, k-1, d)-set conditions—specifically, no k1k-1 distinct evaluation points sum to dd in Fq\mathbb{F}_q (Wu et al., 2024).
  • NMDS codes: Constructed via GRL matrices with l=2l = 2 and arbitrary invertible 2×22 \times 2 matrices MGL2(Fq)M \in GL_2(\mathbb{F}_q), the codes RLk(Fq,M)RL_k(\mathbb{F}_q^*, M) of length q+1q+1 and RLk(Fq,M)RL_k(\mathbb{F}_q, M) of length q+2q+2 are proven to be NMDS (Singleton defect S(C)=S(C)=1S(C) = S(C^\perp) = 1) under parameter regimes:
    • For p=2p=2: 4kq34 \leq k \leq q-3 in the punctured (Fq\mathbb{F}_q^*) case, 4kq24 \leq k \leq q-2 in the extended (Fq\mathbb{F}_q) case.
    • For p2p \neq 2: 3kq23 \leq k \leq q-2 (punctured), 3kq3 \leq k \leq q (extended) (Liang et al., 24 Jun 2025).
  • AMDS codes and Duals: The duals of Roth-Lempel codes often attain d=kd^\perp = k (almost MDS) for precisely specified matrix and subset conditions—see the complete list of equivalent conditions (six families) in (Liang et al., 4 Jun 2025).
  • Self-Dual Codes: Under explicit algebraic constraints on the matrix AA and scaling vector vv, self-dual generalized Roth-Lempel codes exist if n+3=2kn + 3 = 2k and vi2ui=λv_i^2 u_i = \lambda holds for all ii, together with matrix equations (see (Liang et al., 4 Jun 2025) Theorem 4.3).
Code Type Length/Dimension Minimum Distance Singleton Defect Matrix Condition
MDS n+2,kn+2,\,k n+2k+1n+2-k+1 S(C)=0S(C)=0 (n,k1,d)(n, k-1, d)-set
NMDS q+1q+1 or q+2,kq+2,\,k q+1kq+1-k or q+2kq+2-k S(C)=1S(C)=1 MGL2(Fq)M \in GL_2(\mathbb{F}_q)
AMDS as above, dual code d=kd^\perp = k S(C)=1S(C^\perp)=1 Six subset conditions
Self-dual n+3=2k, kn+3=2k,\ k kk --- vi2ui=λv_i^2 u_i = \lambda

3. Weight Distribution and Combinatorial Formulas

For NMDS Roth-Lempel codes constructed with MGL2(Fq)M \in GL_2(\mathbb{F}_q), the minimum-weight codewords and full weight distributions are determined explicitly:

  • The number of weight-kk codewords in the dual, AkA_k^\perp, is given via subset sum formulas: N(t,b;Fq)=1q(q1t)+(1)t+t/pv(b)q(q/p1t/p)N(t, b; \mathbb{F}_q^*) = \frac{1}{q} \binom{q-1}{t} + (-1)^{t + \lfloor t / p \rfloor} \frac{v(b)}{q} \binom{q/p - 1}{\lfloor t/p \rfloor} with v(b)=1v(b) = -1 for b0b \neq 0, q1q-1 for b=0b = 0 (Liang et al., 24 Jun 2025).
  • The full weight distribution for NMDS codes [n,k,nk]q[n, k, n-k]_q is reconstructed once Ank=AkA_{n-k}=A_k^\perp is computed: Ank+=(nk)j=01(1)j(nk+j)(qj1)+(1)(k)AnkA_{n-k+\ell} = \binom{n}{k-\ell} \sum_{j=0}^{\ell-1} (-1)^j \binom{n-k+\ell}{j} (q^{\ell-j} - 1) + (-1)^\ell \binom{k}{\ell} A_{n-k} for 1k1 \leq \ell \leq k (Liang et al., 24 Jun 2025, Liang et al., 17 Aug 2025). This closed-form weight distribution ensures optimal error detection and near-optimal correction capability.

4. Efficient Decoding Algorithms

The first efficient (near-linear time) decoding algorithms for Roth-Lempel codes were developed based on the Guruswami-Sudan (GS) framework (Zhu et al., 30 Dec 2025):

  • Puncturing: Removing the final coordinate of a Roth-Lempel code yields a GRS code, allowing existing efficient list decoding algorithms to be leveraged.
  • List Decoding: Decoding up to τ<(n1)(n1)k\tau < (n-1) - \sqrt{(n-1)k} errors via GS yields all codewords within radius τ\tau, with list size bounded by O(n/k)O(\sqrt{n/k}) for fixed rate.
  • Unique Decoding: To decode up to half the minimum distance, run the list decoder and output the unique codeword when possible.
  • AMD-Integration: By incorporating algebraic manipulation detection codes (AMD) into the list-decoding regime, recovery of the correct message from the list is possible with arbitrarily small failure probability.

This development guarantees practical decoding for RL codes at complexities comparable to GRS code decoding, while retaining their non-GRS nature beneficial in cryptographic and distributed storage settings.

5. Roth-Lempel Type Codes in Locally Repairable Codes and Extensions

Recent advancements employed Roth-Lempel constructions to extend the range and optimality of locally repairable codes (LRCs) (Zhu et al., 31 Jan 2025):

  • LRC Extensions: By appending one or two Roth-Lempel-type coordinates to a classical LRC of locality rr, the resulting code remains optimal and can reach maximal length q+2q+2 over Fq\mathbb{F}_q.
  • AG Codes: The Roth-Lempel mechanism transfers to algebraic geometry code contexts, yielding LRCs and (r,3)(r,3)-LRCs with locality and minimum distance competitive to previously best-known constructions.
  • Parameter formulas: For one-coordinate extensions,

CRL,1:[s(r+1)+2,  rt,  dnrtt+1]C_{RL,1}: \quad [\,s(r+1)+2,\;rt,\;d \ge n-rt-t+1\,]

for (r,3)(r,3)-extensions,

Ce:[s(r+1)+2s,  rt,  (r,3) locality,  d=nk(kr1)2+1]C_e: \quad [\,s(r+1)+2s,\;rt,\;(r,3)\text{ locality},\;d = n-k-(\tfrac{k}{r}-1)\cdot2+1]

with explicit locality and minimum distance formulas matching Singleton-type bounds.

6. Extended and Generalized Roth-Lempel Codes

Generalizations include the extended GRL (EGRL) codes, which further increase length and design flexibility (Liang et al., 17 Aug 2025):

  • Definition: For =2\ell=2 and an additional bf0b f_0 coordinate, the EGRL code attains parameters [n+3,k][n+3, k] and admits a parity-check matrix explicitly constructed from Vandermonde determinants and matrix MM.
  • MDS/AMDS/NMDS Criteria: Necessary and sufficient conditions for MDS and AMDS status are expressed as sum inequalities over subset sums of the evaluation points and matrix entries.
  • NMDS codes: For n=q1n = q-1 and αi=Fq\alpha_i = \mathbb{F}_q^*, v=(1,,1)v = (1,\ldots, 1), and arbitrary MM, the resulting [q+2,k,q+2k][q+2, k, q+2 - k] code is NMDS except in small parameter ranges.

7. Applications and Structural Non-GRS Nature

Roth-Lempel codes are the canonical explicit MDS codes not equivalent to GRS codes (Zhu et al., 30 Dec 2025, Wu et al., 2024). Their non-GRS nature is significant:

  • Cryptography: They avoid certain algebraic attacks on GRS-McEliece cryptosystems (Sidelnikov-Shestakov).
  • Combinatorial Designs: Varying MM within GL2(Fq)GL_2(\mathbb{F}_q) produces many non-isomorphic NMDS codes allowing fine control over minimum distance, dual distance, and support sets—useful in tt-design construction.
  • Quantum Codes: High minimum and dual distances make Roth-Lempel based NMDS codes ideal for entanglement-assisted quantum code construction (Liang et al., 24 Jun 2025).
  • Distributed Storage and Secret Sharing: MDS property ensures optimal erasure recovery and uniform information dispersal (Zhu et al., 30 Dec 2025).

Roth-Lempel codes thus form an algebraic toolkit underpinning diverse coding-theoretic constructions, equipped with full combinatorial characterization and efficient decoding, yet retaining structural properties (non-GRS, twist-combinatorics) that enable significant flexibility for modern coding theory demands.

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Roth-Lempel Codes.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube