Resonant Excitation of SMBH Modes

• Resonant excitation of SMBH modes is the process where external perturbations, such as compact binaries or massive fields, amplify a black hole’s natural quasinormal modes through precise frequency matching.
• The methodology utilizes black hole perturbation theory and the Teukolsky equation to decompose disturbances and quantify resonant energy fluxes and damping characteristics.
• Observable insights include distinct gravitational-wave amplitude peaks, phase modulations, and extended ringdown signatures that enable stringent tests of general relativity and constraints on ultralight fields.

Resonant excitation of supermassive black hole (SMBH) modes refers to the phenomenon in which external perturbations—such as those from compact binaries, plunging bodies, or massive fields—drive the quasinormal modes (QNMs) of an SMBH to large amplitude via a resonance mechanism. These QNMs encode the characteristic damped oscillatory response of black holes and form a fundamental probe of their spacetime structure, horizon properties, and interaction with matter and fields. Resonant excitation is integral both for precise gravitational-wave signal modeling and for theoretical tests of general relativity, including the black hole no-hair theorem.

1. Physical Mechanisms for Resonant Excitation

Several astrophysically relevant scenarios can induce resonant excitation of SMBH QNMs:

• Stellar-mass binary near an SMBH ("b-EMRI"): When a compact binary orbits close to an SMBH, the binary’s internal orbital frequency or its harmonics can match the real part of a QNM frequency, establishing the resonance condition $$m\Omega_{\mathrm{bin}} \approx \Re \omega_{\ell m n}$$ for azimuthal index $m$ (Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026, Cardoso et al., 2021).
• Small mass–ratio inspiral and plunge: In SMBH mergers with small mass ratios $\mu/M\ll1$, the inspiraling and plunging body acts as a temporally varying $\delta$-function source, whose swept-frequency perturbs the SMBH as it passes through the QNM spectrum; near resonance, the QNMs are excited efficiently (Oshita et al., 2022).
• Massive field perturbations: The QNM excitation factors of massive bosonic fields (scalar, Proca, Fierz-Pauli) display strong resonance as a function of the mass parameter, leading to "giant ringings" for specific values of $\mu M$ (Decanini et al., 2014).
• Radial potential modifications and exceptional points: The QNM spectrum is sensitive to the black-hole potential structure; small changes can produce new mode "basis sets" and affect resonant excitation, with avoided crossings giving rise to destructive interference phenomena (Oshita et al., 27 Mar 2025).

The central ingredient is the overlap between the perturbing source’s frequency content and the spectrum of the SMBH’s own natural modes.

2. Mathematical Framework and Resonance Conditions

Resonant excitation is formalized within the black hole perturbation theory, specifically:

• Teukolsky equation for Kerr spacetime: The Newman–Penrose scalar $\psi_4$ encodes gravitational radiation and obeys the (generally inhomogeneous) Teukolsky equation:

$$[\mathcal{T}_{(s=-2)}\psi_4](r,\theta,\phi,t) = 4\pi T_4(r,\theta,\phi,t)$$

where $T_4$ represents the perturbing source terms (Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026).

• Mode decomposition: Perturbations are expanded in spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics and Fourier components. The source frequency $\omega_q = q\Omega_{\mathrm{SB}}$ (for tuning-fork models) or $\omega = m\Omega_{\mathrm{bin}} \pm n\Omega_0$ (for generic binaries) is matched against the QNM frequencies $\omega_{\ell m n} = \Re\omega - i\,\Im\omega$ (Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026, Cardoso et al., 2021).
• Resonance condition: Maximal excitation occurs when

$$\omega_{\text{source}} \simeq \Re \omega_{\ell m n}$$

The maximal energy flux to infinity and through the horizon is then modeled as a Lorentzian:

$$\dot E(\omega)\simeq \dot E_{\mathrm{bg}} + \frac{\mathcal{A}}{(\omega-\Re\omega_{\ell m n})^2 + (\Im\omega_{\ell m n})^2}$$

The height $\mathcal{A}$ and quality factor $Q = \Re\omega_{\ell m n}/[2|\Im\omega_{\ell m n}|]$ quantify the response sharpness (Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026, Cardoso et al., 2021).

• Resonance shift: In b-EMRIs, the true peak in $\dot E$ can shift from naively expected $\Re\omega_{\ell m n}$, with

$$\omega_{\ell m n}^{\text{peak}}(r_0) \approx k \frac{\Re\omega_{\ell m n}^{\mathrm{QNM}}}{r_0}$$

where $r_0$ is the source distance, and $k\sim 3M$ (Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026).

3. Mode Excitation, Damping, and Mode Structure

Mode excitation amplitudes and decay times govern the temporal and spectral structure of observed waveforms:

• Excitation amplitudes: The amplitude $A_{\ell m n}$ for each mode is determined by the overlap of the source with the mode wavefunction. In small mass-ratio mergers, $$A_{\ell m n}\propto (\mu/M)\times S_{\ell m n}(j;L_z,E)$$, with excitation factors $S_{\ell m n}$ set by the plunge dynamics and spin (Oshita et al., 2022).
• Dependence on black hole spin: As Kerr spin $j\to1$, the imaginary part $\Im\omega_{\ell m n}$ shrinks. This renders the corresponding QNMs longer lived, while raising the amplitude $A_{\ell m n}$ by factors of several for high $j$. Both overtones and higher-$\ell$ harmonics become prominent, producing a slowly decaying, multi-mode ringdown (Oshita et al., 2022).
• Light-ring feeding and angular dependence: Efficient excitation of specific modes occurs when the binary’s instantaneous spin axis points tangent to the photon ring ("light-ring feeding"), maximizing coupling with $\ell = m$ corotating QNMs (Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026).
• Bosonic field resonance: For massive fields, the excitation factors $B_{\ell n}$ exhibit strong resonant peaks for critical values of the mass parameter $\mu M$, where the corresponding QNMs are long-lived. Wave amplitude and damping time can increase by orders of magnitude at these points, inducing "giant ringings" (Decanini et al., 2014).

4. Observable Signatures in Gravitational Waves

Resonant excitation of SMBH modes produces distinctive and in some cases detectable imprints in GW signals:

• Amplitude enhancement and spectral peaks: Lorentzian peaks in the GW spectrum at resonance frequencies, with sidebands at $m\Omega_{\mathrm{bin}}\pm \omega_{\mathrm{QNM}}$ in triple systems (Cardoso et al., 2021).
• Transient "ringing-up": As the binary’s GW frequency passes through resonance, a transient increase in amplitude is followed by a decay on the QNM damping timescale (Cardoso et al., 2021, Oshita et al., 2022).
• Phase modulation: The additional damping and excitation near resonance causes a measurable phase shift in the GW signal, potentially up to $\mathcal{O}(1)$ rad for high quality-factor modes (Cardoso et al., 2021).
• Multi-mode ringdown: In small mass-ratio mergers into high-spin SMBHs, many overtones and $\ell=m$ harmonics are excited, leading to complex, slowly decaying ringdown signatures. For $j=0.99$, the fundamental ($\ell=m=2, n=0$) mode can have $\tau_{220}\sim67M$; higher overtones up to $n\sim10$ can have $\tau\sim160M$, all observable in the early ringdown phase (Oshita et al., 2022).
• Giant ringings from massive fields: Ultralight bosonic fields with $m\sim 10^{-16}$–$10^{-19}$ eV can induce giant, slowly decaying ringdown signals in SMBHs. The amplitude enhancement can be $\sim100\times$ over nonresonant cases, with decay times set by the imaginary part of the resonance frequency (Decanini et al., 2014).

5. Theoretical Phenomena: Destructive Interference, Avoided Crossings, and Mode Instabilities

A broad range of subtle theoretical phenomena arise in the resonant excitation of SMBH modes:

• Destructive interference from avoided crossings: In cases of mode mixing (e.g., in the Kerr or Kerr–de Sitter spectrum), modes that undergo avoided crossings can interfere destructively. While individual mode amplitudes may be resonantly excited at avoided crossings or exceptional points, their interference stabilizes the observed ringdown waveform, a finding substantiated by direct computation of mode amplitudes from first principles (Oshita et al., 27 Mar 2025).
• Nonuniqueness and basis dependence of mode expansions: Small changes to the SMBH potential can generate new QNM bases, potentially improving convergence and enabling description of late-time wave tails (Oshita et al., 27 Mar 2025).
• Mode spectrum densification in Kerr: Rapid SMBH spin both sharpens individual resonance peaks and densifies the mode spectrum due to $m$-splitting, complicating the identification of individual modes in broadband flux measurements (Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026).
• Potential instability and constraint on new physics: Giant ringings or anomalously large QNM amplitudes may act as probes of ultralight boson fields and other physics beyond general relativity (Decanini et al., 2014).

6. Astrophysical and Observational Implications

Resonant SME mode excitation is central to several key programs in gravitational-wave astronomy and fundamental physics:

• Direct probe of SMBH QNM spectrum: Measurement of multiple QNM frequencies and damping rates (overtones and harmonics) enables independent determination of SMBH mass and spin parameters, supporting stringent tests of the Kerr no-hair theorem (Oshita et al., 2022).
• Event rates and detectability: Hierarchical triple systems and b-EMRIs are predicted to produce $O(10$–$100)$ detectable resonant events per year with LISA, each mapping a "snapshot" of the SMBH QNM landscape (Cardoso et al., 2021).
• Constraints on ultralight fields: Absence (or detection) of giant ringdowns could place tight upper and lower bounds on bosonic masses in the $10^{-16}$–$10^{-19}$ eV window (Decanini et al., 2014).
• Template systematics and detection prospects: Failure to account for resonant phenomena in SMBH GW templates could bias mass and spin inference in LISA EMRI searches. Dedicated templates incorporating resonant excitation signatures are required to avoid systematic errors (Cardoso et al., 2021, Oshita et al., 2022).
• Test of horizon boundary conditions: Large fluxes down the black hole horizon, especially in high-$Q$ modes, serve as direct evidence for the presence of a true event horizon; horizonless alternatives are predicted to radiate much less through these channels (Cardoso et al., 2021).

7. Mode Table: Key Quantities in Resonant Excitation

Phenomenon	Key Equation/Definition	Reference Papers
Resonance Condition	$m\Omega_{\mathrm{bin}} = \Re\omega_{\ell m n}$	(Cardoso et al., 2021, Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026)
Excitation factor (fields)	$$B_{\ell n} = \left[ \frac{1}{2\,p(\omega)}\frac{A^{(+)}_\ell(\omega)}{dA^{(-)}_\ell(\omega)/d\omega} \right]_{\omega=\omega_{\ell n}}$$	(Decanini et al., 2014)
Energy flux at resonance	$$\dot E^{H,\mathrm{res}}_{\ell m} \propto \frac{|\mathcal{S}_{\ell m}|^2}{|\Im\omega_{\ell m n}|}$$	(Cardoso et al., 2021)
Quality factor	$$Q_{\ell m n} = \Re\omega_{\ell m n}/(2|\Im\omega_{\ell m n}|)$$	(Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026)
Giant ringing amplitude	$A_{\ell n} \sim 2|B_{\ell n}|$	(Decanini et al., 2014)
Damping time	$\tau_{\ell m n} = 1/|\Im\omega_{\ell m n}|$	(Oshita et al., 2022, Decanini et al., 2014)

Each quantity plays a central role in characterizing resonant excitation and predicting the ensuing GW signals.

---

In total, resonant excitation of SMBH modes constitutes a rich, multidimensional phenomenon at the intersection of black hole physics, gravitational-wave astronomy, and particle physics. It encompasses precise frequency-matching conditions, intricate dependence on geometry and binary dynamics, as well as profound observational and theoretical implications. Current research leverages these effects for high-precision tests of general relativity, fundamental constraints on new physics, and detailed SMBH parameter estimation (Santos et al., 5 Jan 2026, Oshita et al., 2022, Cardoso et al., 2021, Oshita et al., 27 Mar 2025, Decanini et al., 2014).