Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti Algebras

Updated 7 July 2026
  • Regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras are binary–ternary Hom-type algebras with a bijective twisting map, unifying Hom-Lie, Hom-Lie triple systems, and classical Lie-Yamaguti structures.
  • They exhibit rich structure through quotient constructions, central ideals, and isoclinism formalism, culminating in a finite-dimensional rigidity theorem based on stem decompositions.
  • These algebras connect to Hom-Malcev, Hom-Leibniz, and cohomological frameworks, underpinning deformation, extension, and representation theories in Hom-algebra.

Searching arXiv for the cited HLYA papers to ground the article in the specified literature. arXiv search query: (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025) "Isoclinism in regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras" Regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras are multiplicative Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebras (A,[,],[,,],αA)(A,[-,-],[-,-,-],\alpha_A) for which the twisting map αA\alpha_A is bijective. They are binary–ternary Hom-type algebras over a field K\mathbb K of characteristic zero, and they unify several standard structures: when the ternary bracket vanishes one recovers a Hom-Lie algebra, when the binary bracket vanishes one obtains a Hom-Lie triple system, and when α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id} one returns to the classical Lie-Yamaguti setting. In the regular case, bijectivity of αA\alpha_A governs quotient constructions, centrality, extension theory, and the isoclinism formalism, culminating in a finite-dimensional rigidity theorem: for regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras of equal dimension, isoclinism implies isomorphism (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

1. Defining identities and basic reductions

A Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebra consists of a linear space AA, a linear self-map αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A, a bilinear bracket [,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A, and a trilinear bracket [,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A, subject to the identities, for all x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A,

αA\alpha_A0

αA\alpha_A1

αA\alpha_A2

αA\alpha_A3

αA\alpha_A4

It is multiplicative when

αA\alpha_A5

and it is regular when αA\alpha_A6 is bijective (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

The same structure appears in the earlier Hom-Lie-Yamaguti literature in equivalent binary–ternary form, usually denoted by αA\alpha_A7 and organized through the twisted Yamaguti identities αA\alpha_A8–αA\alpha_A9 or K\mathbb K0–K\mathbb K1. In that formulation, the category of multiplicative Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebras is closed under twisting by self-morphisms: if K\mathbb K2 is an endomorphism commuting with K\mathbb K3, then

K\mathbb K4

again defines a multiplicative Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebra (Gaparayi et al., 2010).

Two reductions are structurally decisive. If K\mathbb K5, the algebra reduces to a Hom-Lie triple system, with the induced ternary Hom-Nambu behavior emphasized in the foundational papers. If K\mathbb K6, it reduces to a Hom-Lie algebra. These reductions are not peripheral: they identify regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras as a common envelope for binary Hom-Lie and ternary Hom-Lie-type geometries (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

2. Regularity, central structure, and stem algebras

Regularity means precisely that K\mathbb K7 is bijective. In the isoclinism theory this hypothesis is essential because it guarantees that the induced map on quotients is bijective and that the center is a Hom-ideal. For a subspace K\mathbb K8, being a Hom-Lie Yamaguti subalgebra means

K\mathbb K9

whereas α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}0 is a Hom-ideal when

α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}1

The center is

α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}2

and the derived subalgebra is

α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}3

A regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra is called stem when

α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}4

In a regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra, α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}5 is a Hom-ideal (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

If α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}6 is a Hom-ideal of a regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}7, the quotient α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}8 inherits the regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti structure via

α=Id\alpha=\mathrm{Id}9

and when αA\alpha_A0 is bijective with αA\alpha_A1, the induced αA\alpha_A2 is bijective as well. This is the mechanism by which central quotients enter the isoclinism formalism (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

Within an isoclinism family, stem objects play the same role that stem groups or stem Lie algebras do in the classical theory: they are the central representatives with no “extraneous” abelian direct summand outside the derived part. For finite-dimensional regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras, this role becomes quantitative: a member of an isoclinism family is stem if and only if its dimension is minimal in that family (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

3. Isoclinism and the invariants it preserves

For regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras

αA\alpha_A3

write αA\alpha_A4 and αA\alpha_A5. The binary and ternary commutator maps are

αA\alpha_A6

αA\alpha_A7

and similarly αA\alpha_A8 on αA\alpha_A9 (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

A pair AA0, with

AA1

is a homoclinism when the binary and ternary commutator diagrams commute and the twisting maps are respected: AA2

AA3

If both AA4 and AA5 are isomorphisms, one has an isoclinism, written AA6 (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

This notion is weaker than isomorphism. By definition, isomorphism implies isoclinism, but the converse fails in general. The central reason is that isoclinism retains the commutator geometry of the quotient by the center and of the derived subalgebra, while allowing central or abelian enlargement. The preserved invariants are therefore

AA7

and hence also AA8 and AA9. In stem families, the center is also preserved up to isomorphism under the derived-subalgebra isomorphism restricted to the center (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

Several structural consequences parallel the classical theory. If αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A0 is abelian, then

αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A1

If αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A2 is a surjective homomorphism with αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A3, then αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A4. For quotients, one has

αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A5

and if αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A6 is finite-dimensional and αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A7, then αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A8 (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

A common misconception is that isoclinism is merely a reformulation of isomorphism. The finite-dimensional theory shows that this is false in general and true only under additional hypotheses. In particular, the equal-dimension condition in the main rigidity theorem is indispensable (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

4. Factor sets and central extension models

A factor set for a regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra αA:AA\alpha_A:A\to A9 is a pair

[,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A0

satisfying the identities [,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A1–[,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A2 together with multiplicativity. These conditions encode [,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A3-skew-symmetry, a Hom-Jacobi-type identity, ternary Hom-Jacobi compatibility, binary–ternary compatibility, and higher-order compatibility on the central component (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

Given such a factor set, one defines

[,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A4

with operations

[,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A5

[,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A6

[,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A7

Then [,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A8 is a regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra, and

[,]:A×AA[-,-]:A\times A\to A9

If [,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A0 is multiplicative, [,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A1 is multiplicative regular (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

Every regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra admits such a presentation. Choosing a linear section [,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A2, one sets

[,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A3

[,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A4

and obtains

[,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A5

Thus regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras can be reconstructed as central extensions of their central quotient by their center (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

Inside an isoclinism family, factor sets organize the passage from one stem algebra to another. If [,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A6 and [,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A7 are stem regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras in the same isoclinism family, then there exists a factor set [,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A8 on [,,]:A×A×AA[-,-,-]:A\times A\times A\to A9 such that

x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A0

Moreover, isomorphisms between such central extension models are characterized by induced automorphisms on x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A1 and x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A2 together with a linear correction term into the center, giving an explicit equivalence criterion for factor sets inside the family (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

5. Stem decomposition and finite-dimensional rigidity

The existence of stem representatives is a basic structural theorem: every isoclinism family of regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras contains at least one stem algebra. In the finite-dimensional case, stem members are exactly the minimal-dimensional members of the family (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

The decomposition theorem sharpens this. If x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A3 is an isoclinism family of finite-dimensional regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras and x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A4, then

x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A5

where x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A6 is a stem regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra and x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A7 is a finite-dimensional abelian Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra. The theorem shows that, despite the presence of both a ternary operation and a twisting map, the family still splits into a stem core and an abelian complement (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

This decomposition drives the rigidity theorem. In the stem case, if x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A8 and x,y,z,w,tAx,y,z,w,t\in A9 are finite-dimensional regular stem Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras, then

αA\alpha_A00

In the general case, if αA\alpha_A01 and αA\alpha_A02 are finite-dimensional regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras with

αA\alpha_A03

then

αA\alpha_A04

The proof proceeds by choosing stem representatives in the common isoclinism family, decomposing each algebra into stem plus abelian summand, using the invariance of αA\alpha_A05 and αA\alpha_A06 under isoclinism to identify the dimensions of the stem parts, and then invoking the stem rigidity theorem (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

The equal-dimension hypothesis is necessary. The paper gives a αA\alpha_A07-dimensional regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra αA\alpha_A08 with αA\alpha_A09 and αA\alpha_A10, and a αA\alpha_A11-dimensional regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebra αA\alpha_A12 with αA\alpha_A13 and αA\alpha_A14, such that

αA\alpha_A15

hence αA\alpha_A16, but αA\alpha_A17 because αA\alpha_A18. A second example exhibits a αA\alpha_A19-dimensional stem algebra αA\alpha_A20 and its central enlargement αA\alpha_A21, showing concretely that αA\alpha_A22 while only αA\alpha_A23 is stem (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

6. Relations to Hom-Lie, Hom-Malcev, Hom-Leibniz, and cohomological constructions

Regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras sit at the intersection of several Hom-algebraic theories. Setting αA\alpha_A24 recovers Lie-Yamaguti algebras, so the finite-dimensional equal-dimension rigidity theorem extends the corresponding result for Lie-Yamaguti algebras. Setting the ternary bracket to zero recovers Hom-Lie algebras; setting the binary bracket to zero recovers Hom-Lie triple systems, hence ternary Hom-Nambu-type structures (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

The foundational construction theory has two classical sources. First, every multiplicative Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebra can be twisted by a compatible endomorphism, and classical Lie-Yamaguti algebras or Malcev algebras produce Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebras by this Yau-type mechanism. Second, when the ternary product is defined from the binary one by

αA\alpha_A25

a Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebra becomes a multiplicative Hom-Malcev algebra, and conversely every multiplicative Hom-Malcev algebra carries a natural Hom-Lie-Yamaguti structure with

αA\alpha_A26

These equivalences remain valid in the regular case, although bijectivity of αA\alpha_A27 is not required for the underlying Hom-Malcev correspondence [(Gaparayi et al., 2010); (Gaparayi et al., 2015)].

A distinct source is Hom-Leibniz theory. Every multiplicative left Hom-Leibniz algebra has a natural Hom-Lie-Yamaguti structure obtained from the skew-symmetrized binary bracket

αA\alpha_A28

and the ternary operation

αA\alpha_A29

When the twisting map αA\alpha_A30 is bijective, this yields a regular Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebra. The construction is the Hom-analogue of the classical passage from left Leibniz algebras to Lie-Yamaguti algebras (Gaparayi et al., 2012).

Representation and cohomology theory for Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebras is organized by three action maps αA\alpha_A31 and a cohomology whose basic deformation-theoretic component is the αA\alpha_A32-cohomology. A αA\alpha_A33-parameter infinitesimal deformation of a Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebra is governed by a pair αA\alpha_A34 that simultaneously defines a Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebra of deformation type and a αA\alpha_A35-cocycle with coefficients in the adjoint representation. Abelian extensions are classified by the cohomology group

αA\alpha_A36

equivalently

αA\alpha_A37

In the regular case, invertibility of αA\alpha_A38 simplifies the transport of identities through powers of αA\alpha_A39 and αA\alpha_A40, but the cohomological formalism itself is not restricted to bijective twists (Zhang, 2015).

Recent operator-theoretic work extends this further. Twisted αA\alpha_A41-operators on a Hom-Lie-Yamaguti algebra, defined relative to a representation and a αA\alpha_A42-cocycle, induce new Hom-Lie-Yamaguti structures on the representation space. Weighted Reynolds operators are special cases of such twisted αA\alpha_A43-operators, and the induced structures are regular when the twisting maps αA\alpha_A44 and αA\alpha_A45 are bijective. The same framework produces Hom-NS-Lie-Yamaguti algebras as underlying structures of twisted αA\alpha_A46-operators (Mabrouk et al., 26 Feb 2025).

The principal limitations of the current structural theory are equally explicit. The isoclinism framework in the 2025 rigidity theorem depends on regularity; without bijectivity of αA\alpha_A47, induced quotient maps may fail to be bijections. Finite-dimensionality is used in the existence and minimality theory of stem algebras, and the equal-dimension assumption is indispensable for the implication “isoclinism αA\alpha_A48 isomorphism.” Infinite-dimensional regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti algebras do not generally satisfy the same rigidity statement. A plausible implication is that future progress will continue to rely on cohomological control of factor sets, classification within individual isoclinism families, and extensions to broader Hom-algebra classes, including Hom-Lie triple systems and superalgebra analogues (Asif et al., 3 Aug 2025).

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Regular Hom-Lie Yamaguti Algebras.