Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 175 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Regular Affine Domains in Geometric Analysis

Updated 15 November 2025
  • Regular affine domains are convex open sets defined as the interior of intersections of C-null half-spaces in an affine space, generalizing classical domains of dependence.
  • They are characterized analytically via solutions to Monge–Ampère equations, yielding unique foliations by smooth hypersurfaces with constant affine Gaussian curvature especially in three dimensions.
  • This framework unifies Lorentzian and affine geometries by bridging geometric convexity with analytic properties and by employing tools like Legendre transforms and comparison principles.

A regular affine domain is a precise generalization of the classical domains of dependence in Minkowski space, extending their definition to arbitrary affine spaces associated with proper convex cones. In this formalism, regular affine domains serve as the natural domains for foliation by smooth, locally strongly convex hypersurfaces of constant affine Gaussian curvature. Their characterization synthesizes geometric convexity with deep analytic properties via solutions to certain Monge–Ampère equations with extended-real, lower semicontinuous boundary conditions. In dimension three, each proper regular affine domain admits a unique smooth foliation by such hypersurfaces, providing a compelling geometric-unifying principle across Lorentzian and affine geometries.

1. Definition of Regular Affine Domain

Let VV be an (n+1)(n+1)-dimensional real vector space equipped with a fixed volume form, and let AA denote the corresponding affine space. A convex cone CVC \subset V is called proper if it contains no entire affine line. The concept of regularity is anchored in the structure of "supporting half-spaces": a supporting half-space HH of CC is any open half-space in VV whose boundary is a hyperplane through the origin and which contains CC. Among these, CC-null half-spaces—those with boundary hyperplanes intersecting C\partial C only at the origin—play a critical role.

A CC-regular domain DAD \subset A is defined as the interior of an arbitrary intersection of closed CC-null half-spaces, i.e.,

$D = \operatorname{Int}\left(\bigcap_{H\in\mathcal{H}} \overline{H}\right), \quad \mathcal{H} \subset \{\text{$C$-null half-spaces}\}.$

This construction, when CC is the future light cone in Minkowski space Rn,1\mathbb{R}^{n,1}, recovers the familiar domains of dependence or regular domains. The properness of CC guarantees that DD is a nontrivial convex open set, and the classification into "null" vs. "spacelike" supports aligns the formalism with features of Lorentzian geometry.

2. Analytic Characterization via Monge–Ampère Equations

In an appropriate affine chart, the dual cone CC^{*} projects to a bounded convex domain ΩRn\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n. Each CC-regular domain DD corresponds bijectively (cf. Theorem 4.3(1)) to a lower-semicontinuous function φ:ΩR{+}\varphi : \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\} through the dual (support) transform:

D={(y,ξ)Rn+1:ξ>φ(y)},D = \left\{ (y,\,\xi) \in \mathbb{R}^{n+1} : \xi > \varphi^*(y) \right\},

where φ\varphi^* is the Legendre transform of φ\varphi.

Selecting a canonical CC-null boundary-defining function is facilitated by solving an analytically intricate Dirichlet-type Monge–Ampère equation. The archetypal Cheng–Yau equation for hyperbolic affine spheres reads:

detD2w=(w)n2on Ω,wΩ=0,\det D^2 w = (-w)^{-n-2} \quad \text{on } \Omega, \quad w|_{\partial\Omega} = 0,

yielding the support function wΩw_\Omega. For surfaces of constant affine Gauss–Kronecker curvature k>0k>0, the equation is extended (see Corollary 6.4):

detD2u(x)=ck(wΩ(x))n2,xU:=IntDomu,uΩ=φ,u(x)+ as xU,\det D^2 u(x) = c_k(-w_\Omega(x))^{-n-2}, \quad x \in U := \operatorname{Int}\operatorname{Dom} u, \quad u|_{\partial \Omega} = \varphi, \quad |\nabla u(x)| \to +\infty \text{ as } x \to \partial U,

where φ:ΩR{+}\varphi: \Omega \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\} is the lower semicontinuous boundary datum, uLC(Rn)u \in LC(\mathbb{R}^n) is convex and finite precisely on UU, and ck>0c_k > 0 depends on kk and nn.

3. Existence and Uniqueness of the Dirichlet Problem

For n=2n=2, existence and uniqueness of convex solutions to the Dirichlet problem above are ensured under a mild exterior-circle (or strict convexity) hypothesis on Ω\Omega and provided the lower-semicontinuous function φ\varphi has nonempty effective domain. Specifically, there exists a unique uLC(R2)u \in LC(\mathbb{R}^2), finite precisely on UΩU \subset \Omega, satisfying:

detD2u=c(wΩ)4 in U,uΩ=φ,u on U.\det D^2 u = c\,(-w_\Omega)^{-4} \text{ in } U, \quad u|_{\partial\Omega} = \varphi, \quad |\nabla u| \to \infty \text{ on } \partial U.

The arguments invoke the Aleksandrov–Heinz strict convexity theorem, Evans–Krylov regularity, and a generalized comparison principle, yielding existence, uniqueness, and interior smoothness.

In higher dimensions (n3n \geq 3), the classical Dirichlet problem for the Monge–Ampère equation requires elevated boundary regularity for well-posedness; when both Ω\Omega and φ\varphi are CC^\infty, unique solvability follows from Li–Simon–Chen. At minimal regularity, smooth solutions may fail to exist.

4. Foliation by Constant Affine Gaussian Curvature Hypersurfaces (Dimension 3)

In R3\mathbb{R}^3, the Monge–Ampère solution uu defines a convex hypersurface ΣR3\Sigma \subset \mathbb{R}^3 as the graph of uu^*, which is necessarily spacelike and complete with respect to the cone CC.

Affine Gauss–Kronecker curvature is defined as follows: Let ΣA\Sigma \subset A be a locally strongly convex hypersurface with Blaschke normal NN, with hijh_{ij} denoting the affine metric (first fundamental form) and the affine second fundamental form. Then

Kaff(Σ)=det(hij)det(gij),K_{\mathrm{aff}}(\Sigma) = \frac{\det(h_{ij})}{\det(g_{ij})},

where gijg_{ij} refers to the first fundamental form or affine metric, subject to normalization conventions; equivalently, Kaff=detSK_{\mathrm{aff}} = \det S, for SS the shape operator.

For each proper CC-regular domain DR3D \subset \mathbb{R}^3 satisfying a projective exterior-circle condition on P(C)P(C^*) and every k>0k>0, there exists a unique complete affine (C,k)(C,k)-surface ΣkD\Sigma_k \subset D asymptotic to D\partial D. The family {Σk}k>0\{\Sigma_k\}_{k>0} foliates DD, and the associated "time-function" K(p)=logkK(p) = \log k on Σk\Sigma_k is convex on DD.

5. Geometric Significance and Relation to Classical Theories

When CC is the light cone in Minkowski space, the resulting CAGC (constant affine Gaussian curvature) hypersurfaces correspond precisely to the classical surfaces of constant Gaussian curvature in R2,1\mathbb{R}^{2,1}, reconstructing the foliation of domains of dependence by space-like slices at constant curvature, as established by Bonsante–Smillie–Seppi and BBZ.

When DD is the cone CC itself, the foliation is by homothetic Cheng–Yau affine spheres, with the defining equation detD2K=aebK\det D^2 K = a e^{b K}. This recovers the hyperbolic-affine-sphere foliation paradigm developed by Cheng–Yau for proper cones.

The described framework unifies and generalizes both the Lorentzian and affine paradigms: one can deform the canonical cone-foliation by affine spheres in arbitrary directions φLC(Ω)\varphi \in LC(\Omega), and every deformed domain retains a canonical convex "time-function" KK by solving a two-step Monge–Ampère problem.

6. Notable Examples and Special Cases

Several explicit instances elucidate the general theory:

  • For the standard Lorentz cone C0R2,1C_0 \subset \mathbb{R}^{2,1}, Ω\Omega is the unit disk, wΩ(x)=1x2w_\Omega(x) = -\sqrt{1 - |x|^2}, and the PDE becomes detD2u=(1x2)2\det D^2 u = (1 - |x|^2)^{-2}. The unique solution utu_t parameterizes the hyperboloid foliation Σk\Sigma_k of the light cone.
  • For simplicial cones ("Titeica affine spheres"), if CC is the positive span of a unimodular basis {v0,,vn}\{v_0, \dots, v_n\}, then Ω\Omega is a simplex Δ\Delta, wΔ(x)(t0tn)1/(n+1)w_\Delta(x) \propto -(t_0 \cdots t_n)^{1/(n+1)}, and the explicit foliation by constant CAGC surfaces can be constructed.
  • For triangular cones in R3\mathbb{R}^3, the existence of a unique affine (C,k)(C, k)-foliation is equivalent to the projective shape of CC (with a circumscribed triangular cone TT) satisfying an exterior-circle condition; failure of the circle condition at a vertex precludes the existence of a complete CAGC surface generating TT.

7. Summary and Unifying Perspective

Regular affine domains in affine space AnA^n associated with a proper convex cone CC are precisely the interiors of intersections of CC-null half-spaces. Such domains are characterized analytically via solutions to a two-step Monge–Ampère equation with extended-real, lower semicontinuous boundary data. In three dimensions, every proper regular affine domain admits a canonical, unique foliation by smooth, locally strongly convex hypersurfaces of constant affine Gaussian curvature, thereby unifying classical results on affine spheres and constant-Gaussian-curvature slices in flat Lorentzian spaces (Nie et al., 2019).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Regular Affine Domain.