Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Recursive Formulas for Riley Polynomials

Updated 31 January 2026
  • The paper establishes that Riley polynomials factor as ±g(u)g(−u) through explicit recurrences dictated by the knot’s ε-sequence.
  • It employs coupled recurrences for f(X) and g(X) with linear computational complexity, enabling efficient invariant calculations for 2-bridge knots.
  • The derived recurrences reveal key algebraic properties such as unimodality and irreducibility, offering a combinatorial perspective on knot invariants.

The Riley polynomial RK(λ)\mathcal{R}_K(\lambda) is a distinguished invariant associated with 2-bridge knots K=S(α,β)K=S(\alpha,\beta). Its structure encodes fundamental properties of the knot group’s SL2(C)\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C}) representations. A central fact is the explicit splitting

RK(u2)=±g(u)g(u),\mathcal{R}_K(-u^2)=\pm g(u)g(-u),

with g(u)Z[u]g(u)\in\mathbb{Z}[u], where g(u)g(u) and RK(X)\mathcal{R}_K(X) are governed by simple recursive relations dictated by the knot’s canonical “ϵ\epsilon-sequence.” These recurrences, central to the modern arithmetic and combinatorial understanding of Riley polynomials, enable efficient computation and offer insight into irreducibility and unimodality properties (Jo et al., 2022).

1. Definition of the ϵ\epsilon-Sequence and ϵ\epsilon-Chebyshev Polynomials

For a 2-bridge knot K=S(α,β)K=S(\alpha,\beta) with α=2n+1\alpha=2n+1, the ϵ\epsilon-sequence ϵ=(ϵ1,ϵ2,,ϵ2n)\epsilon=(\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2,\ldots,\epsilon_{2n}) is given by

ϵi=(1)iβ/α\epsilon_i = (-1)^{\lfloor i\beta/\alpha\rfloor}

for i=1,,2ni=1,\ldots,2n, with the symmetry ϵi=ϵ2n+1i\epsilon_i = \epsilon_{2n+1-i}. Two interrelated families of polynomials, parameterized by this sequence, are central:

  • ϵ\epsilon-Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind: Sn(t)S_n(t), defined as Sn(t)=Tn(0,1;t)S_n(t)=T_n(0,1;t).
  • ϵ\epsilon-Chebyshev polynomials of the third kind: Vn(t)=Tn+1(1,1;t)V_n(t)=T_{n+1}(1,1;t).

Both sequences derive from the unified recurrence

T0(a,b;t)=a;T1(a,b;t)=b;Tn+1(a,b;t)=ϵn+1tTn(a,b;t)Tn1(a,b;t),(1nm).T_0(a,b;t)=a;\quad T_1(a,b;t)=b; \quad T_{n+1}(a,b;t) = \epsilon_{n+1} t T_n(a,b;t) - T_{n-1}(a,b;t), \quad (1\leq n \leq m).

2. Explicit Recursive Formulas

The recursions for the central polynomials are:

  • For Sn(t)S_n(t):

S0(t)=0,S1(t)=1,Sk+1(t)=ϵk+1tSk(t)Sk1(t).S_0(t) = 0, \quad S_1(t) = 1,\quad S_{k+1}(t) = \epsilon_{k+1}t S_k(t) - S_{k-1}(t).

  • For Vn(t)V_n(t):

V0(t)=1,V1(t)=ϵ2t1,Vk+1(t)=ϵk+2tVk(t)Vk1(t).V_0(t) = 1,\quad V_1(t) = \epsilon_2 t - 1, \quad V_{k+1}(t) = \epsilon_{k+2}t V_k(t) - V_{k-1}(t).

These recurrences yield polynomials with integer coefficients, and satisfy

Vn(t)Vn(t)=(1)nS2n+1(t).V_n(t)\,V_n(-t) = (-1)^n S_{2n+1}(t).

3. Splitting and Recurrences for Riley Polynomials

The Riley polynomial for K=S(α,β)K=S(\alpha, \beta) with α=2n+1\alpha=2n+1 is given in the variable X=u2X=-u^2 as

RK(u2)=(1)nS2n+1(u).R_K(-u^2) = (-1)^n S_{2n+1}(u).

By the polynomial identity above,

RK(u2)=Vn(u)Vn(u).R_K(-u^2) = V_n(u) V_n(-u).

Setting g(u):=Vn(u)g(u) := V_n(u), this yields the canonical splitting

RK(u2)=±g(u)g(u).R_K(-u^2) = \pm g(u) g(-u).

Alternatively, RK(X)R_K(X) may be constructed directly via the following coupled recurrences (with f0(X)=1, f1(X)=1+X, g0(X)=0, g1(X)=ϵ1f_0(X)=1,\ f_1(X)=1+X,\ g_0(X)=0,\ g_1(X)=\epsilon_1):

  • gk(X)=gk1(X)+ϵkfk1(X)g_k(X) = g_{k-1}(X) + \epsilon_k f_{k-1}(X),
  • fk(X)=fk1(X)+fk2(X)+2ϵkgk1(X)f_k(X) = f_{k-1}(X) + f_{k-2}(X) + 2\epsilon_k g_{k-1}(X).

For K=S(2n+1,β)K=S(2n+1,\beta), RK(X)=fn(X)R_K(X)=f_n(X). In the parabolic case Xu2X\rightarrow -u^2,

fn(u2)=(1)nS2n+1(u)=Vn(u)Vn(u).f_n(-u^2)=(-1)^n S_{2n+1}(u)=V_n(u) V_n(-u).

4. Computational Implications and Complexity

The coefficients ϵk\epsilon_k enter only linearly in the recurrences for fkf_k and gkg_k, resulting in O(n)O(n) computational complexity once the continued-fraction or Schubert form of KK—and thus the ϵ\epsilon-sequence—is determined. Calculation does not require matrix multiplication or full determinant expansions, instead relying solely on recursive updates indexed by the ϵ\epsilon-sequence (Jo et al., 2022).

5. Algebraic and Combinatorial Properties

The splitting RK(u2)=gn(u)gn(u)R_K(-u^2)=g_n(u) g_n(-u) enables direct analysis of irreducibility. If α=2n+1\alpha=2n+1 is prime and $2$ is a primitive root modulo α\alpha, then gn(u)g_n(u) is irreducible over Q\mathbb{Q}, and so is RK(X)R_K(X). Furthermore, the symmetrized Riley polynomial,

ΦK(x)=xnS2n+1(x+1/x),\Phi_K(x) = x^n S_{2n+1}(x+1/x),

has coefficients forming a unimodal sequence, established via “Pascal-type" inequalities applied to the signed continuant (Jo et al., 2022).

6. Significance and Applications

Recursive formulas for Riley polynomials, via the ϵ\epsilon-sequence and their interpretation as ϵ\epsilon-Chebyshev polynomials, simultaneously provide:

  • Efficient computation of knot invariants.
  • Immediate extraction of the splitting polynomial g(u)g(u).
  • Elementary proofs of symmetrized Riley polynomial unimodality.
  • Rapid irreducibility checks for broad classes of knots.

These results encapsulate Riley polynomials within a combinatorial and algebraic framework that leverages special recurrences traced entirely to the arithmetic data of the knot. This also reflects broader connections between classical special polynomials and the arithmetic of low-dimensional topology (Jo et al., 2022).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Recursive Formulas for Riley Polynomials.