Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 93 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 128 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 449 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Rank-One Multiplicative Perturbation

Updated 4 September 2025
  • The paper shows that adding a rank-one operator can increase the norm of an operator in reflexive Banach spaces without ensuring norm attainment.
  • It distinguishes the V-property, Weak Maximizing Property, and Compact Perturbation Property through explicit constructions and counterexamples.
  • The findings challenge classical intuitions in operator theory and motivate further research into the stability of norm attainment under minimal perturbations.

A rank-one multiplicative perturbation refers to the modification of an operator—typically within the context of a Banach or Hilbert space—by a rank-one operator using an additive or multiplicative structure, with significant implications for the geometry of operator norms, the norm-attaining property, and spectral theory. This article focuses on rank-one operators as multiplicative perturbations in the sense of norm-attaining phenomena for operators between Banach spaces, following the framework and results of (Martínez-Cervantes et al., 2023).

1. Definitions and Fundamental Concepts

A rank-one operator RL(X,Y)R \in \mathcal{L}(X,Y) (where XX, YY are Banach spaces) is one whose range is one-dimensional. Explicitly, RR can be written as

R(x)=f(x)yfor all xX,R(x) = f(x)\, y \quad \text{for all } x \in X,

where fXf\in X^* (the dual of XX) and yY{0}y \in Y\setminus\{0\}. Such operators represent the simplest nontrivial nonzero modifications in linear operator theory.

An operator TL(X,Y)T\in\mathcal{L}(X,Y) attains its norm if there exists xBXx\in B_X (the closed unit ball of XX) such that T(x)=T\|T(x)\|=\|T\|. Understanding how this property behaves under small (in norm) or structured (such as rank-one) perturbations is a classical and delicate issue in the geometry of Banach spaces and operator theory.

2. Existence of Non-Norm-Attaining Rank-One Perturbations

A principal result established in (Martínez-Cervantes et al., 2023) is that for any infinite-dimensional reflexive Banach space XX, there exists a reflexive Banach space YY and operators T,RL(X,Y)T, R \in \mathcal{L}(X, Y) with RR a rank-one operator such that

T+R>T,\|T+R\|>\|T\|,

yet T+RT+R fails to attain its norm. This result demonstrates that the addition of a rank-one operator can strictly increase the norm of TT, but it does not guarantee the existence of a maximizing vector; norm attainment can indeed fail.

This construction answers a question posed in earlier work by S. Dantas and the first two authors, which asked whether every norm increase via a compact (or even rank-one) perturbation must yield a norm-attaining operator in reflexive Banach spaces. The negative resolution underscores the subtleties of norm attainment even for minimal-rank modifications.

3. Relationships Among the V-Property, Weak Maximizing Property, and CPP

The broader context involves several structural properties relating to norm-attainment:

  • V-Property: A pair (X,Y)(X,Y) has the V-property if for every TL(X,Y)T\in\mathcal{L}(X,Y), there exists a norm-one operator SL(Y,X)S\in\mathcal{L}(Y,X) with the spectral radius r(TS)=Tr(TS)=\|T\|. When TT has certain geometric features (e.g., a strictly singular hump), this condition is equivalent to norm attainment.
  • Weak Maximizing Property (WMP): (X,Y)(X,Y) has the WMP if every operator with a maximizing sequence which is not weakly null attains its norm.
  • Compact Perturbation Property (CPP): Any compact perturbation KK added to TT with T+K>T\|T+K\|>\|T\| produces a norm-attaining operator.

Both the V-property and WMP imply the CPP, but they are not equivalent; there exist pairs with the WMP but not the V-property, and vice versa. This separation is highlighted by examples and counterexamples discussed in Section 3 of (Martínez-Cervantes et al., 2023). Understanding these properties and their (non-)equivalence is crucial for assessing the stability of the norm-attainment phenomenon under perturbations.

4. Mathematical Formulations and Mechanisms

The essential constructions revolve around the following formulations:

  • Rank-one operator representation:

R(x)=f(x)y,R(x) = f(x)\, y,

with fXf\in X^*, yYy\in Y.

  • Norm attainment equation:

$\text{$T$ attains its norm} \iff \exists\,x\in B_X : \|T(x)\| = \|T\|$

  • Perturbation norm inequality:

$\|T+R\| > \|T\| \quad \text{and $T+R$ does not attain its norm},$

showing that even minimal rank adjustments can disrupt norm-attaining status.

  • Operator constructed into a direct sum: For certain constructed Banach space ZZ,

T+R:XZ,T+R: X \to Z,

is assembled to exemplify the failure of the CPP.

These mechanisms underpin the constructed counterexamples and provide a template for the analysis of related operator-theoretic questions.

5. Applications and Theoretical Consequences

The paper of rank-one multiplicative perturbations in norm-attaining theory has several notable implications:

  • Operator Theory and Optimization: Understanding when operators attain their norm is relevant for stability and optimality in numerical linear algebra, optimization, and variational analysis.
  • Geometry of Banach Spaces: The existence of non-norm-attaining rank-one perturbations in reflexive Banach spaces challenges classical intuitions. The result illustrates that reflexivity does not guarantee the stability of the norm-attaining property under rank-one modifications.
  • Further Directions in Perturbation Theory: The failure of the CPP in this context leads to several open research problems:
    • Whether similar failures can occur for other low-rank or more general classes of perturbations.
    • Full characterization of reflexive Banach spaces where all operators attain their norm.
    • Investigation of isomorphic invariance phenomena: notably, the CPP is not preserved under isomorphism, as demonstrated by differences between (X,c)(X, c) and (X,c0)(X, c_0) for reflexive XX.
  • Interplay with the V-property and WMP: Exploring whether one of these properties implies the other, and further examining the structural reasons for their distinction, remain open, as explicit counterexamples illustrate their independence.

6. Summary Table: Properties and Implications

Property Definition Implies
V-property TT is a V-operator if \exists norm-one SS with r(TS)=Tr(TS)=\|T\| CPP
Weak Maximizing Prop. Any maximizing sequence not weakly null → norm attainment CPP
Compact Perturbation Compact KK: T+K>T\|T+K\|>\|T\| implies norm attainment

The table encapsulates the logical dependencies discussed; counterexamples show no equivalence between V-property and WMP, even though both imply CPP.

7. Conclusion

Rank-one multiplicative perturbations, despite their simplicity, play a nuanced and powerful role in the theory of norm-attaining operators on Banach spaces. The explicit constructions in (Martínez-Cervantes et al., 2023) demonstrate that the addition of a rank-one operator can raise the operator norm without producing norm attainment, even in the context of reflexive Banach spaces. This outcome not only answers long-standing questions but uncovers the subtle relationships among geometric properties (V-property, WMP, CPP) in operator theory. The work motivates further paper into the interplay between operator structure, perturbations, and the attainable geometry of Banach spaces.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Rank-One Multiplicative Perturbation.