Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Rank-One Multiplicative Perturbation

Updated 4 September 2025
  • The paper shows that adding a rank-one operator can increase the norm of an operator in reflexive Banach spaces without ensuring norm attainment.
  • It distinguishes the V-property, Weak Maximizing Property, and Compact Perturbation Property through explicit constructions and counterexamples.
  • The findings challenge classical intuitions in operator theory and motivate further research into the stability of norm attainment under minimal perturbations.

A rank-one multiplicative perturbation refers to the modification of an operator—typically within the context of a Banach or Hilbert space—by a rank-one operator using an additive or multiplicative structure, with significant implications for the geometry of operator norms, the norm-attaining property, and spectral theory. This article focuses on rank-one operators as multiplicative perturbations in the sense of norm-attaining phenomena for operators between Banach spaces, following the framework and results of (Martínez-Cervantes et al., 2023).

1. Definitions and Fundamental Concepts

A rank-one operator R∈L(X,Y)R \in \mathcal{L}(X,Y) (where XX, YY are Banach spaces) is one whose range is one-dimensional. Explicitly, RR can be written as

R(x)=f(x) yfor all x∈X,R(x) = f(x)\, y \quad \text{for all } x \in X,

where f∈X∗f\in X^* (the dual of XX) and y∈Y∖{0}y \in Y\setminus\{0\}. Such operators represent the simplest nontrivial nonzero modifications in linear operator theory.

An operator T∈L(X,Y)T\in\mathcal{L}(X,Y) attains its norm if there exists x∈BXx\in B_X (the closed unit ball of XX) such that ∥T(x)∥=∥T∥\|T(x)\|=\|T\|. Understanding how this property behaves under small (in norm) or structured (such as rank-one) perturbations is a classical and delicate issue in the geometry of Banach spaces and operator theory.

2. Existence of Non-Norm-Attaining Rank-One Perturbations

A principal result established in (Martínez-Cervantes et al., 2023) is that for any infinite-dimensional reflexive Banach space XX, there exists a reflexive Banach space YY and operators T,R∈L(X,Y)T, R \in \mathcal{L}(X, Y) with RR a rank-one operator such that

∥T+R∥>∥T∥,\|T+R\|>\|T\|,

yet T+RT+R fails to attain its norm. This result demonstrates that the addition of a rank-one operator can strictly increase the norm of TT, but it does not guarantee the existence of a maximizing vector; norm attainment can indeed fail.

This construction answers a question posed in earlier work by S. Dantas and the first two authors, which asked whether every norm increase via a compact (or even rank-one) perturbation must yield a norm-attaining operator in reflexive Banach spaces. The negative resolution underscores the subtleties of norm attainment even for minimal-rank modifications.

3. Relationships Among the V-Property, Weak Maximizing Property, and CPP

The broader context involves several structural properties relating to norm-attainment:

  • V-Property: A pair (X,Y)(X,Y) has the V-property if for every T∈L(X,Y)T\in\mathcal{L}(X,Y), there exists a norm-one operator S∈L(Y,X)S\in\mathcal{L}(Y,X) with the spectral radius r(TS)=∥T∥r(TS)=\|T\|. When TT has certain geometric features (e.g., a strictly singular hump), this condition is equivalent to norm attainment.
  • Weak Maximizing Property (WMP): (X,Y)(X,Y) has the WMP if every operator with a maximizing sequence which is not weakly null attains its norm.
  • Compact Perturbation Property (CPP): Any compact perturbation KK added to TT with ∥T+K∥>∥T∥\|T+K\|>\|T\| produces a norm-attaining operator.

Both the V-property and WMP imply the CPP, but they are not equivalent; there exist pairs with the WMP but not the V-property, and vice versa. This separation is highlighted by examples and counterexamples discussed in Section 3 of (Martínez-Cervantes et al., 2023). Understanding these properties and their (non-)equivalence is crucial for assessing the stability of the norm-attainment phenomenon under perturbations.

4. Mathematical Formulations and Mechanisms

The essential constructions revolve around the following formulations:

  • Rank-one operator representation:

R(x)=f(x) y,R(x) = f(x)\, y,

with f∈X∗f\in X^*, y∈Yy\in Y.

  • Norm attainment equation:

$\text{$T$ attains its norm} \iff \exists\,x\in B_X : \|T(x)\| = \|T\|$

  • Perturbation norm inequality:

$\|T+R\| > \|T\| \quad \text{and $T+R$ does not attain its norm},$

showing that even minimal rank adjustments can disrupt norm-attaining status.

  • Operator constructed into a direct sum: For certain constructed Banach space ZZ,

T+R:X→Z,T+R: X \to Z,

is assembled to exemplify the failure of the CPP.

These mechanisms underpin the constructed counterexamples and provide a template for the analysis of related operator-theoretic questions.

5. Applications and Theoretical Consequences

The study of rank-one multiplicative perturbations in norm-attaining theory has several notable implications:

  • Operator Theory and Optimization: Understanding when operators attain their norm is relevant for stability and optimality in numerical linear algebra, optimization, and variational analysis.
  • Geometry of Banach Spaces: The existence of non-norm-attaining rank-one perturbations in reflexive Banach spaces challenges classical intuitions. The result illustrates that reflexivity does not guarantee the stability of the norm-attaining property under rank-one modifications.
  • Further Directions in Perturbation Theory: The failure of the CPP in this context leads to several open research problems:
    • Whether similar failures can occur for other low-rank or more general classes of perturbations.
    • Full characterization of reflexive Banach spaces where all operators attain their norm.
    • Investigation of isomorphic invariance phenomena: notably, the CPP is not preserved under isomorphism, as demonstrated by differences between (X,c)(X, c) and (X,c0)(X, c_0) for reflexive XX.
  • Interplay with the V-property and WMP: Exploring whether one of these properties implies the other, and further examining the structural reasons for their distinction, remain open, as explicit counterexamples illustrate their independence.

6. Summary Table: Properties and Implications

Property Definition Implies
V-property TT is a V-operator if ∃\exists norm-one SS with r(TS)=∥T∥r(TS)=\|T\| CPP
Weak Maximizing Prop. Any maximizing sequence not weakly null → norm attainment CPP
Compact Perturbation Compact KK: ∥T+K∥>∥T∥\|T+K\|>\|T\| implies norm attainment —

The table encapsulates the logical dependencies discussed; counterexamples show no equivalence between V-property and WMP, even though both imply CPP.

7. Conclusion

Rank-one multiplicative perturbations, despite their simplicity, play a nuanced and powerful role in the theory of norm-attaining operators on Banach spaces. The explicit constructions in (Martínez-Cervantes et al., 2023) demonstrate that the addition of a rank-one operator can raise the operator norm without producing norm attainment, even in the context of reflexive Banach spaces. This outcome not only answers long-standing questions but uncovers the subtle relationships among geometric properties (V-property, WMP, CPP) in operator theory. The work motivates further study into the interplay between operator structure, perturbations, and the attainable geometry of Banach spaces.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Rank-One Multiplicative Perturbation.