Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Ramsey Goodness of Paths

Updated 11 December 2025
  • Ramsey goodness of paths is defined by the equality R(Pₙ, H) = (n-1)(χ(H)-1) + σ(H), linking path lengths to chromatic and partition parameters.
  • Research shows that for any graph H, large n ensures Pₙ is H-good, with refined bounds in unbalanced multipartite cases and for bounded-degree trees using combinatorial techniques.
  • Extensions to hypergraphs reveal distinct behavior where loose paths regain asymptotic goodness while tighter configurations face additional bounds, underscoring nuanced threshold phenomena.

A path is said to be Ramsey-good with respect to a graph or hypergraph HH if the Ramsey number R(Pn,H)R(P_n,H) coincides with the natural lower bound predicted by chromatic and partition parameters. The mathematical study of this property—the Ramsey goodness of paths—plays a central role in structural Ramsey theory for both graphs and hypergraphs, with deep links to extremal combinatorics, structural embeddings, probabilistic constructions, and the study of graph parameters such as bandwidth and degree constraints.

1. Foundational Definitions and Lower Bounds

Let %%%%2%%%% and HH be graphs. The Ramsey number R(G,H)R(G,H) is the smallest integer NN such that any red/blue coloring of the edges of KNK_N contains either a red copy of GG or a blue copy of HH. If GG is connected, the fundamental lower bound (due to Burr) is

R(G,H)(G1)(χ(H)1)+σ(H),R(G,H) \geq (|G|-1)\bigl(\chi(H)-1\bigr) + \sigma(H),

where χ(H)\chi(H) is the chromatic number of HH, and σ(H)\sigma(H) is the size of the smallest color class in any optimal χ(H)\chi(H)-coloring of HH (Pokrovskiy et al., 2015). A graph GG is termed HH-good if equality holds.

Applied to paths PnP_n, the Ramsey-goodness problem asks for which HH and nn one has

R(Pn,H)=(n1)(χ(H)1)+σ(H).R(P_n,H) = (n-1)\bigl(\chi(H)-1\bigr)+\sigma(H).

For kk-uniform hypergraphs, the analogous lower bound is

R(G,H)(v(G)1)(χ(H)1)+σ(H)R(G, H) \geq (v(G)-1)\cdot (\chi(H)-1) + \sigma(H)

where v(G)v(G) is the order of GG and χ(H),σ(H)\chi(H), \sigma(H) are defined for hypergraphs as in the graph case (Boyadzhiyska et al., 2023).

2. Ramsey Goodness of Paths in Graphs

The principle result established by Pokrovskiy and Sudakov is that for any graph HH, the nn-vertex path PnP_n is HH-good for all n4Hn \ge 4|H|:

R(Pn,H)=(n1)(χ(H)1)+σ(H),for n4H[1512.07874,2410.19942],R(P_n, H) = (n-1)\bigl(\chi(H)-1\bigr) + \sigma(H), \qquad \text{for } n \geq 4|H| \, [1512.07874, 2410.19942],

where H|H| is the order of HH (Botler et al., 25 Oct 2024). The proof relies on inductive embedding techniques, the use of the Pósa rotation-extension lemma, and structural partitioning via color classes, showing that for large enough nn, the extremal construction—the union of appropriately sized red cliques with all other edges colored blue—provides the only obstruction.

Botler, Moreira, and de Souza refined this to (2+ε)H(2+\varepsilon)|H| in the highly unbalanced multipartite case, under the additional constraint that the part sizes m1,,mkm_1,\ldots,m_k satisfy a quadratic unbalance condition:

εmi2mi12(2ik),\varepsilon m_i \geq 2 m_{i-1}^2 \quad (2 \le i \le k),

yielding

R(Pn,Km1,,mk)=(n1)(k1)+m1,n(2+ε)(m1++mk)[2410.19942].R(P_n, K_{m_1,\ldots,m_k}) = (n-1)(k-1)+m_1, \quad n \ge (2+\varepsilon)(m_1+\ldots+m_k) \, [2410.19942].

The achieved improvement is sharp up to a constant factor: no bound below $2|H|$ can hold for all HH (Botler et al., 25 Oct 2024).

For bounded-degree trees, Balla, Pokrovskiy, and Sudakov demonstrated that for any fixed Δ\Delta, every nn-vertex tree TT of maximum degree at most Δ\Delta is HH-good for nC(Δ)Hlog4Hn\ge C(\Delta)|H|\log^4|H| (Balla et al., 2016).

The table below summarizes key established Ramsey-goodness ranges for PnP_n vs. HH:

HH Minimal nn Bound Source
Arbitrary HH n4Hn \ge 4|H| Equality (Pokrovskiy et al., 2015)
Unbalanced HH n(2+ε)Hn \ge (2+\varepsilon)|H| Equality (Botler et al., 25 Oct 2024)
Trees nCHlog4Hn \ge C|H|\log^4|H| Asymptotic (Balla et al., 2016)

3. Degree and Structural Conditions in Host Graphs

Beyond complete graphs as hosts, recent research has elucidated tight minimum degree conditions for dense, but possibly incomplete, host graphs to ensure Ramsey-goodness for paths. Aragão, Marciano, and Mendonça proved that if GG is an N(n1)(m1)+1N\ge (n-1)(m-1)+1 vertex graph with δ(G)Nn/2\delta(G)\geq N-\lceil n/2\rceil, then G(Pn,Km)G \to (P_n, K_m) (Aragão et al., 20 Mar 2024, Luo et al., 4 Dec 2025). Luo and Peng further improved the threshold for arbitrary trees and, in the case of non-star trees (including all PnP_n with n3n\ge 3), reduced the minimum degree sufficient for Ramsey-goodness even further (Luo et al., 4 Dec 2025).

For arbitrary pairs (Kr,Pt)(K_r, P_t), Aragão, Marciano, and Mendonça established the sharp minimum degree threshold:

δ(G)nt/2,n=(r1)(t1)+1\delta(G)\geq n-\lceil t/2\rceil, \quad n=(r-1)(t-1)+1

is both necessary and sufficient for G(Kr,Pt)G\to(K_r, P_t) (Aragão et al., 20 Mar 2024).

4. Ramsey Goodness for Sparse or Random Hosts

Fan and Lin proved that for sparse connected graphs GG on nΩ(k4)n \ge \Omega(k^4) vertices with e(G)(1+1/(ck2))ne(G)\le (1+1/(ck^2))n (for some constant cc), GG is PkP_k-good:

r(G,Pk)=max{n+k/21, n+k2α(G)γ} [2507.11835],r(G, P_k) = \max\{ n+\lfloor k/2\rfloor -1,\ n + k -2 - \alpha'(G) - \gamma \} \ [2507.11835],

bridging a forty-year gap with the previous nΩ(k12)n\ge \Omega(k^{12}) requirement (Fan et al., 16 Jul 2025).

For random graphs, Letzter and Sahasrabudhe determined sharp thresholds: for r2r\ge2,

G((1+ε)rn,p)(Kr+1,Pn),pn2/(r+1) [1909.00030].G((1+\varepsilon)rn, p)\to (K_{r+1}, P_n),\qquad p\gg n^{-2/(r+1)} \ [1909.00030].

The thresholds depend delicately on both the order and density.

5. Asymptotic and Structural Ramifications

Allen, Brightwell, and Skokan proved that for any fixed HH and for all sufficiently large nn, if PnP_n (or, in general, any bounded degree, bounded bandwidth graph) is taken as host, then path-goodness always holds:

R(Pn,H)=(n1)(χ(H)1)+σ(H) [1010.5079].R(P_n, H) = (n-1)\bigl(\chi(H)-1\bigr) + \sigma(H) \ [1010.5079].

This applies also to any GG with Δ(G)Δ\Delta(G)\leq \Delta and bandwidth o(n)o(n).

When GnG_n is a bounded-degree graph of order nn with α(Gn)n/4\alpha(G_n)\leq n/4, then PnP_n is asymptotically GnG_n-good:

R(Pn,Gn)=(k1)(n1)+σ(Gn)+o(n) [1407.7092].R(P_n, G_n) = (k-1)(n-1) + \sigma(G_n) + o(n) \ [1407.7092].

6. Ramsey Goodness of Paths in Hypergraphs

Ramsey-goodness phenomena diverge profoundly for kk-uniform hypergraphs. For kk-uniform \ell-paths (2\ell\ge2), one generally has failure of goodness for a large class of kk-graphs HH, with additional terms in the lower bound preventing equality; e.g.,

R(Pn,(k),H)(χ(H)1)(n1)+n/k>(χ(H)1)(n1)+σ(H)R(P^{(k)}_{n, \ell}, H) \ge (\chi(H)-1)(n-1) + \lfloor n/k \rfloor > (\chi(H)-1)(n-1) + \sigma(H)

for many HH (Boyadzhiyska et al., 2023).

By contrast, for loose paths (=1\ell=1), asymptotic Ramsey-goodness is restored:

R(Pn,1(k),H)=(χ(H)1)n+O(1)R(P^{(k)}_{n,1}, H) = (\chi(H)-1)n + O(1)

as nn\to\infty (Boyadzhiyska et al., 2023).

In the 3-uniform setting, tight paths are F\mathbb F-good for the Fano plane F\mathbb F, with

R(Pn,F)=2n1 [1901.07097].R(P_n, \mathbb F) = 2n-1 \ [1901.07097].

Methods involve combinatorial decompositions into red clique "blobs," butterfly structures, Turán-type arguments on auxiliary graphs, and path-decomposition followed by interlaced embeddings.

7. Open Problems and Further Directions

Key open directions include:

  • Determining the minimal constant cc such that PnP_n is HH-good for n>cHn > c|H| for all HH.
  • Eliminating the logarithmic factor in nn for bounded-degree tree-goodness results (Balla et al., 2016).
  • Closing the remaining gaps in minimum degree conditions for dense (not complete) host graphs (Luo et al., 4 Dec 2025).
  • Extending goodness results from paths to cycles and graphs of small bandwidth or bounded treewidth (Botler et al., 25 Oct 2024, Allen et al., 2010).
  • Understanding precise thresholds and obstructions for Ramsey-goodness in nontrivial hypergraph pairs (Boyadzhiyska et al., 2023, Balogh et al., 2019).

Further, for random hosts, exact threshold functions for the Ramsey property involving paths remain an area of active study, particularly the interplay of size and edge probability (Moreira, 2019).


The field of Ramsey goodness for paths illustrates the interplay of extremal constructions, probabilistic methods, and deep structure theory at the interface of graph Ramsey theory. The comprehensive results for graphs contrast sharply with the much more delicate and nuanced landscape in uniform hypergraphs, where goodness can fail dramatically except in the asymptotic sense for certain path types or highly structured target hypergraphs.

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Ramsey Goodness of Paths.