Quantum Tunnelling-Integrated Optoplasmonic Nanotrap
- QTOP-trap is an integrated optoelectronic platform that combines plasmonic optical trapping with quantum tunnelling to enable label-free, single-molecule protein conductance detection.
- It uses a dual-barrelled quartz nanopipette with gold nanoelectrodes to create a tunable tunnelling gap, achieving sub-3 nm spatial resolution and 10 μs temporal precision.
- The device quantifies dynamic electron transfer in proteins through real-time conductance tracking, offering new insights into non-equilibrium biochemical processes.
The Quantum Tunnelling-Integrated Optoplasmonic Nanotrap (QTOP-trap) is an optoelectronic platform that integrates plasmonic optical trapping with real-time quantum tunnelling conductance measurements. This technology enables label-free, single-molecule resolution of protein conductance in physiological electrolyte environments, combining sub-3 nm spatial precision with 10 μs temporal and sub-pA current noise sensitivity. QTOP-trap provides a universal framework for dissecting non-equilibrium electron transfer (ET) mechanisms in dynamic, conformationally active proteins, directly correlating tertiary structure dynamics with electron conductance through synchronised optoelectronic measurements (Zeng et al., 4 Jan 2026).
1. Device Architecture and Physical Principles
QTOP-trap utilizes a double-barrelled quartz nanopipette with a tip diameter of approximately 200 nm, fabricated by laser pulling and internal carbon deposition/etching. Gold nanoelectrodes are formed on each barrel via electrodeposition, producing a tunable tunnelling gap (–3 nm). Protein-specific functionalization is achieved via gold–thiol chemistry, such as cysteine, NTA–Cu²⁺, or biotin–streptavidin coupling, establishing a robust experimental platform for single-molecule studies.
Under dark-field illumination, the tip exhibits a broad plasmon resonance at 583–751 nm, corroborated by FDTD simulations that model the gap as two 50 nm Au spheres separated by 0.5–3 nm, incorporating 5 nm surface asperities to replicate the spectral response.
The plasmonic optical trap is energized by a 637 nm laser diode, focused through a 40×, NA 0.6 objective, yielding power densities up to 1 mW/μm². Linear polarization is aligned with the electrode gap axis, achieving local near-field enhancement at the gap centre for nm. Optical trapping relies on field gradient forces: with the optical potential: where is the molecular polarizability. The depth of this potential well reaches at 300 K, with maximum gradient forces up to 11 pN, efficiently trapping individual target molecules.
When a molecule bridges the nanoelectrodes, quantum tunnelling current is detected and characterized by a non-ohmic Simmons model: with empirical forms , for small-bias, symmetric barriers. Barrier height (0.5–3.5 eV) and gap are fitted per experiment.
2. Instrumentation and Measurement Protocols
The optoplasmonic platform is constructed around a combination of optical, fluidic, and electronic control elements. It employs a laser (637 nm, CW or modulated at 1.077 kHz), a high-NA objective for laser focusing and alignment, a Zurich MFLI lock-in amplifier for photocurrent demodulation (reference set to laser modulation), and a MultiClamp 2400 voltage-clamp amplifier for high-precision tunnelling current recording, digitized at 100 kHz bandwidth (10 μs temporal resolution). The solution environment is maintained in a quartz flow cell (1.5 mm ID) to permit in-solution experiments under physiological conditions.
Operationally, optical trap alignment is optimised by demodulating the photothermal response via lock-in methods; once aligned, the system records continuous DC tunnelling currents at the maximum sampling rate. Synchronization between laser modulation (via TTL shutter controls) and current traces ensures rigorous time-stamped correlation between optical excitation and conductance events.
Spatial calibration is achieved by scanning the tip in XYZ (25 nm steps), producing a sub-50 nm spatially localized hotspot; geometric constraints limit protein capture to a nm region. Temporal fidelity is calibrated by step-function injection and amplifier response characterization.
3. Data Processing and Quantitative Analysis
Raw current traces regularly present baseline drift driven by thermal and ionic noise. To address this, Asymmetric Least Squares (ALS) smoothing is used: where depend on the residual sign.
Peaks are detected using two thresholds: where is the estimated baseline noise. Only events surpassing in amplitude and exceeding a 10 μs duration are retained.
Each tunnelling event is characterized by amplitude () and dwell time (). Conductance increments are calculated as . Dwell-time statistics conform to a single-exponential distribution , and two-dimensional density plots in space serve to identify molecule-specific or mutant fingerprints. K-means clustering on histograms supports robust discrimination of protein variants, with validation via Calinski–Harabasz and Silhouette indices.
4. Tethered Protein Switch and Real-Time Conformational Tracking
To facilitate real-time junction stability and repeated kinetic measurement, proteins are site-specifically tethered to one electrode. Strategies include His₆–Cu²⁺–NTA and biotin–streptavidin (via MSA on biotin-PEG thiol–modified gold). This molecular anchoring enables repeated protein–junction formation and release upon laser capture sequences.
Real-time conformational analysis is exemplified with His₆-tagged Hsp90. Under trapping conditions (7 mW, 100 mV bias), Hsp90 forms a stable conductive junction (–2 nA). Upon ATP (1 mM) addition, the conductance fluctuates stochastically between two discrete states, corresponding to the protein’s open ( nS) and closed ( nS) conformations. The dwell-time distributions for each state yield transition rates and via: Extracted rates ms and ms are congruent with established ATPase kinetics for Hsp90, demonstrating molecular-state-resolved, real-time conductance tracking.
5. Performance Metrics
The QTOP-trap achieves:
| Metric | Typical Value | Determination Method |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial resolution | 3 nm | FDTD & photocurrent mapping |
| Temporal resolution | 10 μs | Digitizer (100 kHz), step-function cal. |
| Conductance sensitivity | 1–10 pS () | Baseline sub-pA noise, pA–nA range |
| Dynamic range | $0.06–1.5$ μS (single-protein ) | Experimental data, Table S1 |
| Optical trap force | up to 11 pN | FDTD, DFT-calculated |
AC photocurrent interference remains below 1% of the DC tunnelling signal at 200 mV bias, ensuring high signal-to-noise for continuous trapping and measurement.
6. Applications and Research Significance
QTOP-trap directly links quantum mechanical tunnelling events with protein conformational dynamics in solution, delivering mechanistic insight into nonequilibrium ET at the single-molecule level. Applications include:
- Single-molecule enzymology and identification of protein variants under physiological conditions.
- Real-time observation of protein folding/unfolding and dynamic mapping of electron-transfer pathways.
- Mechanistic dissection of membrane protein ET and photosynthetic complexes.
- Rational design and conductance benchmarking of protein-based quantum devices.
This approach obviates the limitations of ensemble averaging and non-physiological constraints, allowing direct visualization and quantification of the quantum mechanical underpinnings of bioenergetic processes (Zeng et al., 4 Jan 2026).
References
- Zeng et al., "Quantum tunnelling-integrated optoplasmonic nanotrap enables conductance visualisation of individual proteins" (Zeng et al., 4 Jan 2026).