Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Proximity-Induced Interlayer Excitons

Updated 12 July 2026
  • Proximity-induced interlayer excitons are electron–hole pairs residing in adjacent layers, exhibiting unique optical and electronic signatures due to layer proximity effects.
  • They form via type-II band alignment, tunneling, and hybridization in 2D materials, demonstrating tunable lifetimes and exciton–phonon interactions.
  • These excitons enable novel optoelectronic device concepts by allowing precise control over binding energies, oscillator strengths, and permanent dipole moments.

Proximity-induced interlayer excitons are Coulomb-bound electron–hole pairs whose constituents reside in different adjacent layers and whose existence, generation, fine structure, or optical activity is created or strongly modified by layer proximity. In atomically thin van der Waals bilayers this proximity is expressed through type-II band alignment, interlayer tunneling, layer hybridization, dielectric screening, moiré modulation, and permanent out-of-plane dipoles; in intrinsic multilayers and layered perovskites it can arise from adjacent inorganic sheets within the same crystallographic unit cell, which supply a genuine layer degree of freedom to the excitonic spectrum (Brotons-Gisbert et al., 2024, Das et al., 2019, Grenzer et al., 21 Apr 2026). The term therefore covers both spatially indirect excitons that are weakly allowed or dark in the centrosymmetric limit and layer-hybridized excitons that retain substantial optical dipole while acquiring interlayer character (Hsu et al., 2019, Sponfeldner et al., 2021, Thodika et al., 26 Sep 2025).

1. Definitions, taxonomy, and material realizations

The basic distinction is between intralayer and interlayer excitons. Intralayer excitons place electron and hole in the same monolayer or inorganic sheet and typically exhibit large oscillator strength; interlayer excitons place the electron and hole in different layers, acquire a permanent out-of-plane dipole p=edp = e d, and usually have reduced electron–hole overlap, smaller oscillator strength, and longer radiative lifetimes. In transition-metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers this distinction is commonly tied to type-II alignment, whereas in homobilayers and few-layer crystals it can emerge from layer-selective confinement or carrier-species-specific hybridization (Brotons-Gisbert et al., 2024, Ovesen et al., 2018, Das et al., 2019).

A second taxonomy concerns how “interlayer” the exciton actually is. In conventional spatially indirect interlayer excitons, the electron and hole are predominantly localized in different layers; in layer-hybridized excitons, one carrier remains layer-confined while the other is extended across both layers. Commensurate H-type WSe2_2/MoSe2_2 and WS2_2/MoS2_2 realize the latter situation through valence-band hybridization at KK, yielding excitons that combine a large optical transition dipole with a large out-of-plane electric dipole (Hsu et al., 2019). Naturally 2H-stacked bilayer MoS2_2 provides another nonstandard case: the observed interlayer exciton at KK has strong oscillator strength and is described as a hole state delocalized across the two layers bound to an electron localized in one of the layers (Sponfeldner et al., 2021).

The same language extends beyond TMDs. In few-layer 2H-WSe2_2, the band-edge states at K/KK/K' are effectively confined to alternating layers, producing bright direct (quasi-)intralayer excitons and lower-energy interlayer dark excitons; the bright states are organized by the coupled spin, valley, and layer rule 2_20 (Das et al., 2019). In the 2_21 Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite (PEA)2_22PbI2_23, the two Pb–I octahedral sheets in one crystallographic unit cell double the intralayer fine structure and enable spatially indirect interlayer excitons within the same unit cell (Grenzer et al., 21 Apr 2026). Proximity-induced interlayer excitons have also been identified in magnetic WSe2_24/CrI2_25 stacks and in bilayer armchair graphene nanoribbons, where stacking, hybridization, and screening again determine whether the lowest excitations are intralayer, interlayer, or hybridized (Thodika et al., 26 Sep 2025, Rocha et al., 15 Jul 2025).

2. Microscopic routes by which proximity produces interlayer excitons

In many van der Waals heterobilayers, the minimal route is type-II band alignment. The review literature summarizes the corresponding exciton energy as 2_26, with 2_27 set by the interlayer spacing (Brotons-Gisbert et al., 2024). In MoSe2_28–WSe2_29, the type-II offset places the conduction-band minimum in MoSe2_20 and the valence-band maximum in WSe2_21, so optical excitation of an intralayer exciton is followed by hole tunneling and formation of an interlayer exciton (Ovesen et al., 2018). In twisted WSe2_22/MoS2_23, femtosecond photoemission momentum microscopy shows that interlayer excitons are dominantly formed on the sub-50 fs timescale via interlayer tunneling at the 2_24 valleys, followed by slower formation through dark 2_25-valley excitons and phonon cooling (Schmitt et al., 2021).

A second route is proximity-controlled exciton conversion rather than direct optical creation. In Janus-based heterobilayers such as MoS2_26@WSSe, the intrinsic out-of-plane electric field of the Janus layer tunes the type-II offsets and hence the energy separation 2_27 between bright intralayer and dark interlayer excitons. When 2_28 is resonant with strong in-plane optical phonons, first-order exciton–phonon scattering can efficiently convert bright intralayer excitons into lower-lying interlayer excitons without an external gate (Torun et al., 2022). For MoS2_29@WSSe in AB stacking, the reported 2_20 eV matches the transverse optical-like 2_21 modes near 2_22 meV, and the projected exciton–phonon couplings reach 2_23–2_24 meV (Torun et al., 2022).

A third route is interlayer hybridization. In commensurate H-type WSe2_25/MoSe2_26 and WS2_27/MoS2_28, momentum alignment and symmetry-allowed interlayer hopping hybridize the valence-band edges while the relevant conduction state remains layer-confined. The resulting two-level valence Hamiltonian,

2_29

produces hybridized hole states whose excitons inherit both optical brightness and an electric dipole. Experimentally extracted parameters are 2_20 meV and 2_21 meV in H-type WSe2_22/MoSe2_23, and 2_24 meV and 2_25 meV in H-type WS2_26/MoS2_27 (Hsu et al., 2019).

Intrinsic layered materials supply yet another route. In few-layer WSe2_28, symmetry suppresses conduction-band hopping at 2_29 while strong spin–orbit splitting keeps the valence states effectively layer-localized, so adjacent-layer Coulomb binding yields lower-energy interlayer dark excitons without requiring a heterointerface (Das et al., 2019). In (PEA)KK0PbIKK1, structural inequivalence of the two adjacent inorganic layers generates a layer-dependent offset of band edges, furnishing interlayer transitions whose electron–hole probability density lies on adjacent layers (Grenzer et al., 21 Apr 2026).

3. Fine structure, selection rules, and optical activity

The fine structure of proximity-induced interlayer excitons is often inseparable from that of nearby intralayer states. In (PEA)KK2PbIKK3, polarization-resolved low-temperature photoluminescence at KK4 K resolves four bright intralayer transitions at KK5 eV, KK6 eV, KK7 eV, and KK8 eV, each with KK9 meV uncertainty. These form two closely spaced 2_20-like pairs associated with the two inorganic layers, with intralayer 2_21 anisotropy of 2_22–2_23 meV and an 2_24 centroid offset of 2_25 meV. A weaker doublet at 2_26 eV and 2_27 eV, about 2_28 meV above the bright intralayer states and split by 2_29 meV, is assigned to interlayer excitons (Grenzer et al., 21 Apr 2026). Static KK0+BSE places the interlayer manifold higher, at KK1 meV above the bright intralayer states, and predicts small oscillator strengths; distortion-induced mixing with bright intralayer excitons is proposed to account for the observed brightening and nearly orthogonal in-plane polarizations (Grenzer et al., 21 Apr 2026).

Few-layer WSeKK2 supplies a complementary fine-structure limit in which interlayer states are intrinsically dark. In bilayer WSeKK3, the lower-energy KK4 is interlayer and dark, whereas the higher-energy KK5 is intralayer and bright; the calculated emission energies differ by about KK6 meV, and the bright state has about two orders of magnitude larger radiative rate when KK7 (Das et al., 2019). More generally, an KK8-layer film contains two doubly degenerate bright KK9 excitons, distributed over even or odd layers, while the remaining 2_20 2_21 bands are interlayer and dark (Das et al., 2019).

Layer-hybridized excitons modify these selection rules by redistributing the oscillator strength between branches. In the H-type bilayers analyzed by Tang and co-workers, the optical dipoles scale as 2_22 and the electric dipoles as 2_23 (Hsu et al., 2019). Accordingly, H-type WSe2_24/MoSe2_25 shows a WSe2_26-derived doublet split by 2_27 meV with near-2_28 spectral weight, while H-type WS2_29/MoSK/KK/K'0 shows a corresponding doublet split by K/KK/K'1 meV; in R-type or twisted bilayers the doublets disappear because the interlayer hopping at K/KK/K'2 is symmetry-forbidden or momentum-suppressed (Hsu et al., 2019).

Coupling between interlayer and intralayer excitons can itself become a spectroscopic observable. In naturally 2H-stacked bilayer MoSK/KK/K'3, reflectivity-derived optical susceptibility reveals an avoided crossing between an interlayer exciton branch and the intralayer B exciton with positive coupling K/KK/K'4 meV, and a weaker avoided crossing with the intralayer A exciton with negative coupling K/KK/K'5 meV (Sponfeldner et al., 2021). In magnetic WSeK/KK/K'6/CrIK/KK/K'7 and CrIK/KK/K'8/WSeK/KK/K'9/CrI2_200, a robust interlayer magnetic exciton appears near 2_201 eV between the WSe2_202 A and B excitons, with oscillator strength nearly twenty times larger than the intralayer CrI2_203 Frenkel excitons and dominant out-of-plane dipole character (Thodika et al., 26 Sep 2025).

4. Spatiotemporal formation, localization, and transport

The temporal sequence of interlayer exciton formation has been established most clearly in TMD heterostructures. In MoSe2_204–WSe2_205, a 2_206 fs Gaussian pump resonant with the MoSe2_207 2_208 intralayer exciton creates coherent intralayer polarization that decays within hundreds of femtoseconds via radiative emission and exciton–phonon scattering; interlayer hole tunneling then converts the population to interlayer excitons on a sub-picosecond timescale, with near-complete transfer by 2_209 ps (Ovesen et al., 2018). The interlayer photoluminescence at 2_210 eV surpasses intralayer emission by around 2_211 ps, and by 2_212 ps the equilibrium intensity ratio 2_213 at 2_214 K (Ovesen et al., 2018). In WSe2_215/MoS2_216, the trARPES signature is an interlayer-exciton peak at 2_217 eV above the WSe2_218 valence-band maximum, a characteristic three-peak momentum fingerprint at the mini-Brillouin-zone 2_219 points, and a wavefunction with approximately 2_220 of its probability within one moiré unit cell (Schmitt et al., 2021).

The spatial structure of interlayer excitons is not universally localized. Real-space calculations for reconstructed H-type MoSe2_221/WSe2_222 show that at a twist deviation of 2_223 from 2_224, where the moiré period is 2_225 nm and the reconstructed potential minima are about 2_226 meV, the ground-state interlayer-exciton center-of-mass wavefunction extends over multiple moiré cells and reaches the computational domain limit (Figueiredo et al., 2024). At 2_227 there is a mixture of extended and localized states, whereas at 2_228 the lowest states become localized within a single moiré unit cell and some excited states form quasi-1D quantum-wire-like modes (Figueiredo et al., 2024). Cryogenic photoluminescence supports this crossover: near 2_229, the steady-state line at 2_230 eV is Lorentzian with FWHM 2_231 meV and dominates at long delays, while earlier-time lines have FWHM values of 2_232, 2_233, and 2_234 meV (Figueiredo et al., 2024).

Transport at finite density is likewise proximity-sensitive. A microscopic theory for MoSe2_235–WSe2_236 derives the interaction energy per exciton as 2_237, where the repulsive dipolar term competes with attractive fermionic exchange and a Coulomb-hole shift (Erkensten et al., 2022). Above 2_238, the resulting drift term dominates over ordinary diffusion and drives highly nonlinear propagation; for 2_239, the model yields 2_240 around 2_241 ns without spacer, and up to 2_242 at early times with hBN spacers (Erkensten et al., 2022). Counter to the naive expectation that weaker environmental screening should speed transport, the theory finds that free-standing samples propagate more slowly than hBN-encapsulated ones because stronger screening reduces the magnitude of the attractive Coulomb-hole term, leaving more dipolar repulsion uncompensated (Erkensten et al., 2022).

5. Theoretical descriptions

Most microscopic descriptions start from a Bethe–Salpeter treatment of correlated electron–hole pairs. In the perovskite case, the exciton eigenproblem is written as

2_243

or equivalently 2_244, with oscillator strength

2_245

Within this framework, layer-doubled intralayer manifolds and weak interlayer manifolds emerge naturally once the two-layer unit cell and symmetry lowering are included (Grenzer et al., 21 Apr 2026). In Janus heterobilayers, the same BSE amplitudes are projected onto phonon modes through

2_246

so that the interconversion rate follows Fermi’s Golden Rule and is maximal when 2_247 (Torun et al., 2022).

For TMD heterostructures, an explicit two-body Dirac formulation has also been developed. Starting from monolayer massive Dirac Hamiltonians, one constructs a four-band interlayer-exciton Hamiltonian and couples it to a proximity-modified interaction

2_248

whose dielectric kernel includes the top, bottom, and barrier media, as well as polarization effects in the transition-metal and chalcogen layers (Donck et al., 2018). This formalism predicts interlayer binding energies on SiO2_249 of roughly 2_250–2_251 meV for several TMD pairs at 2_252 nm, larger average in-plane electron–hole separation than in intralayer excitons, and a linear Stark shift 2_253 for the interlayer peak (Donck et al., 2018).

Effective Hamiltonians remain useful when the spectroscopy is dominated by a few interacting branches. In bilayer MoS2_254, a coupled-oscillator susceptibility model,

2_255

combined with intensity asymmetries at avoided crossings, determines both magnitude and sign of the inter-exciton couplings (Sponfeldner et al., 2021). At the many-body level, transport and condensation problems often reduce to density-dependent bosonic descriptions. For interlayer excitonic insulators, an explicitly solvable mean-field model uses an interlayer interaction 2_256 and predicts that including proximity-enhanced overlap in 2_257 permits an interlayer excitonic-insulator phase up to 2_258 nm for 2_259, whereas neglecting the overlap restricts the phase to 2_260 nm (Trushin, 2022).

6. Control modalities, device concepts, and unresolved issues

Because interlayer excitons carry a permanent dipole, electric fields are a primary control axis. In MoS2_261/WSe2_262 on LiNbO2_263, Rayleigh-mode surface acoustic waves generate in-plane and out-of-plane piezoelectric fields with 2_264, enabling contactless and selective manipulation of intralayer and interlayer species (Sun et al., 5 Nov 2025). The interlayer excitons IX2_265 and IX2_266, emitting near 2_267 nm and 2_268 nm with a robust splitting of 2_269 meV across twist angles from 2_270 to 2_271, respond linearly through 2_272 with extracted dipoles 2_273 and 2_274, whereas intralayer excitons exhibit the quadratic Stark effect 2_275 (Sun et al., 5 Nov 2025). The same acoustoelectric fields strongly quench IX photoluminescence, with 2_276 at 2_277 K and 2_278 dBm for IX2_279, evolving to near-complete quenching at 2_280 K (Sun et al., 5 Nov 2025).

Nanoscale electrostatic trapping uses the same dipolar physics in a more localized form. A nanopatterned graphene gate above MoSe2_281/WSe2_282 creates a sharp reduction of the out-of-plane electric field beneath a 2_283–2_284 nm effective hole, producing a trap potential 2_285 for the interlayer exciton (Shanks et al., 2021). The free IX tunes with slope 2_286 eV/(V/nm), implying 2_287 nm and 2_288, while the trapped IX tunes with 2_289 of that slope because the local field is reduced (Shanks et al., 2021). At maximum trapping bias the trap depth is 2_290–2_291 meV with lateral FWHM 2_292 nm; the corresponding harmonic approximation gives 2_293 meV, a ground-state energy of 2_294 meV, and a ground-state spatial width of 2_295 nm (Shanks et al., 2021). The trapped state also shows low-power saturation at 2_296 nW and an increased lifetime 2_297 ns relative to 2_298 ns (Shanks et al., 2021).

Stacking and dimensionality broaden the design space further. In bilayer armchair graphene nanoribbons, vertical stacking produces both type-I and type-II alignments; in 62_299 homobilayers the bright intralayer exciton lies at 2_200 eV and an interlayer exciton at 2_201 eV retains up to 2_202 of the maximum absorption, while in 6-10AGNR heterobilayers the lowest exciton is interlayer at 2_203 eV with oscillator strength 2_204 of 2_205 and a room-temperature radiative lifetime of 2_206s (Rocha et al., 15 Jul 2025). More speculative many-body control follows from proximity-engineered single-particle dispersions: if either the electron or hole acquires a Mexican-hat dispersion, the interlayer-exciton dispersion evolves from parabolic to quartic and eventually to a ring minimum at finite momentum, opening routes to liquid–solid transitions and finite-momentum condensates under external-field tuning (Skinner, 2016).

Several recurring misconceptions are corrected by the present literature. In (PEA)2_207PbI2_208, the low-energy multiplet is consistently explained by exchange, symmetry lowering, octahedral distortions, and layer doubling, without invoking Rashba splitting or exciton–polaron physics as the primary origin; Rashba-like features can appear as a consequence of the same distortions that brighten the interlayer manifold (Grenzer et al., 21 Apr 2026). In reconstructed MoSe2_209/WSe2_210, atomic reconstruction does not inevitably localize interlayer excitons; for sufficiently shallow reconstructed potentials, the ground state is laterally extended over multiple moiré cells (Figueiredo et al., 2024). In WSe2_211/CrI2_212, by contrast, the interlayer magnetic excitons are robust across bilayer and trilayer stackings, whereas the proximity-induced modifications of the WSe2_213 A and B excitons depend sensitively on fine details of interface alignment and hybridization (Thodika et al., 26 Sep 2025). Taken together, these results place proximity-induced interlayer excitons at the intersection of interfacial band engineering, lattice symmetry, many-body screening, and nonequilibrium dynamics, rather than under a single universal mechanism.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Proximity-Induced Interlayer Excitons.