Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Proper Conflict-Free Coloring

Updated 10 July 2026
  • Proper conflict-free coloring is a vertex-coloring method that requires adjacent vertices to differ while ensuring each non-isolated vertex has a uniquely appearing color in its open neighborhood.
  • It generalizes traditional coloring by incorporating h-conflict-free extensions and unique neighborhood conditions, with exact evaluations shown on trees, cycles, and subdivision graphs.
  • The topic yields asymptotically tight bounds, robust list-coloring results, and NP-completeness proofs, underscoring its impact on modern graph theory research.

Proper conflict-free coloring is a vertex-coloring problem on graphs that combines ordinary properness with a neighborhood-uniqueness constraint: adjacent vertices must receive different colors, and every non-isolated vertex must have a color that appears exactly once in its open neighborhood. The resulting parameter, usually written χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G), has developed into a distinct topic between ordinary proper coloring, odd coloring, and distance-2 coloring. Its theory now includes exact evaluations on basic graph classes, asymptotically sharp bounds in terms of the maximum degree Δ\Delta, sparse-graph threshold theorems, list and degree-choosability variants, and hardness results for fixed-color decision problems (Caro et al., 2022, Liu et al., 2024).

1. Definitions, parameters, and scope

For a graph GG and a vertex vv, the standard neighborhood in this literature is the open neighborhood N(v)N(v). A proper conflict-free coloring is a proper coloring φ\varphi such that for every non-isolated vertex vv, there exists a color cc with

{uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.

Equivalently, every non-isolated vertex has a neighbor whose color is unique in its neighborhood. The minimum number of colors is the proper conflict-free chromatic number χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G) (Caro et al., 2022).

A central generalization is the Δ\Delta0-conflict-free proper parameter. In one formulation, a proper coloring is Δ\Delta1-conflict-free if every vertex Δ\Delta2 has at least Δ\Delta3 colors appearing exactly once in Δ\Delta4, and the minimum number of colors is denoted Δ\Delta5 (Chuet et al., 7 May 2025). Earlier work on graphs without isolated vertices uses the same notation with the requirement that every vertex have at least Δ\Delta6 such colors, and explicitly notes that Δ\Delta7 (Kamyczura et al., 2022). This family interpolates between ordinary proper conflict-free coloring and distance-2 phenomena.

The open-neighborhood condition is essential. In the proper closed-neighborhood variant, the conflict-free requirement collapses to ordinary proper coloring, because in any proper coloring the color of Δ\Delta8 itself appears exactly once in Δ\Delta9; accordingly, the proper closed-neighborhood parameter equals GG0 (Fabrici et al., 2022). By contrast, the open-neighborhood conflict-free literature without properness is a separate line of work: adjacent vertices may share colors there, so its results do not transfer automatically to proper conflict-free coloring (Bhyravarapu et al., 2019).

2. Canonical examples and extremal behavior

Several basic graph classes already exhibit the main phenomena of the theory (Caro et al., 2022).

Graph class Proper conflict-free chromatic number
GG1 GG2
Nontrivial tree GG3 GG4
GG5 GG6 if GG7; GG8 if GG9 and vv0; vv1 if vv2
vv3, vv4 vv5
vv6, vv7 vv8

These examples already separate proper conflict-free coloring sharply from ordinary chromatic behavior. The complete subdivision vv9 is bipartite, hence has ordinary chromatic number N(v)N(v)0, yet N(v)N(v)1; consequently, the ratio N(v)N(v)2 can be arbitrarily large (Caro et al., 2022). The parameter is also not monotone under taking subgraphs: N(v)N(v)3, but

N(v)N(v)4

(Caro et al., 2022).

The 5-cycle plays a recurrent exceptional role. Since N(v)N(v)5, conjectures of Brooks type are typically stated only for connected graphs with N(v)N(v)6 (Caro et al., 2022). Sharpness of the conjectural N(v)N(v)7 upper bound is witnessed by subdivision constructions: if N(v)N(v)8, then

N(v)N(v)9

while φ\varphi0, so even connected bipartite graphs can require φ\varphi1 colors (Chuet et al., 7 May 2025).

The φ\varphi2-conflict-free extension adds a second extremal regime. For fixed φ\varphi3, the leading term is linear in φ\varphi4, but when φ\varphi5 is close to φ\varphi6 the problem approaches square coloring. In particular, for infinitely many φ\varphi7, there are graphs with

φ\varphi8

so the parameter can be quadratic in φ\varphi9 when vv0 (Kamyczura et al., 2022).

3. General bounds and asymptotic theory

A foundational general result is the bound

vv1

for connected graphs, together with the conjecture that every connected graph with maximum degree vv2 satisfies

vv3

(Caro et al., 2022). This conjecture has become the central benchmark for the subject.

The first major asymptotic improvement beyond the vv4 bound came from a list-coloring framework for proper conflict-free coloring of a pair vv5. Specializing to ordinary graphs gives, for sufficiently large vv6,

vv7

and for all graphs with vv8,

vv9

(Cranston et al., 2022).

The asymptotically optimal leading constant was then established by Liu and Reed, who proved that for sufficiently large cc0,

cc1

hence

cc2

for every graph of maximum degree cc3 (Liu et al., 2024). This asymptotically confirms the Caro–Petruševski–Škrekovski conjecture in first order, although it does not settle the exact additive form cc4.

For the cc5-parameter, a later theorem shows that for every fixed cc6,

cc7

with explicit form

cc8

(Chuet et al., 7 May 2025). The same work proves a matching first-order lower bound: for infinitely many values of cc9, there exists a graph with

{uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.0

and accordingly conjectures that

{uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.1

for sufficiently large {uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.2, which would be tight (Chuet et al., 7 May 2025).

The large-{uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.3 regime behaves differently. If {uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.4, then {uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.5-proper-conflict-free coloring becomes essentially a distance-2 coloring requirement, and for {uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.6-regular graphs with {uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.7 or {uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.8 it essentially coincides with square coloring; this explains why {uN(v):φ(u)=c}=1.\bigl|\{u\in N(v):\varphi(u)=c\}\bigr|=1.9 can be quadratic when χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)0 is close to χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)1 (Kamyczura et al., 2022).

4. Sparse graphs, minimum degree, and planar structure

One major line of work studies proper conflict-free coloring through sparsity parameters, especially maximum average degree. For χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)2, if

χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)3

then χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)4 has a proper conflict-free χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)5-coloring unless it contains the χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)6-subdivision of χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)7; for χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)8, if

χpcf(G)\chi_{\rm pcf}(G)9

and Δ\Delta00 has no induced Δ\Delta01-cycle, then Δ\Delta02 is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta03-colorable (Cho et al., 2022). The Δ\Delta04 statement was later sharpened to a full extremal characterization: among graphs with

Δ\Delta05

the non-PCF-Δ\Delta06-colorable graphs are exactly those containing an induced Δ\Delta07 whose subdivision vertices remain 2-vertices in the ambient graph (Wang et al., 2022).

A complementary line shows that large minimum degree radically improves the asymptotics. If Δ\Delta08 and Δ\Delta09, then

Δ\Delta10

In particular, for sufficiently large Δ\Delta11-regular graphs and Δ\Delta12,

Δ\Delta13

so for Δ\Delta14 one gets

Δ\Delta15

under regularity (Kamyczura et al., 2022). A later refinement proves that when

Δ\Delta16

one may further reduce the excess to

Δ\Delta17

with explicit bound

Δ\Delta18

in the regime Δ\Delta19 (Chuet et al., 7 May 2025).

Planar and outerplanar graphs form a separate geometric branch of the subject. For the proper open-neighborhood version, outerplanar graphs satisfy

Δ\Delta20

while planar graphs satisfy

Δ\Delta21

(Fabrici et al., 2022). A later planar-girth result proves that if Δ\Delta22 is planar with girth at least Δ\Delta23, then

Δ\Delta24

(Anderson et al., 2024). Another sparse-planar consequence is that every planar graph with girth at least Δ\Delta25 is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta26-colorable (Cho et al., 2022).

5. List coloring and degree-choosability

The list-theoretic analogue asks for proper conflict-free colorings from prescribed lists. A graph Δ\Delta27 is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta28-choosable if every list assignment Δ\Delta29 with

Δ\Delta30

admits a proper conflict-free Δ\Delta31-coloring. This degree-based formulation has become a parallel program to the Δ\Delta32 conjecture.

A general degeneracy theorem states that every Δ\Delta33-degenerate graph is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta34-choosable (Kashima et al., 16 Sep 2025). The same paper proves a sharp improvement for trees: Δ\Delta35 and shows that Δ\Delta36 fails even for stars (Kashima et al., 16 Sep 2025).

For sparse graphs measured by maximum average degree, two sharp list-type thresholds are known: Δ\Delta37 and

Δ\Delta38

(Kashima et al., 22 Jan 2026). As corollaries, every planar graph of girth at least Δ\Delta39 is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta40-choosable, and every planar graph of girth at least Δ\Delta41 is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta42-choosable (Kashima et al., 22 Jan 2026).

Outerplanar graphs admit a stronger exact statement: every connected outerplanar graph other than Δ\Delta43 is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta44-choosable, while there are infinitely many connected outerplanar graphs that are not proper conflict-free Δ\Delta45-choosable (Kashima et al., 8 Sep 2025). More recently, three further confirmations of the degree-Δ\Delta46 conjecture were obtained: connected Δ\Delta47-minor-free graphs with maximum degree at most Δ\Delta48, connected outer-1-planar graphs with maximum degree at most Δ\Delta49, and planar graphs with girth at least Δ\Delta50 are all proper conflict-free Δ\Delta51-choosable; in addition, every outer-1-planar graph is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta52-choosable, and both planar graphs of girth at least Δ\Delta53 and outer-1-planar graphs are proper conflict-free Δ\Delta54-choosable (Wang et al., 28 Dec 2025).

These results support a broader conjecture that every connected graph other than Δ\Delta55 is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta56-choosable (Wang et al., 28 Dec 2025).

The fixed-Δ\Delta57 decision problem is computationally hard. For every integer Δ\Delta58, deciding whether a graph admits a proper conflict-free Δ\Delta59-coloring is NP-complete, even when the input graph is bipartite; moreover, Δ\Delta60 is NP-complete on planar graphs (Ahn et al., 2022). The easy boundary cases are also explicit: for Δ\Delta61, the problem is polynomial-time solvable, and

Δ\Delta62

(Ahn et al., 2022).

Proper conflict-free coloring is closely related to odd coloring. Every proper conflict-free Δ\Delta63-coloring is an odd Δ\Delta64-coloring, so

Δ\Delta65

and several sparse-graph arguments exploit this relaxation (Wang et al., 2022). The relation becomes especially tight in local degree-2 and degree-4 structures, where “odd” and “unique” neighborhood witnesses coincide (Anderson et al., 2024).

A persistent source of confusion is the distinction from nonproper open-neighborhood conflict-free coloring. There is now a theorem that every planar graph admits a full open-neighborhood conflict-free coloring with Δ\Delta66 colors, and this bound is tight, but the proof uses a matching-contraction lift that assigns the same color to the endpoints of matching edges, which is fundamentally incompatible with properness (Hliněný et al., 24 Jun 2026). Consequently, the nonproper planar Δ\Delta67-color theorem does not settle the proper variant.

Several central problems remain open. The exact Caro–Petruševski–Škrekovski conjecture

Δ\Delta68

for connected graphs with Δ\Delta69 is still unresolved in general (Caro et al., 2022). In planar graph theory, the proper open-neighborhood parameter is still only pinned down by

Δ\Delta70

and the conjectured value is Δ\Delta71 (Fabrici et al., 2022). In list coloring, the conjecture that every connected graph other than Δ\Delta72 is proper conflict-free Δ\Delta73-choosable remains open (Wang et al., 28 Dec 2025). For the Δ\Delta74-parameter, the transition between the linear regime and the near-square-coloring regime is also unresolved: existing results show Δ\Delta75 when Δ\Delta76 and Δ\Delta77, but examples with Δ\Delta78 force quadratic behavior, leaving the threshold problem open (Kamyczura et al., 2022).

Proper conflict-free coloring therefore occupies a sharply defined position in modern graph coloring: it is now asymptotically linear in Δ\Delta79, structurally well understood on several sparse classes, list-theoretically rich, and computationally hard even on highly restricted inputs, while still retaining a small set of conjectures whose resolution would substantially clarify the boundary between proper coloring and neighborhood-uniqueness constraints.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Proper Conflict-Free Coloring.