Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 102 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 166 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 436 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Power Contamination Number in Grids

Updated 19 September 2025
  • Power contamination number is defined as the minimal seed set required to fully contaminate a grid graph using local rules similar to power domination.
  • Exact formulas, such as ⌊m/2⌋+1 for even dimensions and ⌈m/2⌉+1 for odd cases, capture how grid size and parity influence the process.
  • Enumeration methods link optimal seed sets to classical combinatorial sequences like the large Schröder numbers, highlighting deep mathematical connections.

Power contamination number denotes the minimal cardinality of a seed set that—under dynamic rules—achieves full contamination (i.e., coverage) of a graph, most notably grid graphs, via local propagation rules reminiscent of power domination processes. While "power domination number" (and its variants) traditionally arise in electrical network monitoring via device placement (see (Brimkov et al., 2017)), the power contamination number is defined by stricter dynamical rules that control the spread of contamination and is particularly studied in combinatorial settings such as grids (Mehiri et al., 16 Sep 2025).

1. Formal Definition and Propagation Rules

On an n×mn \times m grid graph G(n,m)G(n,m), the power contamination number γc(G(n,m))\gamma_c(G(n,m)) is the minimum size of a set SS such that, if the cells belonging to SS are initially contaminated, the entire grid becomes contaminated via a prescribed set of local geometric rules (labeled (a)–(h) in (Mehiri et al., 16 Sep 2025)). These typically involve conditions governing when an uncontaminated cell becomes contaminated based on the contamination status of its neighbors—analogous to zero forcing or bootstrap percolation, yet specialized for grid topology.

This parameter is distinct from the connected power domination number which additionally imposes connectivity constraints on the initial set (see (Brimkov et al., 2017)).

2. Exact Enumeration in Grid Graphs

The principal contribution of (Mehiri et al., 16 Sep 2025) is the explicit determination of γc(G(n,m))\gamma_c(G(n,m)) for grid graphs via combinatorial arguments founded on propagation constraints. The main closed-form result is:

  • For n=1n=1 (a path), n3n \geq 3, or n=2n=2 with mm even:

γc(G(n,m))=m2+1\gamma_c(G(n,m)) = \left\lfloor \frac{m}{2} \right\rfloor + 1

  • For n=2n=2 and mm odd:

γc(G(2,m))=m2+1\gamma_c(G(2,m)) = \left\lceil \frac{m}{2} \right\rceil + 1

These formulas are justified via propagation constraints—such as the necessity of polluting boundary cells and avoiding two consecutive columns being clean—and constructive proofs (notably, a Zig-Zag seeding strategy that achieves γc(G(n,m))\gamma_c(G(n,m)) for all n2n \geq 2, excepting the n=2,mn=2, m odd case which necessitates an adjustment).

3. Recurrence Relations

The power contamination number for grids satisfies several recurrence relations established in (Mehiri et al., 16 Sep 2025):

  • For row grids: γc(G(1,m))=γc(G(1,m4))+2\gamma_c(G(1,m)) = \gamma_c(G(1,m-4)) + 2 for m4m \geq 4, with base cases γc(G(1,0))=1\gamma_c(G(1,0)) = 1, γc(G(1,1))=1\gamma_c(G(1,1)) = 1, and γc(G(1,2))=γc(G(1,3))=2\gamma_c(G(1,2)) = \gamma_c(G(1,3)) = 2.
  • For m>n3m > n \geq 3:

γc(G(n,m))=γc(G(n,m1))+1+(1)m2\gamma_c(G(n,m)) = \gamma_c(G(n,m-1)) + \frac{1 + (-1)^m}{2}

This captures the parity dependence of added columns on required seed count.

Generalizations permit the removal of pp rows and qq columns:

γc(G(n,m))=γc(G(np,mq))+q2\gamma_c(G(n,m)) = \gamma_c(G(n-p, m-q)) + \left\lceil \frac{q}{2} \right\rceil

for mm even and qq odd, or q/2\left\lfloor {q}/{2} \right\rfloor otherwise.

4. Enumeration of Optimal Contaminating Sets

Beyond calculating γc\gamma_c, (Mehiri et al., 16 Sep 2025) initiates the enumeration of all optimal seed sets αn,m\alpha_{n,m}. For specific families, these counts align with famed integer sequences. Notable results include:

  • For G(1,m)G(1,m), if mm is odd: α1,m=1\alpha_{1,m} = 1 (unique optimal solution); if mm even: α1,m=m/2\alpha_{1,m} = m/2.
  • For G(2,2k)G(2,2k) (even): α2,2k=k2k\alpha_{2,2k} = k \cdot 2^k.
  • For G(3,2k+1)G(3,2k+1) (odd columns): Optimal solutions correspond to ternary words of length k+1k+1 containing a "jump" (subword "13" or "31").
  • For G(2k+1,2k+1)G(2k+1,2k+1) (odd-sided square grids): α2k+1,2k+1\alpha_{2k+1,2k+1} equals the large Schröder number A006318(k)A006318(k), counting certain pattern-avoiding permutations.

These correspondences are established via encodings of the optimal configurations as words (for n=3n=3) or permutations (for square grids), subject to constraints derived from the dynamic propagation process.

Table: Optimal Solution Enumeration in Small Grid Families

Grid Size αn,m\alpha_{n,m} Formula Linked OEIS Sequence
G(1,m)G(1,m) $1$ (if mm odd), m/2m/2 (if mm even)
G(2,2k)G(2,2k) k2kk \cdot 2^k A036289
G(3,2k+1)G(3,2k+1) ternary words with forbidden subwords A193519
G(2k+1,2k+1)G(2k+1,2k+1) Large Schröder numbers α=A006318(k)\alpha = A006318(k) A006318

Enumeration results reveal deep connections with combinatorial structures:

  • Words over a finite alphabet with forbidden subwords (see A193519).
  • Large Schröder numbers, which count lattice paths or pattern-avoiding permutations (see A006318).
  • The avoidance of two consecutively clean columns or rows establishes rigorous constraints on permissible seed patterns, paralleling motif avoidance in combinatorics.
  • The Zig-Zag construction ensures optimal propogation, and the distinct combinatorial encodings (ternary words, permutations) permit leveraging enumeration results from classical combinatorics.

The resolution of the Ainouche–Bouroubi conjecture (Mehiri et al., 16 Sep 2025)—which previously posited a different value for γc(G(n,m))\gamma_c(G(n,m))—clarifies the optimal seeding requirements for contamination in grids, settling fundamental questions for percolation-type processes on combinatorial structures. These results provide not only precise bounds for seed set minimization in dynamical models but also algorithmic avenues for constructing optimal sets and analyzing their enumeration in terms of integer sequences.

Future research may generalize these findings to irregular grids, higher dimensions, alternative contamination or domination rules, and the impact of topological variations, drawing further on connections to pattern avoidance and word enumeration in discrete mathematics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Power Contamination Number.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube