Platonic Representation Hypothesis: Emergent Geometry

• PRH is a hypothesis positing that idealized mathematical forms emerge as spatial representations from primitive, non-geometric data.
• It bridges physics and neuroscience by demonstrating how intensive signals are transformed into extensive geometric structures via dilation maps and atlases.
• The framework employs groupoids and convergence theorems to mathematically mirror Plato's ideals, informing modern views on perception and reality.

The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) posits a foundational link between idealized mathematical forms and their emergence as representations in diverse physical, neural, and computational systems. Drawing upon themes from Plato’s Timaeus and extended through rigorous mathematical modeling, PRH explores how complex geometric and spatial structures arise from primitive, non-geometric substrates—whether in physical reality, brain function, or the organization of abstract models. The hypothesis finds support in modern theories and empirical evidence across mathematics, neuroscience, geometry, and physics, suggesting a universal tendency for systems to reconstruct spatial and geometric order from intensive, purely relational data.

1. Equivalence of Emergence in Physics and Neuroscience

The PRH is established through an equivalence between two conceptual problems:

• Physical Reality: Spatial and geometric structure emerges from an underlying non-geometrical reality.
• Neuroscience: The brain constructs spatial representations from intensive signals (e.g., retinal spike trains) lacking inherent spatial or geometric properties.

This equivalence is directly aligned with Plato’s philosophical perspective: reality, as perceived and understood, is not a direct manifestation of a geometrical substrate but instead is built by assembling signals into higher-order relational constructs. In the context of sensory neuroscience, the problem of local sign exemplifies how spatial understanding is synthesized from non-spatial signals; analogously, in physics, classical geometric structures may emerge from topological or graph-based substrates without a prior geometric metric.

2. Intensive vs. Extensive Properties and the Problem of Local Sign

PRH emphasizes the distinction between intensive properties (those associated with signal magnitude or local state, such as spiking rates or local connectivity) and extensive properties (those associated with spatial or geometric order, such as lengths, areas, and angles). The brain receives and processes sensory signals purely as intensive data and then infers extensive, spatial properties through computational mechanisms.

In mathematical models, spatial geometry is “constructed” by:

• Mapping intensive data into local representations via dilation transforms.
• Defining spatial relationships through scale-renormalized distances, e.g.,

$$d_\epsilon(u, v) = \frac{1}{\epsilon} \cdot d(\delta_\epsilon(u), \delta_\epsilon(v)),$$

where $\delta_\epsilon$ is a local dilation around $x$ and $d$ is a non-geometric base distance.

As scale $\epsilon$ shrinks, the system of maps approaches a reconstruction of classical spatial geometry, paralleling how differentiated sensory signals are synthesized into spatial perception.

3. Mathematical Formalism: Dilations, Atlases, and Groupoids

The mathematical foundation for PRH is developed via dilation structures and atlas construction:

• Local Maps via Dilations: Charts $\delta_\epsilon$ map neighborhoods $U_\epsilon(x)$ to $V_\epsilon(x)$, progressively renormalizing and approximating geometric relationships.
• Bi-Lipschitz Conditions: The ideal mapping $f : X \rightarrow Y$ satisfies

$$c \cdot d(x, y) \leq D(f(x), f(y)) \leq C \cdot d(x, y),$$

where $c, C > 0$ are constants specific to the chart.

• Atlas Construction: An atlas of overlapping local maps approximates a global geometric structure, with improved accuracy as scale decreases.

A groupoid $\mathrm{Tr}(X, \epsilon)$ with objects $(U_\epsilon(x), d_\epsilon, m_\epsilon)$ and arrows (approximate translations $ET(u, \cdot)$) formalizes local isometries, converging to genuine translations in a conical group as $\epsilon \to 0$. The process reveals an emergent differential geometry from non-geometric local relationships: $$\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} ET(u, \cdot) \to \text{Translation by } u.$$

4. Emergence of Differential Structure and Geometric Reality

The convergence theorem (Theorem 3.3 in the source) asserts that as the scale parameter $\epsilon$ tends to zero, the local “reality”—i.e., the system of intensive relationships—converges to a smooth, differentiable geometric structure: $$\text{reality}(x, 0) = (U_0(x), d_0, m_0), \quad d_0 = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} d_\epsilon,$$ with transformation maps uniformly converging to group operations in a conical group (a generalization of tangent space).

This formalizes the Platonic view: the classical geometric order perceived in reality (or in brain representation) is an emergent property of limit operations applied to networks of intensive, non-geometric data. The construction of tangent space and differentiation itself is a product of the limiting process over local dilations and translations.

5. Parallels to Platonic Philosophy and Cognitive Construction

PRH connects directly to Platonic philosophy, where ideal forms and numbers emerge from primitive sensory data through processes of Division and Collection. In mathematical terms, the assembly of local maps and groupoid compositions mirrors the assembly of perceptual reality:

• Zooming and Atlas Assembly: Repeated “zooming in” and simultaneous use of many local maps (parallel to binocular vision) recovers dimensionality and geometric structure otherwise absent in raw sensory signal.
• Algebraic Identity and Transformation: The transformation laws satisfied by dilation maps encode the underlying regularity that, in the limit, gives rise to classical geometric relationships.

Thus, the world’s rich geometry is not fundamental but a representation constructed from primitive, non-geometric data structures, much as Plato argued regarding mathematical ideas emergent from sensory interactions.

6. Significance and Implications for Physics and Neuroscience

The PRH framework has substantive implications:

• Physics: Space and geometry may be emergent macroscopic phenomena, built from non-geometric net, foam, or graph substrates obeying transformation laws, rather than being fundamental constructs.
• Neuroscience: The brain’s encoding and simulation of spatial reality reflects abstract computational processes for building geometry out of intensive sensory data, elucidating the mechanism of local sign and perception.

These parallels support the hypothesis that perception of reality—including its geometric order—is not a direct “reading” of fundamental spatial properties, but a constructive representation based on compiling, transforming, and assembling intensive, non-spatial signals.

7. Mathematical Summary and Key Formulas

Essential formulas underpinning PRH include:

• Bi-Lipschitz and Renormalized Distance:

$$c d(x,y) \leq D(f(x), f(y)) \leq C d(x,y) \qquad\text{and}\qquad d_\epsilon(u,v) = \frac{1}{\epsilon} d(\delta_\epsilon(u), \delta_\epsilon(v))$$

• Convergence to Differential Structure:

$$\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} ET(u, \cdot) \to \text{Translation by } u$$

• Groupoid Construction:

$$ET(u, \cdot): \text{reality}(\delta_\epsilon x, \epsilon) \to \text{reality}(x, \epsilon)$$

These capture the emergence of geometric and differential structure from purely intensive, local, and relational properties.

---

The Platonic Representation Hypothesis, as mathematically articulated in this framework, provides a powerful lens for understanding how complex spatial realities—whether in physics, neural systems, or abstract computation—emerge from primitive substrates via a combination of dilation structures, local mapping, and algebraic regularities. The synthesis of philosophy, neuroscience, and mathematical modeling yields a robust account of reality-as-representation, with geometric structure arising secondarily from operations on non-geometric, intensive data.